Monday 31 August 2009

Jihad And The Illusion Of Truth.

By Pervaiz Jamal 31st August 2009.


In the Name of God, the Beneficent, the Merciful.

All Praises be for Allah, the Lord of the Worlds.

The Beneficent, the Merciful.

Sovereign of the Day of Recompense.

You we worship, and You we seek for assistance.

Guide us to the Straight Path.

The path of those on whom You have bestowed Your grace,

Not of those who earned Your anger (the Jews), Nor those who went astray (the Christians).

The Holy Quran: The Opening.


The Story Of Good and Evil:

"And (have We not) shown him (man) the two highways? But he has made no haste on the path that is steep." Holy Qur'an: Al-Balad verses 10 and 11.

The confrontation between the forces of this world, plays itself out in a complex story, of the events that unfold through the many machinations that men create, by their various endeavours, composed of all sorts of intentions. To the public in general, things do not seem to have any particular pattern, nor does there seem to be much meaning behind most events. That for the average person, there is not much significant outside his daily coming and goings. But a careful examination of the interplay of these conflicting forces, reveals complicated, cleverly schemed operation, which displays the actually deeply meaningful course of reality.

That life is the conception of a much more sophisticated wisdom than what we had previously envisioned. The following is a humble attempt to expose some of that reality. We are in a particular period in time, when darkness is predominating. Some of what you are about to read may appear fantastic, but we must remember that our failure to apprehend such matters, is merely the sad fact of underestimating our own selves. We underestimate the potential for good and bad in human beings, because we underestimate ourselves. God created us with an intellect, but we fail to exercise it to its true potential. The capabilities of our intellect lie far beyond what we suspect.

This text is merely a brief resume of the subject, only to introduce the reader to it. Most facts, are presented with the bare minimum of evidence, but the reader can further explore each matter on his own in order to further feed their accounts. He will find its evidences at every step he takes, if he doesn’t satisfy himself merely of reports from others, but investigates matters for himself. Not forgetting to take full advantage of his intuition as a guide into subjects that need inquiry.

The Chosen:

The Jews were chosen by God above the rest of mankind to be an example of righteousness. However, they allowed pride to overcome them, misappropriating the title of Chosen People, to mean they were worthy of God’s favours at the exclusion of everyone else, in compliance with their desires, not God’s. They have become instead, an example for humanity of the extreme of man’s ingratitude to his Creator:

"O Children of Israel! call to mind the (special) favour which I bestowed upon you, and that I preferred you to all others." Holy Qur'an: Al-Baqarah, verse 122.

Though not professed by all Jews, the view that has come to predominate is Zionism. It is an ideology derived, not from their actual religion, but is rather a way in which they interpret that religion. They believe that God chose them above the rest of mankind, for some special virtue on their part, to give them a land. They see their relationship with God as that of a covenant made between He and them, that He promised them a land, the Promise Land. Consequently, they are called Zionists, because the focus of their belief, is the return to the land of Zion, Israel. Once they are to dwell in the Promised Land, as is said in the Bible, their messiah will come, and they will rule the nations of the world in peace.

As we can see, it is in the very foundations of the Jewish belief, that they are superior to the rest of humanity, and that they are destined to rule the world.

Say: "If the last Home, with God, be for you specially, and not for anyone else, then seek you for death, if you are sincere. But they shall never seek for death on account of the (sins) which their hands have sent on before them. And God is well-aquatinted with the wrong-doers. You wilt indeed find them, of all people, most greedy of life, even more than the pagans: Each one of them wishes he could be given a life of a thousand years: But the grant of such life will not save them from (due) chastisement for God sees well all that they do." Holy Qur'an: Al-Baqarah verses 94 to 96.

God promised Abraham He would make his descendants to dwell in the land between the Tigris and the Euphrates. They believe this promise to represent their covenant with God. But, their covenant with God was not that they were to be given a land, but that they were required to obey certain commandments. God took a covenant from the Children of Israel, and We appointed twelve leaders among them. And God said:

"I am with you if you establish regular prayers, pay alms and believe in My messengers; honour and assist them, and loan to God a beautiful loan. Verily, I will wipe out form you your evils and admit you to Gardens under which rivers flow. But if any of you after this, resists faith, he has indeed wandered from the Straight Path." Holy Qur'an: Al-Ma’idah verse 12.

"And remember We took a covenant from the Children of Israel: to worship none but God, treat with kindness your parents and kindred, and orphans and those in need; speak fair to the people; be steadfast in prayer; and give alms; then did you turn back, except a few among you, and you back slide (even now)." Holy Quran: Al-Baqarah, verse 83.

Because their hearts grew hard they twisted the truth to accord with their desires. They didn’t want to comply with God’s commandments, but they wanted the status of Chosen People. As a result, they chose to believe they were chosen because of some special virtue, and that such status was not conditional on any kind of behavior.

"But because of their breach of their covenant, We cursed them, and made their hearts grow hard: they change the words from their places and forget a good part of the Message that was sent them, and you will not cease to find them, except a few, bent on deceit: but forgive them, and overlook (their misdeeds): for God loves those who are kind." Holy Quran: Al-Ma’idah verse 13.

They changed the meaning of the covenant to simply being a promise to be given a land, totally disregarding the condition of obedience to the commandments. Choosing instead to believe that they were deserving of God’s favors regardless of their behavior, because they were chosen by Him. Moses led them out of Egypt to dwell in the Promised Land. Because of their constant transgression, God was displeased with them, and wished to punish them, but Moses begged God to fulfill his promise to Abraham. So, though He was displeased with them, He allowed them to dwell in the Promised Land, only to fulfill His promise to Abraham.

After the reign of David and Solomon, they were carried off into captivity at the hands of Nebuchadnezzar, ruler of the Babylonians in 586 BC. The Temple, Temple of Solomon, the center of Jewish community and a symbol of Jewish identity, was destroyed for the first time. Upon their return from Babylon, they re-established themselves and rebuilt the Temple. Several centuries later, in 70 AD, the Romans ransacked Jerusalem, the Temple was destroyed once again, never to be rebuilt, and the Jews scattered across the many parts of the world.

"And We decreed for the Children of Israel in the Book, that twice would they do mischief on the earth and be elated with mighty arrogance. When the first of the warnings came to pass We sent against you Our servants given to terrible warfare: they entered the very inmost parts of your homes; and it was a warning (completely) fulfilled. Then did We grant you victory over them: We gave you increase in resources and sons, and made you the more numerous in man-power. If you did well, you did well for yourselves, if you did evil, (you did it) against yourselves. So when the second of the warnings came to pass, (We permitted your enemies) to disfigure your faces, and to enter your Temple as they had entered it before and to visit with destruction all that fell into their power." Holy Quran: Bani-Israel verses 4 to 7

A central aspect of the Jewish religion, and in fact all religions is the coming of the expected Messiah, who is to guide all the nations. Every religion has foretold of the coming of the great Messiah, and by all signs available, it is the Prophet Mohammed who was being described. Because he was not Jewish they refused to accept him even though they recognized him as they would their own sons. The Christians believe him to be Jesus son of Mary. In any case they are still awaiting him. When he comes he will be their king, King of the Jews, the King of Zion. He will rebuild the Temple and they will rule the nations of the world in peace.

Zion:

Consequently, the Jews formulate ways by which to realize such a destiny and bring about their rulership of the world. Certainly it is not the case that every Jew participates consciously in this plan:

"There are among them some that are righteous, and some that are opposite..." Holy Qur'an: Al-Baqarah, verse 168

Its proponents comprise merely a section among them. It merely serves their purpose that the slightest suggestion of any Jewish malice prompts accusations of anti-Semitism on the part of those not in the know. It may just be a sign of their corruption that they do not expect God to hand them the world. Maybe it stems from the biblical concept that God helps those who help themselves. In any case, they actively pursue the realization of their purported destiny. As a result of deliberately twisting the idea of being Chosen, they disregard the rights of the rest of humanity.

The Talmud, the ancient book of Jewish jurisprudence, outlines such an attitude. The Jew is better than a non-Jew. The Gentile, or non-Jew, is viewed as being a mere brute, present on this earth to serve the purposes of Jews, like cattle. Just for example, Jews are allowed to expropriate the property of non-Jews, as well as charging them interest on debt, which is forbidden between themselves. Though Jews were themselves forbidden usury, they are nearly solely responsible for the forging of banking institutions throughout the centuries, and of which today they completely dominate. It has also been the backbone of their strategy. As far back as Ancient Greece we see the influx of Phoenicians from the coast cities of Ancient Palestine, establishing a new merchant class of money-lenders rivalling the Greek aristocracy.

Their strategy is essentially Machiavellian. Any form of treachery is acceptable, if an when it serves the greater "good", the fulfilment of the destiny of the Jewish People. The end justifies the means. Their ill intent for humanity can be traced throughout the centuries. Monopolizing the manufacture of weapons, practicing usury, pitting nation against nation, and pillaging the earth’s stores of gold. There is some controversy as to when exactly such efforts came into inception. Some say they began around Solomon’s reign, approximately three thousand years ago. Others claim it was initiated as a response to Jesus’ mission two thousand years ago.

The plan essentially is to deceive humanity into constructing a world empire whose rulership they will ultimately take hold of once its authority is secured. Then, to establish their awaited messiah as the ultimate ruler of humanity. This messiah is known to the Muslims as the Dajjal [Anti-Christ].

Europe:

Having been confronted with the mischief of the Jewish People, nearly every country in Europe expelled them, and they were banned entry up until only a few hundred years ago. Their first re-entry into Europe was by way of England. In 1649, Mennasseh Ben Israel financed Oliver Cromwell, enabling him to overthrow the monarchy of Charles I. Now known as the Glorious Revolution. Once their chosen ruler, Charles II, was installed, they moved quickly to repeal the law banning them entry into England. They immediately proceeded to create a new system of government now known as Parliament. The benefit of a parliamentary system to the Jews is that it completely debilitates the process of governing by confounding it in futile babble.

Through banking, the practice of "money-lending" for which they are famous, they infiltrated the industry of the country. Themselves adding to it, or fuelling it with a new infusion of funds through loans. As a result, we have what is now known as the Industrial Revolution. Whereby, the Jews transformed modern industry by a massive build up of production and manufacture. The tale that can now be told, of the extent of abuse and exploitation that took place during this period, is a sad one.

Freemasonry:

To implement such a plan, the Jews needed to recruit a secret army from among the Gentile, non-Jewish citizens of their host nation. Devised by the middle of the eighteenth century, was a secret society called the Illuminati. Adam Wieshaupt, an apostate Christian, who had been commissioned by a group of Jewish men, to formulate a plan by which to appropriate the rulership of the world by "peaceful means", conceived of its concept. A certain Bauer from Germany originally founded this society, who later changed his name to Baron Mayer von Rothschild (after the emblem of his guild: a red banner encrusted with the picture of an eagle clenching a handful of arrows. "Rothschild" in German means "red shield". Not coincidental is the use of the red flag in communist revolutions). This society was called The Illuminati because it was to be directed by a group of men who were to be "illumined", men professing the practice of special esoteric knowledge.

Recruiting many influential people, this society managed to permeate the upper echelons of European society. Emerging to replace the Illuminati in the following centuries, was the society of the Freemasons. Freemasonry was also capable of attracting a great deal of prominent people. Including, not only businessmen, heads of industry, but also major figures in government and the aristocracy. Including the crown in many cases. The entire British royal family has a long history of membership in Freemasonry.

The present queen of England, Elizabeth II, is the Grand Patroness of Freemasonry. The recruit is offered to participate, through his membership, in the establishment of a new order based on Christian principles. Also, he is assured that his financial future will be secured by the many contacts he is to receive, as well as the "brotherly" assistance that would be available to him through various avenues. Most importantly is the secret knowledge of the Craft, which he is promised to be introduced to. In return he is required to swear absolute allegiance to the Brotherhood and, to obey the orders of the thirteen elders, whose identity would to him remain unknown. Moreover, he would be subject to gruesome punishment and death if he were ever to divulge the secrets of the organization.

Other affiliated organizations are The Rosicrucians, Skull and Crossbones, the Rotary Club, the Lions Club and the Shriners. The theme of the organization is of course masonry. But it is masonry because their efforts in trying to forge a new order, is symbolically represented as the rebuilding of Temple of Solomon, each member helping to lay the bricks. Moreover, the basis of the cult of Freemasonry, is the initiation to the esoteric knowledge, having supposedly been passed down from King Solomon. The Craft they learn is magic. A knowledge the Jews have managed to preserve over the centuries.

"They followed what the Satan’s recited over Solomon’s Kingdom. Solomon did not disbelieve but Satan’s disbelieved, teaching men magic and such things as came down at Babylon to the angels Harut and Marut. But neither of these taught anyone (such things) without saying: "We are only for trial; so do not blaspheme." They learned from them the means to sow discord between man and wife. But they could not thus harm anyone except by God’s permission. And they learned what harmed the, not what profited them. And they knew that the buyers of (magic) would have no share in the happiness of the Hereafter. And vile was the price for which they did sell their souls, if they but knew!" Holy Qur'an: Al-Baqarah, verse 102.

The cult is divided into 33 degrees. Each degree is marked by its own initiation ritual and science that is taught within it. Each level introduces the initiate to higher levels of secret knowledge. At the entry level he is introduced to the most basic understanding of what Freemasonry is all about. But, with each subsequent level he is told that what he was introduced to at the earlier level was not actually what the Craft was really about, and that he would now be introduced to a true understanding of the purpose of the Brotherhood. Every time he ascends to a higher level, he is reindoctrinated in such a manner, so that his idea of the purpose of the cult is transformed as he is promoted to higher echelons.

The earlier initiates are duped into believing that the organization is a Christian one, and that its aims are Christian. According to 33rd degree Freemason and 19th century American politician Albert Pike, the god of freemasonry is the Devil. In fact the name of their god is Jah-Bul-On. It is only at the higher levels that the true nature of the cult is revealed to the member, and that he becomes a conscious worshipper of the Devil. Several figures are 33rd degree Freemasons in our time, one such being Ronald Reagan, former president of the United States. He was responsible for the establishment of the Church of Satan in California, a diabolical church, of which many high profile personalities are members, including Mick Jagger, who is a high priest.

Usury:

Usury according to Christianity is forbidden, so those figures exercising power in the economy had an interest in the deterioration of the Church’s authority. Those interested in the establishment of a banking system, to reap the profits of usury, needed to pick away at the power of the Church. By weakening the Church’s authority through its various methods of dispensing propaganda, the people’s growing desire for loans, the pressure to conform to an increasingly interest oriented business world, and the Church’s own corrupted tendencies, they managed to force the Church to yield on its stance against usury.

It had been necessary to eliminate Christianity, not only because of its hindrance as a potent political body, but as well because of its influence over the mentalities of the Europeans. To create a citizen geared to optimum levels of production, citizens would have to be hard working. The best slave is the hard-working one. Secondly he would have to be motivated to spend everything he earns, so that manufacturers may sell their products. Therefore, it would be necessary to inculcate greed. The other-worldliness of Christianity stood in the way such indoctrination.

The method used would be propaganda, to place doubt as to the legitimacy of the Christian religion. Not only did the Church’s own corruption and hypocrisy, once exposed, work formidably against it, but once scientific research had unearthed the incongruities of the Bible, it was finally possible to discredit Christianity entirely. Furthermore, the Theory of Evolution if misinterpreted suggested an altogether different concept of reality. The European then searched for an alternative belief system. The Jews were there to fill the vacuum with an assortment of "new" or "progressive" ideas.

It is thought that Gutenburg, by the invention of the printing press, liberated mankind from ignorance by making literature available to the common man. Yet, by seizing hold of the new publishing industry, Jews managed to control the entire range of material that would now be available. They produced an array of materiel designed to upset the power of the Church, by a new line of writers and philosophers (usually Freemasons) whom they would themselves help bring into prominence. Consequently, the latter part of the eighteenth century is now known as the Age of Enlightenment.

The wording "enlightenment" should be carefully noted for it was forged by the "illumined" or "enlightened" members of the Illuminata. Most of the major figures of the Enlightenment in fact were Freemasons like the renowned Frenchman Rousseau and the writer Voltaire. The essence of the Enlightenment movement was that it marked the beginning of "free thinking". In other words, that it was considered the first major movement in secular thought, or irreligious or even anti-religious thought.

The French Revolution:

A primary example of where this was put into place is France. Once the people had been freed from the Church’s hold, they were overcome by a new tide of revolutionary ideas. They easily absorbed the Freemason ideals of Liberty, Fraternity, Equality that became the slogan of the French Revolution. Now that the concept of the monarchy being a power vested by God was fully suspended, motivated by their new ideals, spurred on by the agents of Freemasonry, the French revolted against their Aristocracy.

It had been necessary to destroy the aristocracy because it contained the authority of the state within hereditary bonds. Once such a barrier was removed, the new Bourgeoisie, or middle-class merchant, took the reigns of power, now that power was accessible to those able to manage mobility within the industry. Russia in 1918 should be interpreted in a similar fashion. Karl Marx, himself a Jew, was commissioned to write Das Kapital by Freemasons, which they used to create the Red Empire, over the ashes of the Russian aristocracy. Since it's very inception the Soviet Union was entirely dominated by Jews, from the KGB to the Politburo.

America Incorporated:

In the USA, the Jews can be seen dominating every aspect of American industry from banking, to manufacturing, to the media, as well as such national institutions as government and education. These are manipulated to transform the USA into a massive weapons production centre, or as has been termed, a Military-Industrial-Complex. To build up the might of the West, not for its present bogus conflicts, but to be eventually used to secure the power of a world empire.

In the middle of the nineteenth century, banks started encouraging the buy-out of certain companies by others. Instead of several companies competing within the same market, it was seen as more advantageous to merge them into a single monopoly, or at least a collection of a few companies in a certain field, in order to maximize profits. Therefore, there began a merger movement, where whole sectors of industry came to be dominated by a few very large companies. These buy-outs required massive loans, which were of course financed by the banks. By imposing conditions on loans or requiring the appointment of specific people, or even representatives, on the board of directors of these companies, the banks found a way to exercise control over the industry.

The United States’ many banks came under the authority of a few major banks. Massive financial groups thus appeared, composed of large corporations and their financial institutions, each headed by a major bank or banks, distributed throughout the major industrial areas. Already by the turn of the century, fifty percent of the industry of America was under the direct or indirect control of a few major banking powers. This merger movement continued throughout the century and goes on up until this day.

Now companies are so huge, called multi-national corporations, that they diversify their activities in several fields simultaneously and across national boarders. For example a major corporation may own an industrial plant in steel, a clothing chain, a food producer, a publishing company and a television network all at once. If they wish, they can exercise their influence in one field to effect their profits in another. For example, they can create a television program, along with a complimentary book series or a magazine, to advertise the products they manufacture in another field of industry. Just as many toy giants animate their products on Saturday morning television. Or, the Children’ Television Workshop, producer of the "award" winning "educational" children’s television program, Sesame Street, is composed entirely of businessmen and financiers representing the major financial groups.

Indoctrination:

It is a mystery to many people as to what makes Americans so patriotic. The reason is simple, they are the victims of a grand scheme designed to foster adoration for their nation. Principal to a system intent on the control of human beings, is a mechanism for propaganda, to inculcate values favourable to the authority in charge. There are several media used to this purpose: television, radio, film, newspapers and literature, but more importantly the educational system. The major financial groups of the United States appropriated control of the universities already early on in the century. Universities are wholly dependent on funding from boards of trustees, which are composed of corporate individuals from the financial groups.

Taking advantage of the universities’ dependence on their funding, the financial groups pressured the universities to conform to specific agenda. School curricula were entirely rearranged. With such a large infusion of "charity" the universities were forced to abandon many of their former methods of education, in favour of those fields of study that were to directly benefit the corporations, at time remove undesirable members of faculty, and were required to construct facilities to enable the kind of research that was preferred by the leaders of industry.

Education:

The universities were divided into two fields of study: natural sciences and the social sciences. The basis of study of the natural sciences was to serve the major corporations with necessary research. It is through scientific research that innovation and inventions are stimulated. Invention and innovation firstly generate greater wealth by enhancing industrial productivity, and by introducing new commodities into the market. But the primary objective is the development of military technology. Study in the social sciences is to serve a two-fold purpose.

The fields of study include economics, sociology, psychology, political science and history. First of its purposes is to indoctrinate. To inculcate values appropriate for the efficiency and perpetuation of the system. The second aspect of social science is the study of human beings. To analyse the behaviour of human beings and their reactions to different stimuli. Such study is designed to reveal methods to make the population more productive, i.e. what are the causes of possible apathy; reactions to certain programs implemented by the corporations through its various agencies (governmental or otherwise); what are viable incentives to increased productivity; and how to detect revolutionary sentiment before it erupts.

All is coordinated to create a self-perpetuating system, geared to high levels of productivity, in order to build up might and wealth. Though most professors or researchers are not aware of the actual agenda at hand, they are required to submit an application if they wish to pursue research in a certain area. This application is subject to approval of the administration, and thus to the corporations who have set the criteria for approval.

All agencies that direct or make recommendations to the educational system, such as the US Board of Education, the National Research Council, the Heritage Foundation and so on, which are nearly entirely composed of business professionals from the major financial groups, formulate "proper" interpretations of history readied for the educational system, and designed to inculcate appropriate attitudes.

The "interpretation", that Westerners now believe as reality, is as follows: The universe is entirely materialistic. In the beginning there was a great explosion, the Big Bang, that created the universe. Through a series of accidental mutations, life evolved by Survival of the Fittest, from the simplest organism, to various species, to apes and finally to man. In the early stages of humanity, man was faced with a great struggle with the chaos of his environment. He was forced to cope with the violent forces of nature as well as constant threats to his life. The cave man first formed a sort of knife from stone. Then he discovered fire. Then he invented the wheel.

And such he progressed through time, continuously better adapting himself better to his environment. They believe that every successive innovation helps to alleviate the burden of their existence, and that it is through the evolution of technology and the advancement of science that their lives are improved. Through it, they can seek to cure all his ills, not only to alleviate their physical existence, but they will also eventually solve all social and even spiritual problems. Through it he will find salvation. It is such that the entire system is geared to the idolization of science. In education, great emphasis is placed not only on the study of science itself, but also on the study of the merits of science. The biographies of the great that contributed to the progress of technology are studied in some detail.

Deifying Science:

In such a way they make science their primary mode of activity, dispensing a great amount of their effort towards scientific research, without suspecting that they are merely being enslaved. National programs, such as the space program directed by NASA, are initiated in great prestige, that the society may believe its efforts are expended towards a noble cause: the advancement of knowledge. While in actuality, it has been initiated to stimulate research towards the development of advanced weaponry. The greatest degree of technological innovation for the military is drawn from discoveries made in the space program. And everyone believes they are just trying to land on the moon!

Mobocracy:

To disguise the horror of the reality of what is modern day America is the following "interpretation": Once man had significantly progressed from the mental darkness of his pre-human stages, he made his intellectual birth during the Ancient Greek civilization in philosophy, when he first began to question his existence. Socrates first tackled the dilemma of the ideal political system and came up with a theoretical system he called Democracy. Man’s political concepts evolved through time, through the Renaissance, to the Enlightenment, to the British parliamentary system, and finally, to the checks and balances of the multi-party democratic system of the United States. Leading Americans to believe they are citizens of a democracy, the best system evolved for mankind.

Americans are not of a democracy, they are citizens of a corporation. They are deceived into believing that the authority of the country resides in the government, which is supposedly democratic. In actual fact, those who hold power, who make decisions over national policy and who hold sway over the said government, are the corporations and their leaders. The government is merely a smokescreen to hide the fact that there is no government in the US, and that decisions over national policy are really decided in favor of corporate interests. Americans are indoctrinated into believing in the legitimacy of the present system, but specifically, the idea they are to conclude is, that it is the best system available and, most importantly, that they should not seek to change it.

Life, liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness:

Those who pass through the American educational system carry these ideas to the rest of the population through that which they produce when they enter the media industry, in magazines, newspapers, television, radio and film. Notwithstanding the fact that the media are owned and controlled by the major financial groups, wrapped up in a complex network of ownership among multi-nationals. As Caesar said: "…give them bread and circuses". Once the masses are fed they merely require the adequate dose of fantasy in order to be kept passive. Exhausted from extended hours of labour, without the energy to pursue issues more thoroughly, the American worker returns home to digest a half hour of information’s equivalent of baby food: the six o’clock news. Satiating his desire to remain informed with a brief report on "reality". To dissipate his excess stress, television is prepared with a full menu of intellectual junk-food, spiced with the appropriate amount of propaganda.

There are films, sports events, and an assortment of literature that deals in fiction as well as "non-fiction". For those not deceived by the flagrant mediocrity of the popular media, there is a selection of material available that presents a facade of intellectualism, but is no less vacant of substance, and which is merely a more sophisticated type of indoctrination, designed for the upper levels of the society. This array of trash entertainment provides a steady diet of fantasy, advertises the wares of the market, and of course thoroughly hypnotizes.

They arouse lust and greed. Glamorise that which is first devoid of virtue, but inaccessible to most, if not entirely non-existent. Such circuses: the Academy Awards, rock concerts, the Super Bowl, high fashion, Time magazines, pseudo-intellectual McNeil-Lehrer News Hour, modern art exhibitions, Saturday Night Live, MTV and so on, nurture political apathy, by legitimising indulgence in selfish and trivial pursuits as opposed to confronting current injustices. For if man is not a moral being he is an animal, or even worse.

Virtue Or Vice:

If one were to be God-fearing, he could not be transformed into the optimal subject of a system geared to maximum productivity. He needs to be wholly materialistic. Therefore it is necessary to remove his concept of God and the Afterlife. By first divesting him of his knowledge of God and the Afterlife, the concept of accountability is removed. For as long as he understands the consequences of his actions, he could never abandon his better conscience for the sake of personal indulgence. But, without belief in accountability, he is easily manipulated, simply by arousing his desires. He easily compromises his conscience simply because he is afraid of what people think, or because he is afraid to cause decrease to his wealth.

Though the level of hypocrisy and injustice increase around him each day, he is bewildered by his enflamed passions. Where he once might have felt the stirrings of social responsibility, he is defeated by the onslaught of suggestive messages, and he ignores his better conscience for the fulfilment of the base desires of lust and greed ignited in him. Where he would have once felt disgust or outrage, he now finds rationalizations, excuses; and the pursuit of his own selfish aims gains validity. He conveniently denies the wrong that makes itself evident day by day, so as not to place in jeopardy the attainment of his wishes. The rest of humanity, the victims of the oppression he indirectly contributes to, that stand to gain from his initiative, must wait. Thus has he forsaken God. For you cannot serve two masters. It is either vice or virtue. But he makes a pact with the Devil to turn a blind eye to inequality in return for the fleeting treasures of this world.

"Those who desire the life of this world and its pomp, to them We shall pay in full (the wages of) their deeds therein, without diminution." Holy Qur'an: The Prophet Hud, verse 15.

American Popular Culture:

The complete indoctrination of the American people suffices to exert control on the rest of humanity. From their base in America, they can export not only their material products, but they can export "American Culture". It effects the necessary changes upon the mentalities of peoples elsewhere, freeing them from traditional forms of belief and adapting them to the "modern" world.

Nearly the entire world economic system is controlled by a gigantic infrastructure of multi-nationals, their subsidiaries and their affiliates. The major banks of Western countries, who have direct access to control of industry the world-over, themselves fall under the authority of their central banks. These in turn fall under the authority of the World Bank. The concept of "development", is merely double-speak to hide another more insidious agenda. Funded by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), "development" of a country means to enslave that country to the western economic system, by introducing western means of production, which are usually owned by, or at least serve the Western industry. It also enslaves that country to repayment of loans, presenting the World Bank and the IMF yet another mode of coercion. Two thirds of humanity live at a level of subsistence. By imposing a system of import tariffs, Western countries "protect" their markets, create an arena of unfair competition, and thus the multi-nationals keep the Third World back deliberately at staggering levels of poverty to ensure cheap labour and cheap raw materials. For the First World. The "free" world.

The West exercises its authority over nearly every government of the world. The Post-Colonial period is really a Neo-Colonial period. The masses of the Third World have been duped into believing that through their struggles for "independence" they have freed themselves from the colonial powers. The fact is that the colonial powers recognized they could more easily retain control of their colonies if they removed their presence, which caused too much animosity, and was generally expensive. In their stead they fostered the establishment of native governments favorable to them. Puppet governments. Therefore the governments of the Third World countries are merely extensions of the Western hegemony. As a clue, a sign of sure Western influence is the presence of a Western style government in a given country. Upward-mobility within their institutions is conditional on the appropriation of western values.

The Western educated not only make adequate replacements in government, but can be hired for lower pay to run foreign owned operations. In order to suppress potential revolutionary movements, on the part of victimized populations wishing to alter their predicament, brutally repressive regimes are installed or supported by the Western capitalists. As in Saudi Arabia, which is really Zionist controlled, where not only is vicious brutality used, but also by placing the appropriate amount of religious facade, they deceive even the most ardent Muslims.

In the non-Western world there is a great deal of membership in Freemasonry, that nearly all aspects of Third World societies are pervaded with agents of Freemasonry. In some cases, as remote as African chiefs or, as significant as the religious clergy of Islamic countries, are recorded as holding membership in Freemasonry. Many times Jews play the role of impostors to suit their purposes. For example King Fahad of Saudi Arabia is a Jew, King Hasan II of Morocco is a Jew, as were Tito of Yugoslavia, and also Lenin.

If the West wishes to carry out a policy in an Arab country, which may contradict the tenets of Islam, it weighs its influence on its leader (usually Freemason), who uses his influence on his clergymen, who in turn churn out the necessary religious verdict, permitting the implementation of their blasphemy. As happened when America wanted to install its troops in the Gulf, the appropriate Fatwa or religious verdict was passed by the Mufti of Saudi Arabia, Sheikh Bin Bazz (he has since passed away, may Allah forgive his sins. As for us, the Rasulallah (saws) advised us against insulting the dead, so beware.), based on extremely tenuous evidence.

Israel:

Central to the Zionist plan was the creation of a Jewish homeland, the purpose of the First and Second World Wars. To gather Jews for the reception of the Messiah, and their ultimate rulership of the world. Palestine was in Ottoman land, so The First World War disintegrated this major obstacle, the Ottoman Caliphate, which was finally dismantled in 1924, ending 1300 years of consolidated Islamic power. With the Second World War, the role of the United Nations was secured, and with the so-called Holocaust, propaganda about persecution of the Jews was created to argue for the creation of the State of Israel. By it, they convinced their own people into migrating from the various countries around the world to Israel, in order to escape persecution and possible annihilation. They convinced the world, under the guise of the United Nations, to approve the establishment of the State of Israel.

The Coming Messiah:

The aim to establish the Messiah as the ultimate ruler of humanity. As ruler he will also make them the rulers of humanity. To this aim they have prepared the system he is to dominate, the New World Order. The first stage in its establishment has been the United Nations. Now on their agenda is the unification of Europe, to lead to a final global power, the one world government. When the moment is deemed appropriate, they will introduce their leader, the ultimate dictator of humanity: the King of the Jews. The "Messiah". To make the world receive their messiah, their plan is to create a world-wide economic depression.

Having created havoc with the civilizations of history, the Jews will expose to the world its "inability" to construct a viable government. Disillusioned by their many failed attempts, the world will gladly receive their "Messiah" as the one to solve their problems, the great saviour of humanity. The protagonists of this plan claim that its completion is a matter of a few years away. Talk now is under way about the need for European president, but also of a world president. Banners have been erected in the city of Jerusalem warning the people to expect the coming of the Messiah. Preparations have been made and plans have been drawn for the reconstruction of the Temple, whose location is on the site of the Mosque of Al Aqsa. Furthermore, the Pope has said that the "Messiah" will be here by the year 2000

The Unbelievers say: "We will neither believe in this scripture nor in (any) that (came) before it." If you could but see when the wrong-doers will be made to stand before their Lord, throwing back the world (of blame) on one another! Those who were deemed weak will say to the arrogant ones: "Had it not been for you, we should certainly have been believers!" The arrogant ones will say to those who had been deemed weak: "Was it we who kept you back from Guidance after it reached you? Nay, rather it was you who transgressed." Those who had been deemed weak will say to the arrogant ones: "Nay! it was a plot (of yours) by day and by night: Behold! you (constantly) ordered us to be ungrateful to God and to attribute equals to Him! They are filled with remorse. When they see the Chastisement: We shall put yokes on the necks of the Unbelievers: it would only be a requital for their (evil) deeds." Holy Qur'an: as-Saba, verses 31 to 33.

Armageddon:

Zionists have spent thousands of years appropriating control of the World. However, they cannot achieve their final appropriation of the rule of the world until they have completely destroyed Islam. This will lead to a final global conflict between the infidels, led by the Anti-Christ and the Jews, against the Muslims. This is a war expected throughout time called Armageddon.

"Their war is a war with God. They are fighting to extinguish the light of God on the earth. Their intention is to extinguish God’s Light with their mouths; But God will complete His Light, even though the Unbelievers may detest it." Holy Qur'an: as-Saff, verse 8.

They schemed against the light of God from their very beginnings, killing the Prophets as they tried to kill Jesus son of Mary. They strove to defile the purity of Islam from its very inception, attacking it in every way possible, creating the Shia’ sect, as well as the heretical Sufis. Long before the downfall of the Caliph, they schemed to undermine the Ottoman Empire, by sewing the seeds of corruption internally, to make the empire collapse upon itself. Then, when the Muslims were weak enough, the alliance of infidels saw its opportunity to finally dominate the Muslims, after centuries of jealously coveting the rule of Islam.

They attacked and partitioned the Islamic world between them. Once they obliterated the rule of Islam, they proceeded to attempt its final dissolution, or at least its distortion, to secure their power forever. Education was reformulated to dull the true glory of the Islamic empire. Indoctrinating the colonized world as to the supposed virtues of the West, telling a tale of history with the West as the sole protagonist.

They entice into anti-Islamic values by the myriad of subliminal suggestions injected into advertising, films, and television programs, for example, like Dynasty, Beverly Hills 90210, Nintendo, Pretty Woman, music videos, not only advertising Western produced goods like BMW’s, Marlboros, Nike, MacDonald’s and Whitney Houston, but seducing into anti-Islamic forms of behaviour, like premarital relation, extra-marital relations, feminist attitudes, inappropriate or extravagant forms of dress, licentiousness, greed, narcissism, and Western ideologies hostile to Islam. The final blow is dealt, by way of the corrupt clergy, to inculcated a distorted understanding of Islam, into those holding on their faith, to render them politically impotent.

An Age Of Conflicts:

The final stage is set for the unification of Europe, and Zionists feel they have accumulated enough strength and control, that they are now bringing back Islam as the pronounced enemy, which had in fact been the real enemy all along. They see that the corruption they have sewn, has sufficiently weakened the Muslims, that they feel confident enough to begin their attack, to attempt the final annihilation of Muslims. Everywhere in the world conflicts are erupting between Fundamentalists and the West. Serb thugs are used to carry out Zionist plans in Bosnia. Freemason France is executing its war in its colony of Algeria. The West demonises the Islamists’ struggle every time a spy or agents of the West is killed, claiming they are "intellectuals".

In obedience to prompts from the West, Arab countries are carrying a program of brutal repression against Islamic Fundamentalism. In most countries wearing a beard is enough to get you jailed. In Tunisia the head covering for women is illegal. In Egypt, television programs are produced ridiculing Fundamentalists. Wives of Muslim activists are jailed, tortured and raped. In Saudi Arabia the slightest remark against the King could have you killed.

Islam And The West:

Important to his strength is to rally as much of the World to support him in his attack against Islam, towards this aim Westerners as well as many non-Westerners, like the local pro-Western dupes of many countries, cleverly manipulated against their own people, have been indoctrinated into values in opposition to Islam. To this purpose they implanted the following interpretation of history in the mind of the Westerner: Early man, confounded by the chaos of his environment, conceived religion. Formulating the myth of a God to allay his fears. But religion was backwards.

Due to his primitive mentality and his fears, he imposed values of human beings that were incompatible with his nature. He was ashamed of his body, viewing sex as a dirty thing. He imposed chastity and hiding of ones nakedness because he had difficulty coming to terms with his nature. He would punish himself by denying himself the pleasures of life which he irrationally called sins. Then, science exposed the mysteries of the universe, so he was no longer in need of a myth. Man evolved to come to terms with his nature, so he rid himself of repressive religion.

There was no such thing as sin or shame. No need for chastity. But, to rid himself of the stain of the emotionally repressed ideas of religion, was a continual struggle to come to terms with his nature. Daring to defy commonly held principles, is hailed as courage...Finally Neitsche declared: God is dead. The Theory of Relativity, formulated by Einstein, is manipulated to induce the concept of tolerance. The theory postulates that, in the physical world, because of the elasticity of time, everything is relative. One set of rules are applicable to one sphere, while a whole different set of rules are applicable to another sphere. What is right for you is not necessarily right for me! From this is derived the idea of tolerance, that everyone must tolerate everyone else’s opinion, because everyone is right. This is in direct opposition to Muslims, who are certain of their faith, and Fundamentalism, which is not prepared to compromise the tenets of Islam for any other system of values.

Modern Western Values:

Consequently the entire mentality of the Westerner has been carefully designed to be hostile to Islam. In their ignorance, Westerners have been deceived into believing that these modern values, Women’s Rights, Human Rights, Secularism, the separation of church and state, Democracy and Tolerance, are ideas they arrived at, by having fought long and hard intellectually, to rid themselves of such ideas as Islam suggests.

The world is being made to believe that a New World Order is about to be established, the final just rule of the world, after a long list of failed attempts, based on these. Former pro-Israel US diplomat Jeanne Kirkpatrick and former Vice-President Dan Quayle have singled out Islamic fundamentalism as "the new enemy of the West in the 20th century, succeeding Nazism and communism, the archenemies of civilization in a by-gone era".

He has been indoctrinated into these values to be a supporter of he New World Order and to understand that he must fight against Islam if he wishes to see its establishment. Former Israeli President Chaim Herzog, trying to create irrational fear of Islam, told British Prime Minister John Major and Foreign Secretary Douglas Hurd that Islamic Fundamentalism is "the greatest single danger to the free world today".

An Act of War:

The Cold War was a fraud to instil apprehension in the populations of the West to justify a massive weapons build up. To create an illusion of relative peace, to redirect the attention of the world from its real conflicts, to the artificial conflict between America and the Soviet Union. Muslims were led to believe that they were no longer in a state of war with the West, while in fact this war began a long time ago. The Muslim lands were invaded and completely colonized by the infidels. Tricked by their phoney independence’s, they fail to perceive they are still under the control of the West, nor do they perceive the insidious methods of propaganda and sedition, used against them in their countries, which qualify as acts of war

Jihad in the Cause of Allah:

The Islamic concept of Jihad is one of the most misunderstood aspects of the faith. Contrary to the mass of negative propaganda spilling forth from the Zionist press, Jihad does not advocate conquest nor does it advocate the forced conversion to Islam, which is totally condemned in the Quran.

Jihad (pronounced /dʒɪˈhɑːd/; Arabic: جهاد‎ [dʒiˈhæːd]), an Islamic term, is a religious duty of Muslims. In Arabic, the word jihād is a noun meaning "struggle." Jihad appears frequently in the Qur'an and common usage as the idiomatic expression "striving in the way of Allah (al-jihad fi sabil Allah)".[1][2] A person engaged in jihad is called a mujahid, the plural is mujahideen.
A minority among the Sunni scholars sometimes refer to this duty as the sixth pillar of Islam, though it occupies no such official status.[3] In Twelver Shi'a Islam, however, Jihad is one of the 10 Practices of the Religion.

According to scholar John Esposito, Jihad requires Muslims to "struggle in the way of God" or "to struggle to improve one's self and/or society."[3][4] Jihad is directed against Satan's inducements, aspects of one's own self, or against a visible enemy.[1][5] The four major categories of jihad that are recognized are Jihad against one's self (Jihad al-Nafs), Jihad of the tongue (Jihad al-lisan), Jihad of the hand (Jihad al-yad), and Jihad of the sword (Jihad as-sayf).[5] Islamic military jurisprudence focuses on regulating the conditions and practice of Jihad as-sayf, the only form of warfare permissible under Islamic law, and thus the term Jihad is usually used in fiqh manuals in reference to military combat. [1]

The colossal degree of injustice that has been described, is nearly entirely attributable to the perverse desires of a few men. This must be changed. This is the trial placed by God upon humanity. What has to be done? People have to take it upon themselves to change the situation. This will mean that they will have to make sacrifices. They may have to sacrifice their way of life, their careers, their reputation and perhaps their lives. If they do not respond, who will? God could vanquish these criminals within the fraction of an instant. Yet, He wants to see who will fight in His cause, by his tongue, his wealth and his person, against the perpetrators of wrong, the army of darkness.

God revealed Islam in order that humanity could be governed according to it. Unbelief is darkness and disorder. So the unbelievers, if they are not suppressed, create disorder. That is why the Muslims are responsible for the implementation of God’s Law on the planet, that humanity may be governed by it, as opposed to corrupt man-made laws. The Muslims must make all efforts to establish the religion of God in the earth. Otherwise, as God said:

"And those who disbelieve are allies to one another, (and) if you (Muslims of the whole world collectively) do not do so (i.e. become allies, as one united block with one with one Caliph, chief Muslim ruler for the whole Muslim world to make victorious Allah’s Religion of Islamic Monotheism), there will be upheaval (wars, battles, worship to other than Allah, etc.) and oppression on earth, and great mischief and corruption (appearance to other than Allah)." Holy Qur'an: al-Anfaal verse 73

The proponents of this dark plan know that their only threat is the Muslim jihad; in other words, the defensive struggle against those who would destroy Islam. Benjamin Netanyahu, leader of the Israeli Likud party said, trying to disparage his enemies: "The celebrated goal of Islamic Fundamentalism is to secure the worldwide victory of Islam by defeating the non-Muslim and infidels through jihad..." Thank you very much Mr. Netanyahu for a very inaccurate and perverse description. Yes, God has commanded the believers to fight the infidels; but only when Islamic lands are attacked.

"And fight them until there is no more evil and the religion will all be for God Alone..." Holy Qur'an: Al-Anfaal, verse 39.

The struggle continues until there is no more corruption, that there remains only the Law of God in the earth, and that the disbelievers who assault the Ummah comply to it, thus protecting the rest of humanity from their treachery. Very few are the Muslims who adhere to such an agenda, in fact most Muslims are busy trying to prove the West that they are not Fundamentalists, and that they want peace. But, but the fact that Netanyahu mentions this small group, proves what a sizable threat they consider them to be.

The infidels know that when Muslims realize what is truly expected of them in their religion, about struggling to defend Islam against the infidels, it will mean the end of their amoral rule. Consequently, they fight against Fundamentalism in every sphere and struggle to dislodge jihad from its proper role in Islam. They use their army of propagandist, from radical feminists to corrupt religious leaders, to distort the true meaning of this religion. The Muslims follow the leading scholars, so these leading scholars, serve the Zionist plan, to hold back the Fundamentalist threat, by justifying the corruption in their countries, getting Muslims tangled up in petty debates, like talk over Aqeedah, Tarbiya, minor details of the prayer and so on, and all sorts of reasons why Muslims shouldn’t fight jihad.

They fail to make the Muslims conscious of the schemes of their enemies, nor to expose to them the true level of catastrophe they are living in. They fail to inform the Muslims about their responsibilities. The Muslims live in an idyllic world of Islamic discussion, where the many opinions of scholars are legitimate. All this, is to preoccupy the Muslims, such that the infidels may proceed to build up their might. They want to keep the Muslims busy with futile pursuits until they feel they have accumulated enough strength and control, that they can announce their power, without anyone being able to prevent them.

When an Islamic State is set up, and there is no threat to its borders, jihad is not then carried out offensively against the enemies of God in order to propagate the religion. In such a case that jihad is optional, and armies are assembled, composed of volunteers filed with missionary zeal, not swords. When the Muslims have established Islam and an Islamic state, they must secure it, to protect the rule and system of God’s Law. If the Islamic territory becomes threatened, then it is an emergency situation. Then, jihad becomes obligatory upon every Muslim of that area if the unbelievers attack it, because of the extreme importance of protecting the establishment of Islam, and every Muslim is required to march forth.

"If you march not forth, he will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm him at all and God is able to do all things." The Holy Qur'an: at-Taubah, verse 39.

Ibn Kathir, said in Mukhtasir Ibn Kathir 2/144: "God, Most High, ordered that everybody march out with the Messenger of God in the expedition of Tabuk to fight the enemies of God, the Roman infidels." Bukhari has written a chapter in Sahih al Bukhari (entitled The Chapter On The Obligation of Marching Out and What is Required from Jihad and Intention for It) and quoted this verse. It was a general call because the Muslims knew that the Romans were gathering on the borders of the Arabian Peninsula and were preparing to invade Medina. So what is the situation if the infidels enter a Muslim country, does not the march become the ultimate priority? Abu Talha said about the words of the Most High: "...light or heavy...": "old and young, God did not listen to anyone’s excuse". And Hasan al Basri said: "in hardship and in ease."

Ibn Abidin said, in Hashiyat Ibn Abidin 3/238: "Jihad becomes obligatory if the enemy attacks one of the borders of the Muslims, and it becomes obligatory upon those close by. For those who are far away, it is optional, if their assistance is not required. If they are needed, perhaps because those nearby the attack cannot resist the enemy, or are indolent and do not fight jihad, then it becomes obligatory upon those behind them, like the obligation to pray and fast. There is no room for them to leave it. If they too are unable, then it becomes obligatory for those behind them, and so on in the same manner until jihad becomes obligatory for the whole Ummah of Islam from the East to the West".

In Hashiyat ad Dussuqi it is stated: Jihad becomes obligatory upon the surprise attack of the enemy. Dussuqi said: "Wherever this happens, jihad immediately becomes obligatory upon everybody, even women, slaves and children, and they march out even if their guardians, husbands and creditors forbid them" (2/174).

Ibn Taymia said: "If the enemy enters a Muslim land, there is no disagreement that it is obligatory for the closest and then the next closest to repel him, because the Muslim lands are like one land. It is obligatory to march to the territory even without the permission of parents or creditor..". How many years has it been since the enemies of God entered the Muslim lands, that in our present era we don’t even have a state. So how many times is the obligation multiplied for us. The great scholar of Islam, Ibn Taymia said: "To defend that which is sacred and the religion from the aggressor is obligatory, as unanimously agreed upon. For the enemy who creates havoc in the life and in the religion, there is nothing more obligatory after basic belief than defense from him."

"Let those who sell the life of this world for the Hereafter fight in the Cause of God, and whosoever fights in the Cause of God, and is killed or gets victory, We shall bestow on him a great reward. Holy Qur'an." An-Nisaa', verse 74.

The priority for the Muslims right now, the minimum for their religion is the establishment of the security of an Islamic state, where they can secure the rule of God. Once we manage to do so we will have presented an example to the rest of humanity of the rule of God’s Law to compare with the travesty of the rule of oppression. We will be able to manage the affairs of the religion, to protect the Muslims, and propagate the religion of God properly.

The Prophet Muhammad (SAW) said: "It is expected that the nations will call each other from all horizons, as those calling each other to feast from a platter of food in from of them." A person asked the Prophet if would that be because of our small number that day. The Prophet said, "no, but you will be scum, like scum of flood water. God will put weakness into your hearts and remove the fear from the hearts of your enemies because of your love of the world and your hate for death". In another narration it was said: "and what kind of weakness is it Messenger of God? He said: "love of the world and the hate of fighting." Narrated by Ahmad with reliable chain of narration. Narrated by Abu Dawud with the words "hate for death", and it is authentic.

1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihad

Appendix I

On the reverse side of the American one dollar bill are two Masonic symbols. One is a pyramid, its peak with a single left eye in it elevated above it and is radiating (remnant of the Illuminati). The other is a symbol of an eagle (reminiscent of the Rothschild symbol). The eagle is clenching a branch with 13 leaves in its right claw, 13 arrows in its left claw. The shield placed in front of it in 13 American stripes. The six pointed star, the Star of David, symbol of Zionism, composed of 13 small five pointed stars, is illuminated above its head. In the pyramid there are 13 levels of bricks. The inscription above it, Annuit Coeptis, or "our conspiracy" in Latin, is made up of 13 letters. The symbols are detailed in units of 13 to represent the 13 secret elders that guide the Zionist plan. Below the pyramid is inscribed Novus Ordo Seclorum, Latin for New Social Order, the New World Order the are trying to establish. The pyramid represents the hierarchical system of control, centring power at the top through many levels of authority, the one world empire. The eye, a left eye, represents the Messiah is to come and "oversee" the whole system.

Appendix II

A strictly confidential document published in the newspapers Al-Medina al Munawarah issue 4570, Al Arab 6/4/1979, Ad-Dawah issue Safar 1399 and in the book Callers no Rebels page 179.
From: Richard B. Mitchell - the head of the American intelligence in the United States Embassy in Cairo.
To: The head of the secret service in the CIA.
Collected information form our agents, from the Israeli intelligence, and secret reports indicate that it is necessary to direct a strong blow to the Islamic groups whose activities have started to appear in all the Arab Muslim countries and in Europe and North America. We have observed that the means of suppression and terrorism pursued at the time of President Abdul Nasser has led to the sympathy of the Muslim masses with the Muslim Brotherhood, thus leading to adverse results. Additionally, advice delivered by the government of Mamdooh Salem that it is sufficient to direct a blow against the group of "Takfeer and Hijrah" therefore we propose the following means as alternative solutions
FIRSTLY: It is sufficient to carry out partial suppression instead of total suppression and to limit this to the leading personalities in a way which appears normal (natural).
SECONDLY: In regard to the leading personalities who are not selected for culmination, we advise to follow the following:
1) Those who can be tempted by lush jobs, are to be tempted, where they are kept busy with useless Islamic projects and other activities which discharge their efforts.
2) Endeavour to attract those with trading economic inclinations to contribute to the common Egyptian and Israeli project.
3) To create opportunities for work in Arab petroleum countries with highly paid salaries, which distances them from the Islamic activity in Egypt.
4) With regard to the effective elements in Europe and America we propose the following
A) To discharge their energy in spending their efforts with the non-Muslims, and spoiling those efforts by our institutions.
B) To discharge their effort in publishing and issuing Islamic books, and foiling their results.
C) Spreading the seeds of doubt and dissension amongst their leaderships so that they become preoccupied with that rather than the Islamic activity.
THIRDLY: With reference to the Muslim youth we have to concentrate on the following:
1) To encourage the attack on the Sunnah (traditions) of Mohammed, and to raise doubt about it and the other various Islamic sources.
2) To disintegrate the Islamic gatherings to spread dispute inside them and between them.
3) To face the wave of the Muslim youth, male and female, turning to observe Islamic teachings, particularly the commandments for girls to wear Islamic dress, through the information and cultural activity which comply solely with us.
4) The teaching and media institutions in their various stages have to continue in blockading the Islamic groups, restricting them and under-valuing their activities.
5) To change the syllabus of teaching the Islamic history and the Deen (religion) in the Egyptian Schools, focusing on exposing the iniquities of the Islamic Khilaafah (Caliph) particularly at the time of the Ottomans, then showing how the Western countries progressed quickly after the defeat of the Church and distancing it from politics.
6) Try to discharge the energy of the Muslim youth in the worshipping rituals which are supervised by priestly leaderships that comply with our planned policy.
7) To deepen the Mazhabi (scholarly) and partial differences and to magnify them in their minds.
This is what we propose as a solution to the problem of the Islamic grouping in this critical period. And if you are convinced to this, we request you to direct the advice to the concerned authorities to embark on implementation, noticing that we are prepared here to carry out the required role of implementation.
(Signature of Richard B. Mitchell) Head of the American Intelligence in Cairo.

Appendix III

Athens and Sparta

In Ancient Greece two cities dominated the scene: Athens and Sparta. Early in its history Phoenician merchants from the coast cities of Accent Palestine, came to exploit the markets of Ancient Greece. Sparta resisted these foreigners so they were forced to settle in Athens. Through practices of money lending they built up their economic base, establishing themselves as a prominent merchant class rivalling the landed Greek aristocracy.

To conduct the society to their desired objectives, they manipulated the Greek theater, the most important cultural activity of Ancient Greece, which has been celebrated in the West ever since. Like modern television is used, the theatre was used to inculcate immorality. A common practice of the Jews throughout history has been to appropriate the money stock of the country by changing their standard from a gold or precious metal standard to a false paper or wood standard.

This new standard is like a cheque which is supposedly transferable into gold kept in the treasury which they control. As Napoleon found when he entered the vaults of the Bank of Amsterdam, the financial centre of the times, that they were completely empty. The Jews had deceived the people into handing them all their wealth. Sparta aware of the corruptive influence of these foreigner, and to protect its money standard strongly resisted their penetration. To say something is Spartan means that it is conservative or austere, as the Spartans were known for their discipline, trying to keep themselves from the moral decay that afflicted Athens. These foreign merchants wanting absolutely to practice on Sparta what they had on Athens, brought about a war between the two cities, now known as the Peloponnesian Wars.

Socrates, as explained in the Republic of Plato, explained a parable of a cave to the people of Athens to explain the indoctrination process that was taking place in Ancient Greece. He explained a parable of people who were enchained in a cave, forced to look at shadows cast from a fire. He told them that if someone were to release them from their chains, they would be able to see the fire and recognize that what they had thought all along was real were merely shadows of artificial objects. Then they could leave the cave to find the true light. Just like Americans today who believe their government to be a real government. The government they have in mind is the shadow, and the artificial object is the impotent government. If they were unchained they could see that it is a fake created by Jews.

Because Socrates was confronting their plan, he was tried for spreading revolutionary ideas and sentenced to death. In the same way modern people are assassinated, like Malcolm X or Martin Luther King Jr.

Wednesday 26 August 2009

Denmark And The Burkha : Why Danes Hate Islam.

By Philip Jones 26th August 2009.



THIS?




OR THIS??



“Let me state it clearly: Muslims ought to live in Muslimland - and that's not here.” Danish member of the European Parliament, Mogens Camre.

I don't like the Burkha; but then again I don't have to. It's not my choice, it's the choice of those who wear it. On the other hand, I don't like the way Danish women dress themselves these days either. Perhaps instead of considering as to whether the Burkha, which let's be fair is only worn by a small number of Muslim women in Denmark should be banned, perhaps we should consider banning those awful `half mast `pants` and all the other pseudo masculine clothing which has become the uniform of choice for the vast majority of Danish women today.

I have lived in Denmark since early 1996, and my overriding impression of the Danes, (with some exceptions) is of an arrogant, self aggrandising and bigoted little people who due to decades of indoctrination and State sponsored programming, are `locked ` into a narcissistic and uniform (almost `Borg`)[6] like mindset, which in its application to those who do not share the same insular and prejudiced world view and stunted culture, is anything but benign; but rather, is malevolent, Sociopathic[7], all pervasive, and extremely effective in its ability to degrade and demoralise.

Having written at length about this country previously,[1] it will suffice to say that there is much more that is rotten in the state of Denmark, than its just its `pork.`

The Danish Government is the most dictatorial in Europe without question. There can be no doubt that it has been at the very least, the bureaucratic model for the European Union, and like the latter, churns out laws which proscribe almost anything relating to personal choice, liberty and independence. It is no exaggeration to say that in Denmark, a person's life is micromanaged not only from cradle to grave, but 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year every year. It is difficult to think of any aspect of one's daily life which is not legislated for.

What makes this scenario all the more uncomfortable for those who come to live here from elsewhere, is the abject acceptance and compliance, nay, the glorification of their imagined `perfect` model of life, by the Danes.

It is not my intention to allow this article to run into multiple parts so I suggest to the reader that he or she visit the links at the reference section and read my previous essays which expose the sorry state of things here in this old European land.

To the point:

“There is no place for Islam in Europe and our first priority must be to repatriate the Muslims.” Danish member of the European Parliament, Mogens Camre:

There can't be too many people who consider themselves politically `aware` who have not seen, read or heard something about the blasphemous cartoons published a few years ago by the Danish `Newspaper` Jyllandsposten, depicting the Holy Prophet of Islam in an outrageous and highly derisive manner.

At the time, I was incredulous as to why a major national daily would commit such a provocative act, considering the tense relationship between the Muslim community and the host population here. The pretence of `taking a stand for free speech` certainly made me suspicious, as any non-Dane who has lived in Denmark will know; free speech is reserved for Danes only.

Today, I fully understand the thinking behind those ridiculous caricatures; Provocation !

Muslims in Denmark are treated very differently to those living elsewhere in the west. For example their attempts to build a Mosque have been thwarted time and again by the weight of Danish bureaucracy [8]. In 2009, there is still no purpose built Islamic house of worship in Denmark, nor for that matter, any dedicated Muslim cemeteries either.

Unlike in other countries in Europe and the West, Muslims who display their faith publicly by their mode of dress for example, are purposely kept out on the fringes of Danish society, and looked down upon simply for being different. I have had many contacts within the local Islamic community and there is a sense of desperation therein. They feel socially and politically impotent. They are relegated to the lower end of the Job Market and are victims of a form of social injustice which is intensely xenophobic.

The current fires of civic unrest seen recently here in Denmark involving young Muslim boys, are most certainly being fuelled by what can only be regarded as an intentional policy of defamation and degradation of all things Islamic, orchestrated at the very highest state level

Those who have taken an interest in the post 9/11 world, will not be surprised when I say that the numerous Anti Islamic reports which frequent the national `ruse` papers here, on an almost daily basis, bear all the hallmarks of a state sponsored `agent provocateur` operation. In the aftermath of the `French Intifada` some years ago, the OAS (French Intelligence) are believed to have played a major role in stirring up racial and social hatreds. This is almost certainly the case here in Denmark, although I have no proof of this, the whole thing stinks.

The New Unlikely Crusaders:

“Islam is a new totalitarian plague sweeping Europe.” Member of the Danish Parliament, Soeren Krarup.

In his article; “Is Denmark being Set Up, Why Is A Nation Known For Pork Attacking Islam?” [2]Researcher and writer Christopher Bollyn writes:

“One might reasonably ask why one of the smallest and weakest countries in the world, with a population of less than 6 million, would want to inflame the passions and provoke the 1.5 Billion Muslims of the world? It just doesn't make any sense, especially for a nation like Denmark that depends on its exports.”

He continues:

“Why would Danes be so eager to offend Muslims? Are they simply trying to spice up a long winter and an otherwise boring existence, or is there a foreign agenda at work here. Is Denmark being set up for a false-flag terror attack? That seems very likely, given the absurdity of this latest anti-Muslim offence.”

and :

“Denmark is an active member of the anti-Muslim crusade known as the "War on Terrorism." Knowing that this fraudulent "War on Terrorism" is nothing but a Zionist scheme to drag corrupt Western nations into illegal wars of aggression against Muslim nations -- on behalf of Israel -- it stands to reason that Denmark must be both corrupt and dominated by strong Zionist-Jewish forces. There must, after all, be a good reason why other Scandinavians have traditionally called the Danes the "Jews of Scandinavia."

I think Mr. Bollyn is very accurate and insightful in his appraisal of the Danish State as being on an Anti Islamic Crusade, both at home and abroad, and only this past week, another `front` in their declared war against the believers was opened up and can fairly be termed, the `Battle Of the Burkha.`

How Danes hate the Burkha, along with all the other visible signs of Islam, which represent an ideal they cannot, nor wish to comprehend. Surely, the way people choose to clothe themselves is an intensely personal matter to be left to the individual alone?

Not in `Gulag` Denmark, where once again, as with the cartoon charade, we are witnessing all the hype and baloney about democracy, freedom of speech and the Christian way of life dragged out ad nauseum. Christian? I don't think so.

Denmark is a secular humanist society with strong Luciferian overtones. Christianity for most Danes is a tradition to be manipulated for material gain at Christmas and during the annual `Mammonistic` rite called `Confirmation,` where Danish 14 year olds who attend church for a few weeks prior to accepting supposed confirmation into the `body` of Christ, receive countless gifts and monetary advantage, and thereafter in the main, stay as far away from their attested religion as possible, except at weddings and funerals.

Anyway, let's take a look at how the Danish papers are reporting the `Burka Battle.`

The Propaganda Dialectic:

“Islam has since its inception been a terrorist movement. Islam is by its very nature an evil, which must and will be combated.” Member of the Danish Parliament, Martin Henriksen:

The junior minority coalition Conservative Party stated recently that it wants to introduce a ban on the Muslim Burka or Niqab dress codes, which require women to completely cover their faces in public. The Danish State's Puppet Muslim MP , Naser Khader, a Syrian-Palestinian and the Conservative Party’s recently-appointed `integration spokesman` said in Jyllandsposten (no surprise there):

“We don’t want to see burkas in Denmark. We simply can’t accept that some of our citizens walk around with their faces covered.”

(Does Mr Khader honestly believe that the `we` he mentions above, regard him as one of their own?)

Mr Khader says the Burka is un-Danish and oppressive towards women and should be completely banned, although he and his party say that what people do in their own homes is their business, (for now) but as soon as they walk into the public domain, one should be able to see their faces.

WHY??

Talk about the `pot calling the kettle black.` The whole of Danish society is oppressive. Isn't the proposed introduction of a law which dictates how people dress `oppressive.` Who's next in line for a ban. Women in dresses, men in suits? (not that one sees very many of them in Denmark, the `Uni-Sex` capital of the world).

Drawing all concerned into their dialectical trap, the extreme Right-wing National Socialist Danish People’s Party and the Social Democratic Party have played the role of thesis and of course have welcomed the proposal, while the senior coalition Liberal Party, providing the antithesis soundly and vocally reject the idea of legislating about citizens’ clothing as long as they are not in a public function:

“It’s going too far if we start legislating on what sort of clothes people can and cannot wear. The Burka and covered faces should not be allowed if you work with people in the public sector – but that is where we draw the line,” says Liberal Political Spokesman Peter Christensen who sensibly adds that it is important that politicians know where to draw the line in introducing policy.

The highly treacherous Khader however, insists a ban is the only solution regarding the Burka.:

“My view is that (the Burka) is not Islamic at all. The modern Burka was introduced by the Taleban when the movement came to power. So I associate the Burka with the Taleban,” says Khader.

This is simply not true as Mr. Khader being a Muslim himself will know only too well. This type of dress has its origins with desert tribes, long before Islam arrived. It had two functions. Firstly as a sand mask in windy conditions. This would be worn by men and women and is still common today. For women only, the masking of the face and body was used when one group was being raided by another. These raids often involved the taking of women of child bearing age. With all women hidden behind a veil, and the home team fighting back, the chances of being taken were substantially reduced as the women of child bearing age could not be quickly distinguished from the very young and the old. [9]

We are told that the proposed Burka ban is part of an `integration` initiative that the Conservative parliamentary group approved recently, although the party has not decided what punishment should be meted out to those who break the ban. “Initially we’re sending out a signal by saying that it should be banned. Then it’s up to the lawyers to find out what sanctions should be introduced,” Khader tolds Jyllands-Posten.

Integration for Muslims in Denmark means only one thing; give up your faith, your values, your morality, your traditions, your language, your culture and accept absorption into the secular Luciferian Matrix.

Ensuring the dialectical trap is set, we are presented daily with the public consensus angle, with all the national `rags` of any import reporting thus: “The Conservative Party proposal to ban the Burka and Niqab dress codes in public may have caused controversy across the parliamentary spectrum, but it does seem to have the support of a majority of the electorate. A representative Megafon poll for Politiken and TV2 shows 56 percent of the electorate in favour of introducing ‘a general ban on wearing the burka in the public place in Denmark’. Only 30 percent oppose such a ban, according to the poll.”

Establishing the credibility of a phoney democratic consensus is paramount in a society such as Denmark, where the illusion of democracy is all pervading, and a much used tool of political manipulation. Simply telling Danes through the State media that the majority are in favour of something is enough for the `sheep chip` to activate and for the rest of the herd to willingly follow.

The dialectic line up looks like this: The Conservative proposal receives extensive support from Liberal, Conservative, Danish People’s Party and Social Democratic voters while Social Liberal, Socialist People’s Party and Unity List voters are generally against a ban.

The people are then told that the decision by Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen (Lib) to set up a commission to study his Conservative minority coalition partner’s proposal to introduce a ban on the Muslim Burka and Niqab, has caused dismay within his own Liberal Party:

Former Liberal integration spokesman and current Environment Spokesman Eyvind Vesselbo says:

“More than 50,000 people have lost their jobs in the past six months and we may be seeing a further 100,000 in the next nine months. We have an economic crisis that has to be handled, we have a climate conference, we have people who cannot be treated due to waiting lists, we have children with psychological problems who can’t be treated, we have a gang war in which people are shooting at each other – an officer was shot last night - and people are wasting time talking about Burkas. It’s out of all proportion.”

Another senior Liberal politician, Former Home Affairs and Agriculture Minister Britta Schall Holberg, says: “ We’ve reached rock bottom. While hundreds of people are losing their jobs. While many farmers and other companies are on their knees and battling each day to survive. While young people are unable to get traineeships and too few get an education. While the government is gearing up for a budget that for the first time shows a deficit – almost of the size that toppled Anker Jørgensen’s (Soc. Dem.) government in 1982, the government sets up a burka commission,”

At the same time, as the `Theatricide` unfolds for the consumption of the Danish public on the one hand and the hapless Muslims on the other, what was billed as Conservative parliamentary group unity on the ban issue was broken when the party’s `Ecclesiastical and Education` Spokeswoman Charlotte Dyremose turned her back on the proposal, which appears to have been fostered by the party’s newcomer and newly-appointed `Integration` Spokesman Naser Khader.

Dyremose told `Berlingske Tidende` that she fears that a Burka ban will do more harm than good for the relatively small number of women who wear the Burka or Niqab, adding that some of the most important Danish rights are those of the freedom of religion and speech. Then Conservative Parliamentary Group Chairwoman Henriette Kjær, mentions that she is surprised at Dyremose’s statement.

“I don’t understand it. After a longer debate during our group meeting (last) Friday I concluded as Group Chair that as a group we supported a ban on the burka. And no-one objected. Hers is a strange attitude. But she’ll have to take it alone.” Kjær tells Berlingske Tidende.

Ms. Dyremose says she made her views clear to the party leadership prior to its announcement of the ban proposal.

It is vital that the reader understands that at the highest level, the desired outcome is a compromise solution which will erode yet more of the rights of private citizens (Muslim or otherwise), chip away at the culture and traditions of the Muslim community, who as intended, will breathe somewhat relieved that a total ban was avoided, establishing another precedent in how far the state can intrude into peoples lives, create more animosity between the Danes and Muslims, setting the stage for another dialectic exchange in a few months time.[3]

The Clash Of Civilisations in Microcosm:

“All Muslims must be thrown out of Denmark” Vagn Eriksen Danish People's Party.

The world is drawing seemingly ever closer to a financial crash and the possibility of global conflict, the so called `Clash Of Civilizations` between the West and Islam, as projected and planned for by Albert Pike and the Illuminati[4].

So what does this have to do with little Denmark ?

Both Politiken and Jyllandsposten are `Bildeberger` connected. Anders Eldrup, the Chairman of the Danish company `Dong` has been a regular attendee for the past five years. His wife, Merete Eldrup is the managing director of both publications. A further `participant` Toger Seidenfaden just happens to be Executive Editor in Chief for Politiken. Is this all a coincidence? Not so long ago, Fleming Rose, the Editor of Jyllandsposten conducted a highly one sided and uncritical interview with Mr Daniel Pipes, a major Zionist propagandist and `Neo Con`, a la Perle and Wolfovitz. In typical `doublespeak,` this `Hawk` is a member of the US Institute Of Peace.

Since Politiken `bought` the Jyllandsposten, that paper's drift towards the Zionist position has been marked. In a world where nothing appears to be what it is, the Muhammad Drawings and the current provocative coverage by both these editorials on the `Muslim` question in Denmark, should be viewed with suspicion. The media in Denmark, being as it is, weighted from the top with Neo Con Bildberger types, how likely is it that the Muslim side of the story will ever get a fair `airing` ?

It is now my belief that the sole purpose of importing millions of Muslim people into Europe, was to destabilize the continent. I do not believe for one minute that the architects of the European Super State and subsequently the proposed New World Order, did not foresee the tensions which were bound to be caused when introducing a deeply alien culture into countries such as Denmark, which had always been highly homogeneous and somewhat isolated from the European mainstream. It has been done for a reason, and I fear we are beginning to see the true face of that reason.

The State in whatever form has always justified it's existence and domineering of it's citizens by the ever present threat of an external foe. With the `Cold War` filed away in the History Books, and no would be aggressors anywhere to be seen, it was necessary to invent a different kind of threat. Enter the `War on terror`. A war without end as it were. Is it purely coincidental that the very multitude brought through the gates of the Western Citadels, is now identified as this new threat.

What we are seeing in Denmark is an orchestrated means of instilling fear into the citizens of this small country. This will in turn give justification for the implementation of ever more restrictions on personal freedoms and the introduction of ever more Draconian legislation in order to `protect` the people.

Why change a winning formula ? We have seen this time and again with Pearl Harbor, 9/11, 7/7 et al. and through the manipulation of the public consciousness, the media whores of the likes of the Jyllandsposten advance the cause of the EU Superstate, and thereafter the New World Order, perpetuating the dialectic, and the population, now immune to common sense, free thought and the truth, will be led by the nose into the Totalitarian future planned for them.

Hobsons' Choice: Religious And Political Freedom In Denmark For All Except Muslims:

“All Muslims must leave Denmark. It's a harsh thing to say, some of them are human beings, but how are we to sort them out?” Ib Krog Hansen Danish People's Party.

The controversy now raging in Denmark over the Burkha, must be viewed as being only the most recent and intended affront to the Muslim population, committed by a deeply malevolent, oppressive and totalitarian regime, which takes its mandate to govern from an electorate so `dumbed down,` by over half a century of the most intense form of mass mind control [5]hitherto seen in the so called `free world,` in national elections which are a `Hobson's Choice` at best, and irrelevant democratically at worse.

Since the blasphemous and perverse cartoon drawings of the Holy Prophet of Islam made international headlines back in 2006, and through the efforts of myself and others, more and more people around the world have become aware of the fact that there is something occurring here in this tiny country with regard to relations between the native population and the local Muslim Diaspora which is negative in the extreme.

Relations have not improved and in fact, barely a day goes by where some `horror` story or another relating to Muslims does not hit the national headlines. But honestly, Denmark will just not leave these people alone. Islam is an anathema to the Danish obsession with uniformity and conformity in all things at all times. It's a little like that irritating catchphrase used in the `Highlander` movie; “There can only be one.”

When the cartoons were published, we were told that it was as a gesture in order to preserve freedom of speech. But in Denmark, such a freedom is conditional on compliance, uniformity and adherence to the consensus. Yes, in Denmark, for most Danes, there can only be `ONE,` way of life, eating, dressing, living and being, and Islam, by its very nature, flies full in the face of the Totalitarian Danish conformist mindset.

Muslims live differently, worship differently, eat differently and dress differently. They follow the one true God, not the `Gods` of the marketplace as do the overwhelming majority of Danes, and generally live their lives apart from what they rightfully see as a Godless, perverse and corrupt society.

Conclusion:

The Danish, who it must be said are a difficult lot to empathise with, should be very careful not to take this proposed overt and draconian action regarding the Islamic dress code in isolation. Banning things has become a part of the political ideal here in Denmark. Whereas once upon a time, adult people were allowed to make their own decisions concerning how they and their family lived their lives, ate, dressed, raised children, behaved at home etc. etc. In today's `Open Prison` complex that Denmark now is, nobody seems to question the `LAW.`

In Denmark, the letter of the law is everything and justice and reason nothing! And if the law tells you how to dress, or better still, how someone else is to dress, that's just fine. But it's a slippery slope, and what goes around comes around.

The `Burhka Battle` is a dialectical trap designed for all to fall into, and as is usually the case, people here in Denmark, both Muslim and Dane are queuing up to jump in. The Illuminati understand only too well that their path to total world power is through the separating of Christians and Muslims into opposing camps and letting them fight it out amongst themselves, to a standstill, whereby a synthesis compromise can be imposed in the form of a Global Government.

Who would ever have imagined that small and apparently insignificant Denmark would play such a major role in the drama?


Postscript: For those Danes out there whose `knee-jerk` reaction to this article is, “If you don't like it, go home." Buy my house and I will.


Here is a well intended if naïve letter written by two Danes to Barrack Obama pleading for his intercession in what has become a national disgrace:

Letter To Barrack Obama.: http://www.panhumanism.com/letter_to_obama.php


Comments to http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/ or true_brit58@hotmail.co.uk

Postscript: Danes Capitulate On Burkha http://politiken.dk/newsinenglish/article790295.ece




Ref:

1] http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/ and http://www.rense.com/general83/denmark.htm

for my archived articles on Denmark.

2] http://www.bollyn.com/is-denmark-being-set-up

3] http://nord.twu.net/acl/dialectic.html

4] http://www.rense.com/general86/pikeknew.htm

5] http://www.rense.com/general83/dk.htm

6] See Star Trek http://images.google.com/images?q=the+borg&rls=com.microsoft:en-gb:IE-SearchBox&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7GPEA_enDK310&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ei=zleVSqqWAtDc-QaI5aTyDQ&sa=X&oi=image_result_group&ct=title&resnum=4

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borg_(Star_Trek)

7] http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html

8] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Denmark

9] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burqa


http://politiken.dk/newsinenglish/article772402.ece

http://politiken.dk/newsinenglish/article770709.ece

http://politiken.dk/newsinenglish/article769245.ece

http://www.savethemales.ca/180902.html Henry Makow.