The Global Coup d'Etat.

By Philip Jones 8th April 2009.



The term "New World Order" refers to the advent of a Totalitarian World Government. The current push towards achieving this nirvana has at it's core, a powerful and secretive group known as the Illuminati, which has been conspiring to take control of the the world for millennia. They aim to do this by the introduction of an autonomous Global State, which would supersede and replace the sovereign nations of the world. Most if not all significant occurrences in politics and international business are manipulated, orchestrated and designed by this extremely influential cabal operating through many front organisations, such as the Bilderberg Group, The Club Of Rome, The Royal Institute For International Affairs and a plethora of others, all of which connect at the very top of the Illuminati's symbolic pyramid.

But the idea of such a `One World State` is not new, and the origins go back into the very shadows of antiquity, and to a presence that has been a constant thorn in the side of mankind since it's very beginning.

The One World State and the Temptation of Christ:

The Bible tells us that the concept of a `One World State` was put forward by Satan to Christ as one of the `Temptations in the Wilderness`. We are told that it was firmly rejected by Jesus. Whether one accepts the Scriptures or not, it cannot be argued that Christ's teachings, which involve personal freedom and free will, are totally incompatible with the concept of a `One World State` which would mandate and coerce diverse peoples and cultures into a centralised dictatorship. Satan's offer was conditional on Christ's worship of him. This temptation has been put to men throughout the ages, and it is not surprising to discover that many of the most influential men throughout history, and enthusiastic advocates of world government, have been Satanists. I speak of men such as Marx, Bakunin, Moses Hess, Stalin, to name but a few, together with a near full compliment of the more recent crop of Satan worshiping world `leaders` such as the Bush's, Clintons, Blairs and the current `Saviour` of the `Free World` along with them.`

The outlines of the centuries old conflict between good and evil were laid down in the Gospels in as much as `God is the god of truth`, while Satan is the `father of lies and there is no truth in him`. And still on yet another level “You must serve God or money. You cannot serve both.”

The present drive towards the setting up of a World State, that can increasingly be seen to be not atheist in construct, but Satanic and Anti God, has it's origins in Ancient Babylon, with the coalescing of the `Kabballah`, but which in it's modern form can be said to have begun gaining impetus in the 19th century, with the advent of Marxist Socialist theory, together with the growth of International Banking.

“Marxism you say is the bitterest opponent of Capitalism, which is sacred to us. For the simple reason that they are opposite poles, they deliver over to us the two poles of the earth and permit us to be it's axis. Within these two opposites, we find ourselves identified in the Internationale. And these doctrines of the two poles of society, meet in their unity of purpose, the renewal of the world from above by the control of wealth, and from below by revolution.” The Comte de Saint Aulair in `Geneve contre la Paix` Libraire Plan, Paris 1936.

Communism:

Among the requirements outlined in the `Communist Manifesto` for the establishment of a One World Dictatorship were:

1.The abolition of private property.

2.The abolition of the family.

3.The abolition of countries and nationalities.

4.The abolition of religious liberty and freedom of conscience, together with all religion and all morality.

In the context of the above, the word `Communist` is in many ways interchangeable with all those who aspire to a One World State, including Marxists, Zionists, Fabian Socialists, The United Nations, The Parliamentary Group for World Government, Trilateral Commission, CFR, Bilderberg Group, and even the World Council of Churches, plus a plethora of fellow travelers.

Marx formed the first `Internationale` with Mikhail Bakunin, the `God Father` of Anarchism who wrote:

“In this revolution, we will have to awaken the devil in people, to stir up the basest passions.”

Doesn't this describe the world we live in today? All around is social decay and chaos, intended and designed to create the desired response in the people, that `something must be done`. We see violence, pornography, gambling, alcohol and drug abuse, all the vices extolled and normalised, together with the perverse promotion of homosexuality as a `valid lifestyle choice` and extreme feminism, disguised as `women's rights` being used to socially and morally emasculate men, turning God's natural order on it's head, and weakening that element in society most likely to become an obstruction to the plan. More recently, the European Union tabled a motion to legalise Pedophilia. How far down this road do we need to be driven before people say enough? The Masonic Motto `Out of Chaos Order` aptly applies to our world today, and Satan appears to reign supreme.

When Satanists are initiated into the seventh degree, they swear that their overriding principal will be, “ Nothing is true and everything is permitted.”

Is this not indicative of the attitudes and conduct of our leaders and so called celebrities today? Whether they be Bankers, Politicians, Senior Police Officers, Professionals, Bureaucrats, Pop Stars or Film Actors, I believe that even the most cursory examination of all or any of the most prominent individuals active in the above spheres of influence will show that they are deeply connected to both Freemasonry and Satanism, and are working knowingly or otherwise, to bringing their `Master's` goal of a tyrannical world state into being, and sooner rather than later.

In `On Hegel,` Marx wrote: “ Words I teach all mixed up in a devilish muddle. Thus anyone may think just what he chooses to think.”

And that is exactly why so many have followed `the yellow brick road`, towards the Dictatorial One World State that the followers of Satan advocate. They have been duped, confused, mesmerised. They have not thought out what it means to lose one's freedom and national identity, or that the diabolical depopulation agenda is real and evidential and that the slaughter of millions is a very real possibility, to be achieved via a bewildering array of means not least of which might include a `stage managed` Third World War. The `FEMA` camps in the US and the massive number of similar installations throughout Europe http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=8134 attest to the deadly seriousness of the situation. The `Dark One` is playing for keeps this time.

The Genetic Requirements:

For the establishment of a World Dictatorship, there were three main requirements. The Communist and revolutionary teachings of Marx and associates must be integrated, disseminated and universally accepted. The destabilizing of nations morally and financially with the draining away of money and assets outside of the control of any nation would have to be achieved, along with the provision of a `Master Race` to provide the dictators and rulers.

In his book `Terrorism and The Illuminati,` Canadian Author David Livingstone describes such a `race` in the clearest of terms thus:

“The Illuminati represent the descendants of the Fallen Angels who inhabited the lost continent of Atlantis. These Fallen Angels interbred with humans, to whom they taught the Ancient Wisdom. Therefore, throughout the centuries, the Illuminati have been carefully intermarrying with each other, to preserve their “sacred” bloodline, handing on their esoteric knowledge from generation to generation. For this reason, they also refer to themselves as “the Family.”

There are thirteen core bloodlines at the top of this `Family` and it is these `people`, who allegedly trace their lineage back to Babylon, and beyond into the distant past, who intend to become `Again as Gods` once their `Dark Lord's` World State becomes at last a reality. From one of these lines of decent, believed by many to be the Merovingian Bloodline, will come it is said, the supposedly beneficent `World Leader`, sometimes referred to as the `Anti Christ.`

These people or rather `things` see us as cattle, for culling and they have been very busy doing so throughout history. But today with the weaponry, medicines, vaccines and poisons available to them, it is difficult to see how their `Agenda` can be halted. Particularly when one considers the levels of apathy prevalent amongst what they term `The Sheeple.`

The British writer, `Bertrand Russell` had this to say back in 1954:

“Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will continue until they become separate species. A revolt of the plebs against the masters would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.”

Mr Russell wasn't so far `off base` as a walk down any Danish High Street will confirm. However, knowing how deeply `connected` Bertrand Russell was, I am convinced he knew that the `rulers and ruled` have always been different species.

In `Treason at Westminster` Kitty Little writes:

“By 1963, the UN Convention on Racial Discrimination had provided for the massive movements of population that would in turn provide for the interbreeding of genetically incompatible races, and for the positive discrimination against the native populations of European decent who were considered to be the greatest obstacle to their plans. A parallel UNESCO Convention against `discrimination` in education had provided the impetus for race, sex, parentage, local and national loyalties and all forms of religion as well as ability, to be regarded as forms of `discrimination` and therefore to be abolished. Children were deemed to have a `human right` to be protected from religious indoctrination. All this, in addition to the encouragement of oral contraceptives (that lead to physical, mental and moral degeneration) vasectomy, drug abuse, and the current fashion for genetic engineering with artificial insemination and `test tube` babies, was designed for the debasing of the human race.”

Financial Requirements:

Taking financial control out of the hands of national governments was an absolute requirement if the Global Dictatorship was to become a reality. This was seen as a preliminary to the operation of a system of credit whereby only those in good standing with the `World Government` would receive the means of subsistence. Hence the fact that the EU, the prototype for World Government, has concentrated it's focus on undermining national industries, taking control of food supplies, and by dictating farming and fishing policies, ensuring that the member nations remain dependent on the centralized European State for essentials.

Another example of how the `One Worlders` coerce and manipulate countries economically is the way the World Bank discriminates in favour only of those nations who comply with it's genocidal depopulation goals, mandating the use of `family planning` via contraception, and implementing compulsory vaccination policies on whole swathes of people in the developing world, resulting in the mass sterilisation of native women as a primary goal, and chemically induced miscarriages as an important secondary `failsafe.`

The fanatical opposition to South Africa, before the takeover by the majority population can also be placed into context when one comprehends the `Agenda`. South Africa had and still has the largest gold reserves on this planet, and without taking control of that, the credit trap could not be sprung.
Development of the Plan.

Since the launch of World Communism, the Illuminati's plans have developed and matured. In 1928, the Communist Internationale presented a three stage plan for achieving World Government:

1) Socialise the economies of all nations.

2) Bring about the regional unions of various groupings of these nations.

3) Amalgamate all these groupings into a final World Union.

In 1942 Stalin, in cooperation with Western Marxists was intent on laying the foundations of the UN. He defined the necessary goals for the final World Coup d 'Etat as:

1) Confuse, disorganise and destroy the forces of private capitalism.

2) Bring all nations together into a single world system of economy.

3) Force the industrialised nations to pour prolonged financial aid into the developing countries.

4) Divide the world into regional groups as a transitional stage to total World Government.

As any informed observer must be able to see, the plan is far advanced and in it's final stages. Can anyone argue that goals one and three have not already been attained. Number four is partly fulfