To Kill A Tree: Part Four : Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars.

By Philip Jones 7th June 2009.

Introduction:

“Factor VI : The Cattle. Those who will not use their brains are no better off than those who have no brains, and so this mindless school of jelly-fish, father, mother, son, and daughter, become useful beasts of burden or trainers of the same."

This is how the Illuminati Elite view mankind. It is an excerpt from a Top Secret policy document produced at the first Bilderberg meeting in 1954, and Fritz Springmeier exposes it's contents and proposals in some detail in his book; `Be Wise As Serpents`.

In this the fourth part in the series, `To Kill A Tree,` we will look at how the Depopulation Agenda has gone global, and show that the populations of the developing world are now firmly in the line of fire. We will see how women both here in the West and in the Third World are being targeted by `Big Pharma` conglomerates and how vaccine programmes are being used to induce sterility in the female of our species. But first, let's take a look at the underlying ideology to what the Danish researcher Kjeld Heising calls the Global War Against Women, or `Pharmageddon.`

The Fabians:

During the latter half of the twentieth century, the Illuminati was able to massively increase its own wealth and global influence through its monopoly on oil, made possible due to its interconnection with the Saudi Royal family. At the same time, in order to consolidate its global power base, it worked towards undermining and corrupting governments and leaders in the developing nations resulting in the steady impoverishment of the Third World in the process. With the West depopulating itself, and it's culture in crisis, the Illuminists shifted focus opening up this new front in their `quiet war` against humankind, moving themselves ever closer towards to the establishment of a single world order.

The core underlying philosophy of their global strategy in respect to this `quiet war` is known as Malthusian-ism. Named after the eighteenth century British scholar, Thomas Malthus, it was implemented through the activities of the Round Table, via their active sponsorship of the Fabian Socialist Society of England.
The Fabian Society were socialists whose strategy deviated from that of Marx insomuch as they believed they could achieve world domination through what they termed the “doctrine of inevitability of gradualism.” By this, they meant that their goals would eventually be achieved “without breach of continuity or abrupt change of the entire social issue.” They would do this by infiltrating educational institutions, government agencies, and political parties.

Thomas Robert Malthus:

The Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus (13 February 1766 – 23 December 1834) was a British Scholar who came to prominence for drawing attention to what he imagined to be the potential dangers of population growth. Malthus wrote: "The power of population is indefinitely greater than the power in the earth to produce subsistence for man". Malthus became hugely influential, and controversial, in economic, political, social and scientific thought. Many evolutionary biologists read him, notably Charles Darwin and Alfred Russell Wallace, for each of whom Malthusian-ism became an intellectual stepping-stone to the idea of natural selection.

In 1798, he published a pamphlet known as the Essay on Population. According to Malthus, “population, when unchecked, increases in a geometrical ratio. Subsistence increases only in an arithmetical ratio.” Therefore, Malthus concluded that society should adopt certain social policies to prevent the human population from growing disproportionately larger than the food supply.

Some of his predictions came true, but the effects were negligible in the West. The world food production grows exponentially at a rate much higher than the population growth, in both developed and developing countries, partially due to the efforts of Norman Borlaug's "Green Revolution" of the 1960s, and the food per capita level is the highest in history. On the other hand population growth rates have significantly slowed down, and have even begun to fall, especially in the developed world. Famine has not been eliminated, but its root cause is political instability, not global food shortage.

Although Malthus' theories have been largely discredited, he continues to be revered by population alarmists and environmentalists alike, and the ever cynical global elite are still able to make use of his ideas to add credence to their population control programmes and justify their genocidal depopulation agenda.

George Bernard Shaw, writer and Fabian Socialist, stated that the Fabians goal was to be achieved by “stealth, intrigue, subversion, and the deception of never calling socialism by its name.” Other notable Fabians of the period included men like H.G. Wells, Aldous and Julian Huxley, and Lord Bertrand Russell.

Lord Bertrand Russell believed the white population of the world would soon cease to increase, and therefore would “have to defend themselves by methods which are disgusting even if they are necessary.” For Russell, population control was a absolute prerequisite to World Government:

“I have already spoken of the population problem, but a few words must be added about its political aspect. .... It will be impossible to feel that the world is in a satisfactory state until there is a certain degree of equality, and a certain acquiescence everywhere in the power of the World Government, and this will not be possible until the poorer nations of the world have become ... more or less stationary in population. The conclusion to which we are driven by the facts that we have been considering is that, while great wars cannot be avoided until there is a World Government, a World Government cannot be stable until every important country has nearly stationary population.”

Aldous and Julian Huxley were the grandsons of Thomas H. Huxley, a founder member of the Round table, and a lifelong collaborator of Arnold Toynbee. Trained at Oxford, Aldous Huxley, author of Brave New World, was a member of the Children of the Sun, a Dionysian cult, comprised of the children of Britain’s Round-table elites. Among others were T.S. Eliot, W.H. Auden, Sir Oswald Mosley, and D.H. Lawrence.

H.G. Wells, head of British foreign intelligence during World War I, was also a founding member of Cecil Rhodes and Alfred Milner’s Round Table, and tutored Aldous and Julian Huxley at Oxford. It was also Wells who had first introduced the Huxley brothers to Satanist Aleister Crowley during the late 1920s.

Sir Julian Huxley, a British scientist and intellectual, played a leading role in the creation of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), also held similar if not identical views to Wells. Huxley saw medical and scientific progress, such as the development of penicillin, DDT and water purification, as a two-edged sword. He wrote:

“We can and should devote ourselves with truly religious devotion to the cause of ensuring greater fulfilment for the human race in its future destiny. And this involves a furious and concerted attack on the problem of population; for the control of population is… a prerequisite for any radical improvement in the human lot.”

The Bankers:

The World Bank and IMF, both private corporations with shareholders, are owned largely by the Rothschild and Rockefeller families, and were created in 1944, at a UN sponsored monetary conference in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire. The plans for both were drafted by prominent Fabian Socialists from England, like John Maynard Keynes, and the Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, Harry Dexter White. White, who became the first Executive Director for the US at the IMF, was also a CFR member, and later discovered to be part of the Soviet espionage ring in Washington. Robert McNamara, who became president of the World Bank, and ran the Vietnam War, stated:

“There are only two possible ways in which a world of 10 billion people can be averted. Either the current birth rates must come down more quickly. Or the current death rates must go up. There is no other way. There are, of course, many ways in which the death rates can go up. In a thermonuclear age, war can accomplish it very quickly and decisively. Famine and disease are nature’s ancient checks on population growth, and neither one has disappeared from the scene.... To put it simply: Excessive population growth is the greatest single obstacle to the economic and social advancement of most of the societies in the developing world.”

The WWF:

The World Wildlife Fund was founded by Prince Philip, the husband of Elizabeth II Queen of England. Baptised with the name of Philip Battenberg, he is of the House of Oldenburg. He is the great-great-grandson of Grand Master of the Asiatic Brethren, Karl Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel, and also descended from George II, Catherine the Great of Russia, and Frederick I King of Prussia. In other words, he is Illuminati to the bone.

The Prince is on record as having said that if he were to be reincarnated he would like to return as a killer virus, to help solve the overpopulation problem. Other WWF executives have echoed the Prince's concerns about what they incessantly propagate as overpopulation.

Dr. Arne Schiotz, a WWF director has said, “Malthus has been vindicated, reality is finally catching up with Malthus. The Third World is overpopulated, it’s an economic mess, and there’s no way they could get out of it with this fast-growing population. Our philosophy is: back to the village.”

Sir Peter Scott, of the WWF, warned, “If we look at things causally, the bigger problem in the world is population. We must set a ceiling to human numbers. All development aid should be made dependent on the existence of strong family planning programs.”

Silent Weapons And The War Against Women:

There are few women here in the West who would accept or acknowledge that for at least half a century, a `quiet war using silent weapons` has been waged against them. This is because women have been so inculcated with feminist ideals, that the Illuminists have been able to dupe them into becoming willing if albeit misinformed accomplices in the Global Depopulation Agenda. Women throughout the Western nations, deceived by Illuminati sponsored feminist propaganda, deviously disguised and cloaked in the garb of women's rights, equal opportunities and the full array of Cultural Marxist dogma, have simply `bought into` the lies being sold them and adopted as inalienable truths, doctrines which fundamentally contradict the very nature of humanity.

In effect, women have been tricked into working for the very same cabal whose ultimate goal is a World State comprised of the Super Rich Elite and a vastly reduced populace of slaves, wherein the status of the human female will inevitably be vastly reduced.

Recently, the `cloak` has slipped a little, and the face of the `quite war` against women has begun to reveal itself. There comes a time when all conspiracies must show themselves, and just like all the other spurious aspects of the Illuminati agenda, such as the bogus `war on terror` and the disproved and discredited lie regarding man made climate change, now the global war on women is becoming ever more recognizable, to those who have eyes to see at least.

In his article `Pharmageddon: the Global War Against Women`, the highly talented and informed Danish researcher Kjeld Heising writes:

“For me, it started as an idea which became a thesis: How come that more and more vaccination campaigns are targeted on women? Recently in Denmark, the media have been strongly marketing the HPV vaccination against cervical cancer, not as given to women of exactly that age where cervical cancer occurs, no, they are about to be included in the normal children's vaccination scheme, targeting girls at the age of 12 - where it has absolutely no positive effect. How come? ”(www.heising.dk).

The `agenda` to depopulate has apparently existed for two centuries (see Malthus), and at least since World War II, has gone into overdrive, due mainly to advancements in medical science and the pharmaceutical industry. Trying to view the situation here in the West objectively, one can but conclude that it is `game set and match` to the Illuminati. The birth levels are so low in the West, that absent divine intervention or a `sea change` in the attitudes of women, the situation seems irreversible.

So having more or less achieved their goals to depopulate, de-construct and destabilize Western nations, the Luciferian Illuminists have for some time now been implementing their Depopulation Agenda in the developing nations of Africa, Asia and Latin America. The methods being used are quite different to those which proved so effective in the West, where the presence of compulsory state controlled education, and a highly advanced propaganda machine, fronted by the owned mass media, utilized Cultural Marxist Front Groups such as feminists, the Civil Rights Movement and the `Gay` lobby to break down resistance amongst conservatives in the main and the population in general, to population control measures such as abortion and family planning programmes.

In the Third World, the agenda is of a more direct nature, utilising the ungodly power of the pharmaceutical giants, and implemented by using coercive economic measures against native governments who do not cooperate, along with the looting of money and natural resources from Africa and other continents, all facilitated by the Debt Trap, IMF Structural Adjustments and World Bank administrations.

