The Nexus Of Evil : Part Eight (A Pre-emptive Strike On Humanity).

By Philip Jones 28th August 2009.





Introduction.

In Part eight, we will examine the events leading up to the tragedy of September 11th 2001[18], and the resulting consequences for the world at large, in the aftermath of the Illuminist's attack on the collective psyche of the American people. This article will not contain an in depth analysis of that fateful day some eight years ago, rather it will take a broad overview of the conspirators involved, the reasoning behind that cowardly and murderous act, and the crucial part it played in the lead up to the intended Third World War, which forms the very fulcrum around which the whole `One World Luciferian Agenda` revolves.

Firstly, let's look at those main personalities who though not the `architects` of the conspiracy, are the `Front Line` Officers ensuring that orders are obeyed and the overall strategy adhered to.

So, who or what are the `Neo Cons` we have heard so much about since 9/11?

Leo Strauss -The Neo-Conservative.

Rupert Murdoch's Fox Media Network is the principal broadcasting outlet for the Neo-Conservative agenda, which can be said to be the primary organ by which the Illuminati are manipulating world events towards the so-called “Clash of Civilizations.”

The intellectual influence behind so called Neo Conservatism was Leo Strauss[1], who in the words of Barry Chamish[2], is today's leading Frankist thinker[3]. Strauss arrived in the US as a refugee from Nazi Germany in 1937, and began teaching shortly after at the Rockefeller sponsored University of Chicago. It was Robert Maynard Hutchins, the University Chancellor, Aquarian[4] conspirator, member of the CFR[5], and one of the original sponsors of the Aspen Institute[17], who arranged for Strauss' tenure at the university.

Strauss believed that the works of ancient philosophers contain intentionally hidden arcane meaning. Like Plato, he taught that within societies, there are those who are fit to lead, and those who are only fit to follow. Not surprisingly considering his father's connections with the Austrian Nazi party, the current Governor of California, and friend of the Rothschilds, Arnold Schwarzenegger,[19] is in complete agreement with Strauss on this matter, and was quoted recently as saying:

“My relationship to power and authority is that I'm all for it. People need somebody to watch over them. Ninety-five percent of the people in the world need to be told what to do and how to behave.”

For Strauss, it was Machiavelli who initiated the Enlightenment[6], by his rejection of the purely theoretical world of Plato[14], in favour of a more practical interpretation of reality, thereby creating political science. For Strauss, in accordance with Machiavellian thinking, virtue would not be applicable, because no regime could meet its standards. Rather, a new regime should be created, by accepting, understanding, and harnessing man’s tendency for self-interest, or what he termed basic “human nature.”

Strauss determined that the only individuals fit to rule, were those who realised that there was no absolute standard of morality. He believed the world to be a place where policy advisers should be willing where necessary to deceive their own people, and sometimes even their rulers, in order to protect their country's interests. If exposed to the absence of absolute truth, the masses would quickly succumb to nihilism[7] or anarchy[8]. According to Strauss, it would be necessary on occasion, to maintain these “pious frauds”, or “the Noble Lie.”

Like Thomas Hobbes[9], Strauss believed that the inherently violent nature in man could only be controlled by an all powerful nationalistic state apparatus. Put another way, by Fascism; “Because mankind is intrinsically wicked, he has to be governed,” he wrote: “Such governance can only be established, however, when men are united- and they can only be united against other people.”

Shadia Drury wrote in `Leo Strauss and the American Right:`

“Strauss thinks that a political order can be stable only if it is united by an external threat.” Ultimately, as Drury clarifies, “following Machiavelli, he maintained that if no external threat exists then one has to be manufactured.”

The Project For The New American Century : Rebuilding America's Defences.

The tragedy of September 11th 2001 was that new `Pearl Harbour` deemed necessary by the PNAC in order to provide justification for their plan to foment Albert Pike's global Clash Of Civilisations between Islam and the West, and events seen in Afghanistan and Iraq since have certainly proceeded very much according to Pike's `blueprint.`

Established in the spring of 1997, the `Project for the New American Century` was founded by, among others, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, with the aim of promoting and furthering the neo-conservative agenda. The present chairman is Bill Kristol, of the right-winger propagandist Weekly Standard. Prominent throughout PNAC is Richard Perle, former chair of the powerful Defence Policy Board and fervent supporter of Israel. In Washington, even his `friends` call him “The Prince of Darkness”

Another influential PNAC member is Elliott Abrams, of the National Security Council. These primary movers and shakers of this radical group, subsequently became the foreign policy, military, and national security establishment of the United States government. Dick Cheney, Rumsfeld, Perle, Wolfowitz, Abrams, and their accomplices were quite literally the men running America. Some other PNAC high-profile players are; former presidential candidate Gary Bauer, Govenor Jeb Bush, and former director of the CIA Robert James Woolsey.

The PNAC Mission Statement (excerpts):

`Does the United States have the resolve to shape a new century favorable to American principles and interests? … “[What we require is] a military that is strong and ready to meet both present and future challenges; a foreign policy that boldly and purposefully promotes American principles abroad; and national leadership that accepts the United States’ global responsibilities. … The history of the 20th century should have taught us that it is important to shape circumstances before crises emerge, and to meet threats before they become dire... `

Basically, we are dealing with an organisation which promotes a doctrine of world domination and exploitation in order to further American (read Zionist/Illuminist) interests. Among the PNAC’s “fundamental propositions” is the belief that “American leadership is good both for America and for the world.” “Does the U.S. have the resolve to shape a new century favourable to American principles and interests?” asks the PNAC.

Their policy would be achieved through imperialism and pre-emptive strikes. In order to become capable of achieving this “global responsibility,” they contend that it is necessary to have a large dominant modern military. They advocate openly for substantial increases in military spending on arms and technological research. Essentially, their plan dramatically expands the military-industrial-complex.

Another of the PNAC founding and predominating principles was; “that what is good for Israel is good for America. Even though the PNAC statements are using the “America” vernacular, it appears by their actions, their true hidden agenda is “Israeli-American interests.”

This sinister “brain centre” of the military-industrial-complex is composed of top elitist from many different sectors, but predominately it is headed by right wing politicians, military strategists and defence contractors. Emerging as a major organ of the Illuminati's `Nexus Of Evil,` these neo-conservatives intend nothing less than total world domination though military and financial supremacy.

PNAC Members Given Positions Of Influence..

Following his election in 2000, George W. Bush installed many of the PNAC’s major `players` into key positions of power within his new administration. The following list of appointments taken from http://911exposed.org/PNAC.htm show exactly where President Bush's loyalties lay, and what agenda he intended to pursue during his term in office:

Elliott Abrams – National Security Council, pled guilty to the charge of lying to Congress in the Iran/Contra scandal, later pardoned by George Bush Sr.

Richard Armitage – Deputy Secretary of State.

John R. Bolton – served as Under-secretary for Arms Control and International Security in the Bush administration, then U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations.

Richard Cheney – Vice President, PNAC Founder, and ex-CEO of Halliburton. Previously served as Secretary of Defence.

Seth Cropsey – Director of the International Broadcasting Bureau.

Paula Dobriansky – Under-secretary of State for Global Affairs.

Francis Fukuyama – White House Council Member.

Bruce Jackson – President U.S. Committee on NATO.

Zalmay Khalilzad – Ambassador to Iraq. Previously served as U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan from November 2003 to June 2005.

Lewis “Scooter” Libby – National Security advisor for the Vice President. Indicted by Grand Jury on charges of Obstruction of Justice, False Statements and Perjury and resigned October 28, 2005.

Richard Perle – PNAC founder, Chairman of the Defense Policy Board, Director of the Jerusalem Post. Had been accused of spying for Israel.

Peter W. Rodman – Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security.

Donald Rumsfeld – Secretary of Defense, and a PNAC founder. He served as Secretary of Defense (1975-1977) and as Chief of Staff of the White House (1974-1975).

Randy Scheunemann – U.S. Committee on NATO, Project on Transitional Democracies, International Republican Institute, founded the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq.

Paul Wolfowitz – Deputy Secretary of Defense, 2001-2005, considered the ideological father of the group. Currently, President of World Bank.

Dov S. Zakheim – Comptroller Department of Defense Former CEO of System Planning Corp. (See below), he served as Senior Foreign Policy advisor for George Bush Jr. in 2000.

Robert B. Zoellick – Deputy Secretary of State.

Their Project – Our Nightmare.

In their now infamous report entitled, Rebuilding America’s Defenses, Strategy, Forces, and Resources for a New Century.[10] The PNAC outlined their strategy for global conquest together with an agenda which argued for huge increases on military spending, research and development.

When the PNAC stated that it would be necessary for the American Military to fight several major theatre wars simultaneously, they were not only outlining a need for military preparedness, but proposing that the US actually fight these wars—and as if to prove how Ernest they were, we have since 9/11 seen the US wage war on two fronts in Afghanistan and Iraq, with more to come I would suggest. From there, the plan is to conquer the entire Middle East, with Iran appearing to be the next logical target on the list. Americans now appear to fighting Israel's wars for them. The question which begs to be asked is; “ Is America doing Israel’s bidding? Are Rumsfeld, Perle, Wolfowitz, and Rabbi Dov Zakheim (all Jews) using America’s resources and manpower to destroy Israel's enemies?”

PNAC doctrine maintained that The US needed a permanent military presence in Iraq. Since the invasion of that Middle Eastern country in 2003, Dick Cheney’s Halliburton-subsidiary KBR has been involved in everything from the constructing of U.S. military bases, to supplying and feeding the troops and other personnel. It appears that the US military is in Iraq to stay. With the two deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan being consolidated, and the infiltration by US forces into the Caucasus, the American Military is extending its influence ever wider across the globe; clearly positioning itself strategically for a definite purpose that has nothing to do with `freedom, democracy or justice and everything to do with imperialism, domination and Global Conquest.

`Rebuilding America’s Defences`…insisted on pouring 3.8 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) into the national Defence budget, and that is the exact amount that the Bush Administration requested and received from the Republican Congress. Was this a coincidence?

Bush, and his “National Security Strategy” of 2006, turned the US into a nation, which for the first time in its history, endorsed a doctrine of pre-emptive strike. In their `Rebuilding America’s Defences`…statement, the PNAC chillingly determined, “The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalysing event like a new Pearl Harbour?”

The Hegelian Dialectic And The Truth About Pearl Harbour.

To men and women of understanding, whether they be politicians, historians, and or educated citizens, Pearl Harbour was much more than just an American catastrophe. Many books have been written on the subject, especially since the declassification of pertinent military documents.

There can be no valid argument to the contrary, that the attack only occurred because President Franklin D. Roosevelt allowed it to, in order that America would be drawn into WWII. He along with other top officials in the US government had contrived a plan, to `hamstring` the U.S. Naval defences. Key personnel were exchanged, vital Japanese code-deciphers conveniently went missing, along with other unethical tactics, employed to give the Japanese the element of surprise that they needed for their mission to succeed. It was a staged event! A `False Flag!`[11] It’s purpose, to engender public outrage and resolve, to mobilize and fight a war!

Problem Reaction Solution:

The Problem – How to draw America into WWII = Thesis.

The Reaction – Public anger following the Japanese attack = Antithesis.

The Solution – America enters the war = Synthesis; the very solution planned for.

Therefore, Pearl Harbour to insiders is synonymous with a “staged or contrived catastrophic and catalysing event.” So, the neo-cons were in essence calling for a similar event to initiate their “War of Terror.”

The PNAC Pentagon neo-cons, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz already had plans to invade Iraq prior to 9/11! All they needed was their own Pearl Harbour! Enter 9/11.

According to `9/11 Exposed` these are some of the personalities that participated in the Rebuilding America’s Defences… project:

Thomas Donnelly – Director of Communications, Lockheed Martin.

Fred Kagan – U. S. Military Academy at West Point.

Robert Kagan – Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

William Kristol – The Weekly Standard.

Mark Lagon – Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Lewis Libby – Chief of Staff for the Vice President.

Gary Schmitt – Project for the New American Century.

Barry Watts – Northrop Grumman Corporation.

Paul Wolfowitz – Nitze School of Advanced International
Studies, Johns Hopkins University.

Dov Zakheim - System Planning Corporation.

Eliot Cohen – Nitze School of Advanced International
Studies, Johns Hopkins University.

Donald Kagan – Yale University, conservative columnist.

Steve Rosen – Harvard University, Professor of National Security and Military Affairs.

Abram Shulsky - The RAND Corporation.

Roger Barnett, Phil Meilinger, and Mackubin Owens – U.S. Naval War College.

Alvin Bernstein and Stephen Cambone – National Defense University.

The Carlyle Group Revisited.

In part seven, we briefly discussed the clandestine operations and connections of the Carlyle Group of companies. It is pertinent that at this point, we take a closer look at this particular organ of the evil `Nexus` driving our world to the brink.

The Carlyle Group's offices are on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington DC, midway between the White House and the Capitol building, and within a short distance of FBI HQ and numerous other government departments. Carlyle’s position at the very centre of the Washington establishment is reflected in its address. The Group specialises in taking over control of aerospace and defence contractors, and then by exerting influence, gains contracts from the Department of Defence.

Some of the Elite officers of the Carlyle Group are:

George Herbert Walker Bush – former US President and Director of the CIA, Carlyle Senior advisor and Shareholder.

Frank Carlucci – former Secretary of Defence and Deputy Director of the CIA, Carlyle Chairman Emeritus.

James Baker III – former Secretary of State and Secretary of Treasury, Carlyle Senior Counsellor. Baker is defending Saudis against a 9-11 Families’ Lawsuit.

Fidel V. Ramos – former President of the Philippines, Carlyle Asia Advisory Board.

John Major – former British Prime Minister, Chairman Carlyle Europe.

At the time of the 9/11 attacks, The Carlyle Group, was hosting a business conference in Washington D.C. in which the featured guest of honour was one of Osama Bin Laden’s brothers! The Guardian Newspaper reported:

“On 11 September, while [al-Qaeda’s] planes slammed into the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon, the Carlyle Group hosted a conference at a Washington hotel. Among the guests of honour was a valued investor: Shafig bin Laden, brother to Osama.”

At the same time as the Carlyle investors were watching the World Trade Centre towers collapse, grotesquely, the group’s business prospects soared. By their own accounts, they manage what they call a “a vast, interlocking, global network of businesses and investment professionals” that operate within a triangle of industry, government, and the military.

The Carlyle Group doesn't appear to concern itself with regards to any conflict of interest. For example, its political and intelligence connections (reportedly, ex-President Bush is still receiving daily CIA briefings) have given it a wide open window of opportunity to exploit. Former U.S. president George W. Bush himself, was in a pole position to make decisions that would have fattened his father’s (and his own) bank accounts. The Carlyle Group is a powerful and bloodthirsty corporation that has clandestine governmental powers It can make wars in order to profit from them.

The Carlyle Group, The Bin Ladens And The Bushes.

Osama bin Laden’s family is a major investor in The Carlyle Group. The Bin Laden family members, who allegedly disowned their renegade son ten years ago, were the very same who stood to gain most financially from the war being waged against him until late October 2001. When news surfaced about the relationship, public outrage forced them to liquidate their holdings in the firm. However, the bin Ladens have reportedly channelled tens of millions of dollars to Osama through banks, like Algemene Bank Nederland (now called ABN-AMRO), which has reported links to the La Salle National Bank in the U.S.

George H.W. Bush Sr. has also been a paid consultant to the Bin Laden Group, using his CIA connections to further their business concerns. His son, George W. Bush, refused to freeze Osama’s numerous accounts at ABN-AMRO, thus evading the possibility of having his own families dirty secrets being made public, for instance; its links to Osama Bin Laden.

As we saw in Part Seven, during his days as CIA head and Vice President, it was George Bush Sr. who in effect created Osama bin Laden as an American CIA-asset. Bin Laden was paid to `wear down` the Soviets in their prolonged Afghan campaign (1979-1989). Originally designated “freedom fighters” or “Mujahideen”, they were in the main financed, armed, and trained by the Saudis and United States’ through the CIA, the funds being then funnelled through the BCCI. The training bases, Tora Bora cave complex, stinger missiles, etc. were all CIA financed through the Pakistani ISI, under the direction of the likes of George Bush Sr.

U.S. Naval Intelligence operative, Mike Vreeland claimed, “Sometimes certain governments design, and create networks like al-Qaeda… Those entities create specific problems at the creating government’s direction.”

Following the end of the war with the Soviets, the CIA’s “Mujahideen”, lacked an enemy. In the ensuing years, they would become the new CIA backed al-Qaeda (“the base”) group, which would do their bidding in a new war; the “War of Terror.” The Israeli’s had their Abu Nidal terrorist network, and now the United States would have its al-Qaeda network. The conspirators would soon launch a new `era of terror` and… throughout, Africa, America, The UK, Spain, The Philippines, and Indonesia, people would experience these terrorist atrocities first-hand.

Wahhabism And The War On Terror.

“Although it can fairly be concluded that it is the Saudi government which is primarily responsible for the financing of `terrorism,` the propagation of its Wahhabi version of Islam in the U.S reveals that the conspiracy climbs to the very highest levels. On September 26, 2001, former President George W. Bush gathered fifteen prominent Muslim Arab-Americans at the White House, where he proclaimed that, “the teachings of Islam are teachings of peace and good.”

This assemblage of Muslim “moderates” was a necessary diplomatic manoeuvre to deny that the Bush administration was at war with Islam. However, many of the leaders present were part of a large network of Islamic organizations, created through Saudi funding for the spread of Wahhabi Islam[11], and often with ties to terrorist activities.” David Livingstone-Terrorism And The Illuminati.

It is estimated that since 1975, the Saudis have spent as much as seventy billion dollars towards this international project, making it the largest propaganda campaign in history. Unlike other parts of the world, where the progress of Wahhabi preaching has been impeded by stubborn adherence to traditional interpretations of Islam, the American Islamic community is relatively new, and therefore, far more vulnerable to Saudi influence.

Out of thousands, the Wahhabis reportedly control as many as eighty percent of mosques in the U.S., giving them control over the appointment and training of Imams, the content of preaching, and of literature distributed in Islamic book stores.

In order to garner political influence in America, the Saudis deliberately imitated the model of the Jewish lobbying groups. With Saudi backing, American Muslims created organizations like the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), which was similar to the anti-Defamation League; the American Muslim Council (AMC), which was modelled on the American Jewish Committee; the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), which was similar to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, and so on.

Mustafa El Hussein, the secretary of a centre for Muslim intellectuals known as the Ibn Khaldun Society, remarked that “there is a great deal of bitterness that such groups have tarnished the reputation of mainstream Muslims” because “self-appointed leaders... spew hatred toward America and the West and yet claim to be the legitimate spokespersons for the American Muslim community.” El Hussein believes not only that they should “be kept at arm’s length from the political process, but that they should be actively opposed as extremists.”

Supporting El Hussein's contention, in October 2001, it was discovered, that not only was a secretive group of prominent Muslim charities and businesses in Northern Virginia channelling millions of dollars to foreign terrorists, but was part of a suspicious agenda designed to sway the Muslim vote in favour of the Republican party. The investigation of these groups in Herndon, Virginia, was the largest federal investigation of its kind in the world.

The Safa Group, as the network of organizations are referred to in Herndon, had transmitted more than $26 million in untraceable money overseas, and leaders of the organization committed and conspired to provide material support to terrorist organizations. The president of Safa, Jamal Barzinji, is a former business associate of Youssef Nada. The ties between Nada and Safa were many, as were ties to other Muslim Brotherhood leaders.

Thus, Bush received thousands of votes from Muslims duped by their so-called leaders. Agha Saeed, the AMPCC chairman said, “it won’t be long before political analysts realize that Muslim voters have played a historic role.” Al Arian boasted that he had delivered considerably more than the 537 votes that gave Bush his victory in Florida, and allowed him to capture the White House. As Craig Unger describes, “in other words, without the mobilization of Saudi-funded Islamic groups, George W. Bush would not be president today.” In June 2001, Al Arian was invited to the White House, along with a 160 members of the American Muslim Council, to be briefed by Karl Rove.

Another Day Of Infamy.

September 11th 2001 provided the opportunity for the Illuminati to finally embark upon the ultimate plan devised by Albert Pike, and articulated more recently by Samuel Huntington as a Clash of Civilizations, a global war against Islam. As William Engdahl pointed out, “if the Bush administration had been unprepared for the shock of September 11, 2001, they certainly wasted no time in preparing their response, the war on terror. Terror was to replace communism as the new global image of “the enemy”.

On September 18, 2001, Niaz Niak, former Pakistani foreign secretary, told the BBC he had been informed by senior US officials at a mid-July Berlin meeting that “military action against Afghanistan would go ahead by the middle of October.” Ultimately, the invasion of Afghanistan was a furtherance of the initial plans devised by Z.Brzezinski[20] to gain control over Central Asia.

As many who have spent time researching the events of September 11th 2001 have pointed out, there is zero credibility in the official mythology that Al Qaeda acted alone. Milton Beardman rebuffed the possibility, noting that, on his evaluation of the scale of the attacks, blame should not be attributed to bin Laden. Rather, he added that it was more probable that a far more “sophisticated” intelligence operation was responsible. Stan Goff, a retired US Army Special Forces Master Sergeant said:

“This cartoon heavy they’ve turned bin Laden into makes no sense, when you begin to appreciate the complexity and synchronicity of the attacks. As a former military person who’s been involved in the development of countless operations orders over the years, I can tell you that this was a very sophisticated and costly enterprise that would have left what we call a huge “signature.” In other words, it would be very hard to effectively conceal.”

Military-strategic analyst and retired Major General Dr. Mahmoud Khalaf, a `Fellow` at Egypt’s Higher Military Academy, Member of the Royal College of Defence Studies in London, Honorary Member of the Association of the United States Army in Fort Benning, in a presentation at the Centre for Asian Studies in the University of Cairo, related:

“First we are confronted with a technical operation of extremely great dimensions. We estimate that the planning organ for this operation must have consisted of at least 100 specialized technicians, who needed one year of planning... The high level of the operation does not match the level of evidence presented... Now, the puzzling question is the preparation and training of these people who had the capability to follow up and execute... There is, actually, one question, which is posed here. That is that there is no proportionality between the performance of the operation and the performance of bin Laden and his followers.”

There is a growing body of evidence which points to complicity in the attacks at the very highest levels. Sibel Edmonds, an FBI translator says the agency covered up evidence warning of the 9-11 attack. Her attempts to blow the whistle on the cover-up of `intelligence` that names at least some of the culprits behind the 9/11 attacks, have resulted in two `gag` orders forbidding her from testifying in court or mentioning the names of the people or the countries involved.

She has nevertheless been quoted as saying: “My translations of the 9/11 intercepts included [terrorist] money laundering, detailed and date-specific information ... if they were to do real investigations, we would see several significant high-level criminal prosecutions in this country [the US] ... and believe me, they will do everything to cover this up”.

Arab `specialist` Antoine Sfeir, states that “the CIA maintained contacts with bin Laden until 1998. Those contacts didn’t end after bin Laden moved to Afghanistan.” As reported by the French daily Le Figaro, Osama Bin Laden was to undergo treatment at the American Hospital in Dubai, where he met a CIA official. Radio France International (RFI) corroborated the report, based on authoritative French intelligence sources, as well as “a witness, a professional partner of the administrative management of the hospital.”

Although bin Laden denied the incident, stating that it was one of his sons who had been mistaken for him, the doctor who treated him has since refused to respond to questioning. While he was hospitalized, bin Laden also received visits from many members of his family, as well as prominent Saudis and Emiratis. And, days before September 11th , a delegation headed by Lt. Gen. Mahmoud Ahmed, Director-General of the Pakistani ISI, was in Washington, for top-level meetings in the White House, the Pentagon, the NSC, and with George Tenet, then head of the CIA, and Marc Grossman, the under-secretary of state for political affairs.

On September 10th, the Pakistani Daily News, acknowledging that talks must have revolved around Afghanistan and Osama bin Laden, noticed that the last time such visits had taken place, domestic politics had been turned on their `head,` and reported, “that this is not the first visit by Mahmoud in the last three months shows the urgency of the ongoing parleys.”

However, immediately prior to the commencement of the bombing campaign against Afghanistan, Mahmoud was dismissed from his position, seemingly at the instigation of the US. Evidence had come to light that he had ordered $100,000 been wired to Mohammed Atta, the supposed ring-leader of the 9/11 attacks. The transfer was made through Ahmad Omar Sheikh, who was one of the three released in exchange for passengers of the hijacked Indian Airlines plane in 1999. Regarding the implication of such a connection, in an article for the UK Guardian, Michael Meacher pointed out that, “the case of Ahmed confirms that parts of the ISI directly supported and financed al-Qaeda, and it has long been established that the ISI has acted as go-between in intelligence operations on behalf of the CIA.”

Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh (Urdu: احمد عمر سعید شیخ) (sometimes known as Umar Sheikh, Sheikh Omar, Sheik Syed, or by the alias "Mustafa Muhammad Ahmad" (born December 23, 1973) is a British-born militant of Pakistani descent with alleged links to various Islamic-based organisations, including Jaish-e-Mohammed, Al-Qaeda, Harkat-ul-Mujahideen and the Taliban.

He was arrested and served time in prison for the 1994 kidnappings of Western tourists in India, an act which he acknowledges, he was released from captivity in 1999 and was provided with safe passage into Pakistan with the support of the Taliban in exchange for passengers aboard hijacked Indian Airlines Flight 814. He is most well-known for his alleged role in the 2002 kidnapping and murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl. Sheikh Omar Saeed was arrested by Pakistani police on February 12, 2002, in Lahore, in conjunction with the Pearl kidnapping, and was sentenced to death on July 15, 2002 for killing Pearl. His judicial appeal has not yet been heard. The delay has been ascribed to his confirmed links with Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence.

Former Pakistani President, Pervez Musharraf, in his book In the Line of Fire stated that Sheikh was originally recruited by British intelligence agency, MI6, while studying at the London School of Economics. He alleges Omar Sheikh was sent to the Balkans by MI6 to engage in jihadi operations. Musharraf later went on to state, "At some point, he probably became a rogue or double agent".

His complicity in the execution and the reasons behind it are in dispute. At his initial court appearance, he stated, "I don't want to defend this case. I did this... Right or wrong, I had my reasons. I think that our country shouldn't be catering to America's needs." but he subsequently appealed his conviction and is awaiting `due process` while in prison. Sheikh's lawyer has stated he will base his client's appeal on the recent admission of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed that he is the killer of Daniel Pearl.

Omar Sheikh[15] is still awaiting execution in Pakistan for the murder of Daniel Pearl in 2002, which he most certainly did not commit. Both the US government and Pearl’s wife have since acknowledged that he was not responsible, but the Pakistani government refuses to try other suspects newly implicated in the case because it could reveal too much.

Rather, the New York Times has since reported that “American officials said that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, once al-Qaida’s top operational commander [and the supposed architect of 9/11], personally executed Daniel Pearl ... but he was unlikely to be accused of the crime in an American criminal court because of the risk of divulging classified information”.

According to court affidavits, in 1993, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was quizzed by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) following an incident when an al Qaeda operative was caught entering the US with his driver’s license and a false passport. The Mounties subsequently released Mohammed when the FBI claimed him as a prized asset, and the former US Army sergeant was free to continue running with al-Qaeda.

Notwithstanding the various theories that claim some sort of foul play in the 9/11 incident, it was investigative reporter Daniel Hopsicker who discovered a nest of intrigue in and around a flight school in Venice Florida, where the terrorists Mohammed Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi, were taking flying lessons. Hopsicker’s research reveals a circle of evidence which has been ignored by the authorities, but which nevertheless offers up the most incriminating trail of information.

In his book, Terrorism And The Illuminati, Canadian Historian, researcher and author David Livingstone writes;

“According to Newsweek, the Washington Post and the New York Times, U.S. military officials gave the FBI information “suggesting that five of the alleged hijackers received training in the 1990s at secure U.S. military installations.” Hijackers may have been trained in strategy and tactics at the Air War College in Montgomery Alabama. Two were former Saudi Air Force pilots. Mohammed Atta, their supposed ringleader, attended International Officers School at Maxwell Air Force Base in Montgomery, while Abdulaziz Alomari attended Aerospace Medical School at Brooks Air Force base in Texas, and Saeed Alghambi the Defense Language Institute in Monterey California.”

Daniel Hopsicker, in `Welcome to Terrorland,` reveals and exposes the clandestine circumstances under which many of the terrorists involved in 9/11 were trained. Amazingly, at the very least, eight of the `terrorist pilots` received their initial training in Venice, Florida, at one or another of the Aviator schools run by Arne Kruithof and Rudi Dekkers. Dekkers, the owner of Huffman Aviation, had by all accounts previously been indicted in his homeland, Holland, on charges of fraud and money laundering. Dekkers coincidentally purchased the flight school at around the same time the `terrorist` pilots moved into town and began their lessons.

Atta and al-Shehhi paid $28,000 each to Rudi Dekkers, for flight training available nearby for a fraction of the price. Yeslam bin Laden also supplied several students for training at Huffman, contradicting his claims of being estranged from his step-brother. Following 9/11, the FBI removed the files at Huffman, and loaded them onto a C-130 military cargo plane at the Sarasota airport, which took off for Washington with governor Jeb Bush on board. Oh how the plot sickens!

Mohammed Atta.

Though Dekkers denied there was any such relationship; according to Venice cab driver Bob Simpson, Dekkers and Mohammed Atta, “knew each other well, really well. They were friends.” Strangely, it appears that the majority of Atta’s closest associates in Venice were not Muslims, but `connected` Europeans. Atta’s girlfriend in Venice, Amanda Keller, claimed that all of his friends, with the exception of al Shehhi, were either German or Dutch, including Dekkers and Kruithof. Atta is known to have called his German friends Wolfgang and Juergen, “my brother.”

Daniel Hopsicker discovered that Atta lived for two months with Amanda Keller, an American stripper and lingerie model. He enjoyed the night-life, drinking, and snorted cocaine. This is not the behaviour one would normally associate with a devout Muslim. His email contacts included names of people who worked for defence contractors, like one who, for instance, worked for a Canadian firm, Virtual Prototypes, which helped develop the avionics for the F-15, F-22 and B-2 warplanes? Miss Keller, under pressure from the FBI to do so, publicly retracted her story. Similarly, according to two employees of a bar in Ft. Lauderdale, Atta whilst intoxicated has shouted out, “F*ck God!” However, once again, these witnesses also retracted their statements?

It is my opinion that the only likely explanation as to why Mohammed Atta would have hurled himself into a building, because it was most certainly not in the cause of Islam, is that he was an Illuminati mind-control slave[16]. His behaviour certainly conformed to the psychopathic model typical in such a condition. When Amanda Keller threw him out of her apartment, Atta avenged himself by disembowelling her pet cat and dismembering its half-dozen baby kittens, strewing the pieces around her apartment to be discovered when she returned home from work.

Following one of his drinking bouts, one eyewitness from a bar, described him as “kind of strange, because he was just staring. Every time I’d walk in and out, he had the same look on his face, so God knows what was going through his mind.” Daniel Hopsicker, in `Welcome to Terrorland,` also reports he “heard speculation, from people who had been in his Atta's in Venice, that he looked as if he might have been brainwashed, not that anyone in town had ever seen anyone who had been brainwashed, but he looked the way they thought somebody in that condition might look.”

During his four year stay in Hamburg, Atta was ostensibly a “scholarship” student at an elite international exchange program, run by an organization with ties to figures like David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger. The U.S. end of the operation being coordinated from an address at the U.N. Plaza in New York, by CDS International, named after Carl Duisberg, who headed the Bayer Corporation, and founded I.G. Farben. It was Duisberg who during WWII, devised the slave labour system later perfected by IG Farben, which in turn provided the financing for the infamous Joseph Mengele, who later developed the MK-Ultra and Monarch mind control programs.

It is likely that Mohammed Atta was a believer, albeit a mentally unbalanced one. David Livingstone surmises in his book that he feels it more likely that Atta, rather than being programmed to carry out the destruction of 9/11, was merely a `patsy`. According to CIA hypnosis expert Milton Klein, creating such a candidate is easier than programming a Manchurian Candidate. The patsy can be induced by hypnosis to do things which later show up as circumstantial evidence that will get him falsely blamed for a crime. Klein has claimed he can create a patsy in three months; a Manchurian Candidate takes six months.

September 11th 2001.

The multi faceted attacks of 9/11 could not have been carried out by CIA asset Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda; it would have been impossible for them to have completely dismantled the entire NORAD fighter response system. That one fact alone should have been obvious from the start, but the official story said “that’s what happened,” and with the Illuminist controlled media on board—they caused it to become public consensus.

So if it wasn't Obama and Al Qaeda, who was it?

Evidence which has surfaced since that fateful day, reveals that the PNAC possessed all that was necessary in order to execute a 9/11, including insider access, skilled manpower, influence and vitally, remote control technology, care of Rabbi Dov S. Zakheim.

Rabbi Dov S. Zakheim, CEO of System Planning Corp.

Rabbi Zakheim was a well respected and established figure within the intelligence community, which accounts for his upwardly mobile move from Systems Planning Corporation to Comptroller of the Pentagon in May 2001.

The `company` website indicates that System Planning Corp. (SPC) specializes in several areas of defence technology, including a highly sophisticated war-game technology that allows the control of as many as eight different drones from a remote location, either on the ground or airborne, on varying frequencies, and has a range of several hundred miles. This technology can be used on many different types of aircraft, including large passenger jets. One system developed by their Radar Physics Group is the Flight Termination System. This is a system used to destroy target drones. For example, if a drone that was fired on and was “missed”, then the drone target would be destroyed.

Prior to 9/11, the SPC website shows a recent purchaser of this technology was USAF Eglin AFB, Florida. Eglin is very near MacDill AFB, Florida, where Rabbi Zakheim contracted to send at least 32 Boeing 767 aircraft, as part of the Boeing /Pentagon tanker lease agreement. So the question here is did the 767’s that hit the World Trade Centre come from this arraignment by Zakheim?

Coincidentally or not, it was an SPC subsidiary, TriData Corp., which had overseen the official investigation following the World Trade Centre bombing in 1993. During Rabbi Zakheim’s period as CFO and Comptroller of the Pentagon, there were reports of substantial fraud. Donald Rumsfeld is on record as having stated “According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions,” Not surprisingly, not long after, Dov Zakheim resigned.

The Main Conspirators And Likely Suspects.

Richard Cheney – was the obvious leader of the coup. Cheney appeared to have been one of the main organizers as well as, he had exclusive OEM authority for the drills and exercises, as well as, coordinating the deceptive obstruction of the defence responses on 9/11. He was also instrumental in the cover-up and spin.

Donald Rumsfeld – was involved in designing the war games, implementing the disabling DOD (Department Of Defence) directive, setting up the diversionary training, the shuffling in of `patsies,` and the massive cover-up operation at the Pentagon and Shanksville.

Lewis “Scooter” Libby – Chief of Staff for the Vice President, one of Cheney’s most trusted advisors and a member of his shadow government. He was one of the “chosen few” that were in the White House bunker with Cheney. No doubt, he was one of those behind-the-scenes characters that piloted the spin machine.

Robert James Woolsey – as former director of the CIA, he was involved in designing the terrorist exercises. He personally participated in several important exercises that were utilized to test the responses of key personnel. Did his intelligence connections play a role? He was one of the first to spin the story to the media, blaming the attack on Iraq.

Dov S. Zakheim – previously he was CEO of System Planning Corp. Appears to have used his connections at System Planning Corp. for the remote technology (see below). He is alleged to have been involved in a massive embezzlement at the Pentagon when he was comptroller, which appears to have prompted his resigning. Did the accounting fraud finance the neocon’s 9/11 operation?

George Bush Sr. – ex-head of CIA, and ex-President, worked through his Carlyle Group associations with his friends in the Bin Laden family. He would be instrumental in Saudi diplomacy.

George Bush Jr. – played his role as the idiot-in-chief. He was also active in the cover-up and spin. Bush used his office to promote the USama Bin Laden and WMD fables, while dishing out toxic levels of propaganda to support his “War of Terror”.

General Meyers – During 9/11, he was the acting Joint Chief of Staff. It would have been impossible to carry out the attacks without his complacent cooperation.

Paul Wolfowitz – as Deputy Secretary of Defense, he headed a group of about 700 military experts. The huge “think tank” had formulated plans to remove Saddam Hussein and for the invasion of Iraq. (Background details from 9/11 exposed.org)

The major figures within the PNAC had the motive, means, and ability to arrange, organise and carry out the 9/11 attacks. As we have previously discussed, bin Laden and Al Qaeda acting alone, could not have orchestrated such an elaborate operation. The fact of the matter is that bin Laden was simply playing the part of the scapegoat. In order to be able to sideline US defences it was necessary for the conspirators to have operatives installed at the very highest levels of the government:

1. The operation needed access to the nation's most secure facilities, including the Pentagon. Only insiders would have that kind of access.

2. Only those with privy knowledge from highly classified materials could have had the know-how.

3. Access to large amounts of capital to finance the operation.

4. Connections to military leaders to suppress responses and make key substitutions to personnel.

5. Have a willing and able support staff that is of the highest allegiance. (The Secret Service, CIA, FBI, and loyal foreign agents like MOSAAD).

6. CIA, ISI, and DIA Intelligence information.

7. Ability to run “mock trials” of the operation, through practice exercises and war games.

8. Top military technologies, missiles, remote & drone science, and an arsenal of high explosives, with the facilities to implement them (hangers, technicians, etc.).

9. Access to military aircraft (C-130 or EC-130).

10. The authorization to send personnel overseas, like Powell, Scrwcroft, and Paul O’Neil, whom may interfere with the scheme.

11. The ability to make decisive directives. Examples are the Rumsfeld DOD hijacking directive and the OEM authority given to Cheney over all exercises and preparedness drills.

12. Recruit, fund, and train several `patsy` terrorists.

13. Coordinate FEMA, FBI, and other rescue units, to support cover-up processes.

14. Willing accomplices in the media were needed to propagate the lies.

15. The means to take advantage of the attacks…Box cutters just weren’t enough…

Cui Bono (Who Benefits.)

So who did benefit from the 9/11 attacks and the resulting “War of Terror?”

Did Saddam Hussein get any benefit out of 9/11? None at all; his country was invaded, his army defeated, his government toppled and he himself was executed (supposedly).

Did the pro-Israeli neo-conservatives benefit? Yes they did!. In fact, they achieved more or less everything that they could have possible wished for. Let’s take a look:

1. They advanced the Zionist doctrine by profiling Arabs as our enemies, thus America and its allies joined Israel in their “War of Terror.” On September 11th, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu when asked about U.S.-Israeli relations; his quick reply was, “It’s very good…Well, it’s not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy [for Israel]”

2. Two Arab nations; Iraq and Afghanistan. Attacked and destroyed!

3. They made massive profits during reconstruction efforts, mostly from scams and embezzling U.S. taxpayer dollars.

4. Secured the strategic oil fields of Iraq.

5. Made lucrative profits for the neocon-linked oil and gas companies.

6. Established a permanent presence in the Middle East.

7. Seized the important Afghanistan pipeline corridor for pumping out gas and oil from the former Soviet states around the Caspian region.

8. Increased the U.S. military spending to 3.8 percent of GDP.

9. Increased profits to the defence contracting industries.

10. Funded new research and development for more “war technology”.

11. Created a new military-civilian-complex called Homeland Security.

12. Made immense profits from these Homeland Security-based contracts (i.e. Airport security scanners, etc.).

13. Advanced the neo-conservative political agenda; “police state” legislation like the Patriot Act and domestic spying programs.

14. Increased spending on covert intelligence agencies (CIA, NSA, etc.).

15.Used the 9/11 attacks as a propaganda tool, to advance their “War on Terror” agenda; the new WMD, weapon of mass deception.

16. Endorsed a neo-con “National Security Strategy;” a new U.S. doctrine of pre-emptive strike.

So who benefited from 9/11? Israel and the neo-cons, yes, but ultimately, the Illuminati Luciferian Agenda for World Government as the planet was driven ever closer toward WWIII.

Who lost out? The people of the United States, Afghanistan, and Iraq.

Who’s next? …See part Nine!!

Comments to: http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/


Reference:
1] http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=leo+strauss&sa=Search&domains=rense.com&sitesearch=rense.com
2] http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=Barry+Chamish&domains=rense.com&sitesearch=rense.com
3] http://www.terrorism-illuminati.com/illuminati
4] http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/consp_acua/consp_acua_add1.htm
5] http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_cfr_14.htm
6] http://www.terrorism-illuminati.com/illuminati &
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_enlightenment
7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism
8] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy
9] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbes
10] http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
11] http://www.google.com/search?q=false+flag+operation&rls=com.microsoft:en-gb:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7GPEA_enDK310
12] http://911review.com/precedent/century/gladio.html
13] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mir-Hossein_Mousavi
14] http://socyberty.com/government/criticism-of-plato-the-republic/
15] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omar_Sheikh
16] http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_mindconMKULTRA.htm#Additional_Information
17] http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=the+aspen+institute&sa=Search&domains=rense.com&sitesearch=rense.com
18] http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_911.htm
19] http://www.rense.com/general43/byrd.htm
20] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zbigniew_Brzezinski