The Righteous Alliance

Satanic Possession

2009-10-09T10:10:00.003+02:00

By Kaj Krinsmøe 8th October 2009.

When a satanic monster like Mr. Tony Blair is proposed as the European Union's first President it is symptomatic of how dark Illuminati forces and estranging political development is taking possession of the European Union. It is the New World Order which is already a crime against humanity.

The Bilderberg group is a front for the political assembly in the City (London). In fact global usury and Jewish Supremacism constitutes neo-British Imperialism. This was set up many years ago when Joseph Rettinger, a Krakow Jew, approached Prins Bernhard of Holland and persuaded him to take a lead. Joseph Rettinger was paid by CIA and became a Catholic. And earlier yet, when Mr. Arthur Balfour, as Foreign Secretary, 1917, sent his Balfour Declaration to Lord Rothschild, the monstrous Masonic/Illuminati conspiracy gained great advantage. Jews in GB knew that they were being set up and compromised by the usurers in City, who would exploit Zionist ideology. But the media-controlled majority-mind was focused on the First World War. Great Britain thus became committed to support the Zionist State.

Adolf Hitler, trained at the British Army's center at Tavistock, Devon, England, in 1912, persecuted the Jews to create Israel. In much the same manner Europeans are now becoming committed in a satanic political nexus, the European Union, that they have no comprehension of and that only their corrupted democratic leaders have voted for. These political whores are entirely controlled by the Illuminati assets of global usury.

Mr. Blair is an asset of the intermarried British Imperialism and Jewish Supremacism that manifestly has been cultivated in City for a hundred years, at least, with Israel as a vital fighting wing. When Mr. Blair and former President Bush are not being prosecuted for crimes against humanity in the International Court in Holland, this shows what monstrous corrupt and collusive international administration prevails. The USA and its privately owned central bank, Federal Reserve, is another vital aspect of British Imperialism. America has fought world wars for British Imperialism. The British fought two major wars for the usurers in City, only becoming poorer and poorer for it, whilst the usurers in City grew richer.

The British were confused by the ideology that Mr. Marx served up. Indeed Mr. Marx supplied the synthetic opiate that served the interests of global usury. When international usurers financed the Bolshevik Revolution this reveals how finance is used to disrupt cultures and acquire political/economic power. Mr. Marx wrote extensively about the problems of capital but he didn't mentioned usury which is the element of finance that cause, and is used, to create boom and bust economic cycles. And Mr. Marx put wage earners up against their employers. Yet, both employers and employees are at the mercy of and exploited by usurious predatory finance. Ideological flimflam and cultural subversion has prevented the employees and employers from seeing their common interests. Why else would international usurers finance ideologies?

When international politics is dominated and manipulated by usurers it is because the lick-democratic politicians are corrupted and co-opted. The European Union is managed by the whores of usury.Mr. Blair has already been paid a million dollars to integrate the Zionist State, Israel, in the European Union. His track record shows that he is a possessed political asset. And when Mr. Blair converted to Catholicism some years back this divulges how Masonic assets are used to subvert what integrity may still be intact in Catholicism. The present Pope is a Masonic asset. Before he goes on a state visit to Israel, he takes a holyday in Austria, this is where the present Black Pope (Father General) lives.

Jews began using Catholicism early in the 1500s, less than two generations after the Jews were thrown out of Spain, by starting The Jesuit Order and they put a pious Basque priest up as the first Father General, Ignatius Loyola. The second and third Father General, were Jews. One of their first "good works" was to teach children on Sicily to read and write. During the Middle Ages the Jews, largely excluded from the self-sufficient and wealthy feudal communities, noted that people who could not read and write had more intuition than the dolts who could. This is where mechanistic European thinking started and the ruthless logic culminated with an intellectual dolt like Immanuel Kant.

Within the first 100 years of the Jesuit Order, the Jesuits were in secret control of virtually all political activity in Europe, partly by using the confessional to extract information. And the Jesuit Order evolved as the world's most efficient intelligence organ. At one point Jesuits virtually controlled Japan and they were thrown out. One of their credos declared that the holy goal justifies foul means. Pious Catholics knew that this was a moral perversion, but by then the Jesuit Order was well established. Gradually the Jesuit Order faded into the background in a more and more secular world and their social/political activity was superseded by a political communism, and the communists reminded the world that the revolutionary goal justifies the foul means. Communism was a Jewish front and Catholicism is being subverted to become a satanic Masonic front for City.

The sinister legacy and the foul means of the Western world are blatantly demonstrated in Iraq and Afghanistan and in Palestine. The European Union is a facile moral bog that serves the hegemony of the New World Order which issue from City. And Mr. Blair is a living symptom of this criminal order of dark horses that possess Europe more and more trenchantly. The new Europe is a socialistic phenomenon. Just as Israel was cultivated by humanistic sentiments and socialists, so the European Union is developing in the environment of socialism. It is no coincidence that Jean Monnet worked in London when he master minded the European Union on Socialist lines. He said that a Federal European Government would prevent the nations fighting each other. Was he unaware that it was the international Illuminati bankers who were behind the wars and the ideologies that tore communities apart? Glibly he sophisticated the ideological temple that has attracted legions of bureaucrats and although international usurers don't own the European Central Bank, their predatory practice is almost as pernicious in Europe as on Wall Street.

Greed for work-free assets is a satanic obsession which usurers and Socialists live high on.Without their European and American assets, Jewish Supremacism, ruling the world from Jerusalem, is not feasible. This will be engineered by religious and economic parameters and incentives, and by the corrupt lick-democratic leaders in Europe who flourish in hedonistic hilarity and the cognitive dissonance generated by media whores.

Kaj Krinsmøe
Abildgade 15, 1.th.
8200 Aarhus
Denmark

Unavoidable Abscence.

2009-10-01T18:47:00.003+02:00

Dear Readers,

Due to illness, I will be away from the blog for an extended period.

I apologise for any disappointment caused.

Philip

The New Feudalists - The EU Communitarian Agenda.

2009-09-24T16:36:00.004+02:00

By Philip Jones 24th September 2009.

“Communitarianism is a collectivist philosophy that explicitly rejects individualism. It does not merely relegate individualism to a subordinate position, but is openly hostile to it. It is an ideology of 'civic society' which is nothing less than one version of Post-Marxist collectivism which wants privileges for certain wealthy and influential organized groups, and in consequence, a renewed feudalising of society." Vaclav Klaus.

Introduction.

This article was originally posted in October of last year. With the Irish referendum on the Lisbon Treaty only a week or so away, I felt it timely to repost in order that the people of Europe and the Irish in particular understand that what is at stake is nothing less than the choice between freedom and slavery!Communitarianist Ideology.

The European Union is a major aspect of the `New World Order` and the so called `sustainable development` movement. The main objective of the Federal European State to be, is absolute social, personal and economic control in a collectivist and corporatist society. The philosophy behind the EU is a strange mixture of Capitalism and Communism - a form of Euro Marxism which owes much of its dogma to the Pre World War II Italian Marxist Philosopher, Antonio Gramsci.. The nearest ideology to that practiced by the EU is something called `Communitarianism`, or what Tony Blair called the 'Third Way'..

We are talking of a dialectical trap here, with Corporate money funding Socialism as Thesis, ideological Socialism as Antithesis and Communitarianism or the `New Imperium` as Synthesis. Money grabs and concentrates power, whilst State Socialism promises the total redistribution of ownership and wealth. This contradiction provides an almost irresistible dynamic.

Communitarians want to create a post-modern, post-democratic feudal society run by a small number of rich and powerful people with everyone else working as peasants. In order to achieve their objectives they must destroy the middle class and the nation state. Can anyone deny that their goals are firmly on course.

One of the most mysterious aspects of the European Union from a `lay-man’s` standpoint is the decision making process. Even with only the bare minimum of research, it becomes clear that we the people have little or no influence on any of the decisions reached in our name and the subsequent diktats which inevitably follow. In this article/essay, I will try and identify the ideology and aims of the key socio- economic decisions that drive the EU, and how because of these decisions, our lives are increasingly no longer our own.

The socio political economic agenda of the EU is carefully and intentionally buried beneath myriad layers of tedious and unintelligible `newspeak`. Despite this, in recent years, as the pace of so called EU 'reform' has quickened, many researchers like myself have begun to expose and unravel this intentionally obtuse and often ambiguous jargon and reveal it for what it really is; A tool of confusion and misinformation intended towards the enslavement of the peoples of Europe by the rule of diktat and economic servitude..

Once the spotlight of investigation is shone directly at `the beast`, what emerges is a Communitarian Agenda driven solely by corporate interests. Monetary Profit is to be the `bottom line` on everything from public services to defence to the very useful environmental `Trojan Horse`. High sounding `non descriptions` precede cleverly worded specifics that determine that the one and only benchmark be an economic one.

The truth is of course that if the people of Europe themselves were to engage in setting the EU agenda, the current programme would almost without question be reversed. Instead of the `Mammonistic` ideal of profit before all, we would most certainly witness an agenda dominated by life quality issues like real un-politicised education for our children, and a healthcare service not tied to the pharmaceutical conglomerates, and free of political restraint, with a remit to provide the very best treatment available, whether it be of the traditional or alternative varieties.

The Roots And Goals Of The New Feudalism.

Anarchists would probably say that the basis of the EU agenda rests squarely with the ruling classes, but although in actuality correct, sooner than leave it at that, it is useful to unravel the `ball of string` by which the `Union’s` decisions are formulated, created , morphed into diktat and then monitored. For what appears from beneath the shroud are the most corrupting and powerful corporations in Europe. `Greed` entities with no pretense of any mandate beyond their combined annual turnover of €950 million and the fact they employ only around four million workers on a Continent inhabited by almost 500 million people.

Much of the ideological base for the EU Agenda can be found in the works of Count Count R. N. Coudenhove-Kalergi (Pic.above) who is justifiably regarded by many as the `God-father` of the European Union. It was his suggestion that Beethoven's hymn be the EU's Anthem, and he was extremely active in connection with the design of the EU logo. It was Coudenhove who founded the Pan European Union in the early part of the 20th century. It is interesting to note that his successor in the movement was Otto Von Hapsburg, an honorary professor of the University of Jerusalem, and recipient of the 'International Humanitarian Award', of the 'Anti Defamation-League' (ADL) of the Jewish B’nai B’rith Masonry Lodge. Coudenhove Kalergi's father was a close friend of Theodor Herzle the founder of Zionism.

Coudenhove’s vision for Europe was of a vast feudal fiefdom, where a small group of Money Aristocrats ruled a population of Serfs through a plutocratic {plutocratic = rule or power through wealth} false democratism which we see today holds thrall over the whole of the continent. His vision was shared, funded and sponsored by the `bloodline` and moneyed families of both Europe (Rothschild’s) and the USA(Rockefellers). In fact, since the end of WWII, the major dynamic behind the Federalist vision has come not from the European side, but from the Eastern Seaboard `establishment` families such as the Rockefeller's, Harriman's, Morgan’s, Dulles’ and Bush’s.

Theater For The Masses.

“The plan, I think, is the old one of world dominion in a new form . . . the money-power and revolutionary power have been set up and given sham but symbolic shapes ('Capitalism" or "Communism') and sharply defined citadels ('America' or "Russia') . . . Such is the spectacle publicly staged for the masses. But what if similar men, with a common aim, secretly rule in both camps and propose to achieve their ambition through the clash between those masses? I believe any diligent student of our times will discover that this is the case."-- Douglas Reed

This theatrical struggle between Capitalism and Communism over the inheritance of their `bloodline` aristocracy is a fratricidal war of the `blood` aristocracies a fight between individualistic and socialist, egoist and altruist, heathen and Christian ideals. The `Generals` in this make believe battle of both parties are recruited from Europe's Secret Societies and Brotherhoods, who can all be canopied beneath the metaphorical tarpaulin of the Illuminati.

Both Capitalism and Communism are rational, mechanical constructs. The time of the Old Military Caste nobility has passed. The effect of the `synthesis`, and it’s power, namely the belief in it, along with the hope that it’s time is nearing, is now growing exponentially, and with it the audacity and arrogance of the `New` Aristocracy. Through their puppet politicians sitting furtively in National Parliaments, The Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations and the plethora of other `front` organisations, their European `Project` appears close to becoming a reality, a first step along the road to the New World Order.

At the fourth annual conference of the Institute for the Scientific Study of International Relations at Copenhagen in June 1931 which was published in the magazine of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in December of that year, the following Statement was read out:

“We are at present working discreetly but with all our might, to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local national states of our world. And all the time we aredenying with our lips what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the local national states of the world is still a heresy for which a statesman or a publicist can be, perhaps not quite burnt at the stake, but certainly ostracized and Discredited.”

The Methodology of Communitarianist Fascism.

The EU project has up until recently been subtle in the extreme. Step by laborious step, one treaty after the other, they have hidden their true intentions behind an economic smokescreen, aided by a population who have abdicated responsibility for the decision making in their lives to liars, cheats and degenerates who whilst masquerading as elected representatives of the people, have conspired to disenfranchise them completely. Now, as we writhe and squirm amidst the worst economic crisis in living history, the Corporate plan for total control of the continent in the first instance, and the planet in the second, is nearing successful completion.

What amazes this writer is that there are still those `amateur` researchers, who although far more informed than the average State/Media programmed `resource` still cannot understand that these are not chaotic times. In fact, nothing could be further from the truth. The `project` is completely `on track` and nearing it’s conclusion. So arrogant are the `Lord and Masters` now, that even a minor detail such as the Irish Referendum `NO` vote does not deter their ambitions. So how were a relatively small cadre of conspirators able to achieve this astonishing level of supremacy over a population of almost 500 million people?

A detailed dissection of this question is not feasible in an Essay of this kind, but an examination of the above diagram will help us understand the main instruments of control by which all the countries of Europe (even those outside of the bloc still incredulously clambering for membership) have handed over control to the European Federalists.

The Center.

An illegitimate money power without any public mandate drawing it’s strength from Usury, Monopoly Capitalism and the Industrial Military Complex.. The source of all great power in the 21st century and the 20th before it is money. And the root and base of this power is Usury, that is the issue of money as interest bearing debt. Since the 1980’s, banks and lenders have seemingly been falling over themselves to lend money. Now as we try to ride out our present woes, we are told that money is scarce. Why is it scarce? Because the same people who were lending it so willingly are no longer doing so. They `create` money as figures on a screen in the form of loans. It is money out of thin air, backed by nothing other than the people’s taxes, and a belief that it exists and that it has some worth.

In this way, they have enticed millions of people to sign their freedoms away for the promise of a new home, car, kitchen or bathroom. Then when the time was right, NOW, they started calling in unpaid loans, manipulating prices, raising interest rates and destroying jobs and manufacturing production in the process. Then, with the people in fear for their existence, and terrified of what the future might bring, demanding naively that something be done, they come up with the solution they had planned all along; More centralisation of bank ownership. State and Corporate mergers through `Government Buyout` packages and the call for a uniform across the board single currency not only for Europe, but for the whole planet.

When the dust settles, we will see that the middle classes have been so badly damaged, that their political and economic power base will be no more. This is how `fiefdoms` and servitude is established.

The Corporate Media.

Supplied with unlimited funds and control over the mass media, the `New lords` of money have been able to dictate what is given to the public by way of knowledge and information. Through television and radio, they use subliminal messaging technology to entrap and entice people into exchanging their identities as individual human souls for that of `consumers`. They manipulate all avenues of `News` reporting ensuring that the `Third Way` consensus is consolidated and maintained.

The European Ideal is paramount and our children are indoctrinated into it by the most subtle and non subtle of means. Popular music and movies, loaded with trigger sounds and words have created a `dumbing down` effect across the continent which is matched and exceeded only in some respects by what can be found in the same media forum across the Atlantic. With a owned and controlled compliant press in tow, which simply repeats and enlarges upon the lies of the Six O’clock News from the evening before, it is little wonder that the vast majority’s idea of reality is totally askew.

Politics.

The Financial control and manipulation of politics along with the concerted undermining of private enterprise capitalism combined with a progressive programme of State (EU) interference in all aspects of private commerce, has all but destroyed this once proud and independent feature of the European way of life. The mystery of 21st century European politics is the little understood relationship between `Monopoly Capitalism` and Marxism. Two irrefutable facts of 20th century history, although not generally known, is that without huge financial support from the west, the Russian Revolution would not have happened, and that the Industrial and Military strength of the USSR was almost entirely a creation of the West.

Inside the EU, precisely the same techniques and motives have been powerfully at work, undermining systematically the individual member state’s private enterprise capitalist system, substituting in it’s stead elements of pure Socialism and not surprisingly, the EU Commission can be seen to have been implementing in many ways Marx’s own ten points, which are calculated to bring the whole Bloc under a `Socialist` Corporatist Imperium. Namely a Communitarian New European Order. The Canadian Professor and author, Henry Makow puts it this way:

“The Illuminati’s `revolutionary goal` is the New World Order, or authoritarian socialism run by monopoly capital. It is big government in the service of big business. The Left in the service of the Right”.

Foreign Policy.

The European Unionists see their project as a revival of Ancient Rome. A New European Order along the lines of the Roman Empire. A `Pax Europa` if you will. This `vision of a Pan European Superpower has always been the `endgame` and disciples of this ideal have been growing in both support and popularity within the inner sanctum of the Commission over past few decades. The view is that only within the scenario of "Superpower Europe" will "Greater Europe" achieve its rightful world-power potential. Therefore it is rationalised that the "final goal of a European state" should be pursued. All central political competences (interior, foreign policy, defence, social and economic policies) must be Communitised. The EU, already developing in the direction of "Superpower Europe", would always be capable of accepting new members . Thus it would be "globally the only system which could continually expand its territory. Then the great political and economic power potential of the EU would achieve parity with the USA" .

It is necessary to understand that this emerging `superbloc` is only truly relevant in the context of any future World Government Organisation. A `Superpower` only in as much as it forms one regional supranational entity as would a North American Union, and an Asia Pacific Union, all subordinated to the World Government and Army.

Culture.

The subversion of national culture, including literature, art, music and the undermining of institutions and traditions, church, family and morality was a prerequisite to establishing the Communitarian Supranational State. Only by severing the people’s roots to these aspects of national life could the conspiratorial goals be realised. Organ transplant surgeons encounter a problem called `rejection`, whereby the organ receiver’s body, programmed by nature, rejects the new organ because it simply does not belong. Similarly, before a population can be expected to tolerate any new system of control, means must be found to reduce said populace to a condition of `apathetic servitude`.

Winston Churchill showed his understanding of this when he wrote back in 1922 that there could be no World Government as envisaged by Marxists except on the basis of an induced state of universal arrested development. Since the end of WWII, the peoples of Europe along with the rest of humankind have been, through various means, reduced to exactly that state. This has been achieved via a diabolical program of culture distortion, using subversive genre’s of popular music, ever more degrading and perverse forms of pornography, theater and cinema themes which distort reality and show an inverted and corrupted ideal of all that is natural, moral and good, together with the encouragement of decadence in every possible form.

Briefly put, the substitution of a people’s own indigenous culture with forms of `entertainment` contrived to instill confusion on a mass scale, and paralyse the collective will at source. This undermining and subversion of the culture is openly promoted and encouraged by the media whores of the New Lords Of Money, with the most degraded, drug addicted so called `artists` being touted as role models for our youth.

Science.

Science must be controlled and manipulated in order to prevent any obstruction being placed in the way of the Communitarians. For sake of necessity, there must be truth at least in some of the academic disciplines such as maths, physics, chemistry etc. These the money power need and must have for patently obvious reasons. But it cannot allow at any cost a truth or truths which at last gives pure knowledge to mankind and allows the `useless eaters` to liberate themselves from the millennia of deception they have been subjected to. Scientific truths about the `heavenly bodies` during the renaissance were nowhere near as suppressed as are the genuine products of scientific research today in all those fields of inquiry which cause man to explore his own self, such as anthropology, genetics, psychology and history. The persecution and defamation of those who refuse to accept and conform can be traced back time and again to the illegitimate money power, which in reality always decides who is appointed to a teaching post at a university and who is not. Whose work and research is published and whose is condemned to obscurity.

History.

The falsification and suppression of history (especially recent history) goes hand in hand with the falsification and suppression of news. People will lose all confidence in the media if they discover that they have been lied to or denied the truth. This holds true whether we speak of events today, or fifty years since. The control and manipulation of more recent history has become a primary factor in modern political warfare. Unless people know the truth about the past, they will not be equipped to understand the present, and without a clear understanding of this fact, will have no way of helping determine what will occur in the future. As George Orwell wrote, “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past”. Control of the study of history, especially of the past 100 years is exercised by a system of `Intellectual Terrorism` intended to suppress knowledge which will arm our minds against an enemy whose greatest power lies in it’s capacity for deception.

Agitation.

“The West has been crippled by a corrosive and corrupt ideology-morality that causes our political elite to declare themselves in sympathy with, and in support of the very elements that boldly proclaim their goal to be the destruction of the nation states of the west”. Richard Clarke.

Nowhere is the merging between the Capitalist super rich and the Marxist `supposedly` anti-capitalists more clearly established than it is in `Brussels`.

As Nikki Raapana writes: "The `Communitarians work behind the scenes. Elite communitarian 'thinkers' quietly slide their new laws inside projects and programs few regular people will think or dare to question. And, just so you won't look any closer, (or open your mouth to ask one dumb question) the Communitarians mask their fascist programs behind all kinds of lovely phrasing. The new phrases work so well that if you do stand out and speak up with a debatable question, it means you don't want to live in a safe and healthy community. And since everyone has to agree in order to reach communitarian consensus, you will be shunned and excluded from the decision making 'councils.' Go ahead and try, but the shifty Communitarians will NEVER debate you because their programs are based entirely in a lie called Communism."

Religion.

There is no doubt in the mind of this writer that the most powerful source of resistance to the `illegitimate` power will be found in a people’s religion. I will state quite clearly at this point that I myself have been in the past somewhat irreligious, and that has quite likely been to my detriment in some ways. But I have, through recent close contact with some true Christians and Muslims, come to realise that through faith comes resilience, determination and strength.

The central purpose of religion appears to be a means of giving to the individual a spiritual and intellectual base from which that individual can make relative all the stressors and influences he/she encounters and thereby secure a grounded sense of purpose, direction and belonging. Religion, whichever form it might take must forever be at the core of the culture, sustained by and sustaining the arts.

Corruption of religion by powers whose intentions are anything other than religious will have the most destructive of consequences for society in general. Within the EU bloc and further afield,. the result of this corruption has been a secularization and politicisation of the `Church` along with the creation of the `World Council of Churches`.

As the American Ezra Pound once said, “There is no medieval description of hell which exceeds the inner filth of the mentalities of some of the ministers and prelates for whom every species of cruelty and villainy is condoned, even incited, if perpetrated under the banner of the universalist political objectives prescribed by the money power.”

The Communitarian Super-Capitalist Nexus.

“The world is governed by very different persons to what is imagined by those who are not themselves behind the scene”. Benjamin Disraeli, British Prime Minister to Queen Victoria.

Even a cursory investigation of the forces shaping our current woeful situation, creating a socio-political climate described by `Spengler` as “Anarchy become a habit” would be incomplete, without a more informed look at those two supposed `arch` opposites, Capitalism and Communism. The key word here is Capitalism. This oft used word actually has two very divergent meanings. In order to grasp why a Supranational `would be` Federal State such as the EU, representing ostensibly capitalist interests, would adopt social policies which are in almost every way imaginable Communist, we must first understand the two meanings of this word; Capitalist. Actually, we are speaking here of two words in affect:

1) Capitalism, meaning private ownership of property and resources and competitive free enterprise in the supply of goods and services.

2) Super-Capitalism, meaning a highly concentrated finance capitalism which is not only apart from capitalism, but it’s antithesis and which sooner rather than later acquires the characteristic of being actively `anti-capitalist`.

It is not possible to continue to concentrate ownership and control of property and resources without simultaneously reducing the number who own and control said property and resources. Similarly, there can be no concentration of Corporate Ownership and control, without a corresponding inhibition and suppression of free enterprise. What has happened within the European Union is a progressive degeneration of Capitalism into a form of `Super Capitalism` or what should be more properly termed `Anti Capitalism` which resembles Capitalism less and less and Socialism or Communism more and more.

The bare minimum of `bona fide` capitalist values have been allowed to remain in order to confuse the picture and create difficulties for most people to identify that their traditional economic way of life has in fact been replaced by this new `Money Concentration`. Capitalism serves only as a means of camouflage for an all encompassing and omnipotent `Anti Capitalism` dominating both economics and politics.

The modern `Super-Capitalist` EU has more in common with the former Soviet Union than anyone not involved in this area of research would ever imagine to be the case. Yes, there are differences and opposing spheres of interest, but these become insignificant in comparison to what they have in common. Both are virulently antagonistic towards Nationalism and are therefore revolutionary in principal, setting themselves as they do in fierce opposition to Nationalist aspirations which are essentially evolutionary. Nationalism, a much maligned and misrepresented political credo is inseparably connected to a people’s culture and traditions. This causes it to become the mortal enemy of the `Supra-nationalists` whose goal is the Super-state.

The reason that this `Super-Capitalism` lives in eternal dread of Nationalism can be explained by examining the fundamental issue of whether there should in any state construct be an authority superior to economics. Which shall govern, politics or economics? Through ethical nationalism, in spite of it’s inherited ailments, the will of the people is made vital, which causes politics to become the master over economics, which no matter how important it might be, is then relegated to it‘s morally natural subordinate status.

Since there is no way that Communism, or more correctly in this the first decade of the 21st century, Communitarianism, can be resisted except by nationalism, it is of no surprise that the `Super-Capitalists` have for the past fifty years and more been ruthlessly dedicated to destroying the nation state and severing from it the love and loyalty of the people.

The Communitarians understand that their only weapon against Nationalism is Marxist theory, and that in itself marshals all the forces of the underworld along with the `rootless` academics using them as a `siege gun` against any or all nationalist targets (see the murder of Austrian Politician, Jorg Haider).

Conclusion.

The European Federal State will usher in a new age of Feudalism for the people of the old continent. The technological advances in recent years have enabled the `designers and planners` to construct a `Grid` around people’s lives, using insidious database technology combined with despicable propaganda and pernicious surveillance of all and every aspect of a citizens life. Yet still, we the people do nothing. There are reported to be around 50,000 concentration camps already in place earmarked for EU dissidents (http://www.rense.com/general81/conce.htm ). The Military is still on the streets of Italy, and the Euro Gendarmerie (http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/2009/07/tyranny-of-law.html) is ready to be unleashed. During the 1930’s, even though all the signs were there , people refused to recognise them. Are we going to once again fail to learn from our history?

Jean Monnet, the so called ` founding father of the EU did everything but paint us a picture when he wrote:

“ Europe’s nations should be guided towards the Superstate without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose, but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation .“ (Letter to a friend 30th April 1952).

Now is a time for `Heroes` and time is short. Just maybe once again, the Irish people will show the rest of Europe the way forward and be as heroes for all of us denied the right to self determination by our lying and cheating politicians.

Ref:

This Age Of Confict - Ivor BensonStop Common Purpose - http://www.stopcp.com/cpbreachesthesevenprinciples.phpBalder.org - http://balder.org/judea/Richard-Coudenhove-Kalergi-Practical-Idealism-Vienna-1925.php http://www.freenations.freeuk.com/The reference base for this article regarding what Communitarianism is and who Communitarians are can be found at http://nord.twu.net/acl/standfor.html

Sick As A Dog!!

2009-09-22T22:38:00.004+02:00

Dear Readers, Members etc.

The above says it all. It's going to be a little slow and quiet `Blogwise` for a while. I am not well!

On the upside, it should allow you the time to read David Livingstone's Book.

Philip

The Nexus Of Evil : Part Ten (A Pre-emptive Strike On Humanity) The Conclusion.

2009-09-17T13:29:00.008+02:00

By Philip Jones 16th September 2009.

“By wielding inordinate financial and political power, the plan of the Illuminati is to foment a global war, or World War III, from which will emerge, out of the ashes of the expired civilizations of our time, like a phoenix from the fire, a New World Order. The coming confrontation is being presented as a Clash of Civilizations, between the Liberal Democratic West and Islamic fundamentalism.” David Livingstone -Terrorism And The Illuminati.

Foreword.

When the concepts and ideas which formed the initial `skeleton` of this series began to formulate and take shape in my mind, my goal by article's end was to to illustrate how the `Nexus Of Evil,` created by the Illuminati, has by use of divide and rule, and the Hegelian Dialectical formula, caused otherwise good and decent human beings to fear and even hate each other, for no other reason than being different. Christianity, Islam and Judaism each have the same root origin, and share the worship of the same God. And yet in this the first decade of the 21st century, they are lining up against each other once again, in wars of aggression, stage-managed and manipulated by an ancient and malevolent secret force literally `hell bent` on world domination.

It is all too easy for an extended article such as this, to lose its way, so in order to avoid such digression and deviation from the `script,` I reasoned that an `anchor` was needed. I remembered a booklet I had read some years ago by a now deceased Swedish born South African journalist named Ivor Benson[1], entitled `This Age Of Conflict.`

It is true to say that Mr. Benson's short and concise expose of what many term the `Global Agenda,` had a profound affect on my view of the world I lived in. It is from that booklet that the above diagram originates, and it is that simple illustration of the `Nexus Of Evil` which has credibly provided the required `anchor.`

This series of articles has drawn upon many research sources, but two stand out as having been critical in helping me to assemble the necessary research material and information. The late Mr. Benson's is one, and the other is Canadian historian and author, David Livingstone's `Terrorism And The Illuminati.`[2]

The latter is without doubt the `Bible` of this field of investigation, and I would recommend that anyone wishing to truly understand the dangerous world events now taking place, not only read the book, but refer to it frequently as a means of staying focused, and not becoming sidetracked by the multitude of often conflicting theories and hypotheses, put out by some researchers with not always sincere intentions.

I would like to belatedly thank Mr. Benson for his many excellent articles and books on contentious subjects most writers avoid, and David Livingstone for his superb book and his always prompt and helpful advice whenever I have found it necessary to contact him. All other source material drawn from, is listed with thanks in the reference section below each individual part.

Introduction.

During the course of this series, our path has traversed that 150 year time period which Ivor Benson quite correctly termed an `Age Of Conflict, ` unprecedented in human history. From the middle of the 19th Century to the present day, humankind has been subjected to an almost uninterrupted sequence of terrible and catastrophic wars, which have decimated the global population, and twice during the 20th Century caused slaughter and destruction on a scale hitherto unimagined. A Third Global Conflagration would most certainly bring the mass of humanity to the very brink of annihilation.

Research has shown clearly that this `Age Of Conflict,` is no accident. In fact, there exists a `blueprint` for what has happened, in the form of a letter written by Free-masonic Grand Master Albert Pike, to fellow Mason and Luciferian, Giuseppe Mazzini back in the 19th Century[3] where he outlined his plans for three world wars, the third being a `Clash of Civilisations, ` between the Islamic World and the West.

So far, everything has gone exactly according to Pike's plan, and since the tragedy of September 11th 2001, it has not been too difficult to identify the means by which the Illuminati are manipulating the Dialectic towards a Third Global War, by manoeuvring the Zionist puppet government of the USA and its allies, into a major confrontation with the nations of Islam, which will then inevitably spill over and draw Russia China, Pakistan and India and thereafter the whole world into the conflict.

The `Endgame` for this insane agenda, is a One World Global Communitarian[4] State, of demonic proportions, with a culled and reduced population of micro-chipped slave workers, whose every movement and thought will be monitored by a Big Brother apparatus the like of which even George Orwell could not have imagined.

In the previous part, we examined the aftermath of 9/11 and the carnage being wrought by the `allied` occupation forces in Afghanistan and Iraq. Here in this concluding `episode,` we will look at the likely `flashpoints` which could give the Washington `War Hawks` the pretext they need, to launch their `Operation Armageddon,` and finally draw our conclusions accordingly.

For the past two years, all indications have been, that the Islamic Republic Of Iran was next on the Zionist `hitlist, ` so it will be to that ancient land and civilisation which we must now turn our attention.

A Warning to Iran.

The American invasion, occupation, subjugation and destruction of a modern, scientifically and culturally advanced civilization, such as existed in Iraq, is only the prelude to what the people of Iran can expect if the US-Zionist `hawks` in Obama's regime decide that the time is right and a military attack is launched. The impending threat to the people of Iran and its cultural and scientific foundations, has been conspicuous by it absence from the narrative among the affluent Iranian student protesters and their US-funded NGO's during their post-election so called `Lipstick Revolution' protests.

They should not forget that in 2004, educated and sophisticated Iraqis in Baghdad consoled themselves with a fatally misplaced optimism that “at least we are not like Afghanistan.” The same elite are now to be found in squalid refugee camps in Syria and Jordan, and their country now resembles Afghanistan, more closely than anywhere else in the Middle East. The chilling promise of President Bush in April 2003 to transform Iraq in the image of “our newly liberated Afghanistan” has been fulfilled, and reports that the US Administration advisers had reviewed the Israeli Mossad policy of selective assassination of Iranian scientists should cause the pro-Western liberal intellectuals of Tehran, to seriously ponder the lesson of the murderous campaign that has virtually eliminated Iraqi scientists and academics during 2006-2007.

The conquest of Iraq has resulted in the destruction of a modern secular republic. The cultural wasteland that remains is controlled by gangsters, swindlers, mercenary thugs posing as `Iraqi officers', tribal and ethnic cultural illiterates and corrupted religious figures. They operate under the guidance and direction of West Point graduates holding `blue-prints for empire', formulated by graduates of the Ivy League Academies on the Eastern Seaboard of the United States, eager to serve the interests of American and European multi-national corporations, and ultimately, wittingly or not the Illuminati Agenda.

The Iranian people should take Michael Ledeen[5] at his word, and should be viewing events in neighbouring Iraq with not a little trepidation.

An Arc Of Crisis : Return To Iran.

"Never believe anything until it's officially denied," British writer Claud Cockburn.

In 1979, President Jimmy Carter's National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski thought he could use the Iranian government, including the Iranian Shiite mullahs as part of an `Arc` of resistance[6] from Egypt eastward against Soviet expansionism. When `students` supported by Khomeini took over the U.S, Embassy in Tehran, it presented a crisis. However, as Robert Dreyfuss notes:

"Along with the threat from Khomeinism, some U.S. policy makers also saw opportunity...using the Islamic `right` to undermine the Soviet Union in its own empire, deep in Central Asia....The twin Islamic movements in Iran and (Muslim Brotherhood linked organizations like Al Qaeda in) Afghanistan, inspired Brzezinski and Bill Casey (President Reagan's CIA director) to pursue the Islam-in-Asia ('arc-of-Islam') theme aggressively."

Brzezinski developed a plan of financial and other means of support for Afghanistan, hoping to lure the Soviets into involvement in a `quagmire` there, and as history records, the Soviets obliged and invaded in December 1979. After this, Zalmay Khalilzad[6] (former U.S. Ambassador to Iraq), a neo-conservative RAND strategist, wrote a paper explaining "the Khomeini regime also poses risks to the Soviets. The change of regime has encouraged similar movements in Iraq and Afghanistan, and might even affect Soviet Muslim Central Asia."

Perhaps it is useful at this time to remember that according to a map prepared by the World Association of Parliamentarians for World Government meeting in London in 1952, when the World Government comes into being, U.S. forces would be patrolling Central Asia (e.g., Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, etc.). Brzezinski at Mikhail Gorbachev's first State of the World Forum in 1995 said:

"We cannot leap into world government through one quick step. A consensual global system requires a process....The precondition for eventual and genuine globalization is progressive regionalization because by that we move toward larger, more stable, more cooperative units."

This is the same strategy proposed by Cecil Rhodes' Association of Helpers member P. E. Corbett in Post-War Worlds (1942) and its fruits can been seen in the EU, NAU and other Superstate projects currently under-way.

Since the Iranian election of June 12th this year, barely a day has passed without mass global media coverage of what has been depicted as another tumultuous event in Iranian history. Elections whose results are challenged as being dubious, have taken place in most countries at one time or another in recent decades. Many countless Americans and with much justification, believe that the presidential elections of 2000 and 2004 were stolen by the Republicans, and not just inside the voting machines and in the counting process, but prior to the actual voting as well, with numerous Republican Party dirty tricks designed to keep poor and black voters off voting lists or away from polling stations.

That large numbers of people did not take to the streets day after day in protest, as they have in Iran, is not something Americans should be proud of. Perhaps if the CIA, the Agency for International Development (AID), several US government-run radio stations, and various other organizations supported by the National Endowment for Democracy (which was created to serve as a front for the CIA, literally) had been active in the United States, as they have been for years in Iran, major street protests would have taken place in the US.

In 1953, when the CIA overthrew Iranian Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh, they paid people to agitate in front of Mossadegh's residence and elsewhere and engage in acts of violence; some pretended to be supporters of Mossadegh while engaging in anti-religious actions. And it worked, very well.

Since the cessation of hostilities following the end of World War II, one US government or another, on behalf of the Illuminati agenda, has seriously intervened in some thirty elections around the world. Adding a new twist this time, the State Department asked `Twitter` to postpone a scheduled maintenance shut-down of its service to keep information flowing from inside Iran, helping to mobilize protesters.

In recent years, the United States has been provocatively patrolling the waters surrounding Iran with warships, halting Iranian ships on the pretext to check for arms shipments to Hamas, or other equally spurious and illegitimate reasons. It has been financing and "educating" Iranian dissidents, used Iranian groups to carry out terrorist attacks inside Iran, kidnapped Iranian diplomats in Iraq, abducted Iranian military personnel from inside Iran, thereafter transporting them to Iraq. It has been spying and recruiting within Iran, and has manipulated Iran's currency and her international financial transactions, and imposed various economic and political sanctions against the country.

By all standards, the United States Government has been conducting a form of warfare against the people of Iran. US President Barack Obama said with a straight face on June 23rd:

"I've made it clear that the United States respects the sovereignty of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and is not at all interfering in Iran's affairs. Some in the Iranian government [have been] accusing the United States and others outside of Iran of instigating protests over the elections. These accusations are patently false and absurd."

In his speech to the Middle East on June 4, President Obama mentioned that "In the middle of the Cold War, the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government." So here we have the president of the United States actually admitting to a previous overthrow of the Iranian government, while the United States is in the very midst of trying to overthrow the current Iranian government. If you can think of a better example of hypocrisy, let me know.

So what is all the fuss about over the Iranian election and street protests anyway? For public consumption at least, the announced winner, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is currently sharing time with Venezuelan President, Hugo Chavez, as Washington's `public enemy number one.` This `honour` has been `bestowed` for not sufficiently respecting the `Empire` and its Israeli partner-in-crime; indeed, Ahmadinejad is publicly one of the most outspoken critics of US foreign policy in the world. Can anything be that simple though in the grand web of Illuminist machinations?

This `default` response seems to be `built in,` to Washington's world view and the fact that whilst Mousavi,[13] (Ahmadinejad's main opponent in the election and very much supported by the protesters), was prime minister back in 1981-89, he was largely blamed for the attacks on the US embassy and military barracks in Beirut in 1983, which took the lives of more than 200 Americans, and also for the 1988 truck bombing of a US Navy installation in Naples, Italy, that killed five persons.

It simply cannot be, that no one in the Obama administration knows of Mousavi's background?

Despite his anti-American terrorist deeds, and just because he's opposed to Ahmadinejad, Time magazine calls Mousavi a "moderate", and goes on to add: "It has to be assumed that the Iranian presidential election was rigged," offering as much evidence as the Iranian protesters, i.e., none at all. It cannot of course be proven that the Iranian election was totally honest, but the arguments given to support the charge of fraud are not very impressive, such as the much-repeated fact that the results were announced very soon after the polls closed.

For decades in various countries election results have been condemned for being withheld for many hours or days. It was contended that some kind of dishonesty must be going on behind the scenes during the long delay. So now we're asked to believe that a species of dishonesty must be going on, because the results were released so quickly. It should be noted that the ballots listed only one electoral contest, with but four candidates.

Phil Wilayto, American peace activist and author of a book on Iran, has observed:

“Ahmadinejad, himself born into rural poverty, clearly has the support of the poorer classes, especially in the countryside, where nearly half the population lives. Why? In part because he pays attention to them, makes sure they receive some benefits from the government and treats them and their religious views and traditions with respect. Mousavi, on the other hand, the son of an urban merchant, clearly appeals more to the urban middle classes, especially the college-educated youth. This being so, why would anyone be surprised that Ahmadinejad carried the vote by a clear majority? Are there now more yuppies in Iran than poor people?”

Since both Ahmadinejad and Mousavi are members of the establishment, neither is seen as being any threat to the Islamic theocracy, and the election can be seen on the surface at least, as the kind of power struggle you find in virtually every country. But that is not the issue here. The issue is Washington's long-standing goal of regime change. If the exact same electoral outcome had taken place in a country that was an ally of the United States, how much of all the accusatory news coverage and speeches would have taken place?

In fact, the exact same thing did happen in a country that is an ally of the United States, three years ago when Felipe Calderon appeared to have stolen the presidential election in Mexico, and there were daily protests for more than two months; but the American and international condemnation was virtually non-existent compared to what we see today in regard to Iran, where Iranian leaders undertook a recount of a random ten per cent of ballots and recertified Ahmadinejad as the victor.

So what does all of us tell us? Well at least for now, Ahmadinejad is fulfilling his dialectical role as the antithesis to Washington's thesis. As in all the major conflicts, military or political, for at least the past century and a half or so, the Iranian election has been one stage-play in a global drama being played out in the media and educational faculties, whilst the reality of the situation is very different. The recent elections in Iran are almost certainly dialectical, with both thesis ( Ahmadinejad) and antithesis (Mousavi,) either knowingly, which I believe likely, or not, being played off against each other for the benefit of the masses, whilst the Illuminati puppet masters pulling all the strings, seeking to impose their synthesis on the unsuspecting Iranian populace.

That synthesis to be presented in the shape of a less radical liberalising of Iranian society than Mousavi's platform, yet more so than anything Ahmadinejad might have offered, and more to the point, moving an Islamic society ever closer the point where western secular influences can begin to rot away at the heart, body and soul of Iranian life from within, thereby weakening the nation viewed as the `West's` most formidable adversary in any `Clash of Civilisations, ` with Islam.

One thing's for certain; The sticky fingers of the CIA are in there somewhere, along with their `playmates` Mossad, working to undermine and subvert Iranian Society from within, whilst the `war hawks` in Washington make their preparations for the Zionist invasion of Persia and the probable spark which ignites WWIII.

The Grand Chess-Game: Central Asia, The Caucasus And The Encirclement Of Russia.

The outcome of the recent six grim days of bloodshed in the Caucasus has triggered an outpouring of the most appalling hypocrisy from western politicians and their bought and paid for media. As the `Chatterers` waxed indignation against Russian imperialism and brutal dis-proportionality, former US vice-president `Big Dick` Cheney, faithfully supported by the UK's Gordon Brown and David Miliband, declared that "Russian aggression must not go unanswered". George Bush denounced Russia for having "invaded a sovereign neighbouring state" and threatening "a democratic government". Such an action, he insisted, "is unacceptable in the 21st century".

Could these by any chance be the leaders of the same governments that in 2003, invaded and occupied , the sovereign states of Afghanistan and Iraq on false pretences at the cost of hundreds of thousands of lives? Or even the two governments that blocked a ceasefire in the summer of 2006 as Israel pulverized Lebanon's infrastructure and killed more than a thousand civilians in retaliation for the capture or killing of five soldiers?

You'd be hard pressed to recall after all the fury over Russian aggression that it was actually Georgia that began the war in the first place, with an all-out attack on South Ossetia, supposedly to "restore constitutional order" – or put another way, establish its rule over an area it has not controlled since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Nor, were there, amid the outrage at Russian bombardments, more than the very briefest of references to the atrocities committed by Georgian forces against citizens it claims as its own in South Ossetia's capital Tskhinvali.

Several hundred civilians along with Russian soldiers operating under a 1990s peace agreement, were killed there by Georgian troops during the offensive; "I saw a Georgian soldier throw a grenade into a basement full of women and children," one Tskhinvali resident, Saramat Tskhovredov, told reporters.

Both the current Georgian president, Mikheil Saakashvili, and his predecessor, came to power in western-backed coup d'Etats, the most recent having been labelled the `Rose Revolution.` Saakashvili was then initially rubber-stamped into office with 96% of the vote before establishing what the International Crisis Group recently described as an "increasingly authoritarian" government, violently cracking down on all opposition dissent and the independent media last November.

It now seems that the term `Democratic` infers nothing more, than establishing a regime's "pro-western" credentials in these cases.

The long-running dispute over South Ossetia - as well as Abkhazia, the other contested region of Georgia - is the inevitable consequence of the breakup of the Soviet Union. As in the case of Yugoslavia, minorities who were happy enough to live on either side of an internal boundary that made little difference to their lives, feel quite differently when they find themselves on the wrong side of an international state border.

Problems such as these would be problematic enough to settle through negotiation in any circumstances, but when one adds to the cooking `pot` the determined and forcible US promotion of Georgia as being a pro-western, anti-Russian forward base in the region, along with its efforts to bring Georgia into NATO, the routing of a key Caspian oil pipeline through its territory aimed at weakening Russia's control of energy supplies, and the US-sponsored recognition of the independence of Kosovo - whose status Russia had explicitly linked to that of South Ossetia and Abkhazia - and conflict was inevitable.

The CIA has in fact been closely involved in Georgia since the Soviet collapse. But during the Bush administration, Georgia became a fully fledged US satellite; its forces are armed and trained by the US and Israel, and it has the third-largest military contingent in Iraq - hence the US need to airlift 800 of them back to fight the Russians during the Ossetia clash.

Saakashvili's links with the neo-conservatives in Washington are particularly close: the lobbying firm headed by former US Republican candidate John McCain's top foreign policy adviser, Randy Scheunemann, has been paid nearly $900,000 by the Georgian government since 2004.

But underlying the conflict has also been the US administration's wider, explicit determination to enforce American global hegemony and prevent any regional challenge, particularly from a resurgent Russia. That aim was first spelled out when Cheney was defence secretary under Bush's father, but its full impact has only been felt as Russia has begun to recover from the disintegration of the 1990s.

Over the past decade, NATO's relentless eastward expansion has brought the western military alliance hard up against Russia's borders and deep into former Soviet territory. American military bases have spread across eastern Europe and central Asia, as the US has helped install one anti-Russian client government after another, through a series of CIA sponsored revolutions. Now the Obama administration is preparing to site a missile defence system in eastern Europe, transparently targeted at Russia.

By any sensible reckoning, this is not a story of Russian aggression, but of US imperial expansion and a ever tighter encirclement of Russia by a potentially hostile power. That a stronger Russia has now used what happened in South Ossetia in order to put a check on that expansion, should hardly come as a surprise. It is not difficult to deduce why Saakashvili launched the attack; of course, he was being `egged on` by his `Warhawk,` friends in Washington.The plan however spectacularly backfired, at tragic human cost.

In spite of the US regime's attempts at `tough talk,` the war also exposed the limits of US power in the region. As long as Georgia's independence is respected - best protected by opting for neutrality - that should be no bad thing. American unipolar domination of the world has squeezed the space for genuine self-determination and the return of some counterweight in the form of a resurgent Russia has to be welcomed.

But the process of adjustment also brings huge dangers. If Georgia had been a member of NATO, this conflict would have risked a far sharper escalation. That would be even more obvious in the case of Ukraine - which recently gave a warning of the potential for future confrontation when its pro-western president threatened to restrict the movement of Russian ships in and out of their Crimean base in Sevastopol.

As `super power` conflict returns after a long absence, South Ossetia is only a taste of things to come in Brzezinski's Grand Chess game of `Who's Going To Rule The World.`

The Zionist Factor.

Zionism is both alien and illegitimate in origin. It is a hegemonist and nationalist project rooted and nourished on what could be called the imperialist impulse towards expansion and domination. The founding fathers of the Zionist adventure were not believers in Judaism, not even in its distorted, rabbinical form: they were in essence pragmatists and Kabbalists who exploited the Judaic heritage as a means to achieve their nationalistic goals. All this, moreover, was done within the broader context of Western strategic hopes for the destabilizing and enfeebling of the Islamic world.

Because Zionism's progenitors were European in their training and mental orientation, and members of the same secret societies, they did not find it difficult to reach an understanding with Western politicians, exploiting their own financial power through their extensive and committed Diaspora, until the Zionist agenda became subsumed under the more general objectives of nineteenth-century European imperialism. The idea of inserting an alien polity into the very heart of the Islamic world, which would exhaust its resources and obstruct any attempt at reforging Muslim unity, proved immediately appealing to European policy-makers in thrall to a Luciferian agenda, and served well the new Western orientation which was ostensibly materialistic, secular, and obsessed with the idea of territorial expansion.

The Centrality Of The Palestine Issue.

It could be said that Palestine and its people have provided the Zionists and Neo Imperialists with a `prototype` model for what we are now seeing in Afghanistan and Iraq, and unless the `Hawks` in the US are either unseated, which is unlikely, or suddenly develop hearts and consciences, which is even more so, then we can reasonably expect similar hostile action in Iran and again in the Caucasus in the foreseeable future.

So Zionism though nationalist in theory can also be seen to be imperialist and malevolent in its practical application.

It can further be perceived as being hostile to every element rooted in ethical and religious principles. It both represents and serves the new existential ethos which transforms the human race into 'marketing' and 'geopolitical' units, which can be deployed, rewarded or punished by the `Hidden Powers` that be, who are accountable to no-one save themselves.

Zionism then, nurtured by and in turn nurturing this global pseudo-secular civilization, represents a secular onslaught on the very heart of Islamic civilisation. The Islamic project, by contrast, is its polar opposite, representing perhaps, the last great hope that human civilization can be rescued from the worship of the Luciferian credo, being foisted incrementally on the global population in the shape of the erroneous political doctrine known as democracy.

To speak of saving Palestine from the Zionists is to speak simultaneously of one's hope for a worldwide liberation. The Palestinian `cause' does not signify the simple reconquest of a patch of territory occupied by aggressors. It is not even about peace and war; Its implications go much further. For to strike at Zionism in Palestine is to strike at the Luciferian enemy in its new citadel, which it has constructed at the centre of the world, in the very heart of the Muslim nation, in a land which has always been of unlimited strategic and spiritual fecundity. The `West,` as a civilization, seems set to extend its influence into the heartland of the Islamic World,` all the better to destroy the surviving traces of spiritual resistance which have remained intact there, and finally to obliterate man's remaining hopes for the rebirth of a civilization which is qualitative and humane, rather than quantitative and perversely malevolent.

Once more we are caught in the pernicious, suffocating and deadly embrace of the Hegelian Dialectic.

The reality is that the Zionist project, being violent, aggressive, and secular, is formidable in its potency. Its power can only be exhausted by mobilizing the resources of those people around the world who have identified the malevolence which stalks our planet and are willing to join in solidarity with the entire Muslim nation in its efforts to resist the monster in our midst.

These resources I speak of are not merely of a military nature; they extend also to worlds as disparate as thought, art and economics. They are also, and pre-eminently, spiritual: demanding a return to the principles of renunciation, repentance, piety, reliance on God, yearning for the ultimate meeting with Him, the spirit of Islamic fraternity, selflessness, and the certainty that the final victory shall go to God and all believers. No project undertaken on this tremendous scale can be 'regional,' or 'Palestinian,' or Arab.' It is far broader. It represents nothing less than a struggle which is at once cultural, Islamic, Christian and Judaic in its pure form. We must, therefore, light the fires of longing, resistance, and sacrifice everywhere on earth. For Palestine will not be retrieved until there is struggle against oppression in all its forms throughout the world.

Lucifer, The Rothschilds And The House Of Zion.

In the ancient world, it was said that all roads lead to Rome. Nowadays, no matter where one turns whilst in the process of investigating the One World Conspiracy, the same can be said of the Rothschilds[8]. Inevitably, their name crops up, and equally inevitably when it does so, the slur of `Anti Semite` is applied to the researcher involved. But the Rothschilds are not Semitic and what's more, neither are they Judaic either!

The Rothschild relationship with the Jews is deceptive. The family stance is publicly "pro-Jewish", and they have given abundant charity to Jewish causes. But their support of the Jewish people has, in most cases, been used for the sole purpose of controlling and profiting from the Jew's misfortune. The Rothschilds have often been called, the `Royal Family` of the Jews. Many leading Rothschilds have been dubbed "King of the Jews". But what kind of Judaism do the Rothschilds support? Do they support the orthodox Jews who believe in the Old Testament and are waiting for the return of the messiah? No.

Do they support Messianic Jews who believe Jesus Christ was the messiah who came to save all men? No. The Rothschilds support those Jews who have fallen prey to the deceptive gnostic and occultic teachings of Cabalism, who in turn promote the Illuminati controlled Zionist movement. Not all Zionists are part of the conspiracy, but their leaders are, and the ultimate leaders of the Zionists have been the Rothschilds. I am disappointed by some researchers, who automatically coin the conspiracy a "Jewish" one.

Recently, I was assailed by one fellow researcher following an article I had penned regarding the pornography industry. “It's The Jews Stupid,” said he, and no amount of documented evidence to the contrary would alter his stance. He is not alone in this assertion that all the world's ills can be attributed to JEWS.

This unfortunate stumbling block pollutes the otherwise excellent work of such people, causing it to be just as misleading as the information `spewed` out by the mass media. These researchers seem blinded by the fact that the conspiracy has abused and manipulated the Jewish race more than any other group in the history of the world. The Jewish hierarchy has sat back and allowed the attack on, and control of, the Jewish masses for the furtherance of the Luciferian. There are people who call themselves "Christians" involved in the conspiracy, and at the same token there are people who call themselves "Jews" who are also playing their part in its machinations. To call the conspiracy "Jewish" is ignorant.

Having read at length the work of Fritz Springmeier, Henry Makow and David Livingstone, it is clear that the Rothschilds are participators in Cabalism, Jewish Sabbatism, and or Frankism, all of which are involved in witchcraft. This belief is strengthened by the Rothschild’s use of the occultic Seal of Solomon as a family symbol. The city in which the Rothschilds originated, Frankfurt, was deeply `anti-Semitic,` and hostile to Jews*[7] See Note.

The first principle of the House of Rothschild was to amass wealth, and the liberation of the Jewish people from oppressive restrictions contributed indirectly to this end, since it would facilitate intercourse with the rest of the world, and thereby increase the possibility of financial gain, which in turn would serve to increase its power.

The `Father's of Israel.`

During the Rothschild's funded slaughter that was the Crimean War, the small Jewish community in Jerusalem found itself isolated from all outside support. This resulted in near starvation. The first Baron Edmond de Rothschild's father James, set up the James Mayer de Rothschild Hospital in Jerusalem in response to this problem. Edmond took over his father's interest in Palestine. When the Russian Jews fled the Czar’s pogroms in the 1880’s Edmond began to finance the Russian Jew’s attempts to establish colonies in Palestine, It is clear that he was an advocate of Zionism, his charities were not only aiding the persecuted, but were promoting the concept of a return the "homeland".

The man who set up the first Zionist Congress was Theodor Herzl. He attempted to get the support for his plans to "restore the Jewish state" from the Rothschilds but many members of the family were opposed to Zionism. Although Edmond supported Herzl’s cause, he felt that the plan should not be implemented to soon, and should rather be accomplished by stealth. He was further concerned that Herzl would annex for himself Rothschild power and influence over the slowly forming Jewish state.

The Baron continued to support his own colonies and though Herzl was socially supported because his ideas facilitated Rothschild power in Palestine, he was not allowed to implement his plans. The Baron was in affect a dictator who expected the colonists to obey him without question.

Following his death, Herzl was succeeded as President of World Zionism by David Wolffsohn and thereafter by Otto Warburg. In 1914 Edmond travelled to Palestine where he was hailed as the "prince returning to his people". Later the Baron Rothschild told Weizmann: "Without me Zionism would not have succeeded, but without Zionism my work would have been struck to death."

The next Rothschild to embrace Zionism was - Lionel Walter, the second Lord Rothschild. The Balfour declaration, which declared England’s support of the creation of a Jewish homeland, was addressed to Lord Rothschild II. Lord Rothschild also received the documents of support from the League of Nations. Charles T. Russell, founder of the Watchtower Society, sent a letter to Lord Rothschild praising his work towards the establishment of a Jewish homeland.

Among its other calculated aims, a further purpose of the Illuminati orchestrated First World War, was to cause the destruction of the Ottoman Empire, in order to free the land of Palestine from its grasp, thereby leading to the creation of the Zionist state of Israel. After Prime Minister of England, Lord Asquith, was deposed in 1916, because he had opposed Zionist interests, David Lloyd George, whose career was made as a lawyer for the World Zionist Organization, as well as Winston Churchill and Arthur Balfour of the Round Table, were placed in power.

Present at the first official meeting of the Political Committee were Lord Rothschild, James de Rothschild, the son of Edmund de Rothschild of Paris, former owner of Rothschild colonies in Palestine, and Sir Mark Sykes. There, the future mandates of Palestine, Armenia, Mesopotamia, and Arabia, then still forming parts of the Ottoman Empire, were discussed in detail.

The Hegelian Dialectic- A Rational For Genocide.

After the cessation of hostilities in 1918, Britain ruled Palestine, and the Rothschilds ruled Britain. Also, a bulk of unpaid debts to the Rothschilds by the failed Ottoman Empire gave the family even more control over Palestine. Then came Hitler. According to Walter Langer, a psychoanalyst who wrote the book `THE MIND OF ADOLF HITLER,` the demonic German leader was a grandson of a Rothschild. Adolf’s father, Alois Hitler, was the illegitimate son of Maria Anna Schicklgruber. It was generally supposed that the father of Alois Hitler was Johann Georg Hiedler. At that time she was employed as a servant in the home of Baron Rothschild. As soon as the family discovered her pregnancy she was sent back to her home ... where Alois was born."

It is believed that Hitler (who was a creation of the Luciferians) attacked Austria first, in order to destroy the Austrian records that proved his Jewish ancestry. As Hitler’s demonic onslaught on the Jews progressed, one would imagine that the Zionists would come to the rescue and offer Palestine as a safe haven. Not so. Many European countries shut their doors to the Jews, including the Palestine colonies.

The Zionist controlled immigration laws in Palestine were very strict and it was near impossible to escape to the Jewish homeland. In fact, the Zionists themselves refused to acknowledge what was happening to Jews in Europe. Hitler forced the Jews to wear the six-pointed star as a sign of shame. It was this same symbol that the Rothschilds were named after and the same symbol that the Zionists promoted as a symbol of Jewish national identity. Do you see the contradiction? Jewish author OJ. Graham wrote in `The Six Pointed Star:`

"Not all the concentration camp victims were Jewish people. Many were Christians. Spiritually, a parallel can be seen in the rituals to Ashteroth[9] and Moloch[10], where the victims were burned as sacrifices to these false gods. Were the victims of the Nazis someone’s sacrificial offerings?"

I believe they were! Remember the six-pointed star was the symbol of Moloch and Ashteroth.

Furthermore, those who deny the holocaust, deny a Problem Reaction Solution scenario on a Satanic scale. Anyone who carefully researches the` Modus Operandi` of the Illuminists will conclude that the slaughter of the Jews during that dire period in World History is completely in character with how they operate and makes perfect sense from a Luciferian point of view.

Cui Bono? Who benefits. They do: Israel, The UN, the slur of `Anti Semite` to quell opposition and promote Jewish victim status, etc. etc.

Few Jews unfortunately will tolerate any discussion on this subject. After World War II, the U.N., spurred on by the Illuminati created horrors against the Jews, granted Israel its statehood. Weizmann was the first president of Israel’s Knesset (which was built with Rothschild money). The occultic hexagram is on the Knesset, and is also displayed on the Jewish flag.

In his expose of the Rothschilds Dynasty, Fritz Springmeier wrote:

"...the six-pointed star [had] made its way from Egyptian pagan rituals of worship, to the goddess Ashteroth and Moloch, to King Solomon when he went into idolatry," says, Graham. "Then it progressed through the magic arts, witchcraft [including Arab magicians, Druids, witches and Satanists], astrology (in which It was no new thing), through the Cabala to Isaac Luria, a Cabalist, in the 16th century, to Mayer Amschel Bauer, who changed his name to this symbol, to Zionism, to the Knesset of the new State of Israel, to the flag of Israel and Its medical organization equivalent to the Red Cross."

So what is the ultimate goal of Zionism?

David Ben-Gurion, a Zionist leader, tells us:

"With the exception of the U.S.S.R. as a federated Eurasian state, all other continents will become united in a world alliance, at whose disposal will be an International police force. All armies will be abolished, and there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents."

Simply stated, Zionism (with Rothschild support) promotes a New World Order. The Rothschild control of Israel is immense. The Luciferian Rothschilds completely dominate Israel. They help Lucifer's Empire control the world’s resources, the world’s nations and the world’s religions. They are an institution in the conspiracy and if one looks carefully, the path of their destructive reign can be followed through the history of the past three centuries.

The Nexus Of Evil - The Road To Armageddon Or A One World Utopian Control Zone.

What follows is based on current trends as they unfold and on an understanding of the policy objectives of the Luciferian elite. This hypothesis is not unique to myself and is only one of several possible `doomsday` scenarios generally agreed upon by most if not all serious students of the New World Order.

A Nation's borders are ultimately defined by its military competence. All of the U.N. edicts and conventions are meaningless without the ability to enforce its will militarily upon recalcitrant nations. It is likely that the E.U. super-state will acquire its necessary army through incremental-ism, sometimes referred to as the `ratchet` system since there is no mechanism in place to repeal E.U. laws. The monumental geo-political restructuring needed however, to bring all nations under a world army will require something quite spectacular.

Think-tanks, university grants and bribes are not enough to bring about global government. The league of Nations and the United Nations were forged from the heat of the first and second world wars. Global government will be the fall-out from World War III. There is a three pronged strategy being played out, masquerading as the Global War on Terror. Firstly, America's super-power status will be destroyed.

This will partly be achieved in carrying out the second tactic which is to bring uncooperative nations, especially those in the Middle East, under U.N. control. America's military might will be exhausted by invading Third World nations and setting up U.N. protectorates. Thirdly, threatened or actual conflict between nuclear powers will persuade all nations to surrender their military power to the U.N. thereby permanently relinquishing their sovereignty.

This is why the West has given nuclear technology to North Korea and China. At this point, before hundreds of cities are annihilated, there will be an emergency U.N. conference. The agreement reached will be to surrender control over all weapons of mass destruction to a U.N. agency. The submission of all conventional armed forces to U.N command will follow. Eventually all military forces will be U.N. 'Peace Keeping' forces, whose purpose is to enforce the U.N. hegemony over rogue states.

If this sounds a little fantastic, consider this: NATO exercises for enforcing U.N. embargoes on breakaway states have already begun. The first exercise of NATO'S Response Force took place between 11th and 26th September 2003 in Galloway, Scotland. This was a 'crisis response' operation called 'Exercise Northern Lights' in which the mission was enforcing a U.N. arms embargo on a recently formed country.

A second exercise took place in Turkey on 20th November 2003. According to the NATO website, "the forces rescued and evacuated the U.N. staff and civilians, established an embargo, engaged in counter-terrorist operations and a show of force".

Like American and European politicians, the Russians and Chinese oligarchs are happy to play their part in this farce because they also dream of international governance. Former party bosses are happy to assume the new role of 'World Controllers' in the eastern regions of the Brave New World. The neo-Liberal/Conservative (Communitarian) government in the Whitehouse, like almost all previous administrations, is 100% committed to the globalist plan to destroy the independence of the U.S.. Once completed, the Donald Rumsfeld-initiated NATO Response Force will put the boot behind the imperial decrees the `Death Star` wishes to impose on rebel colonies.

The policy of weakening the U.S. military really began in earnest under Bush Sr. during the first Gulf War. 300,000 of the 700,000 troops deployed in that conflict are now seriously ill with Gulf War Illness. They are being denied cheap and effective medical care for no apparent reason.

Former Consultant to the Defence Department, Dr Garth Nicolson, estimates that at least 25,000 have died since the war ended. The others face permanent disability and destitution. Major Doug Rokke was the U.S. Army's depleted uranium project director in 1994-95 who has since campaigned tirelessly to expose the devastating health effects of DU munitions.

The report he has obtained from the U.S. Veterans Administration states that by August 2004, it had awarded permanent disability compensation to almost 280,000 U.S. troops who served in the Gulf region between August 1990 and May 2004. Meanwhile, the Veterans Administration refuses to acknowledge that there is a Gulf War Illness, preferring to diagnose post-traumatic stress disorder.

The cause of Gulf War Illness is multi-faceted, invariably linked to depleted uranium munitions, experimental vaccinations and exposure to chemical and biological weapons. All of these factors lead back to the Western military-industrial complex controlled by the elite, whose ultimate goal is to destroy America militarily and economically. The troops who served in the first Gulf War have almost all been cycled out of the military, so the poor new recruits currently serving in Iraq and Afghanistan know little or nothing of their appalling fate. The policy seems to be to give troops a limited operational lifespan, after which they are killed or incapacitated to make way for the next round of cannon fodder. Meanwhile hundreds of billions of dollars are being bled from U.S. taxpayers to finance this destruction. As George Orwell concluded in 1984:

“War is a way of shattering to pieces, or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking into the depths of the sea, materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable...”

Conclusion – A Righteous Alliance.

It has by now, been well enough documented, that the doom laden events occurring worldwide were planned long ago, and that the `blueprint` for global conquest outlined by Albert Pike appears well on course for realisation. In this series of articles, I have tried to show how through an alliance of intellect and money, the former inevitably in the service of the latter, the dark forces of Magic in the form of the Illuminati and their co conspirators, have captured all the positions of power throughout the nations of the world and are intent on driving humanity to the point of no return. But does it have to be that way?

The Hegelian Dialectic is literally killing us. It is the means by which we are manipulated to do their murder and their bidding. We are divided and conquered because of it. It is only by stepping out from their Dialectical Trap that we can hope to foil their plans, and finally rid the world of a malevolent force which has haunted mankind since the dawn of time.

As I have written in this article, for the Illuminati, the means to achieving their `ends` is a fomented clash between the West and Islam sometime in the the near future. That is the main theme of Samuel Huntington's thesis of the `Clash of Civilisations.` But the truth is that there should be no question of any such clash between Islam and Western civilisation, because the Judeo-Christian belief that forms the basis of Western civilisation, is in actuality in complete harmony and alliance with Islam, not in conflict with it. It is in the Luciferian Creed of the Illuminati one finds the conflict!

As people who believe in right over wrong, good over evil, and those who love God and follow His revelations, let us all rally to a common formula - `faith.` When all good people, be they Muslim, Christian or Jew, rally together in this way; when they understand that they are friends not enemies, when they see that the real enemy is the Luciferian Illuminati, then the world will become a very different place. The fighting that has raged for ages, enmities, fears - and the `false flag` terrorist attacks on innocent people- will then come to an end, and a new civilization based on love, respect and peace can be established upon this `common formula.`

However, achieving this goal depends on our identifying the methods used by our enemies to manipulate and control us; namely, the Hegelian formula, and thereafter the promoting of secularism, thereby bringing about a decline in religious morality and decency. Once we understand this, we can begin eradicating their ideological basis. The fact that the law of the strong, which is the Satanic model, prevails throughout the world, is wholly responsible for our fraught situation, for this attitude is as a virulent contagion, and engenders a social model based only upon self-interest.

Even more seriously, it has replaced acceptance, love, sympathy, compassion, and cooperation with conflict, greed, and dispute. This is not man's intrinsic nature, but the result of a perverse and intensive programmed way of thinking and being, which only serves the Luciferian cause, whilst at the same time aiding our own spiritual impoverishment and material enslavement.

In the present environment of hardship and troubles, sincere Jews, Christians, and Muslims must be even more accepting, conciliatory, complementary, and respectful of each other. They should not forget that unity, togetherness, and cooperation will bring success, and that dispute, argument, and conflict bring nothing but division and weakness, rendering our divided efforts ineffectual in the face of the menace which confronts us. The current situation demands the immediate formation of such an alliance.

The Illuminati know full well that at the root of all wars, conflicts, and all forms of corruption lies man's distancing himself from the true religious moral values, and this in itself explains why they have spent so much time, money and effort in defaming and de-constructing true belief.

Historically, the perverse interpretations of certain insincere individuals working on behalf of the malevolent force, allegedly in the name of a religion, have influenced the mass of people who had insufficient knowledge of the true religious ethic. And this has caused them to commit acts that were totally inappropriate in terms of said religious ethic. The solidarity of believers gains ever greater importance in the face of people who believe in the necessity of solving disagreements and problems by violent means, and those who routinely persecute people with oppressive and despotic implementations.

Every Christian, Muslim or Jewish believer, and all those who have understanding, are obliged to do his or her utmost to struggle and strive to end the `blight` on the lives of humanity caused by the Nexus Of Evil. It is right for those who believe in God, who try to gain His approval, who have surrendered to Him, whose hearts are bound to Him, who praise Him, and who essentially defend the same values, to act in partnership. Sincere believers should and must unite in order to live according to the moral values of their maker, and to unseat from his throne, the dark `Lord` of disaster and carnage, so that for the first time in all of history, men and women can live the lives meant for them by God, and not the lives perverted for them by Lucifer.

Comments to : true_brit58@hotmail.co.uk and http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/

Reference:

1] http://www.historiography-project.com/jhrchives/v13/v13n3p21_benson.html

2] http://www.terrorism-illuminati.com/node/35

3] http://www.rense.com/general86/pikeknew.htm

4] http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/2009/07/new-feudalists-eu-communitarian-agenda.html

5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Ledeen (See also Part 8 in this series)

6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zalmay_Khalilzad

7] http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_khazar.htm
*Note: The term Anti Semite implies one is anti Semitic. The vast majority of `Jews` (97%) today originate in Khazaria, not Palestine. In fact, the true Semites are to found in the Arab peoples of the Arabian Peninsula.

8] http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_rothschild16.htm
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/bloodlines/rothschild.htm

9] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astarte http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moloch

Essential Reading :

The Police State Roadmap by Michael Nield http://www.policestateplanning.com/id19.htm
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14464
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14779
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14672
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14538
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14870
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14642

The Nexus Of Evil : Part Nine (A Pre-emptive Strike On Humanity).

2009-09-14T14:25:00.006+02:00

By Philip Jones 28th August 2009.

Introduction.

For most of us, the events of September 11th 2001 may have changed the world as we knew it, but not the world that was! The Hidden Masters of that secret world which most know nothing about, took a quantum leap towards the attainment of their `Great Work Of Ages` that fateful Autumnal day, eight years ago. Ironically, and tragically, it took the loss of thousands of lives, the destruction of millions of dollars worth of property, and the sheer transparency of the official lie, to provide a shock sodden wake up call to humanity that not all was as it should be.

It is true that most of the global population sucked up the official story programmed into them by the Mass Media; but nonetheless, for many like myself, when those planes hit the twin towers, it was as if a `Stargate` to a different reality had appeared before me, shattering what illusions I had left, providing the impetus for me to once again use the investigative skills I had learnt as a Police Officer, in order to search for that most elusive element in the human experience; The Truth!

Following five years of reading and investigation, it was in 2007 that I began to write down my thoughts. I am neither academic nor intellectual, just a retired Cop, so the course I am now following is not an easy one. Yet the rewards of sharing one's findings with those who have understanding, and leading them on to researchers far more capable than myself, far outweigh the struggles and trials one faces in gathering such information and then setting it down coherently for others to read.

Here in this, the ninth part of what has become an extended series of articles, we will bring our story more or less up to date, and in the following conclusion, look forward to what likely scenario awaits us as we move ever closer to that seemingly inevitable `crisis` point, which will determine whether the intrinsic good that is in the heart of the mass of humanity, will arise at last, and release itself, from its tormentors, or whether a Third World War of catastrophic proportions will cull the mass of the people of the planet, and thrust humankind into the past darkly; inaugurating a brutal Global Fiefdom, with Lucifer as its Royal Lord, and the Illuminists its Aristocratic Regulators.

If we accept that a conflict, or `Clash Of Civilisations` between the West and Islam can be regarded as the key to unlock the Illuminati's Pandora's Box for the installation of a world government, then in this the penultimate `episode` in the series, it is to the Islamic world, its relations with the West, and the key conspirators involved, that we must again return to and focus our attention on.

So then, to the task at hand!

The New Machiavelli.

“World War Three is to be fomented by using the differences the agentur of the Illuminati stir up between Political Zionists and the Leaders of the Moslem world. The war is to be directed in such a manner that Islam and Political Zionism (including the State of Israel) will destroy themselves while at the same time the remaining nations, once more divided against each other on this issue, will be forced to fight themselves into a state of complete exhaustion physically, mentally, spiritually and economically.” Albert Pike[1].

Have you heard of Michael Ledeen? [2]As a non American, I admit that I had not prior to reading David Livingstone's book, Terrorism And The Illumniati [3]. I would hazard a guess that even those aware of who Ledeen is, have no idea of the man's extraordinary influence in US foreign affairs. I think it's time we get to know about a man whose whole portfolio is tainted with murder and blood, and whose influence is such, that innocent nations get invaded upon his recommendation.

In order to ensure success in Pike's proposed clash with the Muslim world, the Illuminati had intended all along, that following the 9/11 `False Flag` operation, the already planned invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq would accomplish far more than mere “regime change,” and the ruse introduction of so called democracy; rather, territorial and cultural conquest and occupation. Ledeen, one of the most most influential of the Neo Con spokesmen, has termed the US strategy in the Middle East and Central Asia as,“Total War.”

“No stages. This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq... this is entirely the wrong way to go about it. If we just let our vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don't try to piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war... our children will sing great songs about us years from now.”

Ledeen is a resident scholar at the right-wing “think-tank”, the American Enterprise Institute[5], where he works with the former chairman of the Defence Policy Board, Richard Perle[4]. He is also a contributing editor to the U.S. National Review and the Jewish World Review, and was a founding member of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, JINSA. In 2003, the Washington Post discovered that he was the only full-time international affairs analyst consulted by Karl Rove, George W. Bush's closest advisor. In other words, the man is mainline Illuminati.

Ledeen had been present in Italy in the late 1970s, when he acted in a consultative capacity for Italian military intelligence, and cultivated strong connections to right-wing factions, including the notorious P2 Masonic Lodge. P2 was responsible for Italy's `Strategy of Tension,` which was a campaign of false-flag terror operations, waged by the Gladio Brigades[6], under the patronage of the CIA and the Mafia. These were intended to discredit the increasingly popular Communist Party.

Early in 1978, Italian Prime Minister Aldo Moro was kidnapped and later assassinated by the so-called “Red brigades,” an apparently pro Soviet terrorist group. Evidence now exists that shows Moro’s murder was orchestrated by P2[7], and that both the “Red” and “Black” brigades were heavily penetrated by US intelligence, who are credited with “running” them. The `Strategy of Tension` campaign culminated in the Bologna train station bombing of 1980.

When P2 had come under increasing scrutiny in 1979, Masonic grandmaster Lucio Gelli had reportedly made his base of operations the Montecarlo Comite. Known members of the Montecarlo Comite are Gelli, Henry Kissinger, Alexander Haig, former Supreme Commander of NATO, and Michael Ledeen.

Ledeen then returned to Washington in 1981 as “anti-terrorism” advisor to Alexander Haig, the new secretary of state. During the following years, Ledeen used his position as consultant to Haig, the Pentagon and the National Security Council under Ronald Reagan, to propagate the idea of a global terrorist conspiracy based in the Kremlin, with the KGB supposedly pulling the strings of all of the world's key terrorist groups, particularly those in the Middle East.

He was also a major player in the Iran-Contra Affair. As a consultant of National Security Adviser Robert C. McFarlane, Ledeen vouched for Iranian intermediary Manucher Ghorbanifar, and met with Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres, and officials of the Israeli Foreign Ministry and the CIA to arrange meetings with high-ranking Iranian officials and the much-criticized weapons-for-hostages deal with Iran, that would become known as the Iran-Contra scandal [3].

Ledeen had, along with Arnaud de Borchgrave, in `The New Republic,` “exposed” some details of Billy Carter’s dealings with the Muammar Gaddafi regime in Libya, which de-legitimized his brother’s presidency. Ledeen seems to be again involved in the fabrication of evidence, this time in the instance of the forged documents “uncovered” by Italian intelligence. These depicted an attempt by Iraq's Saddam Hussein regime to purchase yellow-cake uranium from Niger, which formed the basis of President Bush’s support for the invasion of Iraq, and which subsequently unravelled into the “Plamegate” scandal.

Regarding regime change in Iraq, in 2002 Ledeen criticized the views of former National Security Adviser Brent Scowcroft, writing:

“He fears that if we attack Iraq we could have an explosion in the Middle East. It could turn the whole region into a cauldron and destroy the War on Terror. One can only hope that we turn the region into a cauldron, and faster, please. If ever there were a region that richly deserved being cauldronized, it is the Middle East today. If we wage the war effectively, we will bring down the terror regimes in Iraq, Iran, and Syria, and either bring down the Saudi monarchy or force it to abandon its global assembly line to indoctrinate young terrorists. That's our mission in the war against terror.”

Ledeen specifically called for the deposition of Saddam Hussein's regime by force in 2002:

“Okay, well if we are all so certain about the dire need to invade Iraq, then when do we do so? Yesterday!"

Ledeen's statements prior to the start of the Iraq war such as "desperately-needed and long overdue war against Saddam Hussein" and "dire need to invade Iraq" make his later statement to Glenn Greenwald that he "opposed the military invasion of Iraq before it took place" to be an "outright lie". However, Ledeen maintains these statements are consistent since: "I advocated — as I still do — support for political revolution in Iran as the logical and necessary first step in the war against the terror masters.”

In Ledeen's own words, on a leadership trait he admires, from his book Universal Fascism:

“In order to achieve the most noble accomplishments, the leader may have to 'enter into evil.' This is the chilling insight that has made Machiavelli so feared, admired and challenging... we are rotten.... It’s true that we can achieve greatness if, and only if, we are properly led.”

Ledeen stated, at a meeting of the American Enterprise Institute, involving Richard Perle, Newt Gingrich, Nathan Sharansky and James Woolsey:

"Regime change must be achieved by any means necessary in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and the Palestinian Authority.”

In his book, `Machiavelli on Modern Leadership: Why Machiavelli's Iron Rules Are as Timely and Important Today as Five Centuries Ago,` Michael Ledeen proclaimed, “Change – above all violent change – is the essence of human history.” Again we see how intrinsic the application of the Hegelian Dialectic [8] is to the Illuminati Agenda. Ultimately, Ledeen believes that violence in the service of the spread of what he feels is “freedom” around the world is merely a continuation of America’s revolutionary struggle. “Total war” says Ledeen, “not only destroys the enemy’s military forces, but also brings the enemy society to an extremely personal point of decision, so that they are willing to accept a reversal of the cultural trends. The sparing of civilian lives cannot be the total war’s first priority... The purpose of total war is to permanently force your will onto another people.”

An Arc Of Crisis - For Muslims.

Following the defeat of the Soviet Union in 1989, at the hands of the CIA backed Mujahideen in Afghanistan [9], and very much in line with what the PNAC would later propose in it's 2000 document, `Rebuilding America's Defences,` the US administration began to assume an ever more aggressive stance in its international policies. As we have seen above in Part Eight, (and dealt with below) in the wake of 9/11, the G.W Bush administration launched what could be interpreted as a NEO CON -Zionist Crusade against the nations of Afghanistan and then Iraq.

In Afghanistan, even though some eight years later, hostilities continue, a so-called victory was quickly declared over the Taliban’s Islamic Emirate, eliminating the rule of Shari’ah and replacing it with a puppet anti-Islamic government that showered the Afghani people with promises of a better life and freedom. In the absence of any rival superpower, the US, now assuming for itself the role of global policeman, all indications are that the PNAC conspirators in the US Government calculated that the so-called victory in Afghanistan would pave the way for unconditional and unopposed control over the Muslim world.

However, a few months following the invasion, it became evident the US had not even been able to secure the safety of its own soldiers in Afghanistan—let alone to take control of the country—proving the Taliban[10], having executed a tactical withdrawal of their troops from major cities to preserve their arms and fighters, remained undefeated. The only discernible achievement of the US led invasion has been the spread of poverty, crime, diseases, a degradation of security and an `explosion` in drug trafficking in those areas under the control of the Satanic alliance.

In addition, the sharp increase in day and night Mujahideen operations against the allied forces, forcing them to withdraw from many of their positions in the south, east and centre of the country, had inflicted continuous losses to the allied military forces. But despite all this, the US has on the contrary, vigorously pursued the murderous Neo Con Agenda of colonialism and conquest in Afghanistan, and at this juncture, there seems no end to its ambitions there.

Then, in 2003, ignoring world opinion and massive public opposition, American led, so called coalition forces, invaded Iraq on grounds which were nothing but lies, launching what was termed operation `Shock And Awe,` against a people who had already suffered terribly for almost a decade under US sponsored UN sanctions, and who were in no position to defend themselves.

As in Afghanistan, the US administration exercised similar inhumane and barbaric policies in their attempt to take control over Iraq, as is reflected in the random detention, on a massive scale of Iraqi men, women, the elderly and even children; along with the destruction and looting of their homes and properties under the pretext of ‘hunting down’ resistance fighters.

As a result, thousands of ordinary Iraqis with no part to play in the saga, other than trying to live their lives and survive, have been illegally detained and many killed whilst in detention. It is clear that the objective of such a hostile policy against innocent civilians has been to terrorize the Iraqi populace into subjection.

In order appreciate the strategy of the operations now being conducted against the Islamic world by the Illuninati Hidden Power, in the ostensible form of the Neo Con/Libs and Zionists, we will briefly examine in more detail the conflicts in both Afghanistan and Iraq.

Afghanistan : Slaughter For Oil Pipelines And Poppy Fields.

On September 11, 2001, as the twin towers of the World Trade Centre collapsed to the ground, and part of the Pentagon lay in rubble, all fingers almost immediately began pointing to the one man, whom the US, has, over the years brainwashed the American public to hate, fear and seek "protection" against. The U.S. has accused Osama bin Laden of being involved in many acts of terrorism, not providing any evidence to justify these accusations.

In Afghanistan, the Taliban Government followed suit and denounced the attacks. Wakeel Ahmed Mutawakel, the foreign minister of Afghanistan's ruling Taliban regime, told the Arab television network Al Jazeera, "We denounce this terrorist attack, whoever is behind it." [CNN - 09/12/01]. Afghanistan was one of the very first nations to express its condolences to the families of the victims of the horrific and atrocious act, which has no basis in Islam.

The U.S. Administration however, playing the wounded and indignant victim, stated adamantly, via the bought and paid for global media, that it was in no doubt that Osama bin Laden and his Al Qaeda network was the force behind the attacks, and almost immediately threatened Afghanistan with military measures for harbouring a "terrorist" and "terrorist camps."

The US quickly managed, mostly but not exclusively via coercion, to get some forty other nations `on board, in their 'coalition against `terror.` The Taliban asked the U.S. not to attack their already war-ravaged country, which even at that time continued to feel the effects of sanctions and an ever present famine. They also repeatedly asked the U.S. to provide them with evidence for their accusations that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the attacks on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon, making it clear that they would try him in court, but no evidence was given by the U.S., either to the world, or to the Taliban.

The Taliban ambassador to Pakistan, Abdul Salam Zaeef said in a press conference on Friday September 21 that, "It has angered Muslims of the world and can plunge the whole region into a crisis. We are ready to cooperate if we are shown evidence. If American agencies are bent on putting the blame on bin Laden, then they won't be able to catch the real culprits."

In an attempt to win popular support and pacify world public opinion, the US claimed to have provided its allies with irrefutable evidence that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the attacks. However, when British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, subsequently made this 'evidence' public, numerous political analysts and journalists rejected it as being flimsy and weak.

Taliban leader Mullah Mohammad Omar said, "It is unacceptable that America issues ultimatums to the Islamic world either to listen to America's message or accept destruction." Holding Osama bin Laden responsible for the strikes in New York and Washington is an excuse, he said. "Afghanistan does not have resources, nor is Osama that powerful, nor does he have contacts with the outside world to carry out or plan such attacks. We also do not give him permission to use Afghan territory against any other country." Osama bin Laden has also explicitly denied having any involvement in the attacks on the U.S.

Whilst the Taliban made repeated efforts to prevent another devastating war, by asking America to provide evidence of it's accusations against Osama bin Laden, Mullah Omar also made it clear that if the U.S. still chose to fight unnecessarily, the Taliban would retaliate. "Let America be assured that war in Afghanistan is not a picnic," he said, explaining that Afghanistan had never tried to create problems with America. "We have held talks in the present and the past with U.S. governments several times, and we are ready for more talks. If they choose otherwise, they are looking for an endless war that will burn America and America only. When America doesn't choose a peaceful way out of this and chooses war and confrontation, she only is responsible for the consequences."

Undeterred by the calls for justice, the U.S. together with its biggest ally, the UK, began its preparations for war, placing military forces on standby alert.

Was The "Evidence" Against Osama Bin Laden Justification For War?

If the case against Osama Bin Laden was weak, and it really was, then we have to ask ourselves "why did the US and the coalition attack Afghanistan in the first place and why are they still there?”

The UK's Independent newspaper on 7th October 2001, published an article of a UK Government document report intended to vindicate its case against Bin Laden, as being entirely without substance.

The report was initially heralded as being evidence of Osama bin Laden's guilt, but instead, close analysis of the 21-page document put out by the Government revealed a report of conjecture, supposition and unsubstantiated assertions of fact. It used every trick in the Whitehall drafter's arsenal to make the reader believe they were reading something they were not: a damning indictment of Mr. bin Laden for the events of 11th September.

Tony Blair and his officials were it was said delighted with the reaction to publication of the dossier. British Ministers believe the document has sealed the propaganda war, convincing the country of the need to move against Mr. bin Laden and al-Qa'ida and to accept limited British and civilian casualties.

The report was put together by a committee which included senior members of MI5 and MI6, working round the clock, with drafts going backwards and forwards to Washington. Within Whitehall, the dossier was seen as vital to gaining the approval of a naturally cautious and sceptical British public. As a paper produced by mandarins anxious to brook no argument it is a classic of its kind, straight from the script of Yes Minister: short on checkable detail; long on bold assertion; highly selective with the choice of facts.

UK Officials when they prepare such reports operate to a set of principles. They know that unlike the US, and thanks to their efforts in suppressing freedom of information down the years, Britain is a secret society. The British are not accustomed to having anything presented to us about intelligence matters and threats to national security. That, plus the British characteristic of not defying authority, especially in times of crisis, means that if the Government says loudly enough that something is "evidence", even if it is not, it will be accepted as such.

In the introduction, not the conclusion, the document stated: "The clear conclusions reached by the government are: Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda, the terrorist network which he heads, planned and carried out the atrocities on 11 September 2001." Introductions, as the authors knew too well, normally set up a document, relating the background as to why the book or, in this instance, a government document, has been written. Here, that convention was rejected: from the word go, the Government wanted to ensure the point of the document was conveyed.

The document's complete lack of substantive evidence proving that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the attacks on 9/11, in addition to all other official grounds given by the US Government renders the war in Afghanistan illegal. Many people go on about the US obtaining UN mandates for this action but the only type they obtained were mandates which legitimise this action in principal, what that means is that the UN mandates only say (in lay terms) that a nation is justified in retaliation against another nations unprovoked attack, what is not mentioned is that absolutely no mandate was obtained to bomb Afghanistan on the basis of weak evidence.

Leaving that aside, lets' discuss the above points in the two previous sections. Did the US have something to hide in not presenting the "evidence" to the Taliban and a World Court? Well of course it did! If Osama was guilty then why did they not simply present the `evidence` to the Taliban instead of belligerently demanding that the Taliban hand him over, with no conditions even though the US provided absolutely zero evidence that bin Laden was guilty? Certainly it would seem that the Taliban were justified in not handing over Osama Bin Laden, just because a foreign country demands his extradition, without presenting substantive `evidence!` This swiftly moves us to conclude that the evidence was insufficient to convict Osama Bin Laden! The conclusion of the article itself is summarised quite neatly in this one sentence:

"...close analysis of the 21-page document put out by the Government on Thursday reveals a report of conjecture, supposition and unsubstantiated assertions of fact. It uses every trick in the Whitehall drafter's arsenal to make the reader believe they are reading something they are not: a damning indictment of Mr. bin Laden for the events of 11 September."

Again we must ask ourselves, if the "evidence" was not sufficient to convict bin Laden in a court of law (as the above article says) then why was the war launched in the first place and why are they still bombing Afghanistan? We would do well to remember that the USA stated that they it was bombing Afghanistan specifically to make the Taliban hand over Bin Laden.

Another shoddy tactic used by the Western leaders to further demonise Osama Bin Laden in order to rally public support, was the disappearing "video" in which Osama Bin Laden apparently "confesses" that he was in fact the mastermind behind 9/11. Needless to say, the video which was scheduled to be screened to the world failed to appear, and all we were left with as `proof` was the dubious word of Prime Minister Tony Blair and an unsubstantiated transcript of the video. But consider this; if they managed to make a transcript of Osama's `confession` , why then were they unable to produce the video for the world to see?

Think about it, if they claim to have seen this video why did they not show it to us? Since they had a transcript it is only logical that they had the tape, so where was this tape? At this point I would like to offer two good links which feature many good articles and links about this ongoing saga, What really happened? and September the 11th, they provide good articles and links from highly credible sources.

To shed further doubt on the official reason for the invasion of Afghanistan, here is a short transcript from a BBC article which says that Bin Laden never claimed to have any nuclear weapons or weapons of mass destruction in the Urdu translation of the interview he had with the editor of the Pakistani newspaper, Dawn, and that it was only in the English translation that he claimed to have these weapons. The full article can be found here.[11]

Pakistani journalist Hamid Mir, the editor of the Urdu-language newspaper Ausaf, conducted the interview with Bin Laden, who is widely held responsible for the suicide attacks on the United States two months ago. Dawn's English version quotes Bin Laden as saying:

"If America used chemical and nuclear weapons against us, then we may retort with chemical and nuclear weapons. We have the weapons as a deterrent."

Mr Mir then asks Bin Laden where he got the weapons, which the al-Qaeda leader declines to answer.

But in the Urdu version of the article, Bin Laden does not threaten to use nuclear or chemical weapons.

"The US is using chemical weapons against us and it has also decided to use nuclear weapons. But our war will continue," he says, according to the BBC's own translation of the Ausaf article.

"The two versions are otherwise very similar," says the BBC Monitoring unit.

Truly an insight into the workings of the media whores the world over! This clearly shows that an intended and purposeful propaganda campaign to demonise Osama bin Laden in particular and Islam in general in the eyes of the West, in an effort to gain support for the illegal war against the people of Afghanistan.

"I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle."- Osama Bin Laden. This is what he declared in an interview with the Pakistani newspaper, `The Ummat.`

Since the "evidence" against Osama Bin Laden is non-existent in legal terms, why then is the US led coalition still occupying Afghanistan and condoning what can only be described as `Neo Colonialism` and massive scale terrorism?

Perhaps the same rational, logic and action should have been applied to Israel when they they refused to hand over Ariel Sharon, who was being investigated for major war-crimes (this is exactly the same situation as with Bin Laden, who has never been convicted, and yet the US demanded his extradition) yet we saw no great military coalition being formed against Israel, let alone a bombing campaign! Again, it must be emphasised that the Taliban were never provided with any evidence to prove Osama's guilt, so could hardly be expected to hand over a man to another country on the basis of mere suspicion?

The Neo-Con Zionist Axis Turned America Into A Terrorist Nation.

This is in flagrant violation of UN rules, but as we all know by now, the USA government, or rather those pulling its strings do not consider themselves to be subject to the multitude of laws and regulations used to bind the rest of us, while at the same time, hypocritically condemning other nations for not following UN rules.

This link [12]to a speech by Noam Chomsky explains how the US, even though in not so may words, declared a terrorist state by an International court of human rights, has refused to accept any responsibility for it's covert operations (terrorism) in Nicaragua or to submit to due process for it's policy which led to the deaths of thousands of people in that land.

Of interest is the The America service members protection Act 2001[13] which effectively prevents it's VIP's, politicians and it's military from being held to account and or prosecuted for war crimes. One must ask, if a nation goes to these lengths to `immunise` itself from the possibility of being prosecuted for war-crimes which are known about; is it committing wartime atrocities which are hidden from public knowledge?

I think it safe to say that the latter option is in the affirmative. In fact, the Project Monarch and MK-Ultra Mind Control Programmes attest to this fact. But I digress.

Terrorism Is Subjective..

So, former President Bush's `just war?` turns out to be anything but. Clearly many other states harbour supposed terrorists, so why are they specifically bombing Afghanistan (and now Yemen, Iraq, Somalia, etc.)? America did not even accede to the Taliban's simple request, that it hand over evidence of Osama's guilt to have him extradited. Of course, they never had a case against him in the first place, and were merely attempting to justify the implementation of `Phase One` in the build-up to the Clash Of Civilisations.

As an added bonus, most certainly the American defence industry has reaped huge benefits from the war, and as Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote in his book, `The Grand Chessboard,` the domination of Central Asia and its plentiful supply of mineral deposits, would be the primary strategic objective in the 21st Century.

The Devastation Of An Innocent People.

http://www.cursor.org/stories/civilian_deaths.htm

What causes the documented high level of civilian casualties -- 3,767 civilian deaths in eight and a half weeks -- in the U.S. air war upon Afghanistan? The explanation is the apparent willingness of U.S. military strategists to fire missiles into and drop bombs upon, heavily populated areas of Afghanistan. A legacy of the ten years of civil war during the 80s is that many military garrisons and facilities are located in urban areas where the Soviet-backed government had placed them since they could be better protected there from attacks by the rural Mujahideen. Successor Afghan governments inherited these emplacements.

To suggest that the Taliban used 'human shields' is more revealing of the historical amnesia and racism of those making such claims, than of Taliban deeds. Anti-aircraft emplacements will naturally be placed close to ministries, garrisons, communications facilities, etc.. A heavy bombing onslaught must necessarily result in substantial numbers of civilian casualties simply by virtue of proximity to 'military targets', a reality exacerbated by the admitted occasional poor targeting, human error, equipment malfunction, and the irresponsible use of out-dated Soviet maps. But, the critical element remains the very low value put upon Afghan civilian lives by U.S. military planners and the political elite, as clearly revealed by U.S. willingness to bomb heavily populated regions.

“Current Afghan civilian lives must and will be sacrificed in order to [possibly] protect future American lives.”

Actions speak, and words [can] obscure: the hollow pretence of pious pronouncements made by Rumsfeld, Rice and the compliant corporate media about the great care taken to minimize collateral damage is plain for all to see. Other U.S. bombing targets struck are impossible to 'explain' in terms other than the U.S. seeking to inflict maximum pain upon Afghan society and its perceived 'enemies': the targeted bombing of the Kajakai dam power station, the Kabul telephone exchange, the Al Jazeera Kabul office, trucks and buses filled with fleeing refugees, and the numerous attacks upon civilian trucks carrying fuel oil. Indeed, the bombing of Afghan civilian infrastructure parallels that of the Afghan civilian.

These Are people We Are Killing!

Mohammed Raza, an `odd-job man`, was not so lucky. At 8 pm. as he was walking home, near to the Jalalabad airport. A cruise missile targeted at a Taliban facility `a few hundred yards away,` strayed and landed next to him. Shrapnel pierced his neck, grazing his spine, paralysing him.

Three days later, a researcher at the Institute for Health & Social Justice, Partners in Health of Harvard University, H.J. Chien, confirmed that civilians had been killed in Jalalabad and elsewhere. On October 9th, the Pakistan Observer [Islamabad] daily newspaper reported on the first night, "37 Killed, 81 Injured in Sunday's Strikes." The casualties spanned four provinces : Kabul - 20, heart -9, Kandahar -4 and Jalalabad -4.

By October 10th, The Guardian reported 76 dead civilians. And by October 15th, the leading Indian daily, The Times of India was mentioning over 300 civilian casualties and that the US-UK bombing action was in violation of Article 51 of the United Nations Charter allowing the use of force in self-defence. On the following day [October 16th], the alternative U.S. media noted that during the first week of bombing, 400 Afghan civilians had been slaughtered.

Yet, the mainstream western press only took note of civilian those casualties on October 9th when a cruise missile destroyed the building of the United Nations land mine removing contracting firm, the Afghan Technical Centre, in the upper class Macroyan residential district of eastern Kabul, killing four night watchmen. Tellingly, the day before, October 8th, twenty other Afghans living near the Kabul airport (in the Qasabah Khana neighborhood) and near the Kabul radio station were also killed. On October 10th, the Sultanpur Mosque in Jalalabad was hit by a bomb during prayers, killing 17 people. As neighbours rushed into the rubble to pull out one injured, a second bomb was dropped reportedly killing at least another 120 people (though I have not included this figure in my tally).

Fleeing the intense bombing in Kandahar, Mehmood, a Kandahar merchant, brought his family to his ancestral village of Chowkar-Karez, a village 25 miles north of Kandahar. His extended family, crowded into six cars, arrived at a village just about when it was attacked by U.S. war-planes during the night of October 22/23rd. Ironically, the cars arriving in the night may have prompted the raid -- as the Pentagon labels such movements after dark as `a target of opportunity.` Said Mehmood, "I brought my family here for safety, and now there are 19 dead, including my wife, my brother, sister, sister-in-law, nieces, nephews, my uncle. What am I supposed to do now?"

One is tempted to naively ask, “Why is the media covering up these events and giving a false image of low civilian casualties? " But those who understand the Illuminati Agenda, and the personages involved know full well why. The Western media is owned by the same people waging war against the innocents. It plays a major role in the shaping (programming) of public opinion in the West (and around the globe), and if it were shown that there is a high casualty rate in Afghanistan there would be protests hampering the American/NATO military effort in Afghanistan. It should therefore seem logical to even the most uninformed citizen that the media is aiding the American government in its destructive and murderous campaign in Afghanistan. This is not only dishonest but it facilitates the deaths of innocents by way of hiding from the people the knowledge that this killing is happening.

See http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/2009/09/afghani-killing-fields.html for further evidence of Nato War Crimes.

Iraq: Return To Babylon.

It can reasonably said that the Illuminati conspiracy began long long ago in a town called Babylon whose ancient ruins lie just 50 miles south of today's Baghdad. In his book Terrorism And The Illuminati, David Livingstone explains thus:

“The plot for a series of World Wars in the twentieth century, culminating in a third against the Muslim world, was devised in the eighteenth century, by American Civil War general, Albert Pike, then Grand Master of Scottish Rite Freemasonry, a primary adjunct of the Illuminati. However, though the final stages of this plot have been largely reserved for our time, the conspiracy is affiliated with a lore of occult knowledge that dates back to at least the sixth century BC. This lore begins with a heresy, known as Kabbalah, which disguises itself as Jewish, but is a pact to seek world domination, and the eradication of religion in favour of the worship of Lucifer.”

In the sixth century BC, the Assyrians finally succeeded in the sacking Jerusalem, and taking the remaining Jewish population into captivity, this time to the city of Babylon, near what is now Baghdad in Iraq. The tragedy was of enormous psychological consequence for Jewish people. The presence of the Jewish people in the Holy Land was regarded by many as a core tenet of their faith. According to the Bible, God had ratified a covenant between Himself and Abraham, to grant the land of Palestine to his descendants. This promise, however, was contingent on the Jewish people adhering to the Commandments of the Law. Ultimately, their Exile was a punishment fulfilled for their repeated transgressions and occult leanings.

Nevertheless, there were some among the Jewish exiles, who chose not to regard their captivity as a punishment, but as a temporary trial. Instead, they interpreted their status as God’s “Chosen” as a permanent relationship, and that the Promise to inhabit the land of Zion, or Palestine, was binding forever. Thus, this new Zionist interpretation was closely intertwined with the mystical directions of the Kabbalah. Therefore, this new Zionist interpretation was a bastardization of the real intent of the Jewish faith, and, as we shall see, was not an integral part of it, but was, through the centuries, increasingly imposed upon the rest of the Jewish community, by a minority committed to this diabolical scheme.

In Babylon, these heretical Jews, who refused to purge their religion of pagan influences, instead added to them the adopted practices of Babylonian magic. However, knowing that magic was forbidden in Judaism, they rejected the God of Israel, choosing instead to honour Lucifer, who they identified with the traditional enemy of the Hebrew faith, Baal. In order not to reveal their apostasy, they disguised their hidden faith as an “interpretation” of the religion, a cult now known as the Kabbalah.

Again, David Livingstone explains:

This development is carefully described in the Koran, which explains that, though it was claimed the Kabbalah was derived originally from King Solomon, it was demons who taught such things, teaching them that which had been revealed to the angels Harut and Marut in Babylon. According to the Koran, chapter 2: 101-102:

“When a messenger was sent to them (the Jews) by God confirming the revelations they had already received some of them turned their backs (to God’s message) as if they had no knowledge of it. They followed what the demons attributed to the reign of Solomon. But Solomon did not blaspheme, it was the demons who blasphemed, teaching men magic and such things as were revealed at Babylon to the angels Harut and Marut. But neither of these taught anyone (such things) without saying; “we are a trial, so do not blaspheme.” They learned from them the means to sow discord between man and wife. But they could not harm anyone except by God’ s permission. And they learned what harmed them, not what benefited them. And they knew that the purchasers of (magic) would have no share in the happiness of the hereafter. And vile was the price for which they sold their souls, if they but knew.”

Borrowing from Jewish themes, therefore, these Kabbalists would seek world domination by arguing that they were preparing the world for the coming of the Messiah, and merely aiding God in bringing about His promise to institute them as rulers of the world. Having rejected the Jewish faith, however, they did not await the real Messiah, but would seek to establish their own ruler, who they would falsely claim as messiah, who would aid them in implementing the global acceptance of their occult creed.

According to their Kabbalistic interpretation of the Bible, their `Messiah` is to be of line of King David, and since that time, and in order to preserve this purported lineage, until the advent of their expected leader, these Luciferians have been carefully intermarrying amongst each other, and have included among them many of the leading figures of history. They begin with a Persian Royal family, who intermarried with that of Alexander the Great. By combining with that of Herod the Great, these families were responsible for the creation and dissemination of the leading mystery school of the Roman Empire, the Mysteries of Mithras, which eventually succeeded in co-opting the emerging Christian movement, by producing Catholic Christianity.

Nevertheless, a secret, or Gnostic, version of Christianity, also derived from Mithraism, survived to compete with Catholicism, in the form of several secret societies, like the Templars, Rosicrucians and Freemasons, practising occult arts, or what is known as `witchcraft.` This tradition, was perpetuated by the most popularized branch of the Luciferian bloodline, the Merovingians. Symbolized by the Holy Grail, the Merovingians, after intermarrying into the family of a Jewish Exilarch, or claimant to the Jewish throne, culminated in all the leading families of the Crusades.

It was at this time that this European branch of the family recombined with others from Eastern Europe and Armenia. These Eastern aristocracies derived from the enigmatic Khazars, who had populated southern Russia and the Basin of the Don River, and who, in the eighth century AD, had converted to Judaism. Legend has it, however, that the Khazars were remnants of the Lost Tribes. Armenia, just across the Caucasus, was another locale of these supposed Lost Tribes. It was the intermarriage and perpetuation of these aristocratic bloodlines that were being referred to in the heraldic symbols of the lily, the rose, the double-headed eagle, and the skull and crossbones.

Also during the Crusades, this network connected with an important occult center hiding within the Islamic world, in Cairo Egypt, who followed the heretical version of Islam known as Ismailism. According to Masonic legend, a number of these “Eastern Brethren” were rescued and brought to Scotland, where they provided the basis of Sottish Rite Freemasonry, which only emerged in the eighteenth century. However, at the same time, this legend also provided the basis for the establishment of Freemasonry in Egypt, which then became the second centre of Illuminati activism. It was from these secret networks of impostors by which the Western powers created Islamic terrorism, used to foment of a Clash of Civilizations, through the fabrication of the terrorist threat.

Operation Iraqi Freedom.

The 2003 invasion of Iraq was officially, and now in hindsight, grotesquely dubbed, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and has been followed by an interminable U.S. Occupation of that sad country. As a propaganda tool of its political perpetrators, this spurious action, having first been promoted as a "War to liberate Iraq" has now become in effect a "War in Iraq."

"The invasion of Iraq was a bandit act, an act of blatant state terrorism, demonstrating absolute contempt for the concept of international law. The invasion was an arbitrary military action inspired by a series of lies upon lies and gross manipulation of the media and therefore of the public; an act intended to consolidate American military and economic control of the Middle East masquerading - as a last resort - all other justifications having failed to justify themselves - as liberation. A formidable assertion of military force responsible for the death and mutilation of thousands and thousands of innocent people. We have brought torture, cluster bombs, depleted uranium, innumerable acts of random murder, misery, degradation and death to the Iraqi people and call it 'bringing freedom and democracy to the Middle East”-- Nobel Laureate Harold Pinter.

The US led seven-year war of aggression and subsequent occupation of Iraq has at its core a Luciferian purpose, is driven by political `Neo Con/Lib Zionism,` and is economically supported by a variety of very powerful imperial interests. However these interests do not in themselves explain the depth and scope of the sustained, massive and continuing destruction of an entire society and its reduction to a permanent state of war.

We will now examine the main orchestrator's, manipulators and strategic reasoning behind the invasion of Iraq and as is ever pertinent in such events, ask that perennial question, “Cui Bono,” or who benefits. It must be understood by the reader that although major players in the `Geo Political` drama of current world events, these are not the `Capstone Elite` of the Illuminati. Nonetheless, they wield significant and malevolent influence within the halls of power.

The Zionist Power Configuration (ZPC), which features such prominent hard-line supporters of the State of Israel as Douglas Feith and Paul Wolfowitz, Irving (Scooter) Libby, Stuart Levey, Elliot Abrams, together with a cohort of consultants such as Presidential speech writer David Frum, and secondary officials and policy advisers to the State Department. These committed Zionist `insiders' were further supported by numerous `Israel-First` functionaries in the fifty one primary American Jewish associations, which form the PMAJO (President of the Major American Jewish Organizations).

It is their publicly affirmed goal to advance Israel's agenda, and using its substantial influence, strongly advocated the case for an American led war against Iraq in order to overthrow Saddam Hussein, occupy the country, physically divide Iraq, destroy its military and industrial capability and impose a pro-Israel/pro-US puppet regime. Their proposed plan intended that Iraq be ethnically cleansed and then divided along religious and tribal lines, as was advocated by the ultra-right, Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu and the `Liberal' President Emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations and militarist-Zionist, Leslie Gelb.

Influential and powerful criminals like Donald Rumsfeld and Vice President Dick Cheney whose aim was to extend US imperial reach in the Persian Gulf and strengthen its geo-political position by eliminating a strong, secular, nationalist backer of Arab anti-imperialist insurgency in the Middle East in the shape of Saddam Husein. These militarists sought to a) further project the US military s encirclement of Russia and b) secure complete control over Iraqi oil reserves thereby exerting economic and strategic pressure on China. A far reaching element in all of this was Vice President Cheney's past ties with the oil industry and current (at that time) his role as CEO of Halliburton's giant military base contractor subsidiary Kellogg-Brown and Root, which was consolidating the US Empire through worldwide military base expansion. US oil companies, in fear of losing ground to their European and Asian competitors, were anxious and eager that Saddam Hussein be dealt with.

The `Neo Imperialist` strategy of conquest and occupation was designed to establish a long-term colonial military presence in the form of strategic military bases with a significant and sustained contingent of colonial military advisor's and combat units. The brutal colonial occupation of an independent secular state with a strong nationalist history and an advanced infrastructure with a sophisticated military and police apparatus, extensive public services and wide-spread literacy naturally led to the growth of a wide array of militant and armed anti-occupation movements.

In order to offset the threat of a major collective insurgency by Iraqi's, US colonial officials, the CIA and the Defence Intelligence Agencies utilised the well proven `divide and rule' strategy (the so-called `El Salvador solution' associated with the former `hot-spot' Ambassador and US Director of National Intelligence, John Negroponte) fomenting armed sectarian-based conflicts and promoting inter-religious strife in order to debilitate any effort at a united nationalist anti-imperialist movement. The subsequent deconstruction of the secular civilian bureaucracy and the Iraqi armed forces which remained was designed by the Zionists in the Bush Administration to strengthen Israel's power in the region and to promote the rise of those militant Islamic groups, which had been previously suppressed by Saddam.

Israel was a past master of this strategy, having sponsored and financed sectarian Islamic militant groups, like Hamas, as an alternative to the secular Palestine Liberation Organization, thereby setting the stage for sectarian fighting among the Palestinians.

The results of these cynical policies were disastrous for the Iraqi people as the occupation `gangsters` used US taxpayers money to fund and exacerbate a plethora of internal conflicts as mullahs, tribal leaders, political gangsters, warlords, expatriates and death squads proliferated. Iraq pool of armed, unemployed young men formed the nucleus of a a new mercenary army. The engineered `civil war' and `ethnic conflict' provided spurious justification for the occupying forces and their Iraqi puppets to render redundant huge numbers of experienced soldiers, police and civil servants from the previous regime (especially if they were from Sunni, mixed or secular families) and to undermine entirely the very basis for civilian employment.

Using the pretexts of a generalized `war against terror,' US Special Forces and CIA-directed death squads proceeded to spread terror throughout Iraqi civil society, targeting those they suspected of daring to criticise the puppet government. This tactic has decimated the Iraqi educated and professional classes, who were purposely identified as being subversives. Precisely the Iraqis most capable of re-constructing an independent secular republic.

A primary engine behind the second Iraq war was an influential group of neo-conservative and neo-liberal ideologues with strong ties to Israel. They regarded (what for them), was success in the Iraq campaign as the first `domino' to fall, in a series of wars to `re-colonize' and redraw the map of the Middle East . They disguised their imperialist ideology with a paper thin veneer of rhetoric about spreading democracy in the Middle East (notwithstanding of course, the undemocratic policies of their beloved Israel over its subjugated Palestinian populace). In merging together Israeli regional ambitions and US imperial interests, the neo-conservatives and their neo-liberal fellow travellers in the Democratic Party have supported the two Illuminati chosen Puppet Presidents, Bush and Obama in their escalation of the wars against Afghanistan and Pakistan. They to a man supported Israel's recklessly savage bombing campaign against Lebanon, the land and air assault and massacre of thousands of civilians trapped in Gaza, the bombing of Syrian facilities and are vocally behind Israeli lobby pushing for a pre-emptive, full-scale military attack against Iran.

The advocates of the PNAC's strategy for multiple simultaneous wars in the Middle East and Central Asia regarded the securing of total control over Iraq as a necessary prerequisite prior to unleashing the full force of the awesome destructive power available to them. As a means of consolidating this control, and by way of silencing Iraqi civilian dissidents, they have funded both Shia clerics and Sunni tribal assassins, and contracted countless private mercenaries among the Kurdish Peshmerga warlords to carry out selective assassinations of leaders of civil society movements.

The colonial administration has created and trained a 200,000 member Iraqi colonial puppet army composed almost entirely of Shia gunmen, and excluded experienced Iraqi military men from secular, Sunni or Christian backgrounds. A barely reported aside of this build up of American trained and financed death squads and its puppet `Iraqi' army, was the virtual destruction of the ancient Iraqi Christian population, which was displaced, its churches bombed and its leaders, bishops and intellectuals, academics and scientists assassinated or driven into exile. Being well aware that Iraqi Christians had played a key role the historic development of the secular, nationalist, anti-British/anti-monarchist movements, their elimination as a force of influence was no coincidence. With their puppets in power, Iraq would serve as a launching platform for its strategic pursuit of the other `dominoes' (Syria, Iran, Central Asian Republics).

Since the US led coalition invaded in March 2003, over 1.3 million Iraqi civilians have died as a result of hostilities. To date, the invasion and occupation has cost the US treasury over $666 billion. This massive expenditure is evidence in itself of its centrality in the larger strategy for the entire Middle East/South and Central Asia region.

Back To The Stone Age?

Prior to the onslaught in 2003, Iraq had the most advanced scientific-cultural order in the Arab world, despite the repressive nature of Saddam Hussein's police state. There was a system of national health care, universal public education and generous welfare services. The separation of church and state and the protection of religious minorities (Christians, Assyrians and others) which existed prior to the invasion appears in sharp contrast to what has resulted from the US occupation and its destruction of the Iraqi civil and governmental structures. The oft propagated severely dictatorial rule of Saddam Hussein somehow then managed to preside over a highly developed modern civilization in which advanced scientific work went hand in hand with a strong nationalist and anti-imperialist identity. In turn, this resulted especially in the Iraqi people's solidarity for the plight of the Palestinian people under Israeli rule and occupation.

The architects of the invasion understood that it would take more than `regime change' to extirpate what was a deeply embedded and advanced secular republican culture in Iraqi conciousness. The American war planners and their Israeli advisers knew well prolonged occupation would increase Iraqi nationalism and provide a focal point for resistance. The secular nation would have to be destroyed.. Retrogression became the principal instrument for the US to impose its colonial puppets, with their primitive, `pre-national' loyalties, in power in a culturally purged Baghdad stripped of its most sophisticated and nationalistic social strata.

The Al-Ahram Studies Center in Cairo, maintains that more than 310 Iraqi scientists were eliminated during the first 18 months of the US occupation a figure that the Iraqi education ministry does not dispute. Another report listed the killings of more than 340 intellectuals and scientists between 2005 and 2007. Bombings of institutes of higher education had pushed enrollment down to 30% of the pre-invasion figures. In one bombing in January 2007, at Baghdad's Mustansiriya University 70 students were killed with hundreds wounded.

Assassination As Political Terrorism.

Baghdad was once known as the `Paris' of the Arab world, in terms of culture and art, science and education. In the 1970's and 80's, its universities were the envy of the Arab world. The US `shock and awe' campaign that rained down on Baghdad in 2003 evoked emotions akin to an aerial bombardment of the Louvre, the Sorbonne and the greatest libraries of Europe.

The use of assassination is an extreme form of terrorism, which has causes a ripple effect throughout the community. Statistics reveal that for every Iraqi intellectual assassinated, thousands of educated Iraqis left the country or abandoned their work for safer, less vulnerable activity. Up to and including November 2008, eighty-three academics and researchers teaching at Baghdad University had been murdered and several thousand of their colleagues, students and family members fled for their lives.

Bloody purges of academics have also occurred in all of Iraq's, including those in the provinces:

127 senior academics and scientists were assassinated at the various well-regarded universities in Mosul, Kirkuk, Basra and elsewhere. The provincial universities with the highest number of murdered senior faculty members were in cities where the US and British military and their Kurdish mercenary allies were most active: Basra (35), Mosul (35), Diyala (15) and Al-Anbar (11)

It was the Iraqi military and its allied death squads which carried out most of the killing of academics in the cities under US or `allied' control. The methodical assassination of academics was a nation-wide campaign to destroy the cultural and educational foundations of a modern Arab civilization. The death squads carrying out most of these assassinations were unleashed by American military strategists with the intended aim of wiping out any politically conscious intellectuals and nationalist scientists who might pursue an agenda for re-building a modern, secular society and independent, unified republic.

The US war and occupation of Iraq, has been declared a success by both Presidents G.W Bush and Barrack Obama. By what standards of decency and justice can an operation which has resulted in the forcible occupation of an independent nation of 23 million citizens, the installation of a puppet regime ensconced, where colonial mercenary troops in the pay of American officers terrorise the population, and the nation's oil fields have been appropriated and put up for sale be declared a success?

I'll tell you! None whatsoever. It's the devil's work for sure and I mean it literally.

Iraq's laws which protected its patrimony, its cultural treasures and national resources, have been wiped from the books. The occupiers have imposed a `constitution' favouring US Imperialist interests. Israel and its Zionist flunkies in the American administration can celebrate the demise of a modern adversary and the conversion of Iraq into a cultural-political desert. To add further insult to injury, the looted treasures of ancient Mesopotamia have `found' their way into the collections of the elite in London, New York and elsewhere.

The Iranian people should take Michael Ledeen at his word, and should be viewing events in neighbouring Iraq with not a little trepidation, while the `collectors` wait and anticipate the pillage and plunder awaiting them in Iran.

Postscript: For a peek into `our boys'` mentality during the Gulf War, the U.S. Air Force's 77th Tactical Fighter Squadron published a songbook before the bombing began, describing their plans for Iraq. The only part that can be reproduced in polite company was this little ditty:

“Phantom fliers in the sky, Persian-pukes prepare to die, Rolling in with snake and nape, Allah creates but we cremate.”

The rest of songbook is, in the words of David Stannard, a "melange of sadism and obscenity, most of them employing personifications of entire Arabic and Islamic peoples as racially inferior, maggot-infested women whose mass destruction by the Americans is equated with brutal, violent s-x... Wade Frazier.

Comments to - http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/
http://www.nylonmanden.dk/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogsection&id=7&Itemid=43
or true_brit58@hotmail.co.uk
Reference:
1] http://www.rense.com/general86/pikeknew.htm
2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Ledeen
3] http://www.terrorism-illuminati.com/node/35
4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Perle
5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Enterprise_Institute
6] http://911review.com/precedent/century/gladio.html
7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_Due
8] http://nord.twu.net/acl/dialectic.html Hegelian Dialectic
9] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in_Afghanistan
10] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taliban
11] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1648572.stm
12] http://www.islamicity.com/islamiTV/?ref=3167
13] http://www.schnews.org.uk/archive/news326.htm
http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14870

Thanks to Brendan for this info:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=3246

http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm

The Afghani Killing Fields.

2009-09-13T20:30:00.005+02:00

By Pervaiz Jamal 13th September 2009.

I remember the beginning of the onslaught in Afganistan back in 2001 very well. I come from a region in Pakistan which lies close to the Afghani border. War is terrible indeed and the people of Afghanistan have suffered more than most from its evils.

But those of you living in the west will have been for the most part misinformed regarding the slaughter and carnage being inflicted upon innocent Afghani people by the so called `coalition forces.`

Here though, is a newspaper report by an honest and uncorrupted western journalist. Remember as you read this is only the tip of the `iceberg.` The scale of murder and death being wrought in that proud land is beyond anything all but a small minority here could ever imagine.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=230361&thesection=news&thesubsection=world
Khanabad 'decimated by the Americans, 100 civilians killed'27.11.2001
1:00 pm - By JUSTIN HUGGLER
KHANABAD -

When we heard the explosion, we were walking though the bombed out ruins of Khanabad, near the Tajikistan border in the northeast of Afghanistan.

When we got there, picking our way through the collapsed remains of houses, an old man sat in his blood blinking and shaking his head in bewilderment. Beside him, a 15-year-old boy lay bleeding and unconscious.

They had trodden on one of the American cluster bombs that litter the fields and roadside around Khanabad.

The Americans have killed more than 100 unarmed civilians in Khanabad in the last two weeks, relentlessly bombing heavily populated residential areas in the town, which was one of the last under Taleban control.

The Independent first reported allegations of civilian deaths made by fleeing refugees a week ago. Yesterday, after the Taleban finally fled the town, those allegations were confirmed.

Whole suburbs of Khanabad have been decimated. In the suburb of Charikari, we found giant craters and piles of rubble where houses used to be. Burnt, blackened stumps of trees poked through the rubble. Here and there, a fragment of a house was till standing, half a room, open at one end where the rest had collapsed.

Juma Khan was poking around the crater where most of his family died with a shovel. His wife and six of his children, his brother and all his brother's children died in there when the American bomb struck: 15 people in all.

A child's black gumboot lay in the rubble. It could have belonged to Mr Khan's five-year-old son Hakimullah, or his three-year-old daughter Hamza.

The bomb fell at 8am, when the whole family was sitting inside the house. A neighbour, Abdul Qadir, had dropped in to visit. He died too.

"I was just sitting there. The next thing I knew, people were digging me out of the rubble," Mr Khan said.

He saw them dig out his 11-year-old daughter, Gulshan, the only other survivor. She has severe head injuries. "I just started crying out for help," said Mr Khan. But everyone else in the rubble was already dead.

"I don't know who to blame," said Mr Khan. He didn't even know it was the Americans who killed his wife and children. "Maybe it was the Taleban bombing," he said "The planes came and bombed my home. I don't know why. But whoever bombed me is my enemy."

Another man beckoned us towards the remains of his house. It wasn't until we had climbed onto the pile of rubble that was all that was left that he told us we were standing on top of an unexploded bomb. He wanted to know if we thought it was safe for him to move back into the remains with his family. They survived because they were already fleeing when the bomb hit.

"When the bomb hit, I was knocked over by the blast," he told us. "When I came to, I staggered out of the house, but then I felt my legs give way and I fainted again."

General Mohammed Daud of the Northern Alliance claimed that only 13 people were killed in Khanabad when one bomb went astray. That was patently untrue.

One of the refugees who fled named one of the families killed as that of Agha Pedar. Yesterday we found a survivor from Mr Pedar's family, Faizullah.

"I only lived because I was sitting inside," said the young man, a cousin of Mr Pedar's. "The others, who were all sitting outside, were killed."

Faizullah's father, Mr Pedar's son and daughter, and a neighbour, were all killed by the bomb.

The cluster bombs, innocuous-looking yellow tubes, littered the fields and roads around the town, and you had to look carefully before every step. Some of them still had the tiny parachutes on which they float down out of the sky.

Nearby we found the remains of the canister in which they are dropped from the American planes, half of a six-foot-long green cylinder, twisted by the impact when it hit the ground.

"Are they dangerous?" a returning refugee asked us about the cluster bombs. Another wanted to know if it was safe to pick one up.

The answer lay bleeding by the roadside: 15-year-old Habibullah with his stomach torn open, Nur Mohammed, the old man, moaning in agony. There were two other men lying injured beside them. They were returning refugees who tried to take a short cut through a field full of cluster bombs.

When they reached the hospital, there was no one there to treat them. The Taleban used it as a barracks, and most of the doctors had fled the town. The boy, Habibullah, was in serious condition, and when he finally reached the hospital in the next town, an hour away, the doctors were not sure he would survive.

Nur Mohammed was treated by the only doctor in Khanabad, Gholam Rasul Talash. It was he who gave us the figure of 100 civilian deaths. It was entirely consistent with the number of bombed houses.

There was no clue as to why the Americans decided to bomb residential areas of Khanabad - and to use cluster bombs, which are designed to kill and maim.
Some refugees said that foreign Taleban fighters had been hiding inside the houses - but the people we met outside the ruins of their homes said that was not true. There was a Taleban barracks nearby - but the Americans did not appear to have hit that.
One of the refugees told us he had stayed up all night digging a mass grave for the dead. In the cemetery, we found the huge grave of Mr Khan's family. It could have been this one the refugee dug.

Mr Khan stood blinking in the sun. His wife and six of his children were killed in an instant by an American bomb. "What do I do now?" he asked. "I just don't know."

My Comment:

Why are they using cluster bombs in a civilian area? America of all nations should know the dangers of cluster bombs, they have been described as airborne mines due to the undistinguishing nature of these bombs. How can it use them in civilian areas and claim that these deaths are an accident?

The End Of The Nation States Of Europe (The Irish Referendum On The Lisbon Treaty October 2nd 2009).

2009-09-12T01:43:00.006+02:00

By Philip Jones 12th September 2009.

“Europe's nations should be guided towards the super-state without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose, but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation.” Jean Monnet (Founding Father Of The EU in a letter to a friend 30th April 1952).).

On June 12th 2008, the proud and independent minded Irish screamed a loud and clear NO to the treacherous Lisbon Treaty and to further integration into the EU Superstate being constructed around the hopes, dreams and lives of the peoples of Europe. Typically, arrogantly and not surprisingly, the Euro Fascists, whose credentials are appearing ever more Totalitarian in structure and ruthless in application, simply ignored the voice of the Irish voter, demanding there be a another vote, and this time, the rebellious Irish would have to get it right, or else.

On October 2nd this year, once again, the fate of nearly 500 million people will be decided by a country whose population totals only 4.2 million. The people of the Republic Of Ireland will now for a second time, have been the only `citizens` of the European Union given the opportunity to have their say on what is potentially the most fundamental piece of legislation in the history of the `Old Continent.` All the other member states have simply ignored the wishes of their people and left ratification to be `rubber stamped` by their respective parliaments. However, it is necessary, at least at the moment, for all twenty seven member states to complete ratification before the `Treaty` becomes legally binding.

So, if the Irish vote is `NO` for a second time, then legally, according to its own rules, Brussels will not be able to implement the Treaty. However, if the Irish people this time around swallow the massive `Pro Treaty` propaganda and vote `Yes,` then the fate of, and inevitable demise of the Nation States of Europe will be sealed. There will be no more serious obstacles left to Federalisation. The long dreamed of (by the Federalists that is) United States Of Europe will inevitably become a reality.

Many, if not the majority of people on both sides of the Atlantic have been `duped` for decades into believing that the EEC/EU is about a `free trade` zone. This is not at all the case, as the above quote by Monsieur Monet illustrates very clearly. So what are the ramifications of a `Yes` vote by the Irish.

The European Union was founded on lies and deceit at the very highest levels of government. This trail of deception has continued since, and on Thursday 13th December 2007 stopped momentarily in Lisbon Portugal, where the `dignitaries` of the member states of this `trading bloc` signed the `EU Reform Treaty`.

This `Treaty` replaces the EU Constitution rejected in 2005 by both France and the Netherlands. Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor and the former French President `Giscard D`Estaing are among many European ministers who have confirmed that the `Treaty` is but the Constitution by another name. The only differentials being the dropping from the new document those articles relating to the EU Flag, Anthem and Motto. Yet only two days prior to the `Historic event` in Lisbon, sixteen member states `broke cover` and called for an amendment to the `Treaty `and the reinstatement of these three articles, thereby transforming the `Treaty` into the original Constitution. They also want to impose the `single currency` on all those member states still retaining their `indigenous` currencies and are suggesting that a `Europe Day` become a holiday for celebration.

The leader of the United Kingdom Independence Party `Nigel Farage` said, “The full treachery being imposed is at last fully out in the open. The pathetic attempts claiming this wasn't the Constitution are now blown out of the water. Back comes the flag, the anthem and the motto. It means that what was 96% of the original constitution is now 100%. Let's not hear any more of the `Reform Treaty`. This is the rejected EU Constitution brought back in all it's pomp.”

Whilst still in office, the former Danish Prime Minister and current Secretary General of NATO, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, decided against any referendum on the Treaty, leaving it's ratification to Danish MPs. Since then, nothing has changed here in the `Old Kingdom,` where it's business as usual as far as the Lisbon Treaty is concerned.

Last year, Mr Fogh Rasmussen stated that the “Treaty` was 'Good For Denmark.” Denmark had planned to hold a referendum on the Constitution back in 2005, but following the `NO` votes in France and Holland, said plans were dropped. The Danish Justice Ministry have concluded that the `Treaty` does not threaten Danish Sovereignty. Mr Fogh Rasmussen was quoted as saying, “ When sovereignty is relinquished, a referendum is needed, but when no sovereignty is relinquished, Parliament will ratify the text.”

He also confirmed plans to hold another referendum on the `Single Currency` (EURO) and whether to end the `opt outs` agreed at Maastricht relating to defence, justice and home affairs.

So, no threat to sovereignty ? Well let's consider the implications: If a Sovereign Nation State no longer controls it's own Economy, Defence, Justice System and Home Affairs, can it truly be called a `Sovereign Nation State` any longer ? The answer is quite simply NO.

The Political and Financial Elite of Europe have been working towards this moment since the end of World War Two. In every member state, the personalities might differ, but the rhetoric is always the same; “No Loss Of Sovereignty, good for the people, good for the economy and so on.”

So let us take a look at what this `Treaty` is really about. What is the difference between this document and the original Constitution? German Lawyer, Klaus Heeger, a researcher and legal advisor to the Independent Democratic group in the EU Parliament has drawn the following conclusions regarding the two documents:

According to his analysis, the Constitution granted the EU 105 new `competences`. The `Treaty` also grants 105 new areas of competence. Out goes the EU symbols (Flag, Anthem, Motto) in comes Climate Change. The remaining 104 areas remain the same.

Decision making by qualified majority replaces `unanimity` in 62 new areas in the Reform Treaty. One more than in the Constitution. Out goes `Intellectual property rights,` in comes energy and climate change. The other 60 stay the same.

His conclusion; The EU Constitution by another name.

This sixth and final `Treaty` is the `death knell` for the sovereignty of the member states of the EU. Do not be mistaken about this, and no matter what your `elected` leaders are telling you to the contrary, this is it. This is the culmination of years of plotting, deception and conspiring against the people of Europe. So what's the big deal many will ask ? Read on and find out.

This `Treaty` is the EU's most secret and quickest drafted document yet. Opposition to and recognition that the EU is a Police State in the making is growing and they (the conspirators) know that speed is vital. Tony Blair agreed to it in June 2007 as his final `Stab in Britain's Back.` Foreign Ministers agreed it's terms in September 2007 and on 13th December two months later, the representatives of each member state signed the document, and now, all that remains is ratification, and the deed will be done.

So, if the result of the Irish vote is a `Yes` and all other member states do as indicated, ratify this treasonous piece of infamy, and the majority already have; how will our lives be affected ?

Our National Parliaments will become redundant as all power that still remains will transfer to Brussels. It will mean the formal end of those Historic Nations of Europe who are member states of the EU. National Embassies around the world will come under the auspices of EU bureaucrats. The ancient counties and provinces will be merged and combined into `EU Administrative Regions`. (The amalgamations of Kommunes in Denmark is a pre-emptive example of this, along with the `devolved` parliaments of Scotland and Wales, to be soon joined by the eradication of `England` and the setting up of similar regional assemblies there).

The EU will take ownership of Police, Military, Nuclear Weapons, Currency Reserves and North Sea Oil as outlined in the Treaty document. Serving members of our Police and Armed Forces will be required to take an oath of loyalty to the EU. Refusal will result in dismissal. The EU will have complete control of all military matters, equipment and facilities.

Political parties will be abolished, phased out or realigned. Only Pan European parties will be allowed. Independence parties will effectively be outlawed as under the 1999 ruling of the European Court Of Justice (case 274/99), it is illegal to criticize the EU. (Even before the Irish Vote, News from Brussels indicates that plans are afoot already to eliminate any `Euro-sceptic groups within the EU Parliament). The EU will have the legal right to close National Parliaments and Assemblies.

Many people will be made unemployed as the EU rule of `retraining` at a citizens own expense becomes universal (including the purchase of a Certificate confirming said retraining). Hundreds of thousands of small businesses will be forced to close due to the enforcement of endless numbers of impracticable and unworkable EU regulations.

Around 107,000 EU laws will criminalise many, as adherence to this amount of legislation is impossible. We will be subject to frequent fines and even arrest as a result of what will be our inevitable ignorance. Take the following as examples: From January 2006, it became illegal to repair your own domestic plumbing, electrics or even your own car. If you buy a boat over six feet long, built after 1999, you will be required to pay the equivalent in Euros of £4000, or face six months in prison. As the EU `Police State` flexes it's muscles ever more, each of us will live under the fear and threat of arrest or prosecution for any one of a myriad of offences, even minor ones.

The Large Corporations will do well of course, utilising massive immigration from within and without the EU, paying minimum wages to immigrants at the expense of the indigenous population, thus forcing salaries downwards. Furthermore, these Corporations will have a near Monopoly on employment (along with Government), and will be able to dictate conditions and terms of employment without fear of contradiction.

Top Government Jobs and the inevitable corruption which will accompany this monopoly, will create a new `Class Divide` ensuring the rich and their `fellow travellers` get richer, whilst the majority decline into poverty. Taxes will increase in order to pay for the massive growth in bureaucracy.

There will be no `redress of grievance` through local `democratic` channels because there won't be any local democracy. Or any democracy at all for that matter. The `EU Administrative Regional Governments` will be unelected (See the EU Regionalisation plan on the EU Website). Our only vote will be to the powerless EU Parliament. We will be ruled by the unelected EU Commissioners, who have no `accountability to the people` at any level.

If we demonstrate or protest, we can be seized and relocated to another EU Region. The EU Arrest Warrant and the various legislation introduced across the EU since 9/11 will give the Authorities absolute power over us. The shootings of innocents `Philip Prout` and `Jean de Menezes` were entirely legal under EU Law. The intimidation and growing `Anti Muslim` vitriol across the EU is becoming reminiscent of the treatment of Jews in pre-war Germany. A Federal European State will become a very unpleasant place to be.

Following Federation, in and around 15 years hence, Europe could collapse under the weight of it's own Bureaucracy and Corruption. There will be so little production, that no amount of taxation will be able to support the vast, inept, corrupt and wasteful government machinery. Many will be reduced to poverty on the brink of starvation. The complete lack of any `checks and balances` will leave the door open for any would be dictatorship.

The EU as monstrous as it is, is nothing more than a `stepping stone` to `World Government`. Before you dismiss this article as `Scare Mongering` or `Conspiracy Theory`, find out how many of your own country's leading politicians are members of such `Secret Organisations` as the Bilderbergers, Trilateral Commission, Club Of Rome, and the Royal Institute For International Affairs.

Each and every one of the above are totally dedicated to a `One World` Government and see a Federal Europe as a necessary evolution towards that goal. Their memberships read like a who's who of the planet's `power players`. Danish readers for example, might be very surprised to discover which of their country's Political and Financial Elites attend the Bilderberger meetings, which has been in the forefront of machinations to further European Federalisation. To find out which of your elected representatives are members of any of the above groups, just type in the organisation's name on any recognised search engine. Then sit back and prepare to be shocked.

We live in an age where people seem to have abdicated all responsibility for their own lives to Government. This has been going on since the end of World War Two, but has accelerated markedly since the 1980's. This `social irresponsibility` led us to Lisbon on 13th December 2007, where our so called leaders signed away our ancient rights and freedoms in the name of their `great plan`. If we sit back and do nothing, the rest of our lives will become a nightmare of our own making, because in the final analysis, it is we who will have handed over our rights and liberties into the hands of `wolves.`

The future well being of a whole continent lies in the hands of the Brave and Heroic Irish people. They need our support. They need to know they are not alone. It's time to start writing to your `elected` representatives, time to find the time to research what the EU `Beast` is really about. It's time to switch off the TV and pick up a book about the EU, or check out the many Internet sites relating to this Totalitarian `Super-State in the making.`

Do something, speak to your friends, neighbours, family; just do something before it is too late, and if the Irish vote yes, it is.

Comments to: http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/

Reference:

http://www.jimcorr.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=section&layout=blog&id=10&Itemid=77

http://www.bonde.com/index.php/bonde_uk/article/C221/

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2009/0909/breaking45.htm

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2009/0909/breaking45.htm

http://www.freenations.freeuk.com/

http://www.statewatch.org/

Loose Change : 9/11 Exposed.

2009-09-11T08:44:00.003+02:00

I don't think 9/11 changed the way I looked at life; but it did confirm my suspicions that Government was the enemy of the people.

This is one of the best exposes of that treacherous attack on the collective psyche of the world, and anyone who wants to understand the truth about what happened that day should take the time to view it.

Philip

HPV-The UK's Fascist Mask Slips.

2009-09-09T15:54:00.011+02:00

By Philip Jones 9th September 2009.

Ashleigh Cave (above) lost the use of her legs after a vaccination.

PARENTS in the UK are being threatened with having their children taken into care after questioning doctors’ diagnoses or objecting to their medical care. John Hemming, a Liberal Democrat MP, who campaigns to stop injustices in the family court, said: “Very often care proceedings are used as retaliation by local authorities against ‘uppity’ people who dare to question the system.”

Many such cases are now emerging across the UK:

The mother of a 13-year-old girl who became partly paralysed after being given a cervical cancer vaccination says social workers have told her the child may be removed from parental care if she (the mother) continues to link her condition with the vaccination against HPV (Human Papilloma virus).

Ashleigh Cave, from Liverpool (Above Picture), began experiencing severe headaches and dizziness half an hour after being inoculated last October with Cervarix, which supposedly guards against girls contracting the Human Papilloma Virus.

The schoolgirl was soon collapsing repeatedly; she lost the use of her legs and was admitted to Alder Hey children’s hospital. Nearly 11 months later she is still in hospital and is unable to stand or walk unaided. Her mother Cheryl, has now been told that doctors believe her condition must be `psychosomatic.`

“The hospital brought in social workers from the local authority who have told me they are considering putting Ashleigh on an at-risk register,” Cheryl Cave said.

She is convinced, and with good reason, that her daughter’s paralysis was caused by the vaccination. Mrs Cave said that a social worker from Sefton council said she suspected her of having Munchhausen’s syndrome by proxy or factitious illness syndrome — controversial conditions in which mothers are said to attribute illnesses falsely to their children in order to gain attention.

Mrs Cave said: “The social worker said I should stop believing the injection has anything to do with Ashleigh’s condition because I am putting my thoughts on to her and stopping her getting well. Since Ashleigh was in hospital she has become incontinent and had double kidney infections and chest infections. Have I made all these up?”

No Cheryl, you haven't made anything up.

This is just another example of the UK National Health Service's whorish slavery to the State/Big Pharma Corporate Axis, and illustrates the stranglehold that the modern Corporate State has on it’s people, and how completely `plugged in` to it’s `Matrix` most of those people are, particularly those who depend upon it for their livelihood. Many parents in the UK for example, under immense pressure from both central and local government and the social services have simply abdicated responsibility for their children. Handing them over `lock stock and barrel` to the State machine. Thankfully, Cheryl Cave isn't one of them.

The British Government is on record as stating that it intends to vaccinate as many young girls as is possible against the HPV virus which it, or rather the Pharmaceutical Giants, in whose salary it clearly is, say causes cervical cancer. Social networking sites have already been targeted in a bid to encourage girls to have the jab telling them that it helps protect against Human Papilloma Virus (HPV).

The Corporate/State assertion is that HPV is a sexually-transmitted infection that causes most cases of cervical cancer. Schools across the UK have been vaccinating pupils aged 12 and 13 (Year 8) for over a year now, with about 300,000 girls estimated to having already received the jab in England alone. By July 2011, it is estimated that more than two million girls will have been `offered` the vaccine, including those up to the age of 18 as part of a catch-up programme.

The Government's campaign for England, which was launched last year and continues unabated, has included online, press, TV and radio advertising. A series of `road shows` have been held in shopping centres across the country. The initial campaign ran this time last year, with follow-up advertising in February in order to remind girls not to miss their third and final injection. Girls aged 17 and 18, who form part of the catch-up programme, will be the target of a different advertising campaign this October.

The Propaganda lie goes something like this: "The HPV vaccine protects against over 70% of the strains that cause cervical cancer, which accounts for around 1,000 deaths a year in the UK."

This is nothing but Corporate/State/Media `hokum,` as the real experts in the field, who are in no doubt whatsoever about what the true purpose of this pernicious campaign is all about, have been trying so hard to get across to the public on both sides of the Atlantic.

The Facts.

Merck, the manufactures of the Gardasil vaccine insist that it protects against over 70% of the strains that cause Cervical Cancer. There are over 100 strains of HPV, only 30 of which are theoretically linked to Cervical Cancer. HPV is present naturally in at least half the population without ever causing any disease whatsoever. HPV has never been proved as a pathogen for any disease.

Merck originally claimed that, “ There was a strong connection between HPV and cervical cancer." Somewhere along the way, that became “is the cause of” without any medical evidence to support this claim. This is clearly more about sales and marketing than science.

Merck's Gardasil and its competition, Glaxo's `Cervarix,` are made up of virus like particles from four strains of HPV. With no clinical studies whatsoever, two of these `strains` are now being touted by both Merck and Glaxo, as being responsible for 70% of all cervical cancer cases. Both make the unproven claim, that HPV causes squamous cell cervical cancer.

The question which demands answering is why the market demographic Merck chose, was pre -teen 12 year old girls, when the average age of women who contract cervical cancer is 50 years plus, so why target 12 year olds? And even Merck themselves openly state that the efficacy of the vaccine is only 5 years, making it worthless by the time the subject needs the immunity, i.e. around her fiftieth birthday. Any claimed protection will have worn off long ago.

An established risk factor with cervical cancer is the number of sexual partners a woman has had during her life. So who do you imagine will have had more, a 12 year old girl, or a 50 year old woman? I would suggest that there is something seriously amiss with anyone who selects the former.

So why are they so intent on giving it to 12 year olds, rather than what would be the correct target age group, that is, if the vaccine did have any protective value; namely women in their late forties and fifties? Merck say it’s because the vaccine hasn’t been `safety proved` for women above 26 years of age.

So as Dr Tim O’Shea[1] sardonically puts it, "better give it to young girls then."

Real side effects in exchange for unproven immunity.

As can be seen in the case of Ashleigh Cave (above), the vicious debilitating and painful side affects to this vaccine programme are little short of frightening, and when weighed against the benefits, which appear to be zero; then surely it is time for parents to wake up, smell the horse manure, and join together against the State's draconian and inhuman treatment of its people, before a whole generation of British Girls are allowed to be sterilised or worse.

Treating Cancer, Or Dealing Cancer?

It appears that there is even a strong probability that this under tested and unproven drug might be carcogenic in it’s own right. We are dealing here with a vaccine which claims to prevent cancer by imitating a pathogen which causes cancer. Merck say about this:

“Gardasil has not been evaluated for carcogenicity or impairment to fertility.”

It is in the above statement that I believe the true motives behind this programme lie. To cause sterility and or cancer in young females thereby enabling a massive advance in the global depopulation agenda. It can be the only logical reason as to why governments now so obviously in the service of the `hidden masters` would either encourage, coerce or mandate such an unsubstantiated vaccination regime and apply it to 12 year old girls when the risk group if any, applies to women in their forties and fifties, who for the most part are well past the age of conception.

Furthermore, the Pharmaceuticals will once again make a fortune off the back of human suffering. What is so worrying is that with all the mainstream avenues of information secured, Governments bought and paid for, health professionals either cynically `on board` or woefully uninformed, and the seemingly limitless ability of the mass of the population to just comply, comply, comply, it is difficult to see how this exercise in evil can be thwarted.

It appears that in the UK at least, the State in its utter arrogance and disdain for its own populace, no longer considers it necessary to mask its Fascist Credentials. What is going on in that once proud land is a scandal and a disgrace, and I for one am both angry and frustrated that there seems so little that ordinary people can do to unseat the demagogic tyranny which now inhabits the `Mother Of All Parliaments;` not that the other lot would do it any better!

Comments To : The Righteous Alliance.

Ref:

1] Dr Tim O’Shea : HPV The First Cancer Vaccine www.rense.com 10.6.7

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=gardasil&emb=0#

http://www.heising.dk `Pharmageddon The Global War Against Women` by Kjeld Heising.

http://www.google.com/search?q=how+many+gitrls+in+the+uk+have+been+injected+against+HPV&rls=com.microsoft:en-gb:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7GPEA_enDK310

The Nexus Of Evil : Part Eight (A Pre-emptive Strike On Humanity).

2009-09-09T00:11:00.008+02:00

By Philip Jones 28th August 2009.

Introduction.

In Part eight, we will examine the events leading up to the tragedy of September 11th 2001[18], and the resulting consequences for the world at large, in the aftermath of the Illuminist's attack on the collective psyche of the American people. This article will not contain an in depth analysis of that fateful day some eight years ago, rather it will take a broad overview of the conspirators involved, the reasoning behind that cowardly and murderous act, and the crucial part it played in the lead up to the intended Third World War, which forms the very fulcrum around which the whole `One World Luciferian Agenda` revolves.

Firstly, let's look at those main personalities who though not the `architects` of the conspiracy, are the `Front Line` Officers ensuring that orders are obeyed and the overall strategy adhered to.

So, who or what are the `Neo Cons` we have heard so much about since 9/11?

Leo Strauss -The Neo-Conservative.

Rupert Murdoch's Fox Media Network is the principal broadcasting outlet for the Neo-Conservative agenda, which can be said to be the primary organ by which the Illuminati are manipulating world events towards the so-called “Clash of Civilizations.”

The intellectual influence behind so called Neo Conservatism was Leo Strauss[1], who in the words of Barry Chamish[2], is today's leading Frankist thinker[3]. Strauss arrived in the US as a refugee from Nazi Germany in 1937, and began teaching shortly after at the Rockefeller sponsored University of Chicago. It was Robert Maynard Hutchins, the University Chancellor, Aquarian[4] conspirator, member of the CFR[5], and one of the original sponsors of the Aspen Institute[17], who arranged for Strauss' tenure at the university.

Strauss believed that the works of ancient philosophers contain intentionally hidden arcane meaning. Like Plato, he taught that within societies, there are those who are fit to lead, and those who are only fit to follow. Not surprisingly considering his father's connections with the Austrian Nazi party, the current Governor of California, and friend of the Rothschilds, Arnold Schwarzenegger,[19] is in complete agreement with Strauss on this matter, and was quoted recently as saying:

“My relationship to power and authority is that I'm all for it. People need somebody to watch over them. Ninety-five percent of the people in the world need to be told what to do and how to behave.”

For Strauss, it was Machiavelli who initiated the Enlightenment[6], by his rejection of the purely theoretical world of Plato[14], in favour of a more practical interpretation of reality, thereby creating political science. For Strauss, in accordance with Machiavellian thinking, virtue would not be applicable, because no regime could meet its standards. Rather, a new regime should be created, by accepting, understanding, and harnessing man’s tendency for self-interest, or what he termed basic “human nature.”

Strauss determined that the only individuals fit to rule, were those who realised that there was no absolute standard of morality. He believed the world to be a place where policy advisers should be willing where necessary to deceive their own people, and sometimes even their rulers, in order to protect their country's interests. If exposed to the absence of absolute truth, the masses would quickly succumb to nihilism[7] or anarchy[8]. According to Strauss, it would be necessary on occasion, to maintain these “pious frauds”, or “the Noble Lie.”

Like Thomas Hobbes[9], Strauss believed that the inherently violent nature in man could only be controlled by an all powerful nationalistic state apparatus. Put another way, by Fascism; “Because mankind is intrinsically wicked, he has to be governed,” he wrote: “Such governance can only be established, however, when men are united- and they can only be united against other people.”

Shadia Drury wrote in `Leo Strauss and the American Right:`

“Strauss thinks that a political order can be stable only if it is united by an external threat.” Ultimately, as Drury clarifies, “following Machiavelli, he maintained that if no external threat exists then one has to be manufactured.”

The Project For The New American Century : Rebuilding America's Defences.

The tragedy of September 11th 2001 was that new `Pearl Harbour` deemed necessary by the PNAC in order to provide justification for their plan to foment Albert Pike's global Clash Of Civilisations between Islam and the West, and events seen in Afghanistan and Iraq since have certainly proceeded very much according to Pike's `blueprint.`

Established in the spring of 1997, the `Project for the New American Century` was founded by, among others, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, with the aim of promoting and furthering the neo-conservative agenda. The present chairman is Bill Kristol, of the right-winger propagandist Weekly Standard. Prominent throughout PNAC is Richard Perle, former chair of the powerful Defence Policy Board and fervent supporter of Israel. In Washington, even his `friends` call him “The Prince of Darkness”

Another influential PNAC member is Elliott Abrams, of the National Security Council. These primary movers and shakers of this radical group, subsequently became the foreign policy, military, and national security establishment of the United States government. Dick Cheney, Rumsfeld, Perle, Wolfowitz, Abrams, and their accomplices were quite literally the men running America. Some other PNAC high-profile players are; former presidential candidate Gary Bauer, Govenor Jeb Bush, and former director of the CIA Robert James Woolsey.

The PNAC Mission Statement (excerpts):

`Does the United States have the resolve to shape a new century favorable to American principles and interests? … “[What we require is] a military that is strong and ready to meet both present and future challenges; a foreign policy that boldly and purposefully promotes American principles abroad; and national leadership that accepts the United States’ global responsibilities. … The history of the 20th century should have taught us that it is important to shape circumstances before crises emerge, and to meet threats before they become dire... `

Basically, we are dealing with an organisation which promotes a doctrine of world domination and exploitation in order to further American (read Zionist/Illuminist) interests. Among the PNAC’s “fundamental propositions” is the belief that “American leadership is good both for America and for the world.” “Does the U.S. have the resolve to shape a new century favourable to American principles and interests?” asks the PNAC.

Their policy would be achieved through imperialism and pre-emptive strikes. In order to become capable of achieving this “global responsibility,” they contend that it is necessary to have a large dominant modern military. They advocate openly for substantial increases in military spending on arms and technological research. Essentially, their plan dramatically expands the military-industrial-complex.

Another of the PNAC founding and predominating principles was; “that what is good for Israel is good for America. Even though the PNAC statements are using the “America” vernacular, it appears by their actions, their true hidden agenda is “Israeli-American interests.”

This sinister “brain centre” of the military-industrial-complex is composed of top elitist from many different sectors, but predominately it is headed by right wing politicians, military strategists and defence contractors. Emerging as a major organ of the Illuminati's `Nexus Of Evil,` these neo-conservatives intend nothing less than total world domination though military and financial supremacy.

PNAC Members Given Positions Of Influence..

Following his election in 2000, George W. Bush installed many of the PNAC’s major `players` into key positions of power within his new administration. The following list of appointments taken from http://911exposed.org/PNAC.htm show exactly where President Bush's loyalties lay, and what agenda he intended to pursue during his term in office:

Elliott Abrams – National Security Council, pled guilty to the charge of lying to Congress in the Iran/Contra scandal, later pardoned by George Bush Sr.

Richard Armitage – Deputy Secretary of State.

John R. Bolton – served as Under-secretary for Arms Control and International Security in the Bush administration, then U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations.

Richard Cheney – Vice President, PNAC Founder, and ex-CEO of Halliburton. Previously served as Secretary of Defence.

Seth Cropsey – Director of the International Broadcasting Bureau.

Paula Dobriansky – Under-secretary of State for Global Affairs.

Francis Fukuyama – White House Council Member.

Bruce Jackson – President U.S. Committee on NATO.

Zalmay Khalilzad – Ambassador to Iraq. Previously served as U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan from November 2003 to June 2005.

Lewis “Scooter” Libby – National Security advisor for the Vice President. Indicted by Grand Jury on charges of Obstruction of Justice, False Statements and Perjury and resigned October 28, 2005.

Richard Perle – PNAC founder, Chairman of the Defense Policy Board, Director of the Jerusalem Post. Had been accused of spying for Israel.

Peter W. Rodman – Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security.

Donald Rumsfeld – Secretary of Defense, and a PNAC founder. He served as Secretary of Defense (1975-1977) and as Chief of Staff of the White House (1974-1975).

Randy Scheunemann – U.S. Committee on NATO, Project on Transitional Democracies, International Republican Institute, founded the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq.

Paul Wolfowitz – Deputy Secretary of Defense, 2001-2005, considered the ideological father of the group. Currently, President of World Bank.

Dov S. Zakheim – Comptroller Department of Defense Former CEO of System Planning Corp. (See below), he served as Senior Foreign Policy advisor for George Bush Jr. in 2000.

Robert B. Zoellick – Deputy Secretary of State.

Their Project – Our Nightmare.

In their now infamous report entitled, Rebuilding America’s Defenses, Strategy, Forces, and Resources for a New Century.[10] The PNAC outlined their strategy for global conquest together with an agenda which argued for huge increases on military spending, research and development.

When the PNAC stated that it would be necessary for the American Military to fight several major theatre wars simultaneously, they were not only outlining a need for military preparedness, but proposing that the US actually fight these wars—and as if to prove how Ernest they were, we have since 9/11 seen the US wage war on two fronts in Afghanistan and Iraq, with more to come I would suggest. From there, the plan is to conquer the entire Middle East, with Iran appearing to be the next logical target on the list. Americans now appear to fighting Israel's wars for them. The question which begs to be asked is; “ Is America doing Israel’s bidding? Are Rumsfeld, Perle, Wolfowitz, and Rabbi Dov Zakheim (all Jews) using America’s resources and manpower to destroy Israel's enemies?”

PNAC doctrine maintained that The US needed a permanent military presence in Iraq. Since the invasion of that Middle Eastern country in 2003, Dick Cheney’s Halliburton-subsidiary KBR has been involved in everything from the constructing of U.S. military bases, to supplying and feeding the troops and other personnel. It appears that the US military is in Iraq to stay. With the two deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan being consolidated, and the infiltration by US forces into the Caucasus, the American Military is extending its influence ever wider across the globe; clearly positioning itself strategically for a definite purpose that has nothing to do with `freedom, democracy or justice and everything to do with imperialism, domination and Global Conquest.

`Rebuilding America’s Defences`…insisted on pouring 3.8 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) into the national Defence budget, and that is the exact amount that the Bush Administration requested and received from the Republican Congress. Was this a coincidence?

Bush, and his “National Security Strategy” of 2006, turned the US into a nation, which for the first time in its history, endorsed a doctrine of pre-emptive strike. In their `Rebuilding America’s Defences`…statement, the PNAC chillingly determined, “The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalysing event like a new Pearl Harbour?”

The Hegelian Dialectic And The Truth About Pearl Harbour.

To men and women of understanding, whether they be politicians, historians, and or educated citizens, Pearl Harbour was much more than just an American catastrophe. Many books have been written on the subject, especially since the declassification of pertinent military documents.

There can be no valid argument to the contrary, that the attack only occurred because President Franklin D. Roosevelt allowed it to, in order that America would be drawn into WWII. He along with other top officials in the US government had contrived a plan, to `hamstring` the U.S. Naval defences. Key personnel were exchanged, vital Japanese code-deciphers conveniently went missing, along with other unethical tactics, employed to give the Japanese the element of surprise that they needed for their mission to succeed. It was a staged event! A `False Flag!`[11] It’s purpose, to engender public outrage and resolve, to mobilize and fight a war!

Problem Reaction Solution:

The Problem – How to draw America into WWII = Thesis.

The Reaction – Public anger following the Japanese attack = Antithesis.

The Solution – America enters the war = Synthesis; the very solution planned for.

Therefore, Pearl Harbour to insiders is synonymous with a “staged or contrived catastrophic and catalysing event.” So, the neo-cons were in essence calling for a similar event to initiate their “War of Terror.”

The PNAC Pentagon neo-cons, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz already had plans to invade Iraq prior to 9/11! All they needed was their own Pearl Harbour! Enter 9/11.

According to `9/11 Exposed` these are some of the personalities that participated in the Rebuilding America’s Defences… project:

Thomas Donnelly – Director of Communications, Lockheed Martin.

Fred Kagan – U. S. Military Academy at West Point.

Robert Kagan – Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

William Kristol – The Weekly Standard.

Mark Lagon – Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Lewis Libby – Chief of Staff for the Vice President.

Gary Schmitt – Project for the New American Century.

Barry Watts – Northrop Grumman Corporation.

Paul Wolfowitz – Nitze School of Advanced International
Studies, Johns Hopkins University.

Dov Zakheim - System Planning Corporation.

Eliot Cohen – Nitze School of Advanced International
Studies, Johns Hopkins University.

Donald Kagan – Yale University, conservative columnist.

Steve Rosen – Harvard University, Professor of National Security and Military Affairs.

Abram Shulsky - The RAND Corporation.

Roger Barnett, Phil Meilinger, and Mackubin Owens – U.S. Naval War College.

Alvin Bernstein and Stephen Cambone – National Defense University.

The Carlyle Group Revisited.

In part seven, we briefly discussed the clandestine operations and connections of the Carlyle Group of companies. It is pertinent that at this point, we take a closer look at this particular organ of the evil `Nexus` driving our world to the brink.

The Carlyle Group's offices are on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington DC, midway between the White House and the Capitol building, and within a short distance of FBI HQ and numerous other government departments. Carlyle’s position at the very centre of the Washington establishment is reflected in its address. The Group specialises in taking over control of aerospace and defence contractors, and then by exerting influence, gains contracts from the Department of Defence.

Some of the Elite officers of the Carlyle Group are:

George Herbert Walker Bush – former US President and Director of the CIA, Carlyle Senior advisor and Shareholder.

Frank Carlucci – former Secretary of Defence and Deputy Director of the CIA, Carlyle Chairman Emeritus.

James Baker III – former Secretary of State and Secretary of Treasury, Carlyle Senior Counsellor. Baker is defending Saudis against a 9-11 Families’ Lawsuit.

Fidel V. Ramos – former President of the Philippines, Carlyle Asia Advisory Board.

John Major – former British Prime Minister, Chairman Carlyle Europe.

At the time of the 9/11 attacks, The Carlyle Group, was hosting a business conference in Washington D.C. in which the featured guest of honour was one of Osama Bin Laden’s brothers! The Guardian Newspaper reported:

“On 11 September, while [al-Qaeda’s] planes slammed into the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon, the Carlyle Group hosted a conference at a Washington hotel. Among the guests of honour was a valued investor: Shafig bin Laden, brother to Osama.”

At the same time as the Carlyle investors were watching the World Trade Centre towers collapse, grotesquely, the group’s business prospects soared. By their own accounts, they manage what they call a “a vast, interlocking, global network of businesses and investment professionals” that operate within a triangle of industry, government, and the military.

The Carlyle Group doesn't appear to concern itself with regards to any conflict of interest. For example, its political and intelligence connections (reportedly, ex-President Bush is still receiving daily CIA briefings) have given it a wide open window of opportunity to exploit. Former U.S. president George W. Bush himself, was in a pole position to make decisions that would have fattened his father’s (and his own) bank accounts. The Carlyle Group is a powerful and bloodthirsty corporation that has clandestine governmental powers It can make wars in order to profit from them.

The Carlyle Group, The Bin Ladens And The Bushes.

Osama bin Laden’s family is a major investor in The Carlyle Group. The Bin Laden family members, who allegedly disowned their renegade son ten years ago, were the very same who stood to gain most financially from the war being waged against him until late October 2001. When news surfaced about the relationship, public outrage forced them to liquidate their holdings in the firm. However, the bin Ladens have reportedly channelled tens of millions of dollars to Osama through banks, like Algemene Bank Nederland (now called ABN-AMRO), which has reported links to the La Salle National Bank in the U.S.

George H.W. Bush Sr. has also been a paid consultant to the Bin Laden Group, using his CIA connections to further their business concerns. His son, George W. Bush, refused to freeze Osama’s numerous accounts at ABN-AMRO, thus evading the possibility of having his own families dirty secrets being made public, for instance; its links to Osama Bin Laden.

As we saw in Part Seven, during his days as CIA head and Vice President, it was George Bush Sr. who in effect created Osama bin Laden as an American CIA-asset. Bin Laden was paid to `wear down` the Soviets in their prolonged Afghan campaign (1979-1989). Originally designated “freedom fighters” or “Mujahideen”, they were in the main financed, armed, and trained by the Saudis and United States’ through the CIA, the funds being then funnelled through the BCCI. The training bases, Tora Bora cave complex, stinger missiles, etc. were all CIA financed through the Pakistani ISI, under the direction of the likes of George Bush Sr.

U.S. Naval Intelligence operative, Mike Vreeland claimed, “Sometimes certain governments design, and create networks like al-Qaeda… Those entities create specific problems at the creating government’s direction.”

Following the end of the war with the Soviets, the CIA’s “Mujahideen”, lacked an enemy. In the ensuing years, they would become the new CIA backed al-Qaeda (“the base”) group, which would do their bidding in a new war; the “War of Terror.” The Israeli’s had their Abu Nidal terrorist network, and now the United States would have its al-Qaeda network. The conspirators would soon launch a new `era of terror` and… throughout, Africa, America, The UK, Spain, The Philippines, and Indonesia, people would experience these terrorist atrocities first-hand.

Wahhabism And The War On Terror.

“Although it can fairly be concluded that it is the Saudi government which is primarily responsible for the financing of `terrorism,` the propagation of its Wahhabi version of Islam in the U.S reveals that the conspiracy climbs to the very highest levels. On September 26, 2001, former President George W. Bush gathered fifteen prominent Muslim Arab-Americans at the White House, where he proclaimed that, “the teachings of Islam are teachings of peace and good.”

This assemblage of Muslim “moderates” was a necessary diplomatic manoeuvre to deny that the Bush administration was at war with Islam. However, many of the leaders present were part of a large network of Islamic organizations, created through Saudi funding for the spread of Wahhabi Islam[11], and often with ties to terrorist activities.” David Livingstone-Terrorism And The Illuminati.

It is estimated that since 1975, the Saudis have spent as much as seventy billion dollars towards this international project, making it the largest propaganda campaign in history. Unlike other parts of the world, where the progress of Wahhabi preaching has been impeded by stubborn adherence to traditional interpretations of Islam, the American Islamic community is relatively new, and therefore, far more vulnerable to Saudi influence.

Out of thousands, the Wahhabis reportedly control as many as eighty percent of mosques in the U.S., giving them control over the appointment and training of Imams, the content of preaching, and of literature distributed in Islamic book stores.

In order to garner political influence in America, the Saudis deliberately imitated the model of the Jewish lobbying groups. With Saudi backing, American Muslims created organizations like the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), which was similar to the anti-Defamation League; the American Muslim Council (AMC), which was modelled on the American Jewish Committee; the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), which was similar to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, and so on.

Mustafa El Hussein, the secretary of a centre for Muslim intellectuals known as the Ibn Khaldun Society, remarked that “there is a great deal of bitterness that such groups have tarnished the reputation of mainstream Muslims” because “self-appointed leaders... spew hatred toward America and the West and yet claim to be the legitimate spokespersons for the American Muslim community.” El Hussein believes not only that they should “be kept at arm’s length from the political process, but that they should be actively opposed as extremists.”

Supporting El Hussein's contention, in October 2001, it was discovered, that not only was a secretive group of prominent Muslim charities and businesses in Northern Virginia channelling millions of dollars to foreign terrorists, but was part of a suspicious agenda designed to sway the Muslim vote in favour of the Republican party. The investigation of these groups in Herndon, Virginia, was the largest federal investigation of its kind in the world.

The Safa Group, as the network of organizations are referred to in Herndon, had transmitted more than $26 million in untraceable money overseas, and leaders of the organization committed and conspired to provide material support to terrorist organizations. The president of Safa, Jamal Barzinji, is a former business associate of Youssef Nada. The ties between Nada and Safa were many, as were ties to other Muslim Brotherhood leaders.

Thus, Bush received thousands of votes from Muslims duped by their so-called leaders. Agha Saeed, the AMPCC chairman said, “it won’t be long before political analysts realize that Muslim voters have played a historic role.” Al Arian boasted that he had delivered considerably more than the 537 votes that gave Bush his victory in Florida, and allowed him to capture the White House. As Craig Unger describes, “in other words, without the mobilization of Saudi-funded Islamic groups, George W. Bush would not be president today.” In June 2001, Al Arian was invited to the White House, along with a 160 members of the American Muslim Council, to be briefed by Karl Rove.

Another Day Of Infamy.

September 11th 2001 provided the opportunity for the Illuminati to finally embark upon the ultimate plan devised by Albert Pike, and articulated more recently by Samuel Huntington as a Clash of Civilizations, a global war against Islam. As William Engdahl pointed out, “if the Bush administration had been unprepared for the shock of September 11, 2001, they certainly wasted no time in preparing their response, the war on terror. Terror was to replace communism as the new global image of “the enemy”.

On September 18, 2001, Niaz Niak, former Pakistani foreign secretary, told the BBC he had been informed by senior US officials at a mid-July Berlin meeting that “military action against Afghanistan would go ahead by the middle of October.” Ultimately, the invasion of Afghanistan was a furtherance of the initial plans devised by Z.Brzezinski[20] to gain control over Central Asia.

As many who have spent time researching the events of September 11th 2001 have pointed out, there is zero credibility in the official mythology that Al Qaeda acted alone. Milton Beardman rebuffed the possibility, noting that, on his evaluation of the scale of the attacks, blame should not be attributed to bin Laden. Rather, he added that it was more probable that a far more “sophisticated” intelligence operation was responsible. Stan Goff, a retired US Army Special Forces Master Sergeant said:

“This cartoon heavy they’ve turned bin Laden into makes no sense, when you begin to appreciate the complexity and synchronicity of the attacks. As a former military person who’s been involved in the development of countless operations orders over the years, I can tell you that this was a very sophisticated and costly enterprise that would have left what we call a huge “signature.” In other words, it would be very hard to effectively conceal.”

Military-strategic analyst and retired Major General Dr. Mahmoud Khalaf, a `Fellow` at Egypt’s Higher Military Academy, Member of the Royal College of Defence Studies in London, Honorary Member of the Association of the United States Army in Fort Benning, in a presentation at the Centre for Asian Studies in the University of Cairo, related:

“First we are confronted with a technical operation of extremely great dimensions. We estimate that the planning organ for this operation must have consisted of at least 100 specialized technicians, who needed one year of planning... The high level of the operation does not match the level of evidence presented... Now, the puzzling question is the preparation and training of these people who had the capability to follow up and execute... There is, actually, one question, which is posed here. That is that there is no proportionality between the performance of the operation and the performance of bin Laden and his followers.”

There is a growing body of evidence which points to complicity in the attacks at the very highest levels. Sibel Edmonds, an FBI translator says the agency covered up evidence warning of the 9-11 attack. Her attempts to blow the whistle on the cover-up of `intelligence` that names at least some of the culprits behind the 9/11 attacks, have resulted in two `gag` orders forbidding her from testifying in court or mentioning the names of the people or the countries involved.

She has nevertheless been quoted as saying: “My translations of the 9/11 intercepts included [terrorist] money laundering, detailed and date-specific information ... if they were to do real investigations, we would see several significant high-level criminal prosecutions in this country [the US] ... and believe me, they will do everything to cover this up”.

Arab `specialist` Antoine Sfeir, states that “the CIA maintained contacts with bin Laden until 1998. Those contacts didn’t end after bin Laden moved to Afghanistan.” As reported by the French daily Le Figaro, Osama Bin Laden was to undergo treatment at the American Hospital in Dubai, where he met a CIA official. Radio France International (RFI) corroborated the report, based on authoritative French intelligence sources, as well as “a witness, a professional partner of the administrative management of the hospital.”

Although bin Laden denied the incident, stating that it was one of his sons who had been mistaken for him, the doctor who treated him has since refused to respond to questioning. While he was hospitalized, bin Laden also received visits from many members of his family, as well as prominent Saudis and Emiratis. And, days before September 11th , a delegation headed by Lt. Gen. Mahmoud Ahmed, Director-General of the Pakistani ISI, was in Washington, for top-level meetings in the White House, the Pentagon, the NSC, and with George Tenet, then head of the CIA, and Marc Grossman, the under-secretary of state for political affairs.

On September 10th, the Pakistani Daily News, acknowledging that talks must have revolved around Afghanistan and Osama bin Laden, noticed that the last time such visits had taken place, domestic politics had been turned on their `head,` and reported, “that this is not the first visit by Mahmoud in the last three months shows the urgency of the ongoing parleys.”

However, immediately prior to the commencement of the bombing campaign against Afghanistan, Mahmoud was dismissed from his position, seemingly at the instigation of the US. Evidence had come to light that he had ordered $100,000 been wired to Mohammed Atta, the supposed ring-leader of the 9/11 attacks. The transfer was made through Ahmad Omar Sheikh, who was one of the three released in exchange for passengers of the hijacked Indian Airlines plane in 1999. Regarding the implication of such a connection, in an article for the UK Guardian, Michael Meacher pointed out that, “the case of Ahmed confirms that parts of the ISI directly supported and financed al-Qaeda, and it has long been established that the ISI has acted as go-between in intelligence operations on behalf of the CIA.”

Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh (Urdu: احمد عمر سعید شیخ) (sometimes known as Umar Sheikh, Sheikh Omar, Sheik Syed, or by the alias "Mustafa Muhammad Ahmad" (born December 23, 1973) is a British-born militant of Pakistani descent with alleged links to various Islamic-based organisations, including Jaish-e-Mohammed, Al-Qaeda, Harkat-ul-Mujahideen and the Taliban.

He was arrested and served time in prison for the 1994 kidnappings of Western tourists in India, an act which he acknowledges, he was released from captivity in 1999 and was provided with safe passage into Pakistan with the support of the Taliban in exchange for passengers aboard hijacked Indian Airlines Flight 814. He is most well-known for his alleged role in the 2002 kidnapping and murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl. Sheikh Omar Saeed was arrested by Pakistani police on February 12, 2002, in Lahore, in conjunction with the Pearl kidnapping, and was sentenced to death on July 15, 2002 for killing Pearl. His judicial appeal has not yet been heard. The delay has been ascribed to his confirmed links with Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence.

Former Pakistani President, Pervez Musharraf, in his book In the Line of Fire stated that Sheikh was originally recruited by British intelligence agency, MI6, while studying at the London School of Economics. He alleges Omar Sheikh was sent to the Balkans by MI6 to engage in jihadi operations. Musharraf later went on to state, "At some point, he probably became a rogue or double agent".

His complicity in the execution and the reasons behind it are in dispute. At his initial court appearance, he stated, "I don't want to defend this case. I did this... Right or wrong, I had my reasons. I think that our country shouldn't be catering to America's needs." but he subsequently appealed his conviction and is awaiting `due process` while in prison. Sheikh's lawyer has stated he will base his client's appeal on the recent admission of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed that he is the killer of Daniel Pearl.

Omar Sheikh[15] is still awaiting execution in Pakistan for the murder of Daniel Pearl in 2002, which he most certainly did not commit. Both the US government and Pearl’s wife have since acknowledged that he was not responsible, but the Pakistani government refuses to try other suspects newly implicated in the case because it could reveal too much.

Rather, the New York Times has since reported that “American officials said that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, once al-Qaida’s top operational commander [and the supposed architect of 9/11], personally executed Daniel Pearl ... but he was unlikely to be accused of the crime in an American criminal court because of the risk of divulging classified information”.

According to court affidavits, in 1993, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was quizzed by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) following an incident when an al Qaeda operative was caught entering the US with his driver’s license and a false passport. The Mounties subsequently released Mohammed when the FBI claimed him as a prized asset, and the former US Army sergeant was free to continue running with al-Qaeda.

Notwithstanding the various theories that claim some sort of foul play in the 9/11 incident, it was investigative reporter Daniel Hopsicker who discovered a nest of intrigue in and around a flight school in Venice Florida, where the terrorists Mohammed Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi, were taking flying lessons. Hopsicker’s research reveals a circle of evidence which has been ignored by the authorities, but which nevertheless offers up the most incriminating trail of information.

In his book, Terrorism And The Illuminati, Canadian Historian, researcher and author David Livingstone writes;

“According to Newsweek, the Washington Post and the New York Times, U.S. military officials gave the FBI information “suggesting that five of the alleged hijackers received training in the 1990s at secure U.S. military installations.” Hijackers may have been trained in strategy and tactics at the Air War College in Montgomery Alabama. Two were former Saudi Air Force pilots. Mohammed Atta, their supposed ringleader, attended International Officers School at Maxwell Air Force Base in Montgomery, while Abdulaziz Alomari attended Aerospace Medical School at Brooks Air Force base in Texas, and Saeed Alghambi the Defense Language Institute in Monterey California.”

Daniel Hopsicker, in `Welcome to Terrorland,` reveals and exposes the clandestine circumstances under which many of the terrorists involved in 9/11 were trained. Amazingly, at the very least, eight of the `terrorist pilots` received their initial training in Venice, Florida, at one or another of the Aviator schools run by Arne Kruithof and Rudi Dekkers. Dekkers, the owner of Huffman Aviation, had by all accounts previously been indicted in his homeland, Holland, on charges of fraud and money laundering. Dekkers coincidentally purchased the flight school at around the same time the `terrorist` pilots moved into town and began their lessons.

Atta and al-Shehhi paid $28,000 each to Rudi Dekkers, for flight training available nearby for a fraction of the price. Yeslam bin Laden also supplied several students for training at Huffman, contradicting his claims of being estranged from his step-brother. Following 9/11, the FBI removed the files at Huffman, and loaded them onto a C-130 military cargo plane at the Sarasota airport, which took off for Washington with governor Jeb Bush on board. Oh how the plot sickens!

Mohammed Atta.

Though Dekkers denied there was any such relationship; according to Venice cab driver Bob Simpson, Dekkers and Mohammed Atta, “knew each other well, really well. They were friends.” Strangely, it appears that the majority of Atta’s closest associates in Venice were not Muslims, but `connected` Europeans. Atta’s girlfriend in Venice, Amanda Keller, claimed that all of his friends, with the exception of al Shehhi, were either German or Dutch, including Dekkers and Kruithof. Atta is known to have called his German friends Wolfgang and Juergen, “my brother.”

Daniel Hopsicker discovered that Atta lived for two months with Amanda Keller, an American stripper and lingerie model. He enjoyed the night-life, drinking, and snorted cocaine. This is not the behaviour one would normally associate with a devout Muslim. His email contacts included names of people who worked for defence contractors, like one who, for instance, worked for a Canadian firm, Virtual Prototypes, which helped develop the avionics for the F-15, F-22 and B-2 warplanes? Miss Keller, under pressure from the FBI to do so, publicly retracted her story. Similarly, according to two employees of a bar in Ft. Lauderdale, Atta whilst intoxicated has shouted out, “F*ck God!” However, once again, these witnesses also retracted their statements?

It is my opinion that the only likely explanation as to why Mohammed Atta would have hurled himself into a building, because it was most certainly not in the cause of Islam, is that he was an Illuminati mind-control slave[16]. His behaviour certainly conformed to the psychopathic model typical in such a condition. When Amanda Keller threw him out of her apartment, Atta avenged himself by disembowelling her pet cat and dismembering its half-dozen baby kittens, strewing the pieces around her apartment to be discovered when she returned home from work.

Following one of his drinking bouts, one eyewitness from a bar, described him as “kind of strange, because he was just staring. Every time I’d walk in and out, he had the same look on his face, so God knows what was going through his mind.” Daniel Hopsicker, in `Welcome to Terrorland,` also reports he “heard speculation, from people who had been in his Atta's in Venice, that he looked as if he might have been brainwashed, not that anyone in town had ever seen anyone who had been brainwashed, but he looked the way they thought somebody in that condition might look.”

During his four year stay in Hamburg, Atta was ostensibly a “scholarship” student at an elite international exchange program, run by an organization with ties to figures like David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger. The U.S. end of the operation being coordinated from an address at the U.N. Plaza in New York, by CDS International, named after Carl Duisberg, who headed the Bayer Corporation, and founded I.G. Farben. It was Duisberg who during WWII, devised the slave labour system later perfected by IG Farben, which in turn provided the financing for the infamous Joseph Mengele, who later developed the MK-Ultra and Monarch mind control programs.

It is likely that Mohammed Atta was a believer, albeit a mentally unbalanced one. David Livingstone surmises in his book that he feels it more likely that Atta, rather than being programmed to carry out the destruction of 9/11, was merely a `patsy`. According to CIA hypnosis expert Milton Klein, creating such a candidate is easier than programming a Manchurian Candidate. The patsy can be induced by hypnosis to do things which later show up as circumstantial evidence that will get him falsely blamed for a crime. Klein has claimed he can create a patsy in three months; a Manchurian Candidate takes six months.

September 11th 2001.

The multi faceted attacks of 9/11 could not have been carried out by CIA asset Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda; it would have been impossible for them to have completely dismantled the entire NORAD fighter response system. That one fact alone should have been obvious from the start, but the official story said “that’s what happened,” and with the Illuminist controlled media on board—they caused it to become public consensus.

So if it wasn't Obama and Al Qaeda, who was it?

Evidence which has surfaced since that fateful day, reveals that the PNAC possessed all that was necessary in order to execute a 9/11, including insider access, skilled manpower, influence and vitally, remote control technology, care of Rabbi Dov S. Zakheim.

Rabbi Dov S. Zakheim, CEO of System Planning Corp.

Rabbi Zakheim was a well respected and established figure within the intelligence community, which accounts for his upwardly mobile move from Systems Planning Corporation to Comptroller of the Pentagon in May 2001.

The `company` website indicates that System Planning Corp. (SPC) specializes in several areas of defence technology, including a highly sophisticated war-game technology that allows the control of as many as eight different drones from a remote location, either on the ground or airborne, on varying frequencies, and has a range of several hundred miles. This technology can be used on many different types of aircraft, including large passenger jets. One system developed by their Radar Physics Group is the Flight Termination System. This is a system used to destroy target drones. For example, if a drone that was fired on and was “missed”, then the drone target would be destroyed.

Prior to 9/11, the SPC website shows a recent purchaser of this technology was USAF Eglin AFB, Florida. Eglin is very near MacDill AFB, Florida, where Rabbi Zakheim contracted to send at least 32 Boeing 767 aircraft, as part of the Boeing /Pentagon tanker lease agreement. So the question here is did the 767’s that hit the World Trade Centre come from this arraignment by Zakheim?

Coincidentally or not, it was an SPC subsidiary, TriData Corp., which had overseen the official investigation following the World Trade Centre bombing in 1993. During Rabbi Zakheim’s period as CFO and Comptroller of the Pentagon, there were reports of substantial fraud. Donald Rumsfeld is on record as having stated “According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions,” Not surprisingly, not long after, Dov Zakheim resigned.

The Main Conspirators And Likely Suspects.

Richard Cheney – was the obvious leader of the coup. Cheney appeared to have been one of the main organizers as well as, he had exclusive OEM authority for the drills and exercises, as well as, coordinating the deceptive obstruction of the defence responses on 9/11. He was also instrumental in the cover-up and spin.

Donald Rumsfeld – was involved in designing the war games, implementing the disabling DOD (Department Of Defence) directive, setting up the diversionary training, the shuffling in of `patsies,` and the massive cover-up operation at the Pentagon and Shanksville.

Lewis “Scooter” Libby – Chief of Staff for the Vice President, one of Cheney’s most trusted advisors and a member of his shadow government. He was one of the “chosen few” that were in the White House bunker with Cheney. No doubt, he was one of those behind-the-scenes characters that piloted the spin machine.

Robert James Woolsey – as former director of the CIA, he was involved in designing the terrorist exercises. He personally participated in several important exercises that were utilized to test the responses of key personnel. Did his intelligence connections play a role? He was one of the first to spin the story to the media, blaming the attack on Iraq.

Dov S. Zakheim – previously he was CEO of System Planning Corp. Appears to have used his connections at System Planning Corp. for the remote technology (see below). He is alleged to have been involved in a massive embezzlement at the Pentagon when he was comptroller, which appears to have prompted his resigning. Did the accounting fraud finance the neocon’s 9/11 operation?

George Bush Sr. – ex-head of CIA, and ex-President, worked through his Carlyle Group associations with his friends in the Bin Laden family. He would be instrumental in Saudi diplomacy.

George Bush Jr. – played his role as the idiot-in-chief. He was also active in the cover-up and spin. Bush used his office to promote the USama Bin Laden and WMD fables, while dishing out toxic levels of propaganda to support his “War of Terror”.

General Meyers – During 9/11, he was the acting Joint Chief of Staff. It would have been impossible to carry out the attacks without his complacent cooperation.

Paul Wolfowitz – as Deputy Secretary of Defense, he headed a group of about 700 military experts. The huge “think tank” had formulated plans to remove Saddam Hussein and for the invasion of Iraq. (Background details from 9/11 exposed.org)

The major figures within the PNAC had the motive, means, and ability to arrange, organise and carry out the 9/11 attacks. As we have previously discussed, bin Laden and Al Qaeda acting alone, could not have orchestrated such an elaborate operation. The fact of the matter is that bin Laden was simply playing the part of the scapegoat. In order to be able to sideline US defences it was necessary for the conspirators to have operatives installed at the very highest levels of the government:

1. The operation needed access to the nation's most secure facilities, including the Pentagon. Only insiders would have that kind of access.

2. Only those with privy knowledge from highly classified materials could have had the know-how.

3. Access to large amounts of capital to finance the operation.

4. Connections to military leaders to suppress responses and make key substitutions to personnel.

5. Have a willing and able support staff that is of the highest allegiance. (The Secret Service, CIA, FBI, and loyal foreign agents like MOSAAD).

6. CIA, ISI, and DIA Intelligence information.

7. Ability to run “mock trials” of the operation, through practice exercises and war games.

8. Top military technologies, missiles, remote & drone science, and an arsenal of high explosives, with the facilities to implement them (hangers, technicians, etc.).

9. Access to military aircraft (C-130 or EC-130).

10. The authorization to send personnel overseas, like Powell, Scrwcroft, and Paul O’Neil, whom may interfere with the scheme.

11. The ability to make decisive directives. Examples are the Rumsfeld DOD hijacking directive and the OEM authority given to Cheney over all exercises and preparedness drills.

12. Recruit, fund, and train several `patsy` terrorists.

13. Coordinate FEMA, FBI, and other rescue units, to support cover-up processes.

14. Willing accomplices in the media were needed to propagate the lies.

15. The means to take advantage of the attacks…Box cutters just weren’t enough…

Cui Bono (Who Benefits.)

So who did benefit from the 9/11 attacks and the resulting “War of Terror?”

Did Saddam Hussein get any benefit out of 9/11? None at all; his country was invaded, his army defeated, his government toppled and he himself was executed (supposedly).

Did the pro-Israeli neo-conservatives benefit? Yes they did!. In fact, they achieved more or less everything that they could have possible wished for. Let’s take a look:

1. They advanced the Zionist doctrine by profiling Arabs as our enemies, thus America and its allies joined Israel in their “War of Terror.” On September 11th, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu when asked about U.S.-Israeli relations; his quick reply was, “It’s very good…Well, it’s not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy [for Israel]”

2. Two Arab nations; Iraq and Afghanistan. Attacked and destroyed!

3. They made massive profits during reconstruction efforts, mostly from scams and embezzling U.S. taxpayer dollars.

4. Secured the strategic oil fields of Iraq.

5. Made lucrative profits for the neocon-linked oil and gas companies.

6. Established a permanent presence in the Middle East.

7. Seized the important Afghanistan pipeline corridor for pumping out gas and oil from the former Soviet states around the Caspian region.

8. Increased the U.S. military spending to 3.8 percent of GDP.

9. Increased profits to the defence contracting industries.

10. Funded new research and development for more “war technology”.

11. Created a new military-civilian-complex called Homeland Security.

12. Made immense profits from these Homeland Security-based contracts (i.e. Airport security scanners, etc.).

13. Advanced the neo-conservative political agenda; “police state” legislation like the Patriot Act and domestic spying programs.

14. Increased spending on covert intelligence agencies (CIA, NSA, etc.).

15.Used the 9/11 attacks as a propaganda tool, to advance their “War on Terror” agenda; the new WMD, weapon of mass deception.

16. Endorsed a neo-con “National Security Strategy;” a new U.S. doctrine of pre-emptive strike.

So who benefited from 9/11? Israel and the neo-cons, yes, but ultimately, the Illuminati Luciferian Agenda for World Government as the planet was driven ever closer toward WWIII.

Who lost out? The people of the United States, Afghanistan, and Iraq.

Who’s next? …See part Nine!!

Comments to: http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/

Reference:
1] http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=leo+strauss&sa=Search&domains=rense.com&sitesearch=rense.com
2] http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=Barry+Chamish&domains=rense.com&sitesearch=rense.com
3] http://www.terrorism-illuminati.com/illuminati
4] http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/consp_acua/consp_acua_add1.htm
5] http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_cfr_14.htm
6] http://www.terrorism-illuminati.com/illuminati &
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_enlightenment
7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism
8] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy
9] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbes
10] http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
11] http://www.google.com/search?q=false+flag+operation&rls=com.microsoft:en-gb:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7GPEA_enDK310
12] http://911review.com/precedent/century/gladio.html
13] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mir-Hossein_Mousavi
14] http://socyberty.com/government/criticism-of-plato-the-republic/
15] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omar_Sheikh
16] http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_mindconMKULTRA.htm#Additional_Information
17] http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=the+aspen+institute&sa=Search&domains=rense.com&sitesearch=rense.com
18] http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_911.htm
19] http://www.rense.com/general43/byrd.htm
20] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zbigniew_Brzezinski

A New Breed Of Female.

2009-09-06T00:43:00.007+02:00

By Anne Berg 6th September 2009.

DREPTE AFGHANERE PÅ OPPDRAG FRA STORTINGET:

(Kill Afghans : A Mission Ordered By The Norwegian Parliament).

Jeg tenkte ikke så mye på at det var mennesker jeg skjøt.

(I didn't really think of them as people when I fired the first shots, "says Tone Gunnes)

From her armored vehicle (see photo) 22 yr old former Norwegian soldier, Tone Gunness says she killed between 20 to 25 people during her tour of duty in Afghanistan. She maintains that it was an assignment with which she had been tasked by the Norwegian Parliament. Now back home in Norway, she states in a newspaper interview that she feels no remorse and doesn't think it was a such a big deal. In her own words it was an "OK experience". In the interview she says that she did receive psychiatric counseling and had to fill out some forms, but it it did not mean much and she does not dwell on her experience.

The interview was conducted during training for her new occupation - to join the police force. Pity the `subject` crossing her path. According to this new breed of female, she did not give much thought to the fact that she shot and killed human beings. She was there to fight terrorists - her leaders told her so. She also believes that the citizens of Afghanistan see them as liberators and welcome their presence. (Funny, but the Norwegians did not see it that way during the WW2 German occupation).

Tone Gunnes (22) rode `Shotgun` in Afghanistan. Read Original Story Here

http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/uriks/article3252398.ece
http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-09-04-voa7.cfm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/sep/04/afghan-village-devastated-nato-missiles

The Nexus Of Evil : Part Seven (A Pre-emptive Strike On Humanity).

2009-09-03T18:18:00.007+02:00

By Philip Jones 28th August 2009.

The Story So Far.

This series of articles actually began as nothing more than an `addendum` to my `To Kill A Tree` article[2] with a view to tracing the progress of designed and orchestrated conflict as outlined by General Albert Pike[1] in his letter to Giuseppe Mazzini [2], dated August 15, 1871. But as I delved ever deeper into the underworld of Secret Societies and their clandestine intrigues, and those personages who have dictated the course of world events over the past century and a half, the whole project took on a life of its own, and so what was to be a short summary of our `Age Of Conflict,` has developed into something of a semi major project in it's own right.

In Parts One to Four, we examined how the Age Of Conflict in which we live is the product of a dark alliance of `magic,` money and intellect, with intellect almost invariably subordinate to, and in the service of money, with money similarly being in the service of magic; the infernal forces of Lucifer manipulating both money and intellect to their will, with money being since the 20th century the primary overt source of it's visible power. I have showed how deep-rooted changes occurred primarily in two quite separate realms; those of money and intellect, and how this `Nexus Of Evil,` in the service of the very darkest of forces, has here in the first decade of the 21st Century, built a global control grid around all our lives, and how, by its hegemony over money, politics, religion, the media, big business, and education, it has subverted culture, rewritten history, falsified science, and manipulated and coerced humanity to the very precipice of disaster.

In Parts Five and Six, we examined the root of the `Islamic question` and how it connects into the `Nexus Of Evil. ` We revisited those turbulent events surrounding the Islamic Revolution in Iran back in 1979, and saw how contrary to the `fairy tale` broadcast to the world by the bought and paid for global media; the `revolution` was anything but a spontaneous uprising inspired by religious fanaticism. Behind the revolutionary zeal witnessed in Iran, we can recognise the `fingerprints` of those usual suspects where international skulduggery is concerned; the CIA, MI6, and Mossad, all working to Albert Pike's `timetable for that `Clash Of Civilisations` between the West and Islam, which he intended would be necessary to usher in the `New World Order.`

Here in Part Seven, and beyond, we will continue to follow the `money trail` up to the present day and hopefully show that a solution to our planet's woes is possible, if people of good heart and true faith will renounce petty doctrinal differences, come together and cease to give, give, give to the great force of evil which stalks our world, everything it wants to swallow.

Introduction : Why The West Fears Islam.

When one examines the West's fear of Islam, and tries to relate it to the reasons usually given -- Islamic fundamentalism, militancy, radicalism, terrorism, totalitarianism etc.-- it is difficult, if not impossible, to justify this fear on the basis of those reasons given. One has to believe, however, given all the facts and expertise available to the West, that the fear has to be founded on something more than mere xenophobia. What is the basis of this fear that causes the enemies of the Muslim world to play not so subtly on the theme of Pike's `Clash Of Civilisations` in order to demonize Islam and Muslims? Let us first examine what it is not, before we draw our conclusion as to the real reason why the leaders of the West fear Islam.

The fear of Muslim fundamentalism, militancy, radicalism, terrorism, totalitarianism, and the West's timely discovery of the so called `rogue states,` coincided most conveniently with the fall of the Berlin Wall, and the disintegration of the Soviet Union. Former Defence Secretary McNamara, in his 1989 testimony before the Senate Budget Committee, said US defence spending could safely be cut in half. It became clear that the US had to either undergo massive shifts in spending, a painful and unwelcome prospect for the defence establishment, or find new justification for continuing high levels of military expenditures. To provide this justification the Pentagon manufactured the threat of "rogue states and nuclear outlaws." The Gulf War was a contrived opportunity to sell this justification to the American people, to protect oil company profits, and to control the flow of oil to Europe and Japan who need it much more than does the US.

The International Institute for Strategic Studies calculates that the $262 billion US defence budget accounts for about 37 percent of global military expenditures. Russia, Japan, and China each will spend about $80 billion, $42 billion, and $7 billion. The six "rogue states" -- Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Syria, North Korea -- have a combined annual military budget of $15 billion. The US budgets for covert operations (US terrorism?) alone is double this amount. Given the paltry defence expenditures of all the "rogue states" combined, even after correcting for differences in costs, one has to believe that the "rogue states" are no match, militarily, for the West.

And, setting aside the morality of US covert operations that invite retaliation, so called Muslim terrorists should not be a major fear. Far more acts of terrorism and violent crime in the US, according to government statistics, are committed by non-Muslims than Muslims. And if, as propagated throughout the mass media, Muslims do pose a terrorist threat to the US, one hears very little discussion of what it is that these mysterious figures really want.

Islamic totalitarianism, an oxymoron to anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of Islam, should not be a Western concern either. A Muslim ruler may be totalitarian, but then his rule would not be Islamic. Furthermore, the Western record on supporting totalitarian Muslim regimes -- Iran under the Shah, Iraq before the Gulf War -- and doing business with non-democratic regimes -- China, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- speaks for itself.

As for Islamic fundamentalism, Islamic law is based upon the Quran, examples and sayings of the Prophet Muhammad, analogical deduction, consensus among the learned and individual reasoning. Strict interpretation of the Prophet's words lead to the conclusion that all who believe in one God are Muslim, and their faith is Islam; be they Muslim, Christian, Jew, or anyone else.

Fundamentalism is defined purely in terms of Christian thinking not Muslim. There is no parallel in an Islam that stresses the use of reason and logic. Absent a definition, the label Islamic fundamentalism serves only to obscure issues, rather than to resolve them. Meanwhile, the Christian Coalition, and the Zionists with their biblical claim to Palestine appear fundamentalist to many; yet both are courted by US politicians, and not viewed as a threat.

One can go on eliminating Western arguments against Islam and Muslims. Eventually, one has to ask, what then is the source of the West's fear of Islam and Muslims?

The late Marshall G. S. Hodgson, in "Rethinking World History", states: "[Islam's] conscious hopes for a godly world order represent one of the most remarkable undertakings in world history and because its less self-conscious general cultural heritage is laden with human values."

Muslims see the West beset with broken families, violent crime, and drugs. They see a society divided by race, religion, and huge disparities in income. They long for a peaceful life in which they may provide for the basic needs of their families, and enjoy the respect due to all mankind regardless of their race, religion, position, or wealth.

These Muslims see their goals for a more just and compassionate society thwarted by a corrupt often Masonic Muslim elite whose primary purpose in life appears to be the accumulation of wealth and power, and the furthering of a common globalist agenda, regardless of the cost to their fellow human beings. They see these so called `Muslim` elites, who govern not by consensus as Islam prescribes, but by force and coercion, backed up by their fellow conspirators in the West, permitting dark outside powers to exploit their country, while they themselves derive few if any benefits, and find themselves subordinated by corrupt and decadent Western influences driving them down the same troubled road taken by the West. They see few opportunities to earn a decent living because most opportunities are withheld for the elite, their families, friends and their sycophants. And they see these elite remaining silent when their faith, which is about all they have left, is denigrated in the very same propaganda which serves to maintain the elite cabal.

The Muslim elite' allies are the defence establishment and the neo-imperialists in the West. Islam's mandate for justice and compassion opposes the primary objective of these neo-imperialists who seek to follow policies outlined in 1948 by "the leading dove and peace prize winner" Mr. George Kennan, for the US Department of State. In his top secret "Policy Planning Study 23", Mr. Kennan stated:

". . . we have about 50% of the world's wealth, but only 6.3% of its population . . . Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity . . . To do so, we will have to dispense with all sentimentality . . . We should cease to talk about vague and . . . unreal objectives such as human rights, the raising of living standards, and democratization."

To avoid exposure, these neo-imperialists and their allies in the defence establishment, spurred by the enemy within, divert attention by demonizing Islam and Muslims, thereby fanning the fires of bigotry and raising unrealistic fears among the people of the West.

This is the Hegelian Dialectic[3] in action. Just as Albert Pike indicated was needed in order to bring in the Luciferian Age, the `architects` of the Illuminati have `lined` up the `liberal` West as Thesis (the good guys), a western `intel op` created Islamism as Antithesis (the bad guys), with the `proposed `Clash Of Civilisations achieving the desired synthesis, namely the Luciferian Order.

I have written this so many times previously, and must reiterate that without a clear understanding of this diabolical trap, humanity's opportunity to finally live in peace and harmony will never be realised. The below diagram should be studied and digested by the reader, who will discover that it can be liberally applied in order to `decipher` almost every `geopolitical` situation or event and much more, right down to domestic arguments and petty squabbles.

The Jihad And the Dialectic.

Before proceeding with its plan for World War III, the Illuminati had by necessity to end the `Cold War,` with the Soviet Union, reducing in the process its status as a Superpower militarily and economically, thereby rendering the American military free to pit itself against the Muslim World. In a Time magazine cover story, published on Jan. 15, 1979, Z. Brzezinski proclaimed Iran, Afghanistan, and the Indian subcontinent as an “arc of crisis” that supposedly posed a grave challenge to the West, though one that could also spell the end of the Soviet empire. Within the auspices of the overall Illuminati agenda, the Arc of Crisis was used as a pretext to `foment` a wave of Islamism across Central Asia, that could firstly be used to bankrupt and destroy the Soviet Union, and then secondly, to recruit and engage Islamic `fundamentalists,` to later be used as the `bogeymen` of International Terrorism, with which to frighten the Western world.

On December 24th 1979, [5]after being `invited` by the Afghani government, the Russian military entered Afghanistan, and took up positions to protect government assets from rebel attacks.

The CIA’s support of the Mujahideen war in Afghanistan was its largest covert operation thus far, funded by a web of clandestine and illegal activities, known as the Iran-Contra Affair[7] which involved the complicity of the Muslim Brotherhood [4]and the Saudi regime as well. Essentially, the huge wealth created in Saudi Arabia through the orchestration of the Oil Crisis, would be used to fund the CIA’s covert operations. When Ronald Reagan became president, his administration immediately set about engaging in an expansion of the relationship already begun by Roosevelt, whereby Saudi Arabia would build a massive network of naval and air defence facilities that could sustain U.S. forces, under the pretext that they would be needed to protect the region or wage war against an aggressor. The program also involved a new understanding that Saudi Arabia would become a partner in covert operations, but not just in the Middle East. The Saudis agreed to fund anti-communist guerrillas in Afghanistan, Angola, and elsewhere, who were supported by the Reagan administration, including the Contras of Nicaragua.

Iran-Contra notwithstanding, when hostilities commenced between Iran and Iraq in 1980, the U.S (as the Illuminati always do) secretly backed both sides of the conflict, and further became involved in an operation which came to be known as Iraq-gate. The Reagan administration used proceeds from arms sales to Iran to fund the right-wing Contras, in an effort to overturn Nicaragua’s left-wing, but democratically elected, Sandanista government. Both actions were contrary to acts of Congress, which prohibited the funding of the Contras, and the sale of weapons to Iran, which it regarded as a “Terrorist state”. Furthermore, both actions also violated United Nations’ sanctions.

Throughout this period, until the death of Khomeini, (who we have seen previously was an ipso facto creature of the CIA) in 1989, Iran was portrayed as being at the very epicentre of `international terrorism,` calling on all Muslims to fight the Jihad against the Western nations, which Khomeini had categorized as “greater and lesser Satans.” But as ever the reality od events was quite a different matter. At the behest of the Americans, and using the local Shiah communities as intermediaries, Iran had supported and financed a number of `liberation` movements and other armed factions, from Palestine to Northern Ireland, to Sudan, and the Ivory Coast.

Intent on side-stepping Congress, the U.S. approached Prince Bandar[6] to solicit Saudi aid in funding the Contras. In his capacity as Saudi Ambassador to the US, Prince Bandar was allowed unprecedented access to Presidents and senior American officials since the Reagan era and was a close family friend of the Bushes. Bandar was also used as an intermediary with Saddam, when he made known his readiness to accept American aid. The U.S. had also been aiding the Iranians, primarily to gain their influence with militant groups that held several American hostages in Lebanon, and who supported bombings in Western European countries. However, the U.S. was also concerned with supporting Saddam, to protect the Saudis and its oil reserves. Though Congress would not have approved, the Reagan administration secretly allowed Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Egypt to transfer U.S. weapons, including howitzers, helicopters, and bombs, to Saddam.

The running of the Iran-Contra operation, and the arming of the Mujahideen in Afghanistan, was coordinated by the then director of the CIA William Casey, whose `unaccountable and invisible,` operations, involved arms being traded with the Contras for cocaine, and profits from its sale to Black street gangs of Los Angeles, funds from which were then used for the various covert CIA campaigns.

The U.S. government’s involvement in drug-trafficking for the financing of covert activities can be traced back at least to the Office of Strategic Service (OSS), the forerunner of the CIA. During the Vietnam Conflict, the CIA, working together with the assistance of the hill tribes of Vietnam, smuggled untold amounts of Heroin from the `Golden Triangle` region of South-east Asia. Even before that, the French had controlled the Opium trade in this part of the world, an operation which would subsequently become known as the `French Connection.`[8] Following their defeat at Dien Bien Phu, in 1954, the French began to withdraw their forces from Indochina, the Americans thereby taking over the Opium trade, facilitated through the CIA’s `Air America` network of aircraft (No apologies to Mel Gibson fans).

The CIA continued to be an important player in the Golden Triangle heroin trade, long after the war in Vietnam was over. In his book, `Terrorism And The Illuminati,`[5] David Livingstone writes:

“This fact was corroborated Colonel Bo Gritz, a legend in the Special Forces community, after whom Sylvester Stallone modeled himself in the movie “First Blood”. During 1989, Gritz and two others traveled to the Shanland region of northern Burma, controlled by warlord Khun Sa, who runs the Golden Triangle Opium business. Gritz videotaped a meeting with Khun Sa, in which he revealed that the US government official he dealt with was Richard Armitage, the US Assistant Secretary of Defence. Khun Sa said that Armitage, in turn, used the services of a “traffic manager,” who he named on camera as Santos Trafficante, Florida’s notorious Mafia “Boss”.

Richard Armitage, a thoroughly distasteful character and probable psychopath, had been a professional assassin in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia during the Vietnam war, and lead teams similar to the Phoenix program[9] that killed and tortured tens of thousands of Asians. He has been accused of links to illicit gambling, drug smuggling and the expansion of organized crime in Russia, Central Asia and the Far East. As Assistant Secretary of Defence in the Reagan Administration, Armitage was responsible for coordinating covert military operations, and was in close liaison with Oliver North[10]. Armitage’s deputy and chief anti-terrorist official, Noel Koch, was part of the team set up by North, in addition to Richard Secord, George Cave, a former CIA station chief in Tehran, and Colin Powell, military assistant to U.S. Defence Secretary Caspar Weinberger.

(I invite the reader to do some research on the above named individuals, who will be seen to have performed acts of perfidy and treachery against the American people which in a just society would have resulted at the very least in their incarceration for life).

It was William Casey, the former CIA Director, in collaboration with Armitage in the Pentagon, who `ran` the Mujahideen covert war operations in Afghanistan. Stinger missiles, mountain caves equipped as operation centres, military training camps for internationally recruited Islamic combatants, as well as training and recruitment inside the United States, were all a part of what was funded, using the profits from the sale of opium and illicit drugs, channelled through the BCCI, at the suggestion of Saudi Arabia, working closely with the CIA, who in turn used the Pakistani ISI[11] as a proxy to cover its own involvement.

The Bank Of Crooks And Criminals International.

From the very commencement of hostilities in Afghanistan, the CIA, partnered itself with Pakistani Intelligence, in organizing the rebel Mujahideen fighters. Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence, or ISI, was established in 1948, by British Intelligence with whom it has continually maintained close ties. The power of the ISI increased incrementally for its first twenty years, until the emergence of Pakistan’s first popularly elected leader, the socialist Zulfikar Ali Bhutto in 1971. Bhutto eventually fell out of favour with the British, and was overthrown by General Zia Ul-Haq, who had been appointed Chief of the Army Staff by Bhutto in 1976, at the insistence of Gulam Jilani Khan, the Director General of the ISI.

In his book, `If I Am Assassinated,` penned in prison, Bhutto relates how Henry Kissinger threatened him for pushing forward on Pakistan’s nuclear energy program, telling him, “We will make an example of you!” Bhutto was executed in 1978. A spokesman of the Muslim Brotherhood boasted, “The Brotherhood has taken over in Iran and Pakistan. Bhutto stood for intrusion of the West into Islam. Bhutto was everything that Pakistan was not. That is why we killed him. And we will use his death as a warning to others.”

The main `artery` for CIA funds to the Mujahideen fighting in Afghanistan was the Bank of Credit and Commerce International, or BCCI[12]. Created in 1972 by Pakistani banker Agha Hasan Abedi, it was initially funded by Sheik Zayed of Abu Dhabi, in anticipation of the petrodollar bonanza of the oil crisis. In their book `The Outlaw Bank,` Beatty and Gwynne describe that, “BCCI had been built from oil, from the enormous wealth that flowed into the Middle East after the huge OPEC oil price increases of the 1970s. Though Abedi could not claim full credit for it, the timing of BCCI’s launch was nothing short of miraculous , particularly since the American speaker at the 1973 Bilderberg[13] meeting stated that, once oil prices would have increased, “serious problems would be caused by unprecedented foreign exchange accumulations of countries such as Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi.”

In 1976 BCCI purchased 85% of the Banque de Commerce et Placements of Geneva, Switzerland. After taking over the bank, BCCI installed Alfred Hartmann as manager. Hartmann then became the chief financial officer for BCC Holding, and thus one of BCCI’s most influential directors. Hartmann maintained connections with the Rothschilds,[14] being president of Rothschild Bank AG of Zurich. Hartmann was also vice-chairman of NY-InterMaritime Bank of Geneva, run by Mossad operative Bruce Rappaport, who was on the board of N.M. Rothschild and Sons in London.

“Black funds” for the CIA travelled through BCCI for the Contra war, the Iranian-Israeli pay-off's, and large covert wars in Afghanistan and Angola. William Casey had intended all along to establish an offshore entity capable of conducting covert operations that was “stand-alone”, financially independent, and free from congressional oversight. BCCI was the solution.

BCCI became the bank of choice for Middle Eastern terrorists, arms and drug runners, South American drug cartels, organized crime lords, and intelligence services such as the ISI, Mossad, MI6 and the CIA. A branch was set up in Panama, for the cash that Manuel Noriega was funnelling out of his country. Noriega, who had been a long-standing U.S. intelligence asset, was also an informant for the Mossad. He had undergone military and intelligence training in Israel, and-like Uganda’s dictator Idi Amin, wore his Israeli paratrooper wings on his uniform for years afterward.

The BCCI `whitewashed` money for the drug trade and assisted Third World dictators loot their nation's treasuries. BCCI also operated an undercover division of the bank, labelled the “black network,” which functioned as a global intelligence operation and a Mafia-like enforcement squad. It used sophisticated spy equipment and techniques, along with bribery, extortion, kidnapping, prostitution, and even, by some accounts, assassination. The black network operated a lucrative arms-trade business and transported drugs and gold.

The Mujahideen.

The primary purpose of the BCCI, and the reason behind its spectacular rise in fortunes, was its connection to the ISI, and the Mujahideen fighting the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. After Zia replaced Bhutto as Pakistan’s president, he appointed his friend Fazle Haq to be the governor of Pakistan’s North-West Frontier Province in 1978. This is the area that borders Afghanistan, through which drugs and weapons were smuggled over the Khyber Pass. Fazle Haq was an important friend and backer of BCCI’s founder Hasan Abedi, and the BCCI was used to launder untold millions of ISI narcotics revenue.

Under National Security Directive 3, signed by President Reagan in 1982, the then Vice President George Bush Snr. was given charge of the entire global covert action program. It was Bush’s Special Situation Group (SSG), and Crisis Pre-Planning Group (CPPG), at the White House, that employed Oliver North, Richard Secord, “Public Diplomacy” head Walter Raymond, and the entire Iran-Contra operators. Throughout the 1980s, the Afghan War was the largest single program under this Bush chain of command.

As indicated by a series of articles in the Executive Intelligence Review, titled “the Anglo-American support apparatus behind the Afghani Mujahideen”, the City of London also played a leading role in promoting the Afghan `Jihad.` Following the Soviet invasion, Lord Nicholas Bethell, a career British Intelligence agent, and close friend of British double agent Kim Philby, formed Radio Free Kabul, as a voice for the Mujahideen. Other members included Winston Churchill III, former Foreign Secretary Baron Chalfont, Lord Morrison of Lambeth, the former head of the Foreign Office, and British Intelligence official Ray Whitney.

Another British creation was the Afghan Relief Committee (ARC) was established in 1980 by Wall Street investment banker and spy John Train. From its inception, the ARC worked closely with Freedom House, chaired by Leo Cherne, and which was has also included among its board of trustees, Zbigniew Brzezinski and Samuel Huntington, author of The Clash of Civilizations.

Heavily involved in providing safe refuge for the Mujahideen, and also in facilitating their dispersal throughout the world, was Ismaili Prince Sadruddin Aga Khan, the second son of the hereditary Imam of the Ismailis. The Prince was also coordinator of the U.N. Humanitarian and Economic Assistance Programs for Afghanistan, working with John Train, in `Operation Salam,` which although officially intended to organize the repatriation of Afghan refugees after the Soviet withdrawal, was also reportedly involved in the training and supply of the Mujahideen, who often operated out of U.N. refugee camps situated on the Pakistan-Afghanistan border.

Prince Sadruddin has also been a key figure in Prince Philip’s World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), which, according to the EIR, is “the British royal family’s most important intelligence agency”. Since its creation in 1961, Prince Sadruddin has been one of is primary funders, as has his nephew, the current leader of the Ismailis. Through the London-based Aga Khan Foundation, and the Geneva-based Belle-rive Foundation, he has become a luminary in the environmental movement.

In 1983, the WWF successfully `persuaded` the Pakistani government to create two national parks directly on the Afghan border, an area known for the quality and abundance of its opium poppy, which was assiduously cultivated by the Mujahideen. It was also a primary staging area for smuggling weapons into Afghanistan. Before the Soviet-Afghan war, opium production in Afghanistan and Pakistan was channelled to small regional markets, and there was no local production of heroin. However, within two years of the CIA operation in Afghanistan, border between Pakistan and Afghanistan became the world’s top heroin producer, supplying sixty percent of U.S. demand. In Pakistan, the heroin-addict population went from near zero in 1979, to 1.2million by 1985, a much steeper rise than in any other nation. CIA assets again controlled this heroin trade, but once the heroin left Pakistan’s laboratories, the Sicilian Mafia managed its export to the U.S., which according to the DEA , it then distributed to street gangs through a chain of pizza parlours.

Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, the main recipient of CIA funding among the Mujahideen groups, and affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, was at the centre of the drug trade laundered through BCCI to fund the Mujahideen campaign. Over time it has emerged that Hekmatyar was not only an ISI asset, who laundered his money through BCCI, but that he also cooperated with the KGB to ensure his status as the most powerful warlord among many rivals. Human rights groups alleged that he was responsible for murdering more Afghans than the Soviet Union killed.

Al Qaeda.

The Muslim Brotherhood has been highly successful in its efforts to recruit a substantial `pool` of `agent-provocateurs` for the Illuminati. Although the `foot soldiers` who `sign up` to Jihad [15]may sincerely believe they are defending Islam, and confronting `Western imperialism,` in truth the various groups they are recruited into, though representing diverse factions, are a part of a single network serving the same Illuminati agenda as the supposed enemy. When we explore the political and financial connections of the terrorists, we find that these are not merely wayward fanatics, operating in isolation, but that their channels lead to the upper reaches of power, in both the British and American governments, and further into the dark `underworld` of the occult and criminal underworlds.

According to Svali, a former member of the cult, “The Illuminati “.... are truly an international group, and the group’s agenda supersedes any nationalistic feelings.”

Canadian author David Livingstone explains in his book `Terrorism And The Illuminati,` “That members of this network could share a common goal, despite adhering to apparently conflicting ideologies and religious creeds, is explained by the fact that the Illuminati believe there is no truth. This reality, according to them, is too difficult to handle for all but the `elite.` As for the masses, however, they require religion. It is therefore perceived as necessary by the Illuminati to don the façade of religion to lead them.”

As Robert Dreyfuss clarifies:

“The real Muslim Brothers are those whose hands are never dirtied with the business of killing and burning. They are the secretive bankers and financiers who stand behind the curtain, the members of the old Arab, Turkish, or Persian families whose genealogy places them in the oligarchical elite, with smooth business and intelligence associations to the European black nobility and, especially, to the British oligarchy. And the Muslim Brotherhood is money. Together, the Brotherhood probably controls several tens of billions of dollars in immediate liquid assets, and controls billions more in day-to-day business operations in everything from oil trade and banking to drug-running, illegal arms merchandising, and gold and diamond smuggling. By allying with the Muslim Brotherhood, the Anglo-Americans are not merely buying into a terrorists-for-hire racket; they are partners in a powerful and worldwide financial empire that extends from numbered Swiss bank accounts to offshore havens in Dubai, Kuwait and Hong Kong.”

In January 1981, when Ronald Reagan became President, he was told that a Mujahideen fighting force of no less than 150,000 trained and well-equipped troops was needed in Afghanistan. William Casey arranged for a worldwide recruitment effort, to be organised through the CIA and exercised through the Muslim Brotherhood. It was intended to reach out to the Afghan exile communities in Europe, North Africa, other parts of the Islamic world, and America. This recruitment drive to attract Muslims from across the globe was of course a pretext. The Mujahideen were able to attract only a few thousand volunteers. In reality, the recruitment effort was aimed at indoctrinating an international pool of terrorists to serve beyond the war in Afghanistan, to be later used to instigate the phony `War On Terror.`

Meanwhile, these would be regarded as “Freedom Fighters”, but the war in Afghanistan provided the Illuminati with the opportunity to gather together an international army of terrorist recruits, whose directives would later be changed to attack the US. The prime recruiting ground for these dupes, of course, was Saudi Arabia, the bastion of that fanatical version of Islam known as `Wahhabism,` created by the British in the eighteenth century, a country which was now, following the orchestration of the oil crisis, in a financial position to fund these covert operations on behalf of their co-conspirators in London and Washington.

In order to gain Saudi support for the effort, Casey contacted Bandar, who subsequently arranged a meeting with King Fahd, as a result of which, the Saudis guaranteed to match America dollar for dollar in supporting the Mujahideen. For the royal family, the war was not just part of the cornerstone of the burgeoning Saudi alliance with the United States, but served other purposes as well. Contributing to the war effort placated the militant clerics and helped accommodate the growing unrest and the more radical elements at home.

The ISI suggested that the presence of a Saudi prince to lead the “Jihad” in Afghanistan would be helpful, but as no volunteers were forthcoming, the Saudi leaders recommended Usama bin Laden, who hailed from a wealthy Saudi family with close affiliation to the monarchy. Although bin Laden became responsible for the organization and training of new recruits, it was Sheikh Abdullah Azzam who formulated the ideological argument, according to Islamic law, in order to justify the war in Afghanistan as `Jihad,` by which recruits were to be motivated unwittingly to serve US interests against the Soviets.

Like Abdul Wahhab[16], and typical of Muslim Brotherhood ideology, Azzam's ideas depended on an interpretation of Islamic law derived from Ibn Taymiyyah[17]. In Ibn Taymiyyah’s time, the Islamic world had come under the sway of the Mongols.[18] Despite the fact that the Mongol invaders had accepted Islam, Ibn Taymiyyah insisted that their religion was tainted, and therefore that they were unbelievers. By categorizing the Mongol rulers as infidel invaders, Ibn Taymiyyah argued that it was obligatory for the Muslims to fight them. Azzam cynically employed similar arguments, claiming that once a Muslim land is invaded, the Muslims of the world must unite the defend it. Ultimately, what Azzam did was to convince his Muslim brethren that, despite the rampant corruption in their own countries, it was incumbent upon them to fight the unholy infidels in Afghanistan, omitting to mention the fact that it was not at that time a Muslim country anyway, but rather, one which had already been subjected to Communism.

Azzam was assassinated in a car bomb attack in late 1989. Unsubstantiated reports have inferred that some US intelligence officials believe bin Laden ordered the killing.

Osama bin Laden : The New Saladin?

“Through his own personal reputation as a pious Muslim who favoured the cause of Wahabi Islamism, and through involvement of the bin Laden companies in construction and renovation at the holy shrines of Mecca and Medina, he seemed to both Saudi Intelligence and the CIA an ideal choice for the leading role he began to play. Bin Laden began to pay, with his own company and funds, for recruitment, transportation and training of the Arab volunteers who flocked, first to Peshawar, and to Afghanistan... By 1995 bin Laden had collected enough millions from his family and company wealth... to organise al Qaeda. “ John Cooley, ABC Correspondent.

Whilst attending King Abdul Aziz University in Jeddah, Osama bin Laden through his relationship with Mohammed Qutb, was initiated into the Muslim Brotherhood. He had also attended Azzam’s classes and became absorbed into his militant ideology. In 1979, Azzam left Saudi Arabia to join the Afghan Jihad, and bin Laden, at just twenty-two years of age, followed soon after. Together, they founded the MAK, or “Maktab al-Khidamat”, or the Mujahideen Services Bureau, based in Peshawar, Pakistan. According to John Loftus, however, it was George Bush Sr., as vice president, who was actually in charge of the covert operations that supported the MAK. The MAK was nurtured by Pakistan’s ISI, and linked up with Pakistan’s Muslim Brotherhood organization, the Jamaat-e Islami, founded by Abul Ala Maududi, to recruit fighters.

By the late eighties, MAK branches could be found in around fifty countries worldwide, by means of which young Muslims from around the globe, deceived by the call of Jihad, travelled to fight in Afghanistan. Recognising that many of the prospective Mujahideen lacked training, Azzam and bin Laden established the Bayt Al-Ansar in Peshawar, as a central training base, or `Al Qaeda,` set up with the assistance of the resident CIA chief in Peshawar.

That same year, bin Laden flew to the US under the false name of “Tim Osman,” where he met with three men in Sherman Oaks, California. Among them was Ted Gunderson[19], a retired FBI agent, who had been approached by a high-level official in the administration of President Ronald Reagan to provide, outside of government channels, assistance to the Afghan Mujahideen.

The `project` supplied the Afghani resistance with an estimated 600 stinger surface-to-air, shoulder-fired missiles, which had been modified to prevent their use against American aircraft if captured. Gunderson would later confirm that it was these weapons that turned the tide of battle in Afghanistan against the Soviets, whose aircraft, and particularly attack helicopters, fell victim in large numbers to the missiles.

In 1991, bin Laden, having briefly spent some time in Saudi Arabia, travelled first to Pakistan and then Afghanistan, before finally settling in the Sudan, where General Omar Hassan al-Bashir had recently taken power in a military coup. A few months later, at a meeting of the Muslim Brotherhood held in London, it was decided that Sudan would be the new base for the Islamist movement, and a Muslim Brotherhood leadership council of nineteen members was subsequently established in Khartoum under Hassan al Turabi, who was soon to emerge as the real power in the Sudanese regime.

At the end of 1991, as the war in Afghanistan was winding down, CIA leaders in Peshawar held top secret meetings with bin Laden under the authority of Prince Turki al Faisal, the head of Saudi intelligence. As a consequence, many of the fighters who had trained and volunteered in Afghanistan were relocated to Sudan. Bin Laden still however, continued to finance training camps, in Afghanistan, for the purposes of which he often returned. On each of these visits, it is said that he met with the local CIA experts.

Together with the management of weapons shipments to Sudan, bin Laden is also known to have organised and managed an opium supply chain that was established before he departed for Afghanistan with Hekmatyar. The DEA[20] confirms having received multi-source information of Bin Laden's involvement in the financing and facilitation of heroin trafficking activities. It is believed that Al Qaeda reportedly earns as much as six billion a year from illicit drug-trafficking.
It was in Bosnia, during the war there, that Al Qaeda operatives, working with the US, established connections with Bosnian organized crime, creating a route for the trafficking of heroin from Afghanistan into Europe through the Balkans.

February 26, 1993.

The charge that Sheik Omar Abdur Rahman operated with CIA sanction originates from various sources, including an anonymous government official, who leaked that it was a CIA officer assigned as a consular official that approved the Sheik’s visa from the Sudan. A New York Times article on July 14, 1993 reported that the Egyptian President Mubarak had suggested that the visa had been issued to Rahman as a payoff for “services” rendered. “The sheikh has been a CIA agent since his days in Afghanistan,” Mubarak told Egypt’s al-Gomhuria newspaper. “He still earns a salary.”

In the aftermath of the 1993 World Trade Centre bombing, literally thousands of suspected terrorists were incarcerated, including one Omar Abdul Rahman, who was eventually convicted of a conspiracy to blow up New York City landmarks. Egyptian Emad Salem, an FBI informant, and bodyguard for the Sheikh was the key prosecution witness in the trial. Salem revealed under questioning that he had received a quarter million to one million dollars for his services as an FBI informant. He testified that the FBI had prior knowledge of the attack and told him they intended to substitute a harmless powder for the explosives. However, as events that fatal day attest to, this plan was called off by an FBI supervisor, and the bombing was not stopped. Defence attorney William Kunstler discovered that not only was Salem a lieutenant colonel in the Egyptian army, he remained in the employment of the Egyptian government. Apart from the money he received from the FBI, Salem was also funded, according to Kunstler, by other sources connected to foreign regimes, including an organization founded by Rabbi Meir Kahane.[21]

Mossad agent, Victor Ostrovsky, who left Israel’s secret police agency and wrote his best-selling book, By Way of Deception, told the Village Voice that Israeli intelligence may well have been behind the World Trade Center bombing. Mossad had motive and opportunity, says Ostrovsky, though he readily admits he doesn’t have “a shred of evidence” to support his theory. Ostrovsky says that the Mossad would have infiltrated the radical mosques in New Jersey and Brooklyn, where Abdul Rahman preached and disciples like El Sayyid Nosair prayed, and almost certainly recruited a close associate of the Blind Sheikh. The insider is recruited in what Ostrovsky calls a “false flag operation.” The Arab “thinks he is being recruited by an Iranian agent or a Libyan,” says Ostrovsky. He never suspects he is actually being “run” by Mossad.

Ostrovsky also points out that Mossad has effectively used this modus operandi on previous occasions. According to accounts given by Ostrovsky, in 1984 Mossad detonated bombs outside of the U.S. embassy in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia’s capital city, claiming credit in the name of an unknown radical Saudi resistance group. A member of Mossad at the time, Ostrovsky says the purpose was to weaken U.S./Saudi relations, by demonstrating to the U.S. that the regime was fragile and about to fall.

According to Israeli intelligence sources Ahmad Ajaj, one of the men accused of conspiring to bomb the World Trade Centre, is thought to have been a Mossad `mole.` The FBI had already identified Ajaj as being a senior Intifada activist in the occupied territories, having close ties to both El Fatah, and Hamas.

However, Kol Ha’ir, a highly regarded weekly in Jerusalem reported that Ajaj was never involved in Intifada activities, or with the PLO, or Hamas. Citing court papers and other sources, the pape maintained that Ajaj was only a petty crook, and that during his prison stay, after having been sentenced in 1988 for counterfeiting U.S. dollars, he was recruited by Mossad. Strangely or not, considering this particular field of enquiry, following his release a year later, he had undergone a radical metamorphosis and become a devout Muslim.

It wasn't long after, that he was arrested for smuggling weapons into the West Bank, allegedly for El Fatah. Israeli intelligence sources say however, that the arrest for weapons smuggling, and Ajaj’s supposed torture and deportation, were staged by Mossad to establish his credentials as an intifada activist. Mossad allegedly `tasked` Ajaj to infiltrate radical Palestinian groups operating outside of Israel's borders. Israeli intelligence sources say that it is commonplace for Mossad to recruit from the ranks of common criminals.

The Carlyle Connection.

The Carlyle Group’s relationships with prominent Saudis is particularly shady when one considers that despite assertions that Osama is estranged from the family, the documentary records clearly and emphatically contradict the claim. The Wall Street Journal reported that:

“Among its far-flung business interests, the well-heeled Saudi Arabian clan - which says it is estranged from Osama - is an investor in a fund established by Carlyle Group, a well-connected Washington merchant bank specializing in buyouts of defense and aerospace companies. Through this investment and its ties to Saudi royalty, the bin Laden family has become acquainted with some of the biggest names in the Republican Party. In recent years, former President Bush, ex-Secretary of State James Baker and ex-Secretary of Defense Frank Carlucci have made the pilgrimage to the bin Laden family’s headquarters in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Mr. Bush makes speeches on behalf of Carlyle Group and is senior adviser to its Asian Partners fund, while Mr. Baker is its senior counselor. Mr. Carlucci is the group’s chairman. Osama is one of more than 50 children of Mohammed bin Laden, who built the family’s $5 billion business, Saudi Binladin Group, largely with construction contracts from the Saudi government.”

Frank Carlucci, the perennial Chairman of the Carlyle Group, was a former Secretary of Defence in the Reagan Administration and a Deputy Director of the CIA during the Carter Administration. As the Second Secretary in the US Embassy in the Congo during the time of the reign and consequent assassination of Patrice Lumumba, Carlucci was believed to have been intimately involved in US efforts to undermine Lumumba’s government. In 1974, Carlucci took charge of the CIA operation to overthrow the Portugese government. He had been Chief of Sears Roebucks international operations, an actual espionage operation, and later became a top official of the American intelligence community.

The Libyan Affair: The Silencing Of The Lambs?

In 1984, At the request of the Liberian government, Charles Taylor[22] had been arrested and imprisoned in the U.S. Yet mysteriously, fifteen months later he somehow escaped from the Plymouth House of Corrections, and returned to Liberia to lead the revolt that toppled Doe. Taylor’s escape, which it is believed was organised in part by the CIA, greatly enhanced his reputation in Liberia as a `major player,` protected by a great foreign power.

In Terrorism And The Illuminati, David Livingstone writes:

“Douglas Farah asked his source, “CR”, a member of Taylor’s entourage, “Do fighters in the bush really offer human sacrifices and eat the hearts of their victims to gain their strength?” CR didn’t blink an eye. Yes he said, but only a few “really big men”, like Taylor, Foday Sankoh, and their senior commanders carried out the practice because it was such powerful magic. The main organ that gave one spiritual power was the heart. So it was often roasted and eaten.”

During the 1980s, Taylor and Sankoh attended the terrorist training camps of the World Revolutionary Headquarters in Libya, operated by Libyan leader Colonel Muammar al Qadhafi. It will come as no surprise to those reading this now familiar with the intrigues of the Illuminati that despite all his revolutionary and anti-Western rhetoric, Qadhafi is a Freemason and a One World conspirator. In 1980, Ronald Reagan accused Libya of sponsoring international terrorism, and in 1986, he ordered major bombing raids against so-called “terrorist sites”, murdering approximately sixty people, including Qadhafi’s adopted daughter.

Libya allegedly exacted revenge in 1988 by bombing Pan Am flight F103, thereby bankrupting that corporation. Pan Am’s own investigation however, discovered that U.S. government employees of the CIA had blown up the aircraft, in order to prevent a U.S. Army “hostage rescue team” on board from blowing the whistle on a Syrian heroin-dealing operation being used by the White House for its illegal Iran-Contra weapons sales.

It was in Libya that Charles Taylor met Ibrahim Bah, whom the FBI identify as the RUF’s [23]main diamond dealer with Al Qaeda. Senegalese born Bah speaks fluent French, Arabic, and English, as well as several local dialects. By the late 80s, he was a seasoned veteran in the Senegalese revolt, had studied Muslim theology in Egypt, trained in special warfare in Libya for four years, and served with the Mujahideen in Afghanistan. Following his return to Libya, he joined the Hezbollah in southern Lebanon where he fought against Israel. Upon his return to Libya, he served as Quaddafi's bodyguard and trainer.

In 1998 Al Qaeda’s Abdullah Ahmed Abdullah arrived in Liberia to make arrangement with Bah and the RUF, for Al Qaeda to purchase illegal Sierra Leone diamonds on a regular basis. The Bah network has been traced directly to Antwerp Belgium, the largest diamond centre in the world. Bah arranged the diamond transaction between al Qaeda and the RUF, the Charles Taylor-supported rebel army that controlled much of neighbouring civil-war-torn Sierra Leone. “The rebels used the cash from al Qaeda to buy the weapons. The stones gave al Qaeda a fail-safe way to hide its assets outside banks and other financial institutions,” writes Farah. “Belgian investigators later traced $20 million through a single account they believe was used by al Qaeda to purchase diamonds.”

As usual. the CIA has been reluctant to confirm or deny any evidence of a link between themselves and the operations mentioned above. Liberia had been a main CIA base throughout the Cold War. Charles Taylor himself was a CIA informant for years, and the U.S. backed his anti-Doe activities in the eighties and his bid for power in the nineties. This fact, along with the reality of Liberia having been a safe haven for Al Qaeda operatives, like Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, who was held in connection with the 1998 bombings of two US embassies in Africa, would explain why the US prevaricated in supporting Taylor’s usurper, and continues to refrain from using its influence to bring him before a UN war crimes tribunal. Taylor, is believed to be living in exile in Nigeria under a deal brokered by the United States.

The key player in the entire operation interfacing Al Qaeda, Sierra Leone’s RUF and Taylor’s Libya, was retired Israeli army Lt. Colonel, Yair Klein. According to one report in the Israeli newspaper, Yedioth Aharonoth, in 1996, Klein began a contract to provide weapons and training in Taylor’s Liberia, and to the RUF in Sierra Leone which controls the wealthy diamond district. Klein, though ostensibly a retired and so-called renegade intelligence free agent, enjoys the highest-level of protection from Israeli authorities. In the early 90s, he trained the forces of the Colombian drug cartels in assassination, bombings and other covert operations.

Also Involved in the Liberian diamond trade was Victor Bout, a notorious Russian arms dealer originally from Tajikistan. Bout supplied maintenance for Ariana Airways, Afghanistan’s national airline, which was taken over by al Qaeda, and began transportation for their illegal trade network. Passenger flights became few and infrequent, with the airline instead flying drugs, weapons, gold and personnel mostly between Afghanistan, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Pakistan. In 1999 by order of the UN, Ariana’s international flights were finally banned.

In 2002, the Belgian government, through Interpol, issued a warrant for Bout's arrest, on charges of illegal weapons trafficking. At the same time the Russian government was assuring Interpol, “we can say for sure Bout is not in Russia,” Bout was in the middle of taping a two-hour interview for a Moscow radio station. Intelligence officials stated that Bout had flown US clandestine operatives into Afghanistan, as well as badly needed ammunition and other supplies to the Northern Alliance. In exchange, they said, his past activities would be ignored.

In the following part, we will continue to put together the pieces in the puzzle that draws together the web of seemingly diverse, yet ultimately interconnected elements which constitute the `Nexus Of Evil` and further identify the personages and organisations driving humankind towards a third and undoubtedly final global cataclysm.

Comments to : http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/

Reference:

1] http://www.rense.com/general86/pikeknew.htm

2] http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/2009/07/to-kill-tree-part-one.html

3] http://nord.twu.net/acl/dialectic.html Hegelian Dialectic
4] http://www.terrorism-illuminati.com/muslim-brotherhood

5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in_Afghanistan

6] http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&domains=rense.com&sitesearch=rense.com&ei=qp2fSrexA4vM-Qad--DrDw&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=prince+bandar&spell=1

7] http://www.terrorism-illuminati.com/guns-drugs-jihad

8] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Connection

9] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Program

10] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_North
11] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inter-Services_Intelligence

12] http://www.terrorism-illuminati.com/guns-drugs-jihad

13] http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_bilderberg.htm

14] http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_rothschild.htm

15] http://www.mediamonitors.net/ahmedmotiar1.html

16] http://www.terrorism-illuminati.com/wahhabis

17] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Taymiyyah

18] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mongol_Invasions

19] http://www.google.com/search?q=ted+gunderson&rls=com.microsoft:en-gb:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7GPEA_enDK310

20] http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=com.microsoft%3Aen-gb%3AIE-SearchBox&rlz=1I7GPEA_enDK310&q=DEA&btnG=Search&aq=f&oq=&aqi=g10

21] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meir_Kahane

22] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Taylor_(Liberia)
23] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_United_Front

Jihad And The Illusion Of Truth.

2009-08-31T20:12:00.011+02:00

By Pervaiz Jamal 31st August 2009.

In the Name of God, the Beneficent, the Merciful.

All Praises be for Allah, the Lord of the Worlds.

The Beneficent, the Merciful.

Sovereign of the Day of Recompense.

You we worship, and You we seek for assistance.

Guide us to the Straight Path.

The path of those on whom You have bestowed Your grace,

Not of those who earned Your anger (the Jews), Nor those who went astray (the Christians).

The Holy Quran: The Opening.

The Story Of Good and Evil:

"And (have We not) shown him (man) the two highways? But he has made no haste on the path that is steep." Holy Qur'an: Al-Balad verses 10 and 11.

The confrontation between the forces of this world, plays itself out in a complex story, of the events that unfold through the many machinations that men create, by their various endeavours, composed of all sorts of intentions. To the public in general, things do not seem to have any particular pattern, nor does there seem to be much meaning behind most events. That for the average person, there is not much significant outside his daily coming and goings. But a careful examination of the interplay of these conflicting forces, reveals complicated, cleverly schemed operation, which displays the actually deeply meaningful course of reality.

That life is the conception of a much more sophisticated wisdom than what we had previously envisioned. The following is a humble attempt to expose some of that reality. We are in a particular period in time, when darkness is predominating. Some of what you are about to read may appear fantastic, but we must remember that our failure to apprehend such matters, is merely the sad fact of underestimating our own selves. We underestimate the potential for good and bad in human beings, because we underestimate ourselves. God created us with an intellect, but we fail to exercise it to its true potential. The capabilities of our intellect lie far beyond what we suspect.

This text is merely a brief resume of the subject, only to introduce the reader to it. Most facts, are presented with the bare minimum of evidence, but the reader can further explore each matter on his own in order to further feed their accounts. He will find its evidences at every step he takes, if he doesn’t satisfy himself merely of reports from others, but investigates matters for himself. Not forgetting to take full advantage of his intuition as a guide into subjects that need inquiry.

The Chosen:

The Jews were chosen by God above the rest of mankind to be an example of righteousness. However, they allowed pride to overcome them, misappropriating the title of Chosen People, to mean they were worthy of God’s favours at the exclusion of everyone else, in compliance with their desires, not God’s. They have become instead, an example for humanity of the extreme of man’s ingratitude to his Creator:

"O Children of Israel! call to mind the (special) favour which I bestowed upon you, and that I preferred you to all others." Holy Qur'an: Al-Baqarah, verse 122.

Though not professed by all Jews, the view that has come to predominate is Zionism. It is an ideology derived, not from their actual religion, but is rather a way in which they interpret that religion. They believe that God chose them above the rest of mankind, for some special virtue on their part, to give them a land. They see their relationship with God as that of a covenant made between He and them, that He promised them a land, the Promise Land. Consequently, they are called Zionists, because the focus of their belief, is the return to the land of Zion, Israel. Once they are to dwell in the Promised Land, as is said in the Bible, their messiah will come, and they will rule the nations of the world in peace.

As we can see, it is in the very foundations of the Jewish belief, that they are superior to the rest of humanity, and that they are destined to rule the world.

Say: "If the last Home, with God, be for you specially, and not for anyone else, then seek you for death, if you are sincere. But they shall never seek for death on account of the (sins) which their hands have sent on before them. And God is well-aquatinted with the wrong-doers. You wilt indeed find them, of all people, most greedy of life, even more than the pagans: Each one of them wishes he could be given a life of a thousand years: But the grant of such life will not save them from (due) chastisement for God sees well all that they do." Holy Qur'an: Al-Baqarah verses 94 to 96.

God promised Abraham He would make his descendants to dwell in the land between the Tigris and the Euphrates. They believe this promise to represent their covenant with God. But, their covenant with God was not that they were to be given a land, but that they were required to obey certain commandments. God took a covenant from the Children of Israel, and We appointed twelve leaders among them. And God said:

"I am with you if you establish regular prayers, pay alms and believe in My messengers; honour and assist them, and loan to God a beautiful loan. Verily, I will wipe out form you your evils and admit you to Gardens under which rivers flow. But if any of you after this, resists faith, he has indeed wandered from the Straight Path." Holy Qur'an: Al-Ma’idah verse 12.

"And remember We took a covenant from the Children of Israel: to worship none but God, treat with kindness your parents and kindred, and orphans and those in need; speak fair to the people; be steadfast in prayer; and give alms; then did you turn back, except a few among you, and you back slide (even now)." Holy Quran: Al-Baqarah, verse 83.

Because their hearts grew hard they twisted the truth to accord with their desires. They didn’t want to comply with God’s commandments, but they wanted the status of Chosen People. As a result, they chose to believe they were chosen because of some special virtue, and that such status was not conditional on any kind of behavior.

"But because of their breach of their covenant, We cursed them, and made their hearts grow hard: they change the words from their places and forget a good part of the Message that was sent them, and you will not cease to find them, except a few, bent on deceit: but forgive them, and overlook (their misdeeds): for God loves those who are kind." Holy Quran: Al-Ma’idah verse 13.

They changed the meaning of the covenant to simply being a promise to be given a land, totally disregarding the condition of obedience to the commandments. Choosing instead to believe that they were deserving of God’s favors regardless of their behavior, because they were chosen by Him. Moses led them out of Egypt to dwell in the Promised Land. Because of their constant transgression, God was displeased with them, and wished to punish them, but Moses begged God to fulfill his promise to Abraham. So, though He was displeased with them, He allowed them to dwell in the Promised Land, only to fulfill His promise to Abraham.

After the reign of David and Solomon, they were carried off into captivity at the hands of Nebuchadnezzar, ruler of the Babylonians in 586 BC. The Temple, Temple of Solomon, the center of Jewish community and a symbol of Jewish identity, was destroyed for the first time. Upon their return from Babylon, they re-established themselves and rebuilt the Temple. Several centuries later, in 70 AD, the Romans ransacked Jerusalem, the Temple was destroyed once again, never to be rebuilt, and the Jews scattered across the many parts of the world.

"And We decreed for the Children of Israel in the Book, that twice would they do mischief on the earth and be elated with mighty arrogance. When the first of the warnings came to pass We sent against you Our servants given to terrible warfare: they entered the very inmost parts of your homes; and it was a warning (completely) fulfilled. Then did We grant you victory over them: We gave you increase in resources and sons, and made you the more numerous in man-power. If you did well, you did well for yourselves, if you did evil, (you did it) against yourselves. So when the second of the warnings came to pass, (We permitted your enemies) to disfigure your faces, and to enter your Temple as they had entered it before and to visit with destruction all that fell into their power." Holy Quran: Bani-Israel verses 4 to 7

A central aspect of the Jewish religion, and in fact all religions is the coming of the expected Messiah, who is to guide all the nations. Every religion has foretold of the coming of the great Messiah, and by all signs available, it is the Prophet Mohammed who was being described. Because he was not Jewish they refused to accept him even though they recognized him as they would their own sons. The Christians believe him to be Jesus son of Mary. In any case they are still awaiting him. When he comes he will be their king, King of the Jews, the King of Zion. He will rebuild the Temple and they will rule the nations of the world in peace.

Zion:

Consequently, the Jews formulate ways by which to realize such a destiny and bring about their rulership of the world. Certainly it is not the case that every Jew participates consciously in this plan:

"There are among them some that are righteous, and some that are opposite..." Holy Qur'an: Al-Baqarah, verse 168

Its proponents comprise merely a section among them. It merely serves their purpose that the slightest suggestion of any Jewish malice prompts accusations of anti-Semitism on the part of those not in the know. It may just be a sign of their corruption that they do not expect God to hand them the world. Maybe it stems from the biblical concept that God helps those who help themselves. In any case, they actively pursue the realization of their purported destiny. As a result of deliberately twisting the idea of being Chosen, they disregard the rights of the rest of humanity.

The Talmud, the ancient book of Jewish jurisprudence, outlines such an attitude. The Jew is better than a non-Jew. The Gentile, or non-Jew, is viewed as being a mere brute, present on this earth to serve the purposes of Jews, like cattle. Just for example, Jews are allowed to expropriate the property of non-Jews, as well as charging them interest on debt, which is forbidden between themselves. Though Jews were themselves forbidden usury, they are nearly solely responsible for the forging of banking institutions throughout the centuries, and of which today they completely dominate. It has also been the backbone of their strategy. As far back as Ancient Greece we see the influx of Phoenicians from the coast cities of Ancient Palestine, establishing a new merchant class of money-lenders rivalling the Greek aristocracy.

Their strategy is essentially Machiavellian. Any form of treachery is acceptable, if an when it serves the greater "good", the fulfilment of the destiny of the Jewish People. The end justifies the means. Their ill intent for humanity can be traced throughout the centuries. Monopolizing the manufacture of weapons, practicing usury, pitting nation against nation, and pillaging the earth’s stores of gold. There is some controversy as to when exactly such efforts came into inception. Some say they began around Solomon’s reign, approximately three thousand years ago. Others claim it was initiated as a response to Jesus’ mission two thousand years ago.

The plan essentially is to deceive humanity into constructing a world empire whose rulership they will ultimately take hold of once its authority is secured. Then, to establish their awaited messiah as the ultimate ruler of humanity. This messiah is known to the Muslims as the Dajjal [Anti-Christ].

Europe:

Having been confronted with the mischief of the Jewish People, nearly every country in Europe expelled them, and they were banned entry up until only a few hundred years ago. Their first re-entry into Europe was by way of England. In 1649, Mennasseh Ben Israel financed Oliver Cromwell, enabling him to overthrow the monarchy of Charles I. Now known as the Glorious Revolution. Once their chosen ruler, Charles II, was installed, they moved quickly to repeal the law banning them entry into England. They immediately proceeded to create a new system of government now known as Parliament. The benefit of a parliamentary system to the Jews is that it completely debilitates the process of governing by confounding it in futile babble.

Through banking, the practice of "money-lending" for which they are famous, they infiltrated the industry of the country. Themselves adding to it, or fuelling it with a new infusion of funds through loans. As a result, we have what is now known as the Industrial Revolution. Whereby, the Jews transformed modern industry by a massive build up of production and manufacture. The tale that can now be told, of the extent of abuse and exploitation that took place during this period, is a sad one.

Freemasonry:

To implement such a plan, the Jews needed to recruit a secret army from among the Gentile, non-Jewish citizens of their host nation. Devised by the middle of the eighteenth century, was a secret society called the Illuminati. Adam Wieshaupt, an apostate Christian, who had been commissioned by a group of Jewish men, to formulate a plan by which to appropriate the rulership of the world by "peaceful means", conceived of its concept. A certain Bauer from Germany originally founded this society, who later changed his name to Baron Mayer von Rothschild (after the emblem of his guild: a red banner encrusted with the picture of an eagle clenching a handful of arrows. "Rothschild" in German means "red shield". Not coincidental is the use of the red flag in communist revolutions). This society was called The Illuminati because it was to be directed by a group of men who were to be "illumined", men professing the practice of special esoteric knowledge.

Recruiting many influential people, this society managed to permeate the upper echelons of European society. Emerging to replace the Illuminati in the following centuries, was the society of the Freemasons. Freemasonry was also capable of attracting a great deal of prominent people. Including, not only businessmen, heads of industry, but also major figures in government and the aristocracy. Including the crown in many cases. The entire British royal family has a long history of membership in Freemasonry.

The present queen of England, Elizabeth II, is the Grand Patroness of Freemasonry. The recruit is offered to participate, through his membership, in the establishment of a new order based on Christian principles. Also, he is assured that his financial future will be secured by the many contacts he is to receive, as well as the "brotherly" assistance that would be available to him through various avenues. Most importantly is the secret knowledge of the Craft, which he is promised to be introduced to. In return he is required to swear absolute allegiance to the Brotherhood and, to obey the orders of the thirteen elders, whose identity would to him remain unknown. Moreover, he would be subject to gruesome punishment and death if he were ever to divulge the secrets of the organization.

Other affiliated organizations are The Rosicrucians, Skull and Crossbones, the Rotary Club, the Lions Club and the Shriners. The theme of the organization is of course masonry. But it is masonry because their efforts in trying to forge a new order, is symbolically represented as the rebuilding of Temple of Solomon, each member helping to lay the bricks. Moreover, the basis of the cult of Freemasonry, is the initiation to the esoteric knowledge, having supposedly been passed down from King Solomon. The Craft they learn is magic. A knowledge the Jews have managed to preserve over the centuries.

"They followed what the Satan’s recited over Solomon’s Kingdom. Solomon did not disbelieve but Satan’s disbelieved, teaching men magic and such things as came down at Babylon to the angels Harut and Marut. But neither of these taught anyone (such things) without saying: "We are only for trial; so do not blaspheme." They learned from them the means to sow discord between man and wife. But they could not thus harm anyone except by God’s permission. And they learned what harmed the, not what profited them. And they knew that the buyers of (magic) would have no share in the happiness of the Hereafter. And vile was the price for which they did sell their souls, if they but knew!" Holy Qur'an: Al-Baqarah, verse 102.

The cult is divided into 33 degrees. Each degree is marked by its own initiation ritual and science that is taught within it. Each level introduces the initiate to higher levels of secret knowledge. At the entry level he is introduced to the most basic understanding of what Freemasonry is all about. But, with each subsequent level he is told that what he was introduced to at the earlier level was not actually what the Craft was really about, and that he would now be introduced to a true understanding of the purpose of the Brotherhood. Every time he ascends to a higher level, he is reindoctrinated in such a manner, so that his idea of the purpose of the cult is transformed as he is promoted to higher echelons.

The earlier initiates are duped into believing that the organization is a Christian one, and that its aims are Christian. According to 33rd degree Freemason and 19th century American politician Albert Pike, the god of freemasonry is the Devil. In fact the name of their god is Jah-Bul-On. It is only at the higher levels that the true nature of the cult is revealed to the member, and that he becomes a conscious worshipper of the Devil. Several figures are 33rd degree Freemasons in our time, one such being Ronald Reagan, former president of the United States. He was responsible for the establishment of the Church of Satan in California, a diabolical church, of which many high profile personalities are members, including Mick Jagger, who is a high priest.

Usury:

Usury according to Christianity is forbidden, so those figures exercising power in the economy had an interest in the deterioration of the Church’s authority. Those interested in the establishment of a banking system, to reap the profits of usury, needed to pick away at the power of the Church. By weakening the Church’s authority through its various methods of dispensing propaganda, the people’s growing desire for loans, the pressure to conform to an increasingly interest oriented business world, and the Church’s own corrupted tendencies, they managed to force the Church to yield on its stance against usury.

It had been necessary to eliminate Christianity, not only because of its hindrance as a potent political body, but as well because of its influence over the mentalities of the Europeans. To create a citizen geared to optimum levels of production, citizens would have to be hard working. The best slave is the hard-working one. Secondly he would have to be motivated to spend everything he earns, so that manufacturers may sell their products. Therefore, it would be necessary to inculcate greed. The other-worldliness of Christianity stood in the way such indoctrination.

The method used would be propaganda, to place doubt as to the legitimacy of the Christian religion. Not only did the Church’s own corruption and hypocrisy, once exposed, work formidably against it, but once scientific research had unearthed the incongruities of the Bible, it was finally possible to discredit Christianity entirely. Furthermore, the Theory of Evolution if misinterpreted suggested an altogether different concept of reality. The European then searched for an alternative belief system. The Jews were there to fill the vacuum with an assortment of "new" or "progressive" ideas.

It is thought that Gutenburg, by the invention of the printing press, liberated mankind from ignorance by making literature available to the common man. Yet, by seizing hold of the new publishing industry, Jews managed to control the entire range of material that would now be available. They produced an array of materiel designed to upset the power of the Church, by a new line of writers and philosophers (usually Freemasons) whom they would themselves help bring into prominence. Consequently, the latter part of the eighteenth century is now known as the Age of Enlightenment.

The wording "enlightenment" should be carefully noted for it was forged by the "illumined" or "enlightened" members of the Illuminata. Most of the major figures of the Enlightenment in fact were Freemasons like the renowned Frenchman Rousseau and the writer Voltaire. The essence of the Enlightenment movement was that it marked the beginning of "free thinking". In other words, that it was considered the first major movement in secular thought, or irreligious or even anti-religious thought.

The French Revolution:

A primary example of where this was put into place is France. Once the people had been freed from the Church’s hold, they were overcome by a new tide of revolutionary ideas. They easily absorbed the Freemason ideals of Liberty, Fraternity, Equality that became the slogan of the French Revolution. Now that the concept of the monarchy being a power vested by God was fully suspended, motivated by their new ideals, spurred on by the agents of Freemasonry, the French revolted against their Aristocracy.

It had been necessary to destroy the aristocracy because it contained the authority of the state within hereditary bonds. Once such a barrier was removed, the new Bourgeoisie, or middle-class merchant, took the reigns of power, now that power was accessible to those able to manage mobility within the industry. Russia in 1918 should be interpreted in a similar fashion. Karl Marx, himself a Jew, was commissioned to write Das Kapital by Freemasons, which they used to create the Red Empire, over the ashes of the Russian aristocracy. Since it's very inception the Soviet Union was entirely dominated by Jews, from the KGB to the Politburo.

America Incorporated:

In the USA, the Jews can be seen dominating every aspect of American industry from banking, to manufacturing, to the media, as well as such national institutions as government and education. These are manipulated to transform the USA into a massive weapons production centre, or as has been termed, a Military-Industrial-Complex. To build up the might of the West, not for its present bogus conflicts, but to be eventually used to secure the power of a world empire.

In the middle of the nineteenth century, banks started encouraging the buy-out of certain companies by others. Instead of several companies competing within the same market, it was seen as more advantageous to merge them into a single monopoly, or at least a collection of a few companies in a certain field, in order to maximize profits. Therefore, there began a merger movement, where whole sectors of industry came to be dominated by a few very large companies. These buy-outs required massive loans, which were of course financed by the banks. By imposing conditions on loans or requiring the appointment of specific people, or even representatives, on the board of directors of these companies, the banks found a way to exercise control over the industry.

The United States’ many banks came under the authority of a few major banks. Massive financial groups thus appeared, composed of large corporations and their financial institutions, each headed by a major bank or banks, distributed throughout the major industrial areas. Already by the turn of the century, fifty percent of the industry of America was under the direct or indirect control of a few major banking powers. This merger movement continued throughout the century and goes on up until this day.

Now companies are so huge, called multi-national corporations, that they diversify their activities in several fields simultaneously and across national boarders. For example a major corporation may own an industrial plant in steel, a clothing chain, a food producer, a publishing company and a television network all at once. If they wish, they can exercise their influence in one field to effect their profits in another. For example, they can create a television program, along with a complimentary book series or a magazine, to advertise the products they manufacture in another field of industry. Just as many toy giants animate their products on Saturday morning television. Or, the Children’ Television Workshop, producer of the "award" winning "educational" children’s television program, Sesame Street, is composed entirely of businessmen and financiers representing the major financial groups.

Indoctrination:

It is a mystery to many people as to what makes Americans so patriotic. The reason is simple, they are the victims of a grand scheme designed to foster adoration for their nation. Principal to a system intent on the control of human beings, is a mechanism for propaganda, to inculcate values favourable to the authority in charge. There are several media used to this purpose: television, radio, film, newspapers and literature, but more importantly the educational system. The major financial groups of the United States appropriated control of the universities already early on in the century. Universities are wholly dependent on funding from boards of trustees, which are composed of corporate individuals from the financial groups.

Taking advantage of the universities’ dependence on their funding, the financial groups pressured the universities to conform to specific agenda. School curricula were entirely rearranged. With such a large infusion of "charity" the universities were forced to abandon many of their former methods of education, in favour of those fields of study that were to directly benefit the corporations, at time remove undesirable members of faculty, and were required to construct facilities to enable the kind of research that was preferred by the leaders of industry.

Education:

The universities were divided into two fields of study: natural sciences and the social sciences. The basis of study of the natural sciences was to serve the major corporations with necessary research. It is through scientific research that innovation and inventions are stimulated. Invention and innovation firstly generate greater wealth by enhancing industrial productivity, and by introducing new commodities into the market. But the primary objective is the development of military technology. Study in the social sciences is to serve a two-fold purpose.

The fields of study include economics, sociology, psychology, political science and history. First of its purposes is to indoctrinate. To inculcate values appropriate for the efficiency and perpetuation of the system. The second aspect of social science is the study of human beings. To analyse the behaviour of human beings and their reactions to different stimuli. Such study is designed to reveal methods to make the population more productive, i.e. what are the causes of possible apathy; reactions to certain programs implemented by the corporations through its various agencies (governmental or otherwise); what are viable incentives to increased productivity; and how to detect revolutionary sentiment before it erupts.

All is coordinated to create a self-perpetuating system, geared to high levels of productivity, in order to build up might and wealth. Though most professors or researchers are not aware of the actual agenda at hand, they are required to submit an application if they wish to pursue research in a certain area. This application is subject to approval of the administration, and thus to the corporations who have set the criteria for approval.

All agencies that direct or make recommendations to the educational system, such as the US Board of Education, the National Research Council, the Heritage Foundation and so on, which are nearly entirely composed of business professionals from the major financial groups, formulate "proper" interpretations of history readied for the educational system, and designed to inculcate appropriate attitudes.

The "interpretation", that Westerners now believe as reality, is as follows: The universe is entirely materialistic. In the beginning there was a great explosion, the Big Bang, that created the universe. Through a series of accidental mutations, life evolved by Survival of the Fittest, from the simplest organism, to various species, to apes and finally to man. In the early stages of humanity, man was faced with a great struggle with the chaos of his environment. He was forced to cope with the violent forces of nature as well as constant threats to his life. The cave man first formed a sort of knife from stone. Then he discovered fire. Then he invented the wheel.

And such he progressed through time, continuously better adapting himself better to his environment. They believe that every successive innovation helps to alleviate the burden of their existence, and that it is through the evolution of technology and the advancement of science that their lives are improved. Through it, they can seek to cure all his ills, not only to alleviate their physical existence, but they will also eventually solve all social and even spiritual problems. Through it he will find salvation. It is such that the entire system is geared to the idolization of science. In education, great emphasis is placed not only on the study of science itself, but also on the study of the merits of science. The biographies of the great that contributed to the progress of technology are studied in some detail.

Deifying Science:

In such a way they make science their primary mode of activity, dispensing a great amount of their effort towards scientific research, without suspecting that they are merely being enslaved. National programs, such as the space program directed by NASA, are initiated in great prestige, that the society may believe its efforts are expended towards a noble cause: the advancement of knowledge. While in actuality, it has been initiated to stimulate research towards the development of advanced weaponry. The greatest degree of technological innovation for the military is drawn from discoveries made in the space program. And everyone believes they are just trying to land on the moon!

Mobocracy:

To disguise the horror of the reality of what is modern day America is the following "interpretation": Once man had significantly progressed from the mental darkness of his pre-human stages, he made his intellectual birth during the Ancient Greek civilization in philosophy, when he first began to question his existence. Socrates first tackled the dilemma of the ideal political system and came up with a theoretical system he called Democracy. Man’s political concepts evolved through time, through the Renaissance, to the Enlightenment, to the British parliamentary system, and finally, to the checks and balances of the multi-party democratic system of the United States. Leading Americans to believe they are citizens of a democracy, the best system evolved for mankind.

Americans are not of a democracy, they are citizens of a corporation. They are deceived into believing that the authority of the country resides in the government, which is supposedly democratic. In actual fact, those who hold power, who make decisions over national policy and who hold sway over the said government, are the corporations and their leaders. The government is merely a smokescreen to hide the fact that there is no government in the US, and that decisions over national policy are really decided in favor of corporate interests. Americans are indoctrinated into believing in the legitimacy of the present system, but specifically, the idea they are to conclude is, that it is the best system available and, most importantly, that they should not seek to change it.

Life, liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness:

Those who pass through the American educational system carry these ideas to the rest of the population through that which they produce when they enter the media industry, in magazines, newspapers, television, radio and film. Notwithstanding the fact that the media are owned and controlled by the major financial groups, wrapped up in a complex network of ownership among multi-nationals. As Caesar said: "…give them bread and circuses". Once the masses are fed they merely require the adequate dose of fantasy in order to be kept passive. Exhausted from extended hours of labour, without the energy to pursue issues more thoroughly, the American worker returns home to digest a half hour of information’s equivalent of baby food: the six o’clock news. Satiating his desire to remain informed with a brief report on "reality". To dissipate his excess stress, television is prepared with a full menu of intellectual junk-food, spiced with the appropriate amount of propaganda.

There are films, sports events, and an assortment of literature that deals in fiction as well as "non-fiction". For those not deceived by the flagrant mediocrity of the popular media, there is a selection of material available that presents a facade of intellectualism, but is no less vacant of substance, and which is merely a more sophisticated type of indoctrination, designed for the upper levels of the society. This array of trash entertainment provides a steady diet of fantasy, advertises the wares of the market, and of course thoroughly hypnotizes.

They arouse lust and greed. Glamorise that which is first devoid of virtue, but inaccessible to most, if not entirely non-existent. Such circuses: the Academy Awards, rock concerts, the Super Bowl, high fashion, Time magazines, pseudo-intellectual McNeil-Lehrer News Hour, modern art exhibitions, Saturday Night Live, MTV and so on, nurture political apathy, by legitimising indulgence in selfish and trivial pursuits as opposed to confronting current injustices. For if man is not a moral being he is an animal, or even worse.

Virtue Or Vice:

If one were to be God-fearing, he could not be transformed into the optimal subject of a system geared to maximum productivity. He needs to be wholly materialistic. Therefore it is necessary to remove his concept of God and the Afterlife. By first divesting him of his knowledge of God and the Afterlife, the concept of accountability is removed. For as long as he understands the consequences of his actions, he could never abandon his better conscience for the sake of personal indulgence. But, without belief in accountability, he is easily manipulated, simply by arousing his desires. He easily compromises his conscience simply because he is afraid of what people think, or because he is afraid to cause decrease to his wealth.

Though the level of hypocrisy and injustice increase around him each day, he is bewildered by his enflamed passions. Where he once might have felt the stirrings of social responsibility, he is defeated by the onslaught of suggestive messages, and he ignores his better conscience for the fulfilment of the base desires of lust and greed ignited in him. Where he would have once felt disgust or outrage, he now finds rationalizations, excuses; and the pursuit of his own selfish aims gains validity. He conveniently denies the wrong that makes itself evident day by day, so as not to place in jeopardy the attainment of his wishes. The rest of humanity, the victims of the oppression he indirectly contributes to, that stand to gain from his initiative, must wait. Thus has he forsaken God. For you cannot serve two masters. It is either vice or virtue. But he makes a pact with the Devil to turn a blind eye to inequality in return for the fleeting treasures of this world.

"Those who desire the life of this world and its pomp, to them We shall pay in full (the wages of) their deeds therein, without diminution." Holy Qur'an: The Prophet Hud, verse 15.

American Popular Culture:

The complete indoctrination of the American people suffices to exert control on the rest of humanity. From their base in America, they can export not only their material products, but they can export "American Culture". It effects the necessary changes upon the mentalities of peoples elsewhere, freeing them from traditional forms of belief and adapting them to the "modern" world.

Nearly the entire world economic system is controlled by a gigantic infrastructure of multi-nationals, their subsidiaries and their affiliates. The major banks of Western countries, who have direct access to control of industry the world-over, themselves fall under the authority of their central banks. These in turn fall under the authority of the World Bank. The concept of "development", is merely double-speak to hide another more insidious agenda. Funded by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), "development" of a country means to enslave that country to the western economic system, by introducing western means of production, which are usually owned by, or at least serve the Western industry. It also enslaves that country to repayment of loans, presenting the World Bank and the IMF yet another mode of coercion. Two thirds of humanity live at a level of subsistence. By imposing a system of import tariffs, Western countries "protect" their markets, create an arena of unfair competition, and thus the multi-nationals keep the Third World back deliberately at staggering levels of poverty to ensure cheap labour and cheap raw materials. For the First World. The "free" world.

The West exercises its authority over nearly every government of the world. The Post-Colonial period is really a Neo-Colonial period. The masses of the Third World have been duped into believing that through their struggles for "independence" they have freed themselves from the colonial powers. The fact is that the colonial powers recognized they could more easily retain control of their colonies if they removed their presence, which caused too much animosity, and was generally expensive. In their stead they fostered the establishment of native governments favorable to them. Puppet governments. Therefore the governments of the Third World countries are merely extensions of the Western hegemony. As a clue, a sign of sure Western influence is the presence of a Western style government in a given country. Upward-mobility within their institutions is conditional on the appropriation of western values.

The Western educated not only make adequate replacements in government, but can be hired for lower pay to run foreign owned operations. In order to suppress potential revolutionary movements, on the part of victimized populations wishing to alter their predicament, brutally repressive regimes are installed or supported by the Western capitalists. As in Saudi Arabia, which is really Zionist controlled, where not only is vicious brutality used, but also by placing the appropriate amount of religious facade, they deceive even the most ardent Muslims.

In the non-Western world there is a great deal of membership in Freemasonry, that nearly all aspects of Third World societies are pervaded with agents of Freemasonry. In some cases, as remote as African chiefs or, as significant as the religious clergy of Islamic countries, are recorded as holding membership in Freemasonry. Many times Jews play the role of impostors to suit their purposes. For example King Fahad of Saudi Arabia is a Jew, King Hasan II of Morocco is a Jew, as were Tito of Yugoslavia, and also Lenin.

If the West wishes to carry out a policy in an Arab country, which may contradict the tenets of Islam, it weighs its influence on its leader (usually Freemason), who uses his influence on his clergymen, who in turn churn out the necessary religious verdict, permitting the implementation of their blasphemy. As happened when America wanted to install its troops in the Gulf, the appropriate Fatwa or religious verdict was passed by the Mufti of Saudi Arabia, Sheikh Bin Bazz (he has since passed away, may Allah forgive his sins. As for us, the Rasulallah (saws) advised us against insulting the dead, so beware.), based on extremely tenuous evidence.

Israel:

Central to the Zionist plan was the creation of a Jewish homeland, the purpose of the First and Second World Wars. To gather Jews for the reception of the Messiah, and their ultimate rulership of the world. Palestine was in Ottoman land, so The First World War disintegrated this major obstacle, the Ottoman Caliphate, which was finally dismantled in 1924, ending 1300 years of consolidated Islamic power. With the Second World War, the role of the United Nations was secured, and with the so-called Holocaust, propaganda about persecution of the Jews was created to argue for the creation of the State of Israel. By it, they convinced their own people into migrating from the various countries around the world to Israel, in order to escape persecution and possible annihilation. They convinced the world, under the guise of the United Nations, to approve the establishment of the State of Israel.

The Coming Messiah:

The aim to establish the Messiah as the ultimate ruler of humanity. As ruler he will also make them the rulers of humanity. To this aim they have prepared the system he is to dominate, the New World Order. The first stage in its establishment has been the United Nations. Now on their agenda is the unification of Europe, to lead to a final global power, the one world government. When the moment is deemed appropriate, they will introduce their leader, the ultimate dictator of humanity: the King of the Jews. The "Messiah". To make the world receive their messiah, their plan is to create a world-wide economic depression.

Having created havoc with the civilizations of history, the Jews will expose to the world its "inability" to construct a viable government. Disillusioned by their many failed attempts, the world will gladly receive their "Messiah" as the one to solve their problems, the great saviour of humanity. The protagonists of this plan claim that its completion is a matter of a few years away. Talk now is under way about the need for European president, but also of a world president. Banners have been erected in the city of Jerusalem warning the people to expect the coming of the Messiah. Preparations have been made and plans have been drawn for the reconstruction of the Temple, whose location is on the site of the Mosque of Al Aqsa. Furthermore, the Pope has said that the "Messiah" will be here by the year 2000

The Unbelievers say: "We will neither believe in this scripture nor in (any) that (came) before it." If you could but see when the wrong-doers will be made to stand before their Lord, throwing back the world (of blame) on one another! Those who were deemed weak will say to the arrogant ones: "Had it not been for you, we should certainly have been believers!" The arrogant ones will say to those who had been deemed weak: "Was it we who kept you back from Guidance after it reached you? Nay, rather it was you who transgressed." Those who had been deemed weak will say to the arrogant ones: "Nay! it was a plot (of yours) by day and by night: Behold! you (constantly) ordered us to be ungrateful to God and to attribute equals to Him! They are filled with remorse. When they see the Chastisement: We shall put yokes on the necks of the Unbelievers: it would only be a requital for their (evil) deeds." Holy Qur'an: as-Saba, verses 31 to 33.

Armageddon:

Zionists have spent thousands of years appropriating control of the World. However, they cannot achieve their final appropriation of the rule of the world until they have completely destroyed Islam. This will lead to a final global conflict between the infidels, led by the Anti-Christ and the Jews, against the Muslims. This is a war expected throughout time called Armageddon.

"Their war is a war with God. They are fighting to extinguish the light of God on the earth. Their intention is to extinguish God’s Light with their mouths; But God will complete His Light, even though the Unbelievers may detest it." Holy Qur'an: as-Saff, verse 8.

They schemed against the light of God from their very beginnings, killing the Prophets as they tried to kill Jesus son of Mary. They strove to defile the purity of Islam from its very inception, attacking it in every way possible, creating the Shia’ sect, as well as the heretical Sufis. Long before the downfall of the Caliph, they schemed to undermine the Ottoman Empire, by sewing the seeds of corruption internally, to make the empire collapse upon itself. Then, when the Muslims were weak enough, the alliance of infidels saw its opportunity to finally dominate the Muslims, after centuries of jealously coveting the rule of Islam.

They attacked and partitioned the Islamic world between them. Once they obliterated the rule of Islam, they proceeded to attempt its final dissolution, or at least its distortion, to secure their power forever. Education was reformulated to dull the true glory of the Islamic empire. Indoctrinating the colonized world as to the supposed virtues of the West, telling a tale of history with the West as the sole protagonist.

They entice into anti-Islamic values by the myriad of subliminal suggestions injected into advertising, films, and television programs, for example, like Dynasty, Beverly Hills 90210, Nintendo, Pretty Woman, music videos, not only advertising Western produced goods like BMW’s, Marlboros, Nike, MacDonald’s and Whitney Houston, but seducing into anti-Islamic forms of behaviour, like premarital relation, extra-marital relations, feminist attitudes, inappropriate or extravagant forms of dress, licentiousness, greed, narcissism, and Western ideologies hostile to Islam. The final blow is dealt, by way of the corrupt clergy, to inculcated a distorted understanding of Islam, into those holding on their faith, to render them politically impotent.

An Age Of Conflicts:

The final stage is set for the unification of Europe, and Zionists feel they have accumulated enough strength and control, that they are now bringing back Islam as the pronounced enemy, which had in fact been the real enemy all along. They see that the corruption they have sewn, has sufficiently weakened the Muslims, that they feel confident enough to begin their attack, to attempt the final annihilation of Muslims. Everywhere in the world conflicts are erupting between Fundamentalists and the West. Serb thugs are used to carry out Zionist plans in Bosnia. Freemason France is executing its war in its colony of Algeria. The West demonises the Islamists’ struggle every time a spy or agents of the West is killed, claiming they are "intellectuals".

In obedience to prompts from the West, Arab countries are carrying a program of brutal repression against Islamic Fundamentalism. In most countries wearing a beard is enough to get you jailed. In Tunisia the head covering for women is illegal. In Egypt, television programs are produced ridiculing Fundamentalists. Wives of Muslim activists are jailed, tortured and raped. In Saudi Arabia the slightest remark against the King could have you killed.

Islam And The West:

Important to his strength is to rally as much of the World to support him in his attack against Islam, towards this aim Westerners as well as many non-Westerners, like the local pro-Western dupes of many countries, cleverly manipulated against their own people, have been indoctrinated into values in opposition to Islam. To this purpose they implanted the following interpretation of history in the mind of the Westerner: Early man, confounded by the chaos of his environment, conceived religion. Formulating the myth of a God to allay his fears. But religion was backwards.

Due to his primitive mentality and his fears, he imposed values of human beings that were incompatible with his nature. He was ashamed of his body, viewing sex as a dirty thing. He imposed chastity and hiding of ones nakedness because he had difficulty coming to terms with his nature. He would punish himself by denying himself the pleasures of life which he irrationally called sins. Then, science exposed the mysteries of the universe, so he was no longer in need of a myth. Man evolved to come to terms with his nature, so he rid himself of repressive religion.

There was no such thing as sin or shame. No need for chastity. But, to rid himself of the stain of the emotionally repressed ideas of religion, was a continual struggle to come to terms with his nature. Daring to defy commonly held principles, is hailed as courage...Finally Neitsche declared: God is dead. The Theory of Relativity, formulated by Einstein, is manipulated to induce the concept of tolerance. The theory postulates that, in the physical world, because of the elasticity of time, everything is relative. One set of rules are applicable to one sphere, while a whole different set of rules are applicable to another sphere. What is right for you is not necessarily right for me! From this is derived the idea of tolerance, that everyone must tolerate everyone else’s opinion, because everyone is right. This is in direct opposition to Muslims, who are certain of their faith, and Fundamentalism, which is not prepared to compromise the tenets of Islam for any other system of values.

Modern Western Values:

Consequently the entire mentality of the Westerner has been carefully designed to be hostile to Islam. In their ignorance, Westerners have been deceived into believing that these modern values, Women’s Rights, Human Rights, Secularism, the separation of church and state, Democracy and Tolerance, are ideas they arrived at, by having fought long and hard intellectually, to rid themselves of such ideas as Islam suggests.

The world is being made to believe that a New World Order is about to be established, the final just rule of the world, after a long list of failed attempts, based on these. Former pro-Israel US diplomat Jeanne Kirkpatrick and former Vice-President Dan Quayle have singled out Islamic fundamentalism as "the new enemy of the West in the 20th century, succeeding Nazism and communism, the archenemies of civilization in a by-gone era".

He has been indoctrinated into these values to be a supporter of he New World Order and to understand that he must fight against Islam if he wishes to see its establishment. Former Israeli President Chaim Herzog, trying to create irrational fear of Islam, told British Prime Minister John Major and Foreign Secretary Douglas Hurd that Islamic Fundamentalism is "the greatest single danger to the free world today".

An Act of War:

The Cold War was a fraud to instil apprehension in the populations of the West to justify a massive weapons build up. To create an illusion of relative peace, to redirect the attention of the world from its real conflicts, to the artificial conflict between America and the Soviet Union. Muslims were led to believe that they were no longer in a state of war with the West, while in fact this war began a long time ago. The Muslim lands were invaded and completely colonized by the infidels. Tricked by their phoney independence’s, they fail to perceive they are still under the control of the West, nor do they perceive the insidious methods of propaganda and sedition, used against them in their countries, which qualify as acts of war

Jihad in the Cause of Allah:

The Islamic concept of Jihad is one of the most misunderstood aspects of the faith. Contrary to the mass of negative propaganda spilling forth from the Zionist press, Jihad does not advocate conquest nor does it advocate the forced conversion to Islam, which is totally condemned in the Quran.

Jihad (pronounced /dʒɪˈhɑːd/; Arabic: جهاد‎ [dʒiˈhæːd]), an Islamic term, is a religious duty of Muslims. In Arabic, the word jihād is a noun meaning "struggle." Jihad appears frequently in the Qur'an and common usage as the idiomatic expression "striving in the way of Allah (al-jihad fi sabil Allah)".[1][2] A person engaged in jihad is called a mujahid, the plural is mujahideen.
A minority among the Sunni scholars sometimes refer to this duty as the sixth pillar of Islam, though it occupies no such official status.[3] In Twelver Shi'a Islam, however, Jihad is one of the 10 Practices of the Religion.

According to scholar John Esposito, Jihad requires Muslims to "struggle in the way of God" or "to struggle to improve one's self and/or society."[3][4] Jihad is directed against Satan's inducements, aspects of one's own self, or against a visible enemy.[1][5] The four major categories of jihad that are recognized are Jihad against one's self (Jihad al-Nafs), Jihad of the tongue (Jihad al-lisan), Jihad of the hand (Jihad al-yad), and Jihad of the sword (Jihad as-sayf).[5] Islamic military jurisprudence focuses on regulating the conditions and practice of Jihad as-sayf, the only form of warfare permissible under Islamic law, and thus the term Jihad is usually used in fiqh manuals in reference to military combat. [1]

The colossal degree of injustice that has been described, is nearly entirely attributable to the perverse desires of a few men. This must be changed. This is the trial placed by God upon humanity. What has to be done? People have to take it upon themselves to change the situation. This will mean that they will have to make sacrifices. They may have to sacrifice their way of life, their careers, their reputation and perhaps their lives. If they do not respond, who will? God could vanquish these criminals within the fraction of an instant. Yet, He wants to see who will fight in His cause, by his tongue, his wealth and his person, against the perpetrators of wrong, the army of darkness.

God revealed Islam in order that humanity could be governed according to it. Unbelief is darkness and disorder. So the unbelievers, if they are not suppressed, create disorder. That is why the Muslims are responsible for the implementation of God’s Law on the planet, that humanity may be governed by it, as opposed to corrupt man-made laws. The Muslims must make all efforts to establish the religion of God in the earth. Otherwise, as God said:

"And those who disbelieve are allies to one another, (and) if you (Muslims of the whole world collectively) do not do so (i.e. become allies, as one united block with one with one Caliph, chief Muslim ruler for the whole Muslim world to make victorious Allah’s Religion of Islamic Monotheism), there will be upheaval (wars, battles, worship to other than Allah, etc.) and oppression on earth, and great mischief and corruption (appearance to other than Allah)." Holy Qur'an: al-Anfaal verse 73

The proponents of this dark plan know that their only threat is the Muslim jihad; in other words, the defensive struggle against those who would destroy Islam. Benjamin Netanyahu, leader of the Israeli Likud party said, trying to disparage his enemies: "The celebrated goal of Islamic Fundamentalism is to secure the worldwide victory of Islam by defeating the non-Muslim and infidels through jihad..." Thank you very much Mr. Netanyahu for a very inaccurate and perverse description. Yes, God has commanded the believers to fight the infidels; but only when Islamic lands are attacked.

"And fight them until there is no more evil and the religion will all be for God Alone..." Holy Qur'an: Al-Anfaal, verse 39.

The struggle continues until there is no more corruption, that there remains only the Law of God in the earth, and that the disbelievers who assault the Ummah comply to it, thus protecting the rest of humanity from their treachery. Very few are the Muslims who adhere to such an agenda, in fact most Muslims are busy trying to prove the West that they are not Fundamentalists, and that they want peace. But, but the fact that Netanyahu mentions this small group, proves what a sizable threat they consider them to be.

The infidels know that when Muslims realize what is truly expected of them in their religion, about struggling to defend Islam against the infidels, it will mean the end of their amoral rule. Consequently, they fight against Fundamentalism in every sphere and struggle to dislodge jihad from its proper role in Islam. They use their army of propagandist, from radical feminists to corrupt religious leaders, to distort the true meaning of this religion. The Muslims follow the leading scholars, so these leading scholars, serve the Zionist plan, to hold back the Fundamentalist threat, by justifying the corruption in their countries, getting Muslims tangled up in petty debates, like talk over Aqeedah, Tarbiya, minor details of the prayer and so on, and all sorts of reasons why Muslims shouldn’t fight jihad.

They fail to make the Muslims conscious of the schemes of their enemies, nor to expose to them the true level of catastrophe they are living in. They fail to inform the Muslims about their responsibilities. The Muslims live in an idyllic world of Islamic discussion, where the many opinions of scholars are legitimate. All this, is to preoccupy the Muslims, such that the infidels may proceed to build up their might. They want to keep the Muslims busy with futile pursuits until they feel they have accumulated enough strength and control, that they can announce their power, without anyone being able to prevent them.

When an Islamic State is set up, and there is no threat to its borders, jihad is not then carried out offensively against the enemies of God in order to propagate the religion. In such a case that jihad is optional, and armies are assembled, composed of volunteers filed with missionary zeal, not swords. When the Muslims have established Islam and an Islamic state, they must secure it, to protect the rule and system of God’s Law. If the Islamic territory becomes threatened, then it is an emergency situation. Then, jihad becomes obligatory upon every Muslim of that area if the unbelievers attack it, because of the extreme importance of protecting the establishment of Islam, and every Muslim is required to march forth.

"If you march not forth, he will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm him at all and God is able to do all things." The Holy Qur'an: at-Taubah, verse 39.

Ibn Kathir, said in Mukhtasir Ibn Kathir 2/144: "God, Most High, ordered that everybody march out with the Messenger of God in the expedition of Tabuk to fight the enemies of God, the Roman infidels." Bukhari has written a chapter in Sahih al Bukhari (entitled The Chapter On The Obligation of Marching Out and What is Required from Jihad and Intention for It) and quoted this verse. It was a general call because the Muslims knew that the Romans were gathering on the borders of the Arabian Peninsula and were preparing to invade Medina. So what is the situation if the infidels enter a Muslim country, does not the march become the ultimate priority? Abu Talha said about the words of the Most High: "...light or heavy...": "old and young, God did not listen to anyone’s excuse". And Hasan al Basri said: "in hardship and in ease."

Ibn Abidin said, in Hashiyat Ibn Abidin 3/238: "Jihad becomes obligatory if the enemy attacks one of the borders of the Muslims, and it becomes obligatory upon those close by. For those who are far away, it is optional, if their assistance is not required. If they are needed, perhaps because those nearby the attack cannot resist the enemy, or are indolent and do not fight jihad, then it becomes obligatory upon those behind them, like the obligation to pray and fast. There is no room for them to leave it. If they too are unable, then it becomes obligatory for those behind them, and so on in the same manner until jihad becomes obligatory for the whole Ummah of Islam from the East to the West".

In Hashiyat ad Dussuqi it is stated: Jihad becomes obligatory upon the surprise attack of the enemy. Dussuqi said: "Wherever this happens, jihad immediately becomes obligatory upon everybody, even women, slaves and children, and they march out even if their guardians, husbands and creditors forbid them" (2/174).

Ibn Taymia said: "If the enemy enters a Muslim land, there is no disagreement that it is obligatory for the closest and then the next closest to repel him, because the Muslim lands are like one land. It is obligatory to march to the territory even without the permission of parents or creditor..". How many years has it been since the enemies of God entered the Muslim lands, that in our present era we don’t even have a state. So how many times is the obligation multiplied for us. The great scholar of Islam, Ibn Taymia said: "To defend that which is sacred and the religion from the aggressor is obligatory, as unanimously agreed upon. For the enemy who creates havoc in the life and in the religion, there is nothing more obligatory after basic belief than defense from him."

"Let those who sell the life of this world for the Hereafter fight in the Cause of God, and whosoever fights in the Cause of God, and is killed or gets victory, We shall bestow on him a great reward. Holy Qur'an." An-Nisaa', verse 74.

The priority for the Muslims right now, the minimum for their religion is the establishment of the security of an Islamic state, where they can secure the rule of God. Once we manage to do so we will have presented an example to the rest of humanity of the rule of God’s Law to compare with the travesty of the rule of oppression. We will be able to manage the affairs of the religion, to protect the Muslims, and propagate the religion of God properly.

The Prophet Muhammad (SAW) said: "It is expected that the nations will call each other from all horizons, as those calling each other to feast from a platter of food in from of them." A person asked the Prophet if would that be because of our small number that day. The Prophet said, "no, but you will be scum, like scum of flood water. God will put weakness into your hearts and remove the fear from the hearts of your enemies because of your love of the world and your hate for death". In another narration it was said: "and what kind of weakness is it Messenger of God? He said: "love of the world and the hate of fighting." Narrated by Ahmad with reliable chain of narration. Narrated by Abu Dawud with the words "hate for death", and it is authentic.

1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihad

Appendix I

On the reverse side of the American one dollar bill are two Masonic symbols. One is a pyramid, its peak with a single left eye in it elevated above it and is radiating (remnant of the Illuminati). The other is a symbol of an eagle (reminiscent of the Rothschild symbol). The eagle is clenching a branch with 13 leaves in its right claw, 13 arrows in its left claw. The shield placed in front of it in 13 American stripes. The six pointed star, the Star of David, symbol of Zionism, composed of 13 small five pointed stars, is illuminated above its head. In the pyramid there are 13 levels of bricks. The inscription above it, Annuit Coeptis, or "our conspiracy" in Latin, is made up of 13 letters. The symbols are detailed in units of 13 to represent the 13 secret elders that guide the Zionist plan. Below the pyramid is inscribed Novus Ordo Seclorum, Latin for New Social Order, the New World Order the are trying to establish. The pyramid represents the hierarchical system of control, centring power at the top through many levels of authority, the one world empire. The eye, a left eye, represents the Messiah is to come and "oversee" the whole system.

Appendix II

A strictly confidential document published in the newspapers Al-Medina al Munawarah issue 4570, Al Arab 6/4/1979, Ad-Dawah issue Safar 1399 and in the book Callers no Rebels page 179.
From: Richard B. Mitchell - the head of the American intelligence in the United States Embassy in Cairo.
To: The head of the secret service in the CIA.
Collected information form our agents, from the Israeli intelligence, and secret reports indicate that it is necessary to direct a strong blow to the Islamic groups whose activities have started to appear in all the Arab Muslim countries and in Europe and North America. We have observed that the means of suppression and terrorism pursued at the time of President Abdul Nasser has led to the sympathy of the Muslim masses with the Muslim Brotherhood, thus leading to adverse results. Additionally, advice delivered by the government of Mamdooh Salem that it is sufficient to direct a blow against the group of "Takfeer and Hijrah" therefore we propose the following means as alternative solutions
FIRSTLY: It is sufficient to carry out partial suppression instead of total suppression and to limit this to the leading personalities in a way which appears normal (natural).
SECONDLY: In regard to the leading personalities who are not selected for culmination, we advise to follow the following:
1) Those who can be tempted by lush jobs, are to be tempted, where they are kept busy with useless Islamic projects and other activities which discharge their efforts.
2) Endeavour to attract those with trading economic inclinations to contribute to the common Egyptian and Israeli project.
3) To create opportunities for work in Arab petroleum countries with highly paid salaries, which distances them from the Islamic activity in Egypt.
4) With regard to the effective elements in Europe and America we propose the following
A) To discharge their energy in spending their efforts with the non-Muslims, and spoiling those efforts by our institutions.
B) To discharge their effort in publishing and issuing Islamic books, and foiling their results.
C) Spreading the seeds of doubt and dissension amongst their leaderships so that they become preoccupied with that rather than the Islamic activity.
THIRDLY: With reference to the Muslim youth we have to concentrate on the following:
1) To encourage the attack on the Sunnah (traditions) of Mohammed, and to raise doubt about it and the other various Islamic sources.
2) To disintegrate the Islamic gatherings to spread dispute inside them and between them.
3) To face the wave of the Muslim youth, male and female, turning to observe Islamic teachings, particularly the commandments for girls to wear Islamic dress, through the information and cultural activity which comply solely with us.
4) The teaching and media institutions in their various stages have to continue in blockading the Islamic groups, restricting them and under-valuing their activities.
5) To change the syllabus of teaching the Islamic history and the Deen (religion) in the Egyptian Schools, focusing on exposing the iniquities of the Islamic Khilaafah (Caliph) particularly at the time of the Ottomans, then showing how the Western countries progressed quickly after the defeat of the Church and distancing it from politics.
6) Try to discharge the energy of the Muslim youth in the worshipping rituals which are supervised by priestly leaderships that comply with our planned policy.
7) To deepen the Mazhabi (scholarly) and partial differences and to magnify them in their minds.
This is what we propose as a solution to the problem of the Islamic grouping in this critical period. And if you are convinced to this, we request you to direct the advice to the concerned authorities to embark on implementation, noticing that we are prepared here to carry out the required role of implementation.
(Signature of Richard B. Mitchell) Head of the American Intelligence in Cairo.

Appendix III

Athens and Sparta

In Ancient Greece two cities dominated the scene: Athens and Sparta. Early in its history Phoenician merchants from the coast cities of Accent Palestine, came to exploit the markets of Ancient Greece. Sparta resisted these foreigners so they were forced to settle in Athens. Through practices of money lending they built up their economic base, establishing themselves as a prominent merchant class rivalling the landed Greek aristocracy.

To conduct the society to their desired objectives, they manipulated the Greek theater, the most important cultural activity of Ancient Greece, which has been celebrated in the West ever since. Like modern television is used, the theatre was used to inculcate immorality. A common practice of the Jews throughout history has been to appropriate the money stock of the country by changing their standard from a gold or precious metal standard to a false paper or wood standard.

This new standard is like a cheque which is supposedly transferable into gold kept in the treasury which they control. As Napoleon found when he entered the vaults of the Bank of Amsterdam, the financial centre of the times, that they were completely empty. The Jews had deceived the people into handing them all their wealth. Sparta aware of the corruptive influence of these foreigner, and to protect its money standard strongly resisted their penetration. To say something is Spartan means that it is conservative or austere, as the Spartans were known for their discipline, trying to keep themselves from the moral decay that afflicted Athens. These foreign merchants wanting absolutely to practice on Sparta what they had on Athens, brought about a war between the two cities, now known as the Peloponnesian Wars.

Socrates, as explained in the Republic of Plato, explained a parable of a cave to the people of Athens to explain the indoctrination process that was taking place in Ancient Greece. He explained a parable of people who were enchained in a cave, forced to look at shadows cast from a fire. He told them that if someone were to release them from their chains, they would be able to see the fire and recognize that what they had thought all along was real were merely shadows of artificial objects. Then they could leave the cave to find the true light. Just like Americans today who believe their government to be a real government. The government they have in mind is the shadow, and the artificial object is the impotent government. If they were unchained they could see that it is a fake created by Jews.

Because Socrates was confronting their plan, he was tried for spreading revolutionary ideas and sentenced to death. In the same way modern people are assassinated, like Malcolm X or Martin Luther King Jr.

Denmark And The Burkha : Why Danes Hate Islam.

2009-08-26T23:25:00.011+02:00

By Philip Jones 26th August 2009.

THIS?

OR THIS??

“Let me state it clearly: Muslims ought to live in Muslimland - and that's not here.” Danish member of the European Parliament, Mogens Camre.

I don't like the Burkha; but then again I don't have to. It's not my choice, it's the choice of those who wear it. On the other hand, I don't like the way Danish women dress themselves these days either. Perhaps instead of considering as to whether the Burkha, which let's be fair is only worn by a small number of Muslim women in Denmark should be banned, perhaps we should consider banning those awful `half mast `pants` and all the other pseudo masculine clothing which has become the uniform of choice for the vast majority of Danish women today.

I have lived in Denmark since early 1996, and my overriding impression of the Danes, (with some exceptions) is of an arrogant, self aggrandising and bigoted little people who due to decades of indoctrination and State sponsored programming, are `locked ` into a narcissistic and uniform (almost `Borg`)[6] like mindset, which in its application to those who do not share the same insular and prejudiced world view and stunted culture, is anything but benign; but rather, is malevolent, Sociopathic[7], all pervasive, and extremely effective in its ability to degrade and demoralise.

Having written at length about this country previously,[1] it will suffice to say that there is much more that is rotten in the state of Denmark, than its just its `pork.`

The Danish Government is the most dictatorial in Europe without question. There can be no doubt that it has been at the very least, the bureaucratic model for the European Union, and like the latter, churns out laws which proscribe almost anything relating to personal choice, liberty and independence. It is no exaggeration to say that in Denmark, a person's life is micromanaged not only from cradle to grave, but 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year every year. It is difficult to think of any aspect of one's daily life which is not legislated for.

What makes this scenario all the more uncomfortable for those who come to live here from elsewhere, is the abject acceptance and compliance, nay, the glorification of their imagined `perfect` model of life, by the Danes.

It is not my intention to allow this article to run into multiple parts so I suggest to the reader that he or she visit the links at the reference section and read my previous essays which expose the sorry state of things here in this old European land.

To the point:

“There is no place for Islam in Europe and our first priority must be to repatriate the Muslims.” Danish member of the European Parliament, Mogens Camre:

There can't be too many people who consider themselves politically `aware` who have not seen, read or heard something about the blasphemous cartoons published a few years ago by the Danish `Newspaper` Jyllandsposten, depicting the Holy Prophet of Islam in an outrageous and highly derisive manner.

At the time, I was incredulous as to why a major national daily would commit such a provocative act, considering the tense relationship between the Muslim community and the host population here. The pretence of `taking a stand for free speech` certainly made me suspicious, as any non-Dane who has lived in Denmark will know; free speech is reserved for Danes only.

Today, I fully understand the thinking behind those ridiculous caricatures; Provocation !

Muslims in Denmark are treated very differently to those living elsewhere in the west. For example their attempts to build a Mosque have been thwarted time and again by the weight of Danish bureaucracy [8]. In 2009, there is still no purpose built Islamic house of worship in Denmark, nor for that matter, any dedicated Muslim cemeteries either.

Unlike in other countries in Europe and the West, Muslims who display their faith publicly by their mode of dress for example, are purposely kept out on the fringes of Danish society, and looked down upon simply for being different. I have had many contacts within the local Islamic community and there is a sense of desperation therein. They feel socially and politically impotent. They are relegated to the lower end of the Job Market and are victims of a form of social injustice which is intensely xenophobic.

The current fires of civic unrest seen recently here in Denmark involving young Muslim boys, are most certainly being fuelled by what can only be regarded as an intentional policy of defamation and degradation of all things Islamic, orchestrated at the very highest state level

Those who have taken an interest in the post 9/11 world, will not be surprised when I say that the numerous Anti Islamic reports which frequent the national `ruse` papers here, on an almost daily basis, bear all the hallmarks of a state sponsored `agent provocateur` operation. In the aftermath of the `French Intifada` some years ago, the OAS (French Intelligence) are believed to have played a major role in stirring up racial and social hatreds. This is almost certainly the case here in Denmark, although I have no proof of this, the whole thing stinks.

The New Unlikely Crusaders:

“Islam is a new totalitarian plague sweeping Europe.” Member of the Danish Parliament, Soeren Krarup.

In his article; “Is Denmark being Set Up, Why Is A Nation Known For Pork Attacking Islam?” [2]Researcher and writer Christopher Bollyn writes:

“One might reasonably ask why one of the smallest and weakest countries in the world, with a population of less than 6 million, would want to inflame the passions and provoke the 1.5 Billion Muslims of the world? It just doesn't make any sense, especially for a nation like Denmark that depends on its exports.”

He continues:

“Why would Danes be so eager to offend Muslims? Are they simply trying to spice up a long winter and an otherwise boring existence, or is there a foreign agenda at work here. Is Denmark being set up for a false-flag terror attack? That seems very likely, given the absurdity of this latest anti-Muslim offence.”

and :

“Denmark is an active member of the anti-Muslim crusade known as the "War on Terrorism." Knowing that this fraudulent "War on Terrorism" is nothing but a Zionist scheme to drag corrupt Western nations into illegal wars of aggression against Muslim nations -- on behalf of Israel -- it stands to reason that Denmark must be both corrupt and dominated by strong Zionist-Jewish forces. There must, after all, be a good reason why other Scandinavians have traditionally called the Danes the "Jews of Scandinavia."

I think Mr. Bollyn is very accurate and insightful in his appraisal of the Danish State as being on an Anti Islamic Crusade, both at home and abroad, and only this past week, another `front` in their declared war against the believers was opened up and can fairly be termed, the `Battle Of the Burkha.`

How Danes hate the Burkha, along with all the other visible signs of Islam, which represent an ideal they cannot, nor wish to comprehend. Surely, the way people choose to clothe themselves is an intensely personal matter to be left to the individual alone?

Not in `Gulag` Denmark, where once again, as with the cartoon charade, we are witnessing all the hype and baloney about democracy, freedom of speech and the Christian way of life dragged out ad nauseum. Christian? I don't think so.

Denmark is a secular humanist society with strong Luciferian overtones. Christianity for most Danes is a tradition to be manipulated for material gain at Christmas and during the annual `Mammonistic` rite called `Confirmation,` where Danish 14 year olds who attend church for a few weeks prior to accepting supposed confirmation into the `body` of Christ, receive countless gifts and monetary advantage, and thereafter in the main, stay as far away from their attested religion as possible, except at weddings and funerals.

Anyway, let's take a look at how the Danish papers are reporting the `Burka Battle.`

The Propaganda Dialectic:

“Islam has since its inception been a terrorist movement. Islam is by its very nature an evil, which must and will be combated.” Member of the Danish Parliament, Martin Henriksen:

The junior minority coalition Conservative Party stated recently that it wants to introduce a ban on the Muslim Burka or Niqab dress codes, which require women to completely cover their faces in public. The Danish State's Puppet Muslim MP , Naser Khader, a Syrian-Palestinian and the Conservative Party’s recently-appointed `integration spokesman` said in Jyllandsposten (no surprise there):

“We don’t want to see burkas in Denmark. We simply can’t accept that some of our citizens walk around with their faces covered.”

(Does Mr Khader honestly believe that the `we` he mentions above, regard him as one of their own?)

Mr Khader says the Burka is un-Danish and oppressive towards women and should be completely banned, although he and his party say that what people do in their own homes is their business, (for now) but as soon as they walk into the public domain, one should be able to see their faces.

WHY??

Talk about the `pot calling the kettle black.` The whole of Danish society is oppressive. Isn't the proposed introduction of a law which dictates how people dress `oppressive.` Who's next in line for a ban. Women in dresses, men in suits? (not that one sees very many of them in Denmark, the `Uni-Sex` capital of the world).

Drawing all concerned into their dialectical trap, the extreme Right-wing National Socialist Danish People’s Party and the Social Democratic Party have played the role of thesis and of course have welcomed the proposal, while the senior coalition Liberal Party, providing the antithesis soundly and vocally reject the idea of legislating about citizens’ clothing as long as they are not in a public function:

“It’s going too far if we start legislating on what sort of clothes people can and cannot wear. The Burka and covered faces should not be allowed if you work with people in the public sector – but that is where we draw the line,” says Liberal Political Spokesman Peter Christensen who sensibly adds that it is important that politicians know where to draw the line in introducing policy.

The highly treacherous Khader however, insists a ban is the only solution regarding the Burka.:

“My view is that (the Burka) is not Islamic at all. The modern Burka was introduced by the Taleban when the movement came to power. So I associate the Burka with the Taleban,” says Khader.

This is simply not true as Mr. Khader being a Muslim himself will know only too well. This type of dress has its origins with desert tribes, long before Islam arrived. It had two functions. Firstly as a sand mask in windy conditions. This would be worn by men and women and is still common today. For women only, the masking of the face and body was used when one group was being raided by another. These raids often involved the taking of women of child bearing age. With all women hidden behind a veil, and the home team fighting back, the chances of being taken were substantially reduced as the women of child bearing age could not be quickly distinguished from the very young and the old. [9]

We are told that the proposed Burka ban is part of an `integration` initiative that the Conservative parliamentary group approved recently, although the party has not decided what punishment should be meted out to those who break the ban. “Initially we’re sending out a signal by saying that it should be banned. Then it’s up to the lawyers to find out what sanctions should be introduced,” Khader tolds Jyllands-Posten.

Integration for Muslims in Denmark means only one thing; give up your faith, your values, your morality, your traditions, your language, your culture and accept absorption into the secular Luciferian Matrix.

Ensuring the dialectical trap is set, we are presented daily with the public consensus angle, with all the national `rags` of any import reporting thus: “The Conservative Party proposal to ban the Burka and Niqab dress codes in public may have caused controversy across the parliamentary spectrum, but it does seem to have the support of a majority of the electorate. A representative Megafon poll for Politiken and TV2 shows 56 percent of the electorate in favour of introducing ‘a general ban on wearing the burka in the public place in Denmark’. Only 30 percent oppose such a ban, according to the poll.”

Establishing the credibility of a phoney democratic consensus is paramount in a society such as Denmark, where the illusion of democracy is all pervading, and a much used tool of political manipulation. Simply telling Danes through the State media that the majority are in favour of something is enough for the `sheep chip` to activate and for the rest of the herd to willingly follow.

The dialectic line up looks like this: The Conservative proposal receives extensive support from Liberal, Conservative, Danish People’s Party and Social Democratic voters while Social Liberal, Socialist People’s Party and Unity List voters are generally against a ban.

The people are then told that the decision by Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen (Lib) to set up a commission to study his Conservative minority coalition partner’s proposal to introduce a ban on the Muslim Burka and Niqab, has caused dismay within his own Liberal Party:

Former Liberal integration spokesman and current Environment Spokesman Eyvind Vesselbo says:

“More than 50,000 people have lost their jobs in the past six months and we may be seeing a further 100,000 in the next nine months. We have an economic crisis that has to be handled, we have a climate conference, we have people who cannot be treated due to waiting lists, we have children with psychological problems who can’t be treated, we have a gang war in which people are shooting at each other – an officer was shot last night - and people are wasting time talking about Burkas. It’s out of all proportion.”

Another senior Liberal politician, Former Home Affairs and Agriculture Minister Britta Schall Holberg, says: “ We’ve reached rock bottom. While hundreds of people are losing their jobs. While many farmers and other companies are on their knees and battling each day to survive. While young people are unable to get traineeships and too few get an education. While the government is gearing up for a budget that for the first time shows a deficit – almost of the size that toppled Anker Jørgensen’s (Soc. Dem.) government in 1982, the government sets up a burka commission,”

At the same time, as the `Theatricide` unfolds for the consumption of the Danish public on the one hand and the hapless Muslims on the other, what was billed as Conservative parliamentary group unity on the ban issue was broken when the party’s `Ecclesiastical and Education` Spokeswoman Charlotte Dyremose turned her back on the proposal, which appears to have been fostered by the party’s newcomer and newly-appointed `Integration` Spokesman Naser Khader.

Dyremose told `Berlingske Tidende` that she fears that a Burka ban will do more harm than good for the relatively small number of women who wear the Burka or Niqab, adding that some of the most important Danish rights are those of the freedom of religion and speech. Then Conservative Parliamentary Group Chairwoman Henriette Kjær, mentions that she is surprised at Dyremose’s statement.

“I don’t understand it. After a longer debate during our group meeting (last) Friday I concluded as Group Chair that as a group we supported a ban on the burka. And no-one objected. Hers is a strange attitude. But she’ll have to take it alone.” Kjær tells Berlingske Tidende.

Ms. Dyremose says she made her views clear to the party leadership prior to its announcement of the ban proposal.

It is vital that the reader understands that at the highest level, the desired outcome is a compromise solution which will erode yet more of the rights of private citizens (Muslim or otherwise), chip away at the culture and traditions of the Muslim community, who as intended, will breathe somewhat relieved that a total ban was avoided, establishing another precedent in how far the state can intrude into peoples lives, create more animosity between the Danes and Muslims, setting the stage for another dialectic exchange in a few months time.[3]

The Clash Of Civilisations in Microcosm:

“All Muslims must be thrown out of Denmark” Vagn Eriksen Danish People's Party.

The world is drawing seemingly ever closer to a financial crash and the possibility of global conflict, the so called `Clash Of Civilizations` between the West and Islam, as projected and planned for by Albert Pike and the Illuminati[4].

So what does this have to do with little Denmark ?

Both Politiken and Jyllandsposten are `Bildeberger` connected. Anders Eldrup, the Chairman of the Danish company `Dong` has been a regular attendee for the past five years. His wife, Merete Eldrup is the managing director of both publications. A further `participant` Toger Seidenfaden just happens to be Executive Editor in Chief for Politiken. Is this all a coincidence? Not so long ago, Fleming Rose, the Editor of Jyllandsposten conducted a highly one sided and uncritical interview with Mr Daniel Pipes, a major Zionist propagandist and `Neo Con`, a la Perle and Wolfovitz. In typical `doublespeak,` this `Hawk` is a member of the US Institute Of Peace.

Since Politiken `bought` the Jyllandsposten, that paper's drift towards the Zionist position has been marked. In a world where nothing appears to be what it is, the Muhammad Drawings and the current provocative coverage by both these editorials on the `Muslim` question in Denmark, should be viewed with suspicion. The media in Denmark, being as it is, weighted from the top with Neo Con Bildberger types, how likely is it that the Muslim side of the story will ever get a fair `airing` ?

It is now my belief that the sole purpose of importing millions of Muslim people into Europe, was to destabilize the continent. I do not believe for one minute that the architects of the European Super State and subsequently the proposed New World Order, did not foresee the tensions which were bound to be caused when introducing a deeply alien culture into countries such as Denmark, which had always been highly homogeneous and somewhat isolated from the European mainstream. It has been done for a reason, and I fear we are beginning to see the true face of that reason.

The State in whatever form has always justified it's existence and domineering of it's citizens by the ever present threat of an external foe. With the `Cold War` filed away in the History Books, and no would be aggressors anywhere to be seen, it was necessary to invent a different kind of threat. Enter the `War on terror`. A war without end as it were. Is it purely coincidental that the very multitude brought through the gates of the Western Citadels, is now identified as this new threat.

What we are seeing in Denmark is an orchestrated means of instilling fear into the citizens of this small country. This will in turn give justification for the implementation of ever more restrictions on personal freedoms and the introduction of ever more Draconian legislation in order to `protect` the people.

Why change a winning formula ? We have seen this time and again with Pearl Harbor, 9/11, 7/7 et al. and through the manipulation of the public consciousness, the media whores of the likes of the Jyllandsposten advance the cause of the EU Superstate, and thereafter the New World Order, perpetuating the dialectic, and the population, now immune to common sense, free thought and the truth, will be led by the nose into the Totalitarian future planned for them.

Hobsons' Choice: Religious And Political Freedom In Denmark For All Except Muslims:

“All Muslims must leave Denmark. It's a harsh thing to say, some of them are human beings, but how are we to sort them out?” Ib Krog Hansen Danish People's Party.

The controversy now raging in Denmark over the Burkha, must be viewed as being only the most recent and intended affront to the Muslim population, committed by a deeply malevolent, oppressive and totalitarian regime, which takes its mandate to govern from an electorate so `dumbed down,` by over half a century of the most intense form of mass mind control [5]hitherto seen in the so called `free world,` in national elections which are a `Hobson's Choice` at best, and irrelevant democratically at worse.

Since the blasphemous and perverse cartoon drawings of the Holy Prophet of Islam made international headlines back in 2006, and through the efforts of myself and others, more and more people around the world have become aware of the fact that there is something occurring here in this tiny country with regard to relations between the native population and the local Muslim Diaspora which is negative in the extreme.

Relations have not improved and in fact, barely a day goes by where some `horror` story or another relating to Muslims does not hit the national headlines. But honestly, Denmark will just not leave these people alone. Islam is an anathema to the Danish obsession with uniformity and conformity in all things at all times. It's a little like that irritating catchphrase used in the `Highlander` movie; “There can only be one.”

When the cartoons were published, we were told that it was as a gesture in order to preserve freedom of speech. But in Denmark, such a freedom is conditional on compliance, uniformity and adherence to the consensus. Yes, in Denmark, for most Danes, there can only be `ONE,` way of life, eating, dressing, living and being, and Islam, by its very nature, flies full in the face of the Totalitarian Danish conformist mindset.

Muslims live differently, worship differently, eat differently and dress differently. They follow the one true God, not the `Gods` of the marketplace as do the overwhelming majority of Danes, and generally live their lives apart from what they rightfully see as a Godless, perverse and corrupt society.

Conclusion:

The Danish, who it must be said are a difficult lot to empathise with, should be very careful not to take this proposed overt and draconian action regarding the Islamic dress code in isolation. Banning things has become a part of the political ideal here in Denmark. Whereas once upon a time, adult people were allowed to make their own decisions concerning how they and their family lived their lives, ate, dressed, raised children, behaved at home etc. etc. In today's `Open Prison` complex that Denmark now is, nobody seems to question the `LAW.`

In Denmark, the letter of the law is everything and justice and reason nothing! And if the law tells you how to dress, or better still, how someone else is to dress, that's just fine. But it's a slippery slope, and what goes around comes around.

The `Burhka Battle` is a dialectical trap designed for all to fall into, and as is usually the case, people here in Denmark, both Muslim and Dane are queuing up to jump in. The Illuminati understand only too well that their path to total world power is through the separating of Christians and Muslims into opposing camps and letting them fight it out amongst themselves, to a standstill, whereby a synthesis compromise can be imposed in the form of a Global Government.

Who would ever have imagined that small and apparently insignificant Denmark would play such a major role in the drama?

Postscript: For those Danes out there whose `knee-jerk` reaction to this article is, “If you don't like it, go home." Buy my house and I will.

Here is a well intended if naïve letter written by two Danes to Barrack Obama pleading for his intercession in what has become a national disgrace:

Letter To Barrack Obama.: http://www.panhumanism.com/letter_to_obama.php

Comments to http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/ or true_brit58@hotmail.co.uk

Postscript: Danes Capitulate On Burkha http://politiken.dk/newsinenglish/article790295.ece

Ref:

1] http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/ and http://www.rense.com/general83/denmark.htm

for my archived articles on Denmark.

2] http://www.bollyn.com/is-denmark-being-set-up

3] http://nord.twu.net/acl/dialectic.html

4] http://www.rense.com/general86/pikeknew.htm

5] http://www.rense.com/general83/dk.htm

6] See Star Trek http://images.google.com/images?q=the+borg&rls=com.microsoft:en-gb:IE-SearchBox&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7GPEA_enDK310&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ei=zleVSqqWAtDc-QaI5aTyDQ&sa=X&oi=image_result_group&ct=title&resnum=4

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borg_(Star_Trek)

7] http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html

8] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Denmark

9] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burqa

http://politiken.dk/newsinenglish/article772402.ece

http://politiken.dk/newsinenglish/article770709.ece

http://politiken.dk/newsinenglish/article769245.ece

http://www.savethemales.ca/180902.html Henry Makow.