It is fairly obvious that to minimize a population, one must primarily target women, not men. Only by reducing the number of females can you reduce the amount of offspring. One man can fertilize thousands of women. One woman can not be fertilized by thousands of men.

The Rockefeller Connection:

In 1952 John D. Rockefeller III established the `Population Council` and in doing so, brought the issue of overpopulation into the public arena. In 1972, at the request of President Nixon, another commission, `The Rockefeller Commission on Population Growth,` completed a two year study on the subject. The commission concluded:

"After two years of concentrated effort, we have concluded that, in the long run, no substantial benefits will result from further growth of the Nation's population, rather that the gradual stabilization of our population through voluntary means would contribute significantly to the Nation's ability to solve its problems. We have looked for, and have not found, any convincing economic argument for continued population growth. The health of our country does not depend on it, nor does the vitality of business nor the welfare of the average person. By its very nature, population is a continuing concern and should receive continuing attention. Later generations, and later commissions, will be able to see the right path into the future. In any case, no generation needs to know the ultimate goal or the final means, only the direction in which they will be found." John D. Rockefeller 1972.

National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (NSSM200).

Only two years later, came the `National Security Study Memorandum 200,` which was completed on December 10, 1974 by the United States National Security Council under the direction of Henry Kissinger. It was adopted as official U.S. policy by President Gerald Ford in November 1975. It was originally classified, but was later declassified and obtained by researchers in the early 1990s. The basic thesis of the memorandum was that population growth in the least developed countries is a concern to U.S. national security, because it would tend to risk civil unrest and political instability in countries that had a high potential for economic development.

Thirteen countries are named in the report as particularly problematic with respect to U.S. security interests: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Colombia, and Brazil. These countries are projected to create 47 percent of all world population growth by 2050 and beyond. The report advocates the promotion of contraception and other population reduction measures. It also raises the question of whether the U.S. should consider preferential allocation of surplus food supplies to countries that are deemed constructive in use of population control measures. The report advises, "In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion."

The Memorandum recommended that the below goals were necessary to safeguard `US` Interests:

• Zero rate population growth in the developed countries by 1985.

• Zero rate population growth in Lesser Developed Countries by 2000.

Henry Kissinger as he climbed his way up the American Political ladder was sponsored all the way by the Rockefeller's. There can be little doubt that there runs a direct line from the Rockefeller report to the Kissinger memo. It is also worth emphasizing that this agenda was initially tried and tested in the West and then later exported to the Third World. This is undoubtedly due to the prevailing conditions in the industrialized nations, which allow for a more complete and comprehensive manipulation of the populace through the control and centralization of the mass media, education and political systems etc.Which all corresponds very well with the fact that the birth rates declined in the western world long before they began to do likewise in the Third World.

The Modus Operandi (Method Of Operation):

During my lifetime the below ideals have become part of the collective Western consciousness; carved in stone if you will, the received wisdom; irrefutable and irrebuttable. They define totally the very meaning of what we in the West have been told constitutes a modern, progressive and just society. Eight Commandments for the new secular civilization:

• Reproductive health (abortion, condoms)

• Sex education

• Improved health

• Women' equality

• Day care• Government participation

• Improve social security

• Reduce infant mortality

It cannot be argued that blind adherence on the part of Western people to these `articles of faith` have played the primary role in the intended decline in the Western birth rate. They are the tenets of the Welfare State and we were told that their development and implementation were the result of a superior social model based on democracy. But now, as we begin to see the bigger picture, we ask ourselves whether they were in truth the means by which we stopped reproducing ourselves?

Many unacquainted with this subject may balk and scream. “Conspiracy Theory”. But the facts speak loudly for themselves. Three decades after the Kissinger memo, the birthrates throughout the West are in terminal decline and a similar situation is beginning to develop in the Third World now also.

Now, turning our attention to the methods being used in the developing world, the Kissinger Memorandum recommended the following institutions to be used in order to effect the plan for population reduction in that region: The World Bank, the World Health Organization, UNICEF, Governments from "donor" countries, UNFPA, and Private N.G.O.'s

During the 1970's, the twin institutions of the World Bank and IMF were used to spring the economic trap into which the Third World leaped so enthusiastically. Within only a few short years, the loan mechanisms agreed to by native leaders who were either naive and gullible, or knowingly complicit, reversed completely the recently won independence of their nations, enslaving them even more completely, this time by economic colonialism, as opposed to physical conquest. It is through these cynical methods that the Third World has been steadily impoverished and plundered of its natural wealth and resources, and by which the Illuminati have been able to coerce Third World Leaders into adopting their population control measures in return for loan relief or further loans.

Big Pharma:

We will now look at how the pharmaceutical industry in tandem with modern medicine is playing its part in causing an intended human catastrophe in the developing world by the use of UN sponsored vaccination programmes.

In 1999, the organization, Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations, (GAVI), was established. It's sponsor was no less a global `grandee` than Bill Gates, who donated 754 million dollars to it, with the declared goal of his eventual contribution being in the region of between 12 to 15 billion dollars. Previously, Gates had given 1.7 million dollars to UNPFA, 10 million dollars to `research on reproductive health` to UNDP, the WHO and the World Bank, plus, a further 2.2 million dollars to UNPFA and 1.7 million dollars to Planned Parenthood. Bill and Melinda Gates are into Depopulation in a very big way.

With its official remit being to improve the health of people in the world's seventy poorest countries, it is grotesquely ironic that GAVI is in reality the premier instrument of Third World depopulation, and its one and only means of doing so is the mass use of vaccinations. One would have thought that if the intention was to improve health in poor countries, then the introduction of a support system which aids food production and the distribution of water would be primary objectives. But no, it appears that GAVI's one and only reason for being is to vaccinate as many people, and women in particular as possible. Why?

There is no logic in the idea that public health can be improved exclusively by the use of syringes and chemicals. Even if millions of people are inoculated against HIV, Typhoid, Hepatitis, TB, etc. - if there is an inadequate supply of food and water, any such project will quickly be shown to be invalid GAVI's vaccination campaigns are nothing less than anti-fertility campaigns by stealth. The vaccines being distributed on a massive scale in the Third World are in truth chemical weapons that will render women infertile. All the rationale corroborates this thesis. No other explanation makes any sense.

We begin to see the true purpose of GAVI once we realize that its official literature contain thousands of papers, journals and textbooks on what is known as "Reproductive Immunology" or to the layman, "how to make women immune to pregnancy." A GAVI article from 1991 has the headline "The WHO Task Force on Vaccine for Fertility Regulation". Numerous institutes have reproductive immunology on their research scheme. And as we see, the method is based solely on vaccination programmes and the WHO is deeply involved in their practical implementation.

Until recently, the preferred technique has been the mixing of Tetanus and Diphtheria vaccines with hCG Gonadotropine. hCG is a hormone which is naturally formed in the foetus within the first few days, and which is necessary for it's continued life and growth. When the mixture of vaccine and hCG is inoculated into a woman's bloodstream, her immune defence will not only produce antibodies to the Tetanus or Diphtheria bacteria but also to the hCG. As a result, she miscarries.

During the years 1993-95, the WHO carried out extensive vaccination campaigns against Tetanus in Nicaragua, Mexico, Nigeria, Tanzania and the Philippines where many millions of women were inoculated. Despite the fact that 70% of all tetanus occurs in men, the target group was ... women between 14 and 44 years of age. In Uganda, in the village of Mbarara, a polio vaccination program killed 600 children in just one month. In Nigeria, a polio vaccine which was contaminated with Estradiol and a number of carcinogen (cancer generating) agents was distributed. How many more of these criminal campaigns have been performed through the years?

The pharmaceutical industry is now a major tool of population control. The evidence is there and there can be no debating the fact. Already in 1952, John D. Rockefeller III, through his Population Council, began advocating that Mercury should be added to vaccines. The reason given; Mercury is a preservative - that was the ruse. The true intent was of course quite different. Adding Mercury to vaccines enabled the chemical industry to dispose of a highly toxic waste product (just like adding Fluoride in toothpaste did). And, most importantly, the Mercury is absorbed by the body, is not excreted and has various toxic effects.

One of these effects is that it destroys the cilia inside the female genitalia, thereby removing the ability of the mucous membrane to transport semen to the egg cells, which obviously impedes natural conception. Another effect is Autism. It is now a proven fact that the numbers of autistic children born increases with the amount of Mercury containing vaccines consumed by the mother. And there are other effects of the additive which is called thiomesal - such as diabetes. But of even greater significance is the negative effect on women's fertility, and the corresponding effects of the toxins finding their way into the male organ, thereby reducing the ability to form productive semen.

Gardasil The First Cancer Cure?

A recent and worrying trend in Western nations is that of governments mandating vaccination. The most blatant example of this is the campaign to inoculate young girls with the Gardasil Vaccine, supposedly in an effort to combat HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) which we are told causes cervical cancer. But this has nothing do do with preventing cancer and everything to do with increasing profit for the pharmaceuticals, and along the way, adding to the chemical cocktail which is destroying the fertility in women globally.

The Lie:

HPV is a sexually transmitted disease that causes most cases of Cervical Cancer. The HPV vaccine protects against over 70% of the strains that cause Cervical Cancer.

The Truth:

There are over 100 strains of HPV, only 30 of which are theoretically linked to Cervical Cancer. HPV is present naturally in at least half the population without ever causing any disease whatsoever. HPV has never been proved as a pathogen for any disease. The pharmaceutical giant, Merck who produce and market Gardasil are making the ludicrous claim that the virus just happened along and attacked some healthy cells causing them to mutate and begin replicating out of control, and that this is now happening on a mass scale, even though it has only recently been discovered, and that a vaccine can somehow neutralize that attack on normal cervix cells.

Merck originally claimed that “ There was a strong connection between HPV and cervical cancer.“. Somewhere along the way, that became “is the cause of” without any medical evidence to support this claim. This is clearly more about sales and marketing than science. The vaccine itself `Gardasil` has no competition in the field and consists of `virus like ` particles from four strains of HPV. With no clinical studies whatsoever, two of these `strains` are now being touted by Merck as being responsible for 70% of all cervical cancer cases. Merck claim that, “ HPV cause squamous cell, cervical cancer.”

The market demographic Merck chose was 12 year old girls. But the average age of women who contract cervical cancer is 50 years plus, so what's going on? Merck themselves openly state that the efficacy of the vaccine is only 5 years, making it worthless by the time the subject needs the immunity, namely, around her fiftieth birthday. Any claimed protection will have worn off long ago. An established risk factor with cervical cancer is the number of sexual partners a woman has had. So who do you imagine will have had more, a 12 year old or a 50 year old woman.

We are dealing here with a vaccine which claims to prevent cancer by imitating a pathogen which causes cancer. Merck themselves admit, “Gardasil has not been evaluated for carcinogenicity or impairment to fertility.”

It is in the above statement that I believe the true motives behind this program lie. To cause sterility and or cancer in young females thereby enabling a massive advance in the Illuminati’s depopulation agenda. It can be the only logical reason as to why governments in the service of the `hidden masters` would either encourage, coerce or mandate such an unsubstantiated vaccination regime and apply it to 12 year old girls when the risk group is women in their fifties, who for the most part are well past the age of conception anyway. Furthermore, the Pharmaceuticals will once again make a fortune off the back of human suffering.

What is so worrying is that with all the mainstream avenues of information secured, and with the huge financial resources of `Big Pharma` to drive it along, and the seemingly limitless ability of the mass of the population to just comply, comply, comply, it is difficult to see how this exercise in evil can be thwarted.

Casting The Net:

In `Pharmageddon: The Global War Against Women` The Danish researcher Kjeld Heising, a man who has lived in Africa, and is very close to what is happening there writes:

“In terms of vaccination campaigns in the Third World, the major problem for the `slayers` is that a course of vaccinations can take two, three ... five or more shots to be completed. This process can take weeks, during which time rumours quickly spread among the populations about the after effects (bleeding, miscarriages, deaths). In Africa, pregnant women started to flee from their villages when the white land-cruisers arrived. It became so much of a problem that the Rockefeller Commission found it necessary to solve it.”

Herr Heising outlines the solutions found to circumvent this `problem`. He tells us that local governments were `persuaded` to make vaccinations mandatory and to jail people who refused - as was the case in Mali. Governments who refused to play the game - for example Nigeria's - were presented with false reports of growing epidemics which again caused neighbour countries in their own ignorance to publicly condemn the obstinate Nigerian government for "endangering other people's lives". Or in the case of the South African government which still refuses to distribute free HIV tests among it's people, and which is under tremendous pressure from the Western world's `elite`; from British Royals to American Presidential candidates to media clowns like Oprah Winfrey (who showed up in Johannesburg to perform a public HIV test ... the result was not published).

Then they initiated research on how to enlarge the vaccine catchment zone and conduct campaigns in a more effective manner. One of the results was published in a press release from WHO August 2005. It stated that more than 750,000 health workers would go from house to house and inoculate 24 million children under the age of 5 years on certain Indonesian islands - all in one day! As Kjeld Heising rightly puts it, these are “hit-and-run-tactics.” The reasoning behind this was that if anything went wrong, the rumours would not have time to spread.

Making Progress:

Looking forward to whatever future we have left, I have read that they plan to incorporate DNA-fragments into viruses which can automatically reproduce the hCG antibodies. Thereafter, no further action is required since the DNA will replicate itself indefinitely, and imperceptibly sterilize women. Following on from that, the next step will be then be to incorporate such DNA strings into food and stimulants so that women will unknowingly ingest their anti-fertilization agents themselves. This technique is known as `Stealth Vaccine.` Whether it has already been put into action here in the west, I cannot say, but it is a recorded and accepted fact that men and women of European Ancestry, wherever they may be are have increasing trouble conceiving.

Recently, I have detected a certain awakening of awareness, albeit a very tentative one, in some of the European countries, particularly the UK. It seems that there are some sceptics in the media, the British journalist Melanie Phillips for example, who have recognized the Big Pharma-Depopulation Nexus and they are are beginning to make a noise about it ( video).

Here in Scandinavia, where I live, there is no such awareness to speak of, and the `Agenda` can still mobilize massive support from a media network and a state education system which is a hundred percent compliant. Danes, isolated as they are up here in Northern Europe, are among the world's easiest people to control, due to an indoctrinated group mentality, a strange little phenomenon known as the (Jantelav) and a conditioned need to conform to the consensus. So there is little resistance to the massive state sponsored HPV campaign being carried out nationwide in Danish schools. In fact, I know of only one parent here, who has refused to have her daughter inoculated.

But in both Britain and the US, the Rockefeller non-coercion principle has long been suspended. Vaccinations are becoming increasingly mandatory - as in Texas where school children must now receive 68 inoculations throughout the course of their school years. The HIV test is now mandatory for pregnant women in US several states, followed by the mandatory prescribing of deadly poisonous drugs - for mothers and newborn babies.

In the concluding part to this series, I will examine how that other Illuminati arm of human control and depopulation, the `War On Terror`, has in the past decade provided Western Governments with false and spurious justification to suspend one civil right after another. We will see how this `war without end` has it's own agenda for depopulation, and consider what the future of mankind is likely to be, unless all of this madness is stopped.

Finally, women of the world, the `World Power,` `Hidden Hand,` `Illuminati, call it what you will has you in its gun-sights, and unless you take cover, and help us fight back, all our days are numbered, for without you and your fertility, the human race has no future..


Ref: Dr Tim O’Shea : HPV The First Cancer Vaccine www.rense.com 10.6.7http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=gardasil&emb=0# http://www.heising.dk `Pharmageddon The Global War Against Women` by Kjeld Heising. http://www.melaniephillips.com/
Fritz Springmeier: `Be Wise As Serpents.`
David Livingstone: `Terrorism and The Illuminati,`

To Kill A Tree Part Three : The Delusional State - Severing The Roots.

By Philip Jones 31st May 2009.

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” George Orwell.

Introduction:

In this, the third part in the series, `To Kill A Tree,` we will take a closer look at how through various means and methods, the Illuminati are, in parallel with their depopulation agenda, working towards the deconstruction of the nation states of the West, by disconnecting people from their roots, and diluting the ethnic make-up of countries through mass immigration, thereby weakening the resolve of populations to oppose the trend towards internationalism. We will also examine how the Illuminists and their Marxist, humanist, socialist `lackeys,` have worked towards breaking down Western civilisation and tradition, by the rewriting of history and the defamation of national heroes.

Immigration:

To challenge the concept that large scale immigration is beneficial to the West is to risk being labelled racist, even though the proof is clearly `in the pudding` as it were. In his book, `Do We Need Mass Immigration,` the British author Anthony Browne writes:

“ Immigration at current levels is turning Britain into a country very ill-at-ease with itself. It imports poverty, increases social tensions, crime, public health problems such as TB, and creates parallel communities.”

Large scale immigration from the `Third World` is one of the key tools being used by the Illuminati in order to break down resistance to their plans for a One World State. Immigration on the scale we are now witnessing calls into question the very future and character of the nations that our children will inherit, if indeed, with the relentless drive towards the Federal European State and plans for a North America Union moving forward apace, there will be any such entities left to inherit. Massive immigration from the `developing` world is now adversely affecting all the countries of the West.

Within the European Union, the governing elites in Brussels continue to present the member states as little more than a collection of minorities, ‘multicultural societies’ in which national characteristics are of no greater value or significance than those of any other culture. Furthermore, they clearly believe, and the evidence is supportive, that large scale immigration assists them in achieving their defined goal of a Pan European Superstate, within which any nationalism or patriotism would not only be frowned upon, but outlawed under the auspices of xenophobia.

But their premise is wrong. The UK for instance is not a multicultural society. A mere eight per cent of the population are from an ethnic minority, and even then a number of those are Christians. Nor is it a country of immigrants. Until the 1950s, there had been no large-scale immigration since the Norman Conquest over a 1000 years before. The notion that the UK is a `mongrel nation` is erroneous. Britain is a country with a distinctive and ancient identity and culture founded upon a dominant religion, Christianity, to which most of its citizens still feel at least a nominal attachment.

Denying the Culture:

Immigrants, if they are to lead full and rewarding lives, need to become part of the culture and society of their new home. They need to be able to identify with it's history and traditions. Those who went to Britain early in the last century did so, because they valued and admired the country's national characteristics of fair play, tolerance, and emotional restraint. Without sacrificing their own culture, they adopted British values by learning about Shakespeare, Austen, the Bronte Sisters and Dickens, and by studying the history of parliamentary democracy and the growth of British institutions. But the point I am making here is that these things were actually taught. People were imbued with British values because the British themselves were proud of their nation, identity and culture, and they believed in transmitting what Britain stood for to all the nation's citizens and their children.

But this is no longer the case. These things are no longer being taught. For many decades now, the Marxist controlled UK education system, through it's schools and universities has been doing its best instead to destroy all semblances of national pride. The very idea that a national identity should be transmitted is considered racist, imperialist and exclusionary. The great works of English literature are replaced by books considered to be more ‘relevant’ to a child’s own cultural and ethnic background. British political history has become `persona non grata,` so children are given no sense of any chronological national story to make sense of the society they inhabit.

On the front line of the culture war now raging, and amongst its ideologically driven `foot soldiers,` this fallacious dogma is derived largely from a perhaps well intended, but misplaced excess of tact towards minorities, along with an indoctrinated guilt complex over the British Empire, even though if the history of that Empire was taught properly, it would necessarily include the oft valiant story of the many immigrant groups that fought heroically for Britain. But in truth, at it's core, there lies a desire to create an entirely new kind of society by destroying the old one. That means, among other things, repudiating and denying openly and publicly, loudly and often, the Christian basis of British culture.

Thus, in the UK, a recent report by the Institute for Public Policy Research on the teaching of religion in schools, concluded that there was a need to teach a ‘diversity of identities’ to equip children for life in a ‘multicultural society’. Accordingly, it directs teachers to encourage children to question the faith they inherit from their families, and to regard the moral teachings of religion with suspicion, if not outright hostility. Under the cover of promoting ‘diversity,’ this is actually a menu for subversion, explicitly aiming to undermine the family and the moral and religious basis of the nation, severing children from parents and tradition.

Cambridge university amongst others, has banned Christian prayers at graduation ceremonies in order to avoid causing any offence to other religions and atheists, and to avoid legal action under race or religious discrimination laws. Thus we see a national culture, redefined as being intrinsically racist or discriminatory. Because it is embarrassed by its own culture, Britain refuses to defend it in the same way other nations, like the Dutch or the Danes, for example, have done with theirs. The Dutch have recently expelled large numbers of failed asylum-seekers, and Denmark has severely tightened it's policy on immigration, to the point where it struggles to work within the confines of EU legislation. These small countries have belatedly realised, that multiculturalism poses a `clear and present` danger to their culture and identity which they are neither prepared or able to tolerate, and still remain distinct national entities. The Dutch say that their 30-year experiment in multiculturalism has resulted in sink schools, violence, and ethnic ghettos.

Most immigrants are hard-working, honest people, looking to make a good life for themselves and their families, and they bring with them many other admirable ethnic and national characteristics which in time, providing the numbers entering are capable of being assimilated, can add to and enrich the indigenous culture. But if their numbers are too numerous, or if they don’t wish to integrate, it then becomes impossible for the indigenous culture to absorb them. If there simply aren’t enough people who can identify with the country’s history, then it cannot be taught. And since any nation is rooted in its history, the national identity unravels. Being ashamed of our country’s past, no longer becomes a question of any relevance, as there is no longer a sense of any collective ‘we.’

In his `Civitas` pamphlet ‘The Need for Nations,` Roger Scruton insists this situation places democracy itself in mortal danger. He suggests that without national loyalty, there can be no common ground. A democracy works only if its members think of themselves as ‘we’. If there is only ‘them,’ people no longer acknowledge the validity of the laws that bind them, and are no longer prepared to make sacrifices or die for a country inhabited by people they don’t know or trust. The result is that democracy withers, and social disintegration follows.

David Goodhart, editor of the liberal magazine `Prospect,` makes a similar point. He says:

“We are linked by a set of common values and assumptions. But as Britain becomes more diverse, that common culture becomes eroded. And if we feel we no longer have anything in common with our fellow citizens, we will no longer be prepared to pay for common welfare provision.”

Following his considered and thoughtful discussion of an important issue of national significance, Mr Goodhart found himself in the `gun sights` of no less a `grandee,` than the chairman of the Commission for Racial Equality, who labelled him a racist, and likened him to Enoch Powell and the British National Party. It is sometimes difficult to grasp how on earth have we reached the point, where a clearly decent man is smeared a racist simply for wishing to preserve his national identity? Why is Britain so much less attached to its own culture and traditions than the Dutch and the Danes, who have achieved far less, or other Europeans like the French who have their own colonial history to contend with? And why has education unraveled the culture in Britain to an extent not seen elsewhere?

Home To Roost:

The prime suspects in this sorry saga are the radicalised, `baby-boomers` of the sixties and seventies, who having been indoctrinated with the insidious ideologies of Cultural Marxism in university, set out to infiltrate and destabilise western society. They had much less impact in Europe, where institutions remained robust enough to mount a solid defence, and language provided a bulwark against the `new` ideas coming across the Atlantic from America. Schools still transmitted their traditional values, the family held up, and the churches were strong. In Britain, however, these institutions simply collapsed. The welfare state, in promoting a culture of rights, had eroded responsibility and duty and encouraged instead a culture of narcissism. This created fertile ground for the cult of personal choice promoted by the radicals.

In addition, the shared language and close cultural ties with America made Britain particularly susceptible to the Neo Marxist programmes of child-centred education, extreme feminism and minority ‘victim’ rights coming across the `pond.` In Britain, a State monopoly over schools and universities meant there was no challenge to these ideas, which aimed to disconnect citizens from the traditions and established values of the nation. When faced with this rout, the established church merely wrung its hands and screamed, “No Mas,” then dutifully followed suit. As a result, the three pillars of national identity; family, education and church crumbled.

Internationalism:

Britain and the other English speaking nations may be in the vanguard of this process, but it is part of a global trend, carefully planned and orchestrated by the `Hidden Power.` The immigration issue is only the most visible symptom of the ailment afflicting Western Civilisation, which now finds itself at a most perilous juncture in it's history. The idea that a people’s principal duties are to family, community and nation is being challenged at every turn by a new vision in which people are expected to feel a form of `global responsibility.` In this new trans-national order, the powers of individual nations are being progressively transferred to institutions that cross national boundaries.

The European Union, the United Nations, the World Trade Organisation and the proposed NAU will increasingly impose laws and obligations on once proud sovereign nations where they are not accountable to the people. Much of this energy is being provided by insider human rights activists promoting ‘international law,’ which has no democratic legitimacy but is increasingly being used to bring democracies to heel. Bit by bit as the nation state is superseded, democracy is being eroded. The ultimate goal, a One World State.

It is no accident that the trend towards trans-nationalism has been accelerating ever since the collapse of the Soviet Union. It is nothing less than the `Neo-Communist` means by which Western Civilisation is systematically destabilised. There has been a counter reaction against this trend, mostly by small countries, such as the Denmark and Holland, who have adopted what can only be termed a `siege mentality,` as the world at large closes in around them, and waves of immigrants breach the walls of their once homogeneous citadels.

In the US, the `war` rages between rival camps supporting either trans-nationalism or democracy. Amazingly, the British haven’t even grasped there is a battle to be fought. According to Philosopher Roger Scruton, the British are sleep walking into the likely to be European Federal State “in which national loyalty will be no more significant than support for a local football team.” The outcome, he says, will be despotism and anarchy.

We can see the writing on the wall already. In 1996, Greenwich council in London, produced a report in response to the murders of Stephen Lawrence and two other local black boys. One of the principal reasons for the murderous rage of white youths, it said, was that they had no national identity to be proud of and to give their lives meaning. White children, in the UK, it said, ’seem like cultural ghosts, haunting as mere absences the richly decorated corridors of multicultural society.’

In her article, `Britain's' Social Suicide,` the journalist Melanie Phillips writes:

“People may also have several identities, like Russian dolls stacked inside each other. But ultimately, they have to have common bonds; and these depend on a common culture, which requires controlled migration.”

Reconstructing the Past:

"History is the lie commonly agreed upon." Voltaire.

To sever a people's roots, it is necessary to destroy it's memory. By denying a people true knowledge of who they are and where they came from, and those aspects of their history and tradition which defines them as a separate identifiable nation, with a common language, common faith and common mission, it is possible to create a sense of hopelessness and futility, which in time will eventually kill the collective psyche and love of country and enable that once distinct people to be swallowed up by any would be Supranational state.

George Orwell in his book `1984,` argued that by destroying the record of a people's past, thereby leaving it ignorant of it's forbears and their achievements, one can fill the vacuum with a brand new history. The primary weapon devised to create the academic circumstances needed to implement the pernicious and destructive agenda to achieve such a condition is a little something known as `Critical Theory.` Developed by the Marxist `thinkers` of the Frankfurt School, (see reference section) Critical Theory has been defined as the “essentially destructive criticism of all the main elements of Western culture, including Christianity, capitalism, authority, the family, patriarchy, hierarchy, morality, tradition, sexual restraint, loyalty, patriotism, nationalism, heredity, ethnocentrism, convention and conservatism.” Raehn.

In practice, Critical Theory works like this; The Marxist repeats the charge that the West is responsible for injuring and harming every civilisation and culture it has come into contact with. That Western Societies are intrinsically racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic, anti-Semitic and fascist. The almost universal use of this method of cultural degradation since the sixties, has induced a form of `collective pessimism` throughout Western nations. This manifests itself, particularly in the young, as a sense of alienation from the native culture, of hopelessness and despair, where a people come to view their own land as oppressive, evil and unworthy of loyalty.

Critical Theory does to nations what `attack politics` does to opposing candidates in elections, only on a much larger and more destructive scale. Pat Buchanan in his book, `Death Of The West,` calls it “The moral equivalent of vandalising graves and desecrating corpses.”

Can anyone reading this article argue that to date, the `agents of change` by the use of this cultural weapon, have been diabolically successful in their systematic application of Critical Theory towards achieving their nefarious ends?

Out With The Old, In With The New:

Not so long ago, our children were taught the names of the great heroes of Western History. In the UK, amongst many others, it was Nelson, Wellington and Churchill, whilst children in the US learned about the exploits of Columbus, Washington, and Jefferson. National holidays and public buildings were named after them. But those days are gone forever, or so it seems. State schools were once proud national institutions where our children were taught how to be good citizens, patriots even.

In his book, `The Disuniting Of America,` Arthur Schlesinger writes:

“The first step in liquidating a people is to erase its memory. Destroy its books, its culture, its history. Then have someone write new books, manufacture a new culture, invent a new history. Before long, the nation will begin to forget what it is and what it was.”

Since the 1960's, Christianity has been removed from the classroom. The old books by the great writers are gone and new more `relevant` politically correct titles put in their place. The stories of our national heroes are no longer taught in schools, and are noticeably absent from schoolbooks, and have been largely forgotten, except by those of fifty years and upwards who still remember different times. Public buildings and holidays have been given new names, the achievements of our forebears slandered, and our people made to feel embarrassed for a supposedly evil and malevolent past.

The degradation and dethroning of past heroes appears to be pandemic throughout the great nations of the developed world. In the US, amongst a very long list of similar measures taken by the `thought police,` George Washington day has been replaced by `Presidents Day` and in Richmond Virginia, General Robert E. Lee's portrait was removed from a public display and then vandalised. In the UK, former Mayor of London `Red` Ken Livingstone spent much of his two terms in office, albeit unsuccessfully, plotting the destruction of statues honouring the `Great men` of Empire, such as Admiral Sir Charles Napier, Sir Henry Havelock and most notably, Maj. Gen. Charles Gordon, the man who played such a large part in ending the slave trade. In France, plans to celebrate the baptism of Clovis, the fifth century King of the Franks, were `scuppered` by Marxists who bitterly resented any commemoration of the year France became a Christian nation.

In the `Death of The West, Patrick Buchanan reviews how successful the agents of change have been in reshaping the way Americans view their country. In the 1950's around 89% of American men and 94% of American women believed their country to be the finest on earth. In a poll conducted in 2000, only 58% of American men and 51% of American women felt that way. I am well aware that my own countrymen and women are in the main deeply demoralised by what is left of Tony Blair's superficially manufactured `Cool Britannia,` and across Europe, it seems paradoxically, that it is only the Danes who espouse any sense of satisfaction and contentment with their nation, and as I have written at length previously, there is much more to that than meets the eye (see reference section).

The Change Agents:

In the UK, there has been a collective `swoon` over the election of Barrack Obama. Media superlatives have exhausted the full lexicon of clichés. Journalists, grown men amongst them, wept with joy over his acceptance speech. There’s been nothing like it seen in the `old country` since Britain’s former prime minister, Tony Blair was elected back in 1997.

Like Obama, Blair took Britain by storm when he won the first of his three general elections in 1997 and threw the Conservative party a `curve ball` it's still trying to catch. Like Obama, Blair was charismatic, eloquent, cool, and laid back. Like Obama, Blair was seen as a saviour figure, who would lay his hands upon a tired and broken nation and bring healing where there was discord. And like Obama, Blair also had an agenda of change, which unknown to all but the conspiratorial `inner sanctum,` was ready and prepared for him come election day by his Illuminati puppet masters.

Tony Blair was widely considered, by a politically inept and ignorant public, to be something of a conservative in comparison with other Labour Party Ministers. Indeed, it could be said that he came to power because he symbolically threw off the party's commitment to state-control socialism, thus establishing his credentials as a centrist. What few realized at the time was that in fact he was a radical of a different kind. Throughout his term in office, he would follow an agenda to remake Britain according to the `Illuminists` strategy, as outlined to him at the Bilderberg meeting which he had attended the year prior to his election.

A strategy to guide Britain towards full absorption into the European Superstate and change forever the very nature of the British national character. The public façade; the `drama` to be played out before the masses, was to create a more inclusive, kind and just society, ostensibly by eradicating prejudice, reshaping the country in his own image, whilst in reality, he worked tirelessly and treacherously towards the ushering in of a New World Order.

Accordingly, `his` government either directly promoted or did nothing to stop the long march through Britain’s institutions, the systematic undermining of the country’s fundamental values and traditions, in line with the `Cultural Marxism` strategy of the Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci. It tore up Britain’s (unwritten) constitution, devolved power to Scotland and Wales, and changed the composition of the the House of Lords, thereby destroying the delicate equilibrium of the balance of power.

It also set about changing the identity of the country. Promoting the doctrine of multiculturalism, it opened Britain’s doors to mass immigration. In the state-controlled schools, teachers no longer saw their role as the transmission of Britain’s historic culture, which was deemed `racist`; accordingly, children were no longer taught the history of their country, but instead a concept of ‘citizenship’ which was all about changing the values of the country. It undermined marriage, promoting instead `lifestyle choice` by giving incentives to single mothers and morally legitimizing single parenthood.

Barrack Obama has spoken about remedying what he sees as those failings in the U.S. Constitution which promote only `negative liberties,` or put another way, freedom from something, rather than having positive rights to something. Through it's adoption of human-rights legislation, Britain has exchanged its historic concept of `negative” liberty,` that everything is permitted unless it is actively prohibited, for the ‘positive’ European idea that only what is codified is to be permitted. As a result, freedom has shrunk to what ideology permits.

Equality legislation has created a `victim culture` under which the interests of all groups deemed to be powerless (minorities, women, homosexuals etc.) take precedence over those deemed to be powerful (white Christian men). Since this doctrine holds that the `powerless` can do no wrong while the `powerful` can do no right, injustice is thus institutionalized, and anyone who queries the preferential treatment afforded such groups finds his or herself vilified as being a racist or a bigot, or both.

All this constitutes a fundamentally illiberal culture in which dissent is disallowed, and where divide and rule and intellectual intimidation become the order of the day. In the US, not surprisingly, this also happens to be the culture of ACORN, one of the radical groups funded by the Annenberg Challenge and Woods Fund, and the ‘educational’ or criminal justice ideas of William Ayers, naturally endorsed by President Barrack Obama.

In the same way that British `Liberals and Fabians promote the `powerless` as being incapable of doing wrong at home, they do likewise with regards to the third world. These self appointed agents of change recognize Obama as one of their own. That is because Britain's Fabian intelligentsia and political class has `signed up` to `transnational progressivism` which holds that the nation state is the source of all the ills in the world because it is inherently fascist and racist (for an in depth study of the source of this nonsense, read `The Authoritarian Personality` by Theodore Adorno). Obama believes America has its own sins to expiate, and Britain's treacherous internationalist political class likes the sound of that. It wants and needs America to be humbled. The message they want to promulgate is that nations cause wars, and that the sooner we get a World Government, the better!

By contrast transnational institutions such as the sacred UN or EU, are held to promote civilised `engagement` with an enemy, to discuss grievances and then reach compromises (Hegelian-ism). Of course transnational progressivism, multiculturalism, victim culture, pacifism and all the rest of it amount to little more than cultural and national suicide. The reason Britain has embraced these dogmas is because, since the end of WWII, and the ostensible loss of Empire, it has lost belief in itself as a nation and so has been systematically de-constructing its values and breaking down its own defences.

In recent years, because of what they see as the terminal decline in their nation, hundreds of thousands of Britons have moved to live overseas, whilst millions at home are in a state of desperation, and appalled by the implosion of British culture, identity, and values. But they find themselves politically impotent, in part because the Conservative party will not accept or acknowledge that British values are under attack. It should be said that true Conservative Republicans, as opposed to the `Neo Cons` in America should take careful note of this in order to recognize a similar danger and dilemma facing them following their defeat.

In Britain, Conservatives believe that in order to regain power, they have to show the people that they have broken with cultural conservatism and move with the `flow` instead, adapting their policies to the changes in society with regard to such issues as gay rights, green politics, anti-racism, whatever. What they have failed to understand is that such change has turned values such as right and wrong, good and bad on their heads and has produced a sentimentalist, cruel, oppressive and perverse society, one where burglars go unpunished, but householders are prosecuted for putting the wrong kind of garbage in the trash can, and where people are too frightened to protest at the erosion of British, Christian, or Western values because of the inevitable and virulent verbal or written slander that will follow.

True Conservatives whether in America, Britain or elsewhere in the West seem to have abandoned their own cause, `given up the ghost` and capitulated. They just don’t seem to realise that by embracing `change,` they are furthering the severing of national roots, and endorsing a form of enslavement. They don’t appreciate or grasp that as Conservatives, their primary duty is to conserve national culture, values and traditions and protect them against attack. The result has been that millions feel betrayed and abandoned by the absence of conservatism, and many now see the Conservative parties as nothing more, than a bunch of unprincipled opportunists. The challenge for conservatives on both sides of the pond and elsewhere, is to find a way of conserving the essential values of Western Civilization and then defend them against the onslaught being mounted against them both from within and from without. Unless they take up the gauntlet which has been thrown down and soon, there will be nothing left to conserve.

"Those who expect to be ignorant and free expect what never was and never will be." Thomas Jefferson

Ref:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVHV49xFdhM Must See Video 3 Mins.
`The Death Of The West` by Patrick J. Buchanan.
`Do We Need Mass Immigration` by Anthony Browne
`Britain' Social Suicide` by Melanie Phillips
http://catholicinsight.com/online/features/article_882.shtml Frankfurt School
http://www.nylonmanden.dk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=159&Itemid=43
http://www.nylonmanden.dk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=136&Itemid=43

To Kill A Tree: Part Two.

By Philip Jones 28th May 2009.

"On the first Feminian Sandstones, we were promised the fuller life, which started by loving our neighbour, and ended by loving his wife. Till our women had no more children, and the men lost reason and faith, and the gods of the copybook heading read, “The Wages Of Sin Is Death.” Rudyard Kipling.

This article is about how the Illuminati, through a multitude of means and `methods` are engaged in a war against the rest of mankind. It is a war unlike any other in human history insomuch as it is being conducted without one of the sides in the conflict knowing about it. One of the major objectives in this war is the culling of the population, some say by as much as 80%. In this series of articles, I will attempt to show how it is being done, and why.

Contrary to what the Globalist Elite of the `Good Club` (see Part One) will have you believe, we are not threatened by overpopulation. We are now suffering from underpopulation. The US birthrate has been cut from 4 down to 2 children per woman, the European and Canadian is 1.5. (We need 2.2 just for replacement.) Russia will see its population plummet from 145 million to 115 million by 2015, and all the other Western nations face the same threat to their posterity. The West is looking down the barrel of a demographic catastrophe which has no precedent in human history, inasmuch as its population is seemingly opting for its own extinction, by its pursuit of a humanistic, hedonistic and sex-obsessed materialistic lifestyle, based on the insidious machinations of Masonic Luciferianism.

"Any society is free to choose either to display great energy or to enjoy sexual freedom. The evidence is that it can't do both for more than one generation." Anthropologist J.D. Unwin.

In this, the second part of `To Kill A Tree,` we will look at how the `Power` has used the women's movement to further its agenda, and how, in doing so, it has debased the feminine, alienated women from men, been instrumental in the collapse of the family, and been a major cause in the plummeting birth rate here in the West. We will look at the effects of contraception and abortion, and then, in the next in the series, examine how, on a global scale, women have been the victims of an all-out assault on their persons, via the use of propaganda, pharmaceuticals and other science-based methods which have brought them, mostly unwittingly, into the very eye of the Depopulation Agenda storm.

Feminism:

Feminism and feminists have played a front-line role in the Illuminati's war against humankind. I think I must have been around twenty-three years of age and fresh out of the military when I began to realize that Feminism had very little to do with women's rights. Instead, it appeared to me, even back then, to have more to do with population control. One of the most obvious results of societies adopting feminist ideals is a decline in the birthrate.

In 1990 author Katerina Runske wrote a book entitled `Empty Hearts and Empty Homes,` in which she addressed the inevitable result of the feminist's anti-male anti-marriage rhetoric, along with a damning indictment on abortion:

"Feminism is a Darwinian blind alley. In biological terms, there is nothing that identifies a maladaptive pattern so quickly as a below replacement level of reproduction. An immediate consequence of feminism is what appears to be an irreversible decline in the birthrate. Nations pursue feminist policies at their peril."

With the advent of the welfare state and the promise of a `cradle to grave` social security net, children were no longer regarded as a necessary insurance against want and need in old age. If women earned enough to to gain financial independence, then marriage was no longer essential. And, with contraception made freely available, along with the ever-present backup of abortion waiting in the wings, the modern feminist could behave as immorally as she wished, have as much sex as she wanted, and avoid all those unnecessary complications of being a wife and mother. By `liberating` women and consequently men of the burden of family, the `Illuminists` have in essence made the family redundant. Families as we knew them have begun to disappear and when they go, our civilisation goes with them.

In his article `The Devil's Work,` Henry Makow writes: " Feminism fits the elite's depopulation agenda. Since 1963, when "The Feminine Mystique" was published we have experienced an unprecedented breakdown in the family. More than half of all children are now born out of wedlock; the number of single parent households has tripled. Reproduction requires the most delicate care. In the case of human beings, the female must be prepared for motherhood and honoured for her contribution to society. The male must be shown that the standard of manhood is to provide leadership and sustenance for mother and children. Both mother and father must be able to give their children intellectual and spiritual guidance. Instead, in schools and universities, the tender shoots of feminine sexuality are crushed under the feminist jackboot. Young women are taught that heterosexual sex, marriage and family are inherently oppressive. Homosexuality on the other hand is an act of rebellion that is "chic" and "normal." Friedan's comparison of mothers with the concentration camp inmates is pertinent. Betty Friedan, agent of the elite cabal, has put mothers in the concentration camp. Mothers!? The ultimate aim is genocide. The Elite want the world's population to be much smaller. Can there be any question that this is the devil's work?"

In the sixties, something fundamental occurred which altered the way women viewed their lives and degraded in them the desire to be wives and mothers. That something was `Second Wave Feminism` inspired by the likes of Communists Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem, along with the editor of `Cosmopolitan` magazine, Helen Gurley Brown and Britain's Germaine Greer, all coordinated by the CIA and provably bought and paid for by the Rockefeller Foundation (see Henry Makow's Book `The Cruel Hoax` and the links below). With a new generation hitting the university campuses, these Marxist demagogues in disguise had a fresh and naive crop of young women to mould and manipulate. All restraint seemed to collapse, and a `new` unbiblical gauge for measuring morality appeared in order to justify the explosion in promiscuity and immorality.

Women, having been told by the demagogues that they were `slaves` in their own homes, chose en masse to sell themselves to employers instead, who then used them as little more than `wage slaves` or mere commodities. Rather than fulfil their divinely appointed mission as wives and mothers, both loved and cherished by their husbands and children, women today have been guided into turning their backs on all that was once considered rich and rewarding in exchange for pandering themselves to the `gods` of the marketplace.

In `The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State,` Marx and Engels wrote: " The first condition for the liberation of the wife is to bring the whole female sex into public industry and this in turn demands the abolition of the monogamous family as the economic unit of society." It is no coincidence that global capitalism today views women as units of production, liberated from husbands, family and home in exactly the same terms as did the two fathers of Communism.

In his article `When men become women and women become men,` the Danish writer Kjeld Heising writes:
“The modern career woman is labour - flexible, change ready, committed and willing to learn. A resource to be utilised, compliant, fitting in easily wherever needed, ready to share a desk with both men and women. As such, she has become the `worker ant` for the global market.”

Contrary to what the `High Priestesses` of Feminism have been propagating for decades, their ideology has not liberated women. It has enslaved them completely. The role of the modern career woman appears to me more akin to that of a `serf,` a `bondwoman,` tied to the state through her taxes, and to her employer through her labour. Somewhere in between, if married, she juggles her remaining `freedoms` between her often neglected husband and her children, parents, and what friends and leisure pursuits she has time for. True freedom is about having control over one's life; the freedom to pursue personal fulfilment through love, joy, creativity and a sense of familial duty. Slaves are there to work! Mothers are free and nurturing souls.

Feminism has caused a huge fracture in society. Young women are kept busy with their education and careers, and they content themselves with the illusion, that there awaits for them, once they have proved that they can be all that they can be, a life of excitement, romance, husband and children. They can have it all, they are told. But it's a marketplace illusion. Many are in reality destroying any chance they may have of finding true happiness through love, marriage and family, by their casual and often promiscuous sexual behaviour and their disrespect for themselves and their bodies.

Young men today are also occupied with their education and career and unfortunately all too often treat women in the same way they do other consumer products: a commodity to be consumed and discarded. They too may also have some far-off non committal idea of someday having a family, but it doesn't run so deeply, and is low down on their list of priorities. Having a good time is the main thing. Most seem to accept their new-found socio-political impotence, and due to an uncertainty of what their role in the great scheme of things is, content themselves with a life of hedonistic irresponsibility. Those who are politically conscious, and there aren't that many, lay the full blame for their emasculation on women, and they hate them for it.. This does not a fruitful generation make.

Henry Makow, in his book `The Cruel Hoax,` explains that Feminism was created in order to destabilise society and create dysfunctional people. Feminism working indirectly on social norms creates isolation, rootlessness, breaks down communities, and denies our nature as men and women. It has been fatal where families and reproduction are concerned. Few if any young women today place a very high priority on being wives and mothers. For years before I had any knowledge of the `Depopulation Agenda,` I had been able to equate the decline in the birth rates here in the West with the so-called `women's movement.` Now I see it for what it truly is: A form of `Final Solution` to what the Illuminati term `the population problem.` But for the moment, let us continue to unravel the Feminist `ball of string.`

Feminists demanded the same `rights` as men. But nature designed men and women differently and a solution to the reproductive issue had to be found. Enter the contraceptive pill, or as Pat Buchanan terms it, `The Suicide Pill Of The West.` First licensed in 1960, 43% of married American women were using it by 1970.

On its website, the UN Population Fund states:

`Forty years after oral contraceptives were first introduced on May 9, 1960, more than 100 million women rely on them, making them the most popular contraceptive method in 78 of 150 surveyed countries, according to a new report from the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. Outside of China and India, the pill is the most popular contraceptive method, used by some 12% of married women, according to the latest issue of Population Report, the quarterly journal published by the Johns Hopkins Population Information Program. (In China and India family planning programs have emphasized long-term or permanent methods.) Outside Eastern Europe and Asia, an estimated 36% of sexually active unmarried women in developed countries use this method. (For country-by-country statistics on oral contraceptive use, see link http://www.overpopulation.org/birthcon.html).`

Abortion:

As the article on the examiner.com site ( http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-3515-Denver-Political-Issues-Examiner~y2009m5d16-) , that inspired this series maintains, there are now annually 46 million abortions carried out worldwide. For those Danish readers out there, that's the equivalent of 9.2 Denmark's being killed each year. This makes abortion by far the most common and oft performed surgical procedure in modern medicine.

It was in 1973 that the landmark case known in US legal history as Roe v Wade opened the floodgates that have lead us to this most deplorable situation, where innocent human life is regarded as disposable. I do not argue that there are circumstances where abortion may be the only humane recourse, such as in rape cases where the victim falls pregnant. But we have now reached the point where abortion is considered a `failsafe` or a backup to the `Pill` and, what's more, it is being encouraged and used as a major weapon in the global war against populations, causing the wholesale slaughter of the most vulnerable members of our species.

What has made Western women so hostile to the idea of being mothers? Thankfully, when I was born in 1958, in what was regarded back then as a state of illegitimacy, abortion was still regarded not only as a crime, but as a gross act of immorality, otherwise you might not be reading this article. Yet fifteen years later, the US Supreme Court ruling which declared abortion a constitutional right was extolled as a landmark in social progress.

Today, to be `pro life` is regarded by most where I live, at least, as being reactionary and, in the case of a man, sexist. Yet the need to procreate is mankind's most intrinsic and basic instinct, which the Illuminist-backed Feminists and their full entourage of fellow travellers are interfering with; and, as we supposedly `progress ' into this 21st century, we are treading upon very thin ice indeed. To deny our God-given nature, to turn our back on all that is moral and decent is a slippery slope towards oblivion.

A Woman's Right?

Recently I read an emotive story in a British newspaper which caused a very disturbed reaction within me, as it told of a fifteen-year-old girl who had an abortion. The poignant handwritten diary entry in its childish, rounded letters says it all: ‘I had my termination.` Then in brackets underneath: “[killed my baby].`

Through these few words, one can only guess at the turmoil in the mind of this young girl as she struggled to come to terms with what she had done. After noting the event in the impersonal jargon used by the professionals who handled her case, she revealed in simple terms how it actually felt to her. Not a ‘termination,’ but the killing of her baby. Tragic as this was, the really appalling thing was her isolation from her parents. In need of parental guidance and support more than at any time in her life, she had been effectively abandoned to make this decision and cope with its aftermath on her own.

For the doctors who dealt with her had not told her parents on the grounds of ‘patient confidentiality.’ The girl, frightened of what they might say, had said she didn’t want to tell her mother. So her GP, who took a mere 15 minutes to see her, simply referred her on to the hospital which carried out the abortion. The first her mother knew of what had happened was when she read the entry in her daughter’s diary. What have we come to when a girl barely out of childhood herself can have an abortion, a procedure with huge physical, emotional and moral ramifications, without the advice and care of her parents, because they have been deliberately kept in ignorance of what is happening?

On every count, this incident illustrates either a widespread breakdown of responsibility, care and common sense, or a deliberate severing of `roots` by disconnecting the girl from her parents. It also shows how far we have allowed the now commonplace practice of abortion to degrade our own sensibilities. An abortion is traumatic for any woman, let alone a child. It is an event of great significance and difficulty, requiring a balance to be struck between the needs of the mother and respect for the early life she is carrying. When that mother is herself effectively a child, it takes on a further dimension altogether.

Under UK law, a girl under 16 years of age can have an abortion without her parents’ consent, if her GP thinks she is mature enough to make the decision herself. That means understanding the moral, social and emotional implications of what she is about to do. But the teenager’s behaviour in this case illustrates what should be blindingly obvious to anyone with an ounce of compassion or common sense, that such young girls are too immature to make decisions of this kind. The girl has since commented that if her mother had been told, she might have kept the baby.

I cannot help but wonder if there is a conspiratorial aspect to this. Are doctors, when dealing with such matters, aware that there is a hidden conspiracy at the very top to encourage women to choose abortion, or under instruction to bear in mind that if a patient's parents are fully involved in the process, there is more likelihood of the unborn child being kept alive and any planned abortion cancelled?

The girl's parents in this particular case are understandably distraught. As the mother says, she was expected to be by her daughter’s side when she had her tonsils out. Yet when it came to an abortion, with its momentous physical and emotional consequences, she and the girl’s father were deliberately kept out of the loop. They would have supported their daughter if she had decided to have the baby. But instead, says her mother, she herself was made to feel ’so useless’ as a parent. And indeed, one of the worst aspects of this whole business is the undermining of parental responsibility. Although they remain legally responsible for their children’s welfare, parents are seeing their rights taken away and given to their children instead. This deliberately severs a child from her parents by telling her, in effect, that she is now grown-up enough to do without them.

Behind all of this lies the totalitarian Marxist mindset and the belief that children are now in truth the property of the State; and that officialdom knows better than parents how to deal with their children. Instead of parents providing guidance and support, that role is to be performed instead by agents of the State.

In so doing, they replace parental values by their own belief system, and move us ever closer to Huxley's vision of a Brave New World.

`To destroy a people, you must first sever their roots.` Alexander Solzhenitsyn.

Measuring Success:

How many ardent feminists, I wonder, will read the above and say, “It was all worth it and there are always casualties in war.” Make no mistake about it, feminism is not about `women's rights.` It is a war against God, nature, the family and men. Identicality, not equality, is the goal, and they are more than halfway there if present Western societies are the gauge by which success in this war is to be measured.

To be `pro choice` on abortion is today almost the defining mark of the modern woman. Many Feminists regard the phrase `women's liberation` as meaning liberation from all things traditional, including a woman's appearance, along with what they see as being the unrewarding and male-imposed roles of wife and mother. Margaret Sanger, the Feminist `birth mother` of Planned Parenthood and a virulent eugenicist, wrote before the second world war that “ the most merciful thing a large family can do to one of its infant members is kill it.” Sanger is an icon of Feminism, and was an open and vocal admirer of Hitler's eugenics program. It is a recorded fact that the eugenics movement was born in the US and in Great Britain, long before Hitler grabbed power in Germany, and, following the end of the war, simply went home again in the shape of the organisation; Planned Parenthood.

The Collapse Of Morality:

The above example of the chaos caused to a young life by the breakdown in the moral order should be reason enough for the reader to stop and look around his or her self and ask the question: “How did we come to this point?” They say you can judge a tree by its fruit. I think it fair to say that the fruits of our new `humanist` lifestyle are very poisonous.

What people consider right and wrong can be more properly determined by how they live their lives than by what they say they believe. That being the case, the old Christian moral order appears mortally wounded. I grew up in a working-class environment back in the sixties and seventies, when divorce was still to a great extent considered a scandal. Cohabitation was looked down upon, abortion thought abhorrent and homosexuality deplored. Today, half of all marriages end in divorce, `relationships` come and go and, to quote Pat Buchanan, “The love that dare not speak its name won't shut up.”

The collapse of marriage and marital fertility appears to be due to a long-term shift away from Christianity and the values it affirms, towards a militant and secular individualism focused on the self. With promiscuity running amok, divorce the norm, the proliferation of pornography and tax payer-funded abortion on a massive scale, (barely considered newsworthy), the world predicted by Pope Paul VI in 1968 in his `Humanae Vitae` is upon us. In his encyclical, the Pope envisioned four consequences of what he termed the `contraceptive mindset:`

1. Widespread infidelity and a lowering of morality.

2. Women would cease to be man's respected and beloved companion, and serve only as an instrument of his selfish enjoyment.

3. It would place a dangerous weapon in the hands of the state, which took no heed of moral exigencies.

4. The treatment of people as mere objects and unborn children akin to a disease to be prevented, resulting in the dehumanisation of the species.

I think it fair to say, as the sad example given above depicts very well, that the Pope's vision was close to prophetic. Our society seems to be progressively stripping out the human-ties of family and parents, trust and responsibility, authority and dependence, and replacing them with an impersonal bureaucracy that seeks to regulate, licence and ultimately control human relationships and what they produce. Throughout history, the surest defence against state control of our personal lives has been the family unit. Slice by slice, this is being dismembered and its roots are being severed.

Ref: `The Death Of The West` by Patrick J. Buchanan

`The Cruel Hoax` by Henry Makow.

http://www.theoccidentalquarterly.com/archives/vol6no2/DevlinTOQV6N2.pdf
http://www.heising.dk/content.asp?Id=107
http://www.savethemales.ca/180302.html
http://www.henrymakow.com/000185.html
http://www.henrymakow.com/200202.html
http://www.savethemales.ca/150801.html
http://www.henrymakow.com/130103.html
http://www.gillistriplett.com/rel101/articles/destruction.html
http://www.overpopulation.org/birthcon.html RU-486 - The Abortion Pill.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/030406massculling.htm

To Kill A Tree : Part One.

By Philip Jones 26th May 2009.

Introduction:

The saying goes thus : “To kill a tree, sever its roots`, or as the Russian philosopher Alexander Solzhenitsyn put it: “To destroy a people, you must first sever their roots,” and that is precisely what has been done to our societies here in the West. How does one sever a people's roots? First you destroy its memory of itself through rewritten history, then you depopulate it.

The Usual Suspects:

Two days ago on May 26th, the Times Online published a report entitled “Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation. America's richest people meet to discuss ways of tackling a 'disastrous' environmental, social and industrial threat”. The article went on to say that “Some of America’s leading billionaires have met secretly to consider how their wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world’s population and speed up improvements in health and education. The philanthropists who attended a summit convened on the initiative of Bill Gates, the Microsoft co-founder, discussed joining forces to overcome political and religious obstacles to change. Described as the Good Club by one insider it included David Rockefeller Jr, the patriarch of America’s wealthiest dynasty, Warren Buffett and George Soros, the financiers, Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York, and the media moguls Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey.” (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6350303.ece)

Many of you reading this will be familiar with the term `Depopulation Agenda.' I had already begun composing this article when the above story hit the headlines, which makes what I am about to write all the more relevant and necessary. There is a wealth of information out there on this subject, and here in this article I can only begin to `scratch the surface` of what is a deeply involved and complex aspect of the plan for a `New World Order.` In this and the essays which follow, I shall attempt to put the pieces of the puzzle together, join the dots if you will, and illustrate how many diverse and seemingly unconnected factors are in fact interlinked, and are being used by a nefarious cabal of Luciferians, of which the above named `Philanthropists` are most certainly members, in order to cull a large percentage of the global population.

A day or so back, I was skimming through the headlines on Rense when one in particular grabbed my attention. It read "Annually 46 Million Abortions Worldwide” (Annually-46-million-abortions-worldwide-Catholic-Church) . The sheer scale of this legalised and socially accepted mass murder of innocents is bewildering and difficult to consume. In all of nature, no other animal intentionally destroys its young in this way and in such overwhelming numbers.

Although now global in scale, this destructive trend has been accelerating here in in the West since the 1960's, and combined with a plethora of other methods all intended to reduce human reproduction, has resulted in a below-replacement level birthrate in all the so-called developed nations. In Europe, for instance, only Muslim Albania is reproducing itself. The question begs to be asked, why are Western women having fewer children than their mothers or often now none at all ? Women in the West have had access to contraception for many decades, and also to legal abortion for over thirty years, but unlike Chinese women, they have the choice. No law compels them to abort their unborn offspring. Yet these women are terminating their pregnancies at a rate which Patrick James Buchanan, in his book, `The Death Of The West,` rightly terms `Auto genocide.`

So why are children no longer valued as they once were? What brought about this paradigm shift in the hearts and minds of men and women, to turn their backs on their own posterity? As I have written above, in this and the following articles I will attempt to prove my assertions that there is a deliberate culling of the global population under-way, and that a Cabal of Luciferians known as the Illuminati is responsible for the deaths of millions upon millions of innocents, and for the wreckage that we term human civilisation.

In this first part, we will look at the cold reality of the demographic situation along with the intentional undermining of western culture.

The Demographics:

The `Old World` is dying. Its nations have seemingly `given up the ghost` and ceased reproducing. Now, in this first decade of the 21st Century, the traditional genetic make-up of the populations in Europe, America, Australia, Canada and New Zealand have stopped growing and are in steep decline. In Denmark, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Russia, there are now more burials than births.

In 1960, people of European Ancestry accounted for a quarter of the earth's population, numbering around 750 million of the 3 billion alive at the time. While the global population has since then more than doubled, Europeans and their overseas cousins have stopped reproducing sufficiently to ensure continuation of their line. The forecast is not pretty either. In `The Death Of The West,`we read that between now and mid-century, the world population will grow to over 9 billion people, but this 50% increase will come entirely from Asia, Africa and South America while, at the same time, 100 million people of European Stock will vanish unreplaced.. Put another way, as the West declines, the population in the developing world adds 100 million people every fifteen months. That's like forty more Mexico's by 2050, while in Europe alone, the equivalent of Denmark, Belgium, Holland, Sweden, Norway and Germany will have ceased to exist.

Western peoples today constitute only a sixth of the global populace, and, by 2050, this figure is expected to be closer to one tenth. As Mr. Buchanan writes, “These are the statistics of a vanishing
race.”

The Western nations and Europe in particular are facing a stark and unpleasant mathematical reality. If we accept that the likelihood of Western women developing a desire to have large families is zero, and we wish to maintain the current ratio of around 4.8 workers for every senior citizen, then the choice lies between ever higher taxation, or massive immigration from the developing world on a culturally destructive scale. Either option will change the way we and our children (if we have any) live in perpetuity.

The Secret War:

“And ye shall be left few in numbers, whereas ye were as the stars of heaven for multitude; because thou wouldst not obey the voice of the Lord thy God.” Deuteronomy XXVIII : 28 KJV.

For decades now, demographers have been warning of an impending demographic disaster in the `developed world,` but there haven't been too many ready to listen. Western governments, even though fully aware of the catastrophe approaching their nations, have either hidden the facts from their people, or downplayed the forecasts as being exaggerated or even erroneous. But we have now reached that point in time where the mathematics speak for themselves.

In 2007, the United Nations casually proclaimed the seemingly inevitable `Death of the West` which it expected to occur by mid century: "The world population is expected to grow by 3 billion more by 2050, the UN Population Division reports. Africa and Asia will be the home of almost all the world's people, with Europe dwindling to a tiny minority. In 2050, 90% of the world's population will live in the Third World ... the population of Africa is expected to triple in the next 50 years."

Many here in the West reading this will perhaps breathe a sigh of relief and look forward to a time without overcrowded cities and traffic jams. They will reason that since they do not live in the Third World but in Europe, North America, Australia etc. that the issue does not concern them. But it does, and the former UN Population Division director Joseph Chamie outlined why in graphic detail when the 2001 report was first published:

"The policies of Europe will have to change, since it will have to pay for the costs of this population growth and cannot be allowed [emphasis added]not to share its wealth with the growing number of poor in the world. Chamie noted that there will be declining countries which become dependent on migrants to sustain their economy. ... In 1950, Europe was 22% of the world population, Africa 8%. In 2050, Africa will be three times as populous as Europe. Without accelerated migration, by 2003, total European population will start its final, catastrophic contraction. By 2050, the population of Ukraine is expected to fall by 40%, Russia by 27%, and Italy by 25%."

The European Commission joined in with its own `doomsday` statement when it appealed for an end to the 'fortress Europe' policy and encouraged Europeans to embrace racial pluralism and admit a controlled flow of legal immigrants each year. The German Institute of Economic Research has warned Germans that the country will have to accept a major increase in immigration if it hopes to avoid a crippling long‐term labour shortage. It said that net immigration would soon have to be pegged at more than 600,000 annually.

Most of us have learned in schools and universities that World War II was fought in the cause of democracy, liberalism, and equality. But since the end of that most terrible of human events, another war has been raging, not against any great military adversary, but against humankind in general and the people of the West in particular.

Almost immediately after hostilities ceased, a massive program of "re‐education" was imposed on the victors and the victims alike. The public and social institutions of the Western world, now firmly controlled by the architects of "equality," began a campaign of social engineering that laid waste to the cultural awareness of Europeans and their cousins abroad. In this new campaign, there was no neutral territory. Nothing escaped its merciless `scorched earth` policy. No aspect of our history, culture, or science was left untouched, or not twisted and turned inside out by the proponents of "democracy, liberalism, and equality."

Our self appointed inquisitors taught us that there was not a single achievement of our culture and people that was worthy of being left in `situ.` In this all‐out onslaught against Western consciousness, the so called "moral authorities" enlisted the support of our youth and turned them against us. In London, the premier Illuminati agency of human manipulation and control, the Tavistock Institute, in concert with the Intelligence Agencies and the Frankfurt School's Marxist `thinkers` instigated the student revolts of the 1960's, which dealt a series of fatal blows to Western culture. Bombarded with Cultural Marxist Neo-Communist ideas, pseudo‐psychology (based on the Kabbalah), Eastern New Age spirituality and adolescent idealism, a generation of Western youth rebelled against the "establishment" and joined ranks with the enemies of our people ‐‐ all supposedly in the cause of "democracy, liberalism, and equality." The impact of this `movement`, which rejected virtually all our Christian values, on the Western world cannot be overemphasized.

The sixties generation began what Antonio Gramsci, a pre-war Italian Marxist whose radical anti-western ideas had by then been externalised in society, termed the " Long March Through the Institutions”. It is the descendants of this generation who having seized all the major positions of social influence, have knowingly and willingly directed and controlled the Auto genocide being perpetrated against their own people.

“Destroy the family and you destroy society." Lenin.

One of the primary tenets of Marxism is the eradication of the nuclear family, and it is no coincidence that a major thrust of the `sixties cultural revolution` was directed against the family, the very soul of nations and communities. Subsequently, all aspects of that traditional and most natural core of the human condition have been attacked and vilified throughout all avenues of education and information. Can anyone remember the last time they saw a film which extolled marriage and family values? Make no mistake here, all the ridicule, derision and hatred directed towards matrimony and child‐rearing was and is a major part in the play called `The Depopulation Agenda`. It is irrefutable that our present sorry condition in which women reject motherhood, children often know only one parent, and only homosexuals it seems are attracted by marriage, was carefully prepared by the engineers who planned and plotted their long‐term strategy for the culling of our population. Destroy the nucleus of society, and society will fall apart.

Destroy The Culture:

They told us that after centuries of imperialism and colonialism by European powers, the non‐White peoples have accumulated so many grievances that we supposedly have a "moral obligation" for turning over vast proportions of our wealth to them by means of foreign aid. The reasoning is that our high standard of living only came into being due to the "manifold crimes" our ancestors allegedly perpetrated against the rest of mankind. The paradox to this is that without an ever increasing influx of immigrant labour into our countries, due to the calamitous drop in the birth rate here in the West, our bloated welfare systems will all but collapse in the near future. Unless we experience some form of miraculous turnaround and soon, the only way by which our taken for granted high standard of living can be sustained is by the contributions of immigrants from the Third World.

But there is counter side to this. As ever more people from vastly different cultures to our own arrive, set up home and form communities of their own, our own way of life becomes diluted. Many in the West have grave misgivings regarding what amounts to a human tidal wave crashing upon our shores. Yet our politicians seem totally impotent, or even negligent in finding a solution and persist in what they tell us to believe is the only recourse available to them: Mass Immigration. Any questioning, request for open debate or opposition to this "reasoning" is summarily dismissed and denounced as "racism and bigotry." Several European countries, plus Canada, have even penalized the public expression of disagreement to "diversity" ‐‐ just like Jean Raspail predicted in his 1973 novel The Camp of the Saints.

Survival Of The Fittest?

If we accept that the thesis of `Natural Selection` provides for the survival of those who struggle for it, not for those who take it for granted. That immigrants seize the opportunities provided to them is both reasonable and understandable. The evil lies not with those coming here to seek a better life, but with those eternal adversaries of humankind, the Luciferian Illuminists, who have planned, orchestrated and also seemingly conditioned the European race into mild acceptance of it's own its extinction. They, the schemers and movers behind the scenes, have declared war on us, as we in the West were seen as the biggest obstacle to their plans. In her 1979 pamphlet,`A World Coup Is Planned,` Dr. Kitty Little writes:

“By 1963, the UN Convention on Racial Discrimination had provided for the massive movements of population that would in turn provide for the interbreeding of culturally incompatible peoples, and for the positive discrimination against the native populations of European decent who were considered to be the greatest obstacle to their plans. A parallel UNESCO Convention against `discrimination` in education had provided the impetus for race, sex, parentage, local and national loyalties and all denominations of religion as well as ability, to be regarded as forms of `discrimination` and therefore to be abolished. Children were deemed to have a `human right` to be protected from religious indoctrination. All this, in addition to the encouragement of oral contraceptives (that lead to physical, mental and moral degeneration), vasectomy, drug abuse, and the current fashion for genetic engineering with artificial insemination and `test tube` babies, was designed for the debasing of the white race.”

It is the Illuminists, in utter thrall as they are to their `Dark Lord,` who have plotted the demise of Western man. After two fratricidal wars that pitched European nation against European nation, both instruments in their own way of driving humanity towards world government, they then turned on the civil populations of the west by manipulating the decline in birthrates. They achieved their goals within the space of barely half a century, using a multitude of means (to be dealt with more fully later), thereby creating the situation where it is now necessary for the nations of the West to import huge numbers of immigrants in order to maintain the greatest means of ensuring human dependency ever invented; the Welfare State!

Payback Time?

The great majority of immigrants who arrive at the borders of the West do so looking for a better life for themselves and their families. But there are among them a small minority of politically motivated stooges, mesmerised by carefully crafted stories at home of past colonial oppression, all carefully calculated to instill as much resentment as possible, creating a form of "reverse colonialism." They do not come looking for "democratic freedoms" ‐‐ they come for plunder and pillage (in a manner of speaking). The First World is attractive to the Third World for one reason only: our out of control materialism and consumerism. Our middle‐class standard of living appears, to such people, a luxurious lifestyle they can only dream of, and they reason: why shouldn't they get a `piece of the pie` too?

About 90% of all illegal immigrants who pour into Western nations do so to escape poverty. However, in effect they are bringing their own poverty with them. Harvard economist George Borjas writes that "the present wave of immigrants is less educated and at an income level lower than was the case of previous immigrants." ... The net effect, he says, is that we are currently "importing poverty.” With the economic and social conditions in the Third World deteriorating ever more, and the United Nations calling on the Western countries to open their borders, immigration into the First World will become an avalanche in the future and will wreak havoc on our economic and social conditions.

The 2000 Census in the USA showed Hispanic and Asian populations were the fastest growing groups in the country, and for the first time, nearly half of the nation's 100 largest cities are home to more Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and other minorities than Whites. Have a look at these inner city areas where "diversity" runs rampant, and then dare to question the destructive and dis-integrative consequences we are facing. And much of this is courtesy of the "liberals" who have themselves moved to wealthy neighbourhoods long ago!

Our unique civilisation is at stake, yet the Illuminati-controlled media and our `elected` governments either ignore this peril or behave as if there is no problem. Of course, those at the top of the pile know exactly what the plan is, and, to them it must seem as if every thing's going exactly according to plan. Back down on planet earth, nobody has the courage it seems to confront women in the West with this one issue alone: Unless they start conceiving children and lots of them, our civilisation will vanish. European civilization is the engine of progress in the world. With our civilization gone, the Malthusian principle will most assuredly catch up with the rest of mankind. "Diversity" means the death of the West, but this death will not be limited to us. At least this much can be predicted.

The show will be over once we become a minority in our own lands, which mathematically seems guaranteed absent divine intervention. It will then be only a matter of time until the forces of disintegration have finished their destructive work and erased all traces of Western civilization. That not only can, but will, happen to our nations once Western peoples, by virtue of the democratic process, lose their political power to the newcomers.

The death of the West is imminent. It is a bitter irony that those men who went to war against the Axis powers during WWII earnestly believed it would be they who prevented the death of the West. Instead, they were being used as mere pawns to bring about the beginning of the end of Western culture and civilization, and then, to add salt to the wound, their children were enlisted in the counter culture of the sixties which continued the death blows.

There can be no doubt about the grave danger our civilisation and nations have been manoeuvred into. It is a danger that has been spelled out by every institution dealing with population growth. If current trends persist, after 2050, the native population in the West will gradually shrink and become a minority.. This is a danger that can only be faced collectively.

In order to avert this calamity, our welfare states must be dismantled, and the traditional family restored to its rightful and premier place as the bedrock of society. The ideology of feminism has to be recognised as the `siege gun` and a primary agent agenda for our race's auto genocide, and then universally refuted and denounced. The only social construct that protects and nurtures human beings is the nuclear family unit and thereafter, that of the extended family, whereby children learn from not only their parents, but their grandparents, aunties and uncles also. The passing down of knowledge and tradition in this way kept people grounded and gave a sense of natural belonging and security. This is the divine God-given order of the world. The violators of this order are enemies of mankind who not only want the European race to perish, but want every indigenous population on earth to perish along with it.

To be Continued in Part Two.

Ref: http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-3515-Denver-Political-Issues-Examiner~y2009m5d16-
http://www.whale.to/b/genocide_q.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_fertility_rate
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/5245757/Europes-age-crisis-begins-to-bite.html
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_depopu.htm Essential Reading!!
The Death Of The West by Senator Patrick James Buchanan,
http://catholicinsight.com/online/features/article_882.shtml Frankfurt School
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Gramsci
http://www.gillistriplett.com/rel101/articles/destruction.html
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/nwotavistockbestkeptsecret.shtml
Be Wise As Serpents – Fritz Springmeier P 399 Re Freud. Today, psychiatrists, our primary recognized authorities on people, are taught principles that are derived from the teachings of theSatanic Sabbatai. Freud took his ideas from the Zohar and some of the ideas of the Sabbatai. It might surprise some people that Freud got his ideas from the Satanic Jewish sect of Frankist-Illuminati. The depraved behavior of the Frankist-Illuminati was the beginning of what has become the everyday perversions of the ungodly American Society. Psychiatrists using Freud's teachings have been granted unquestioned power over many people lives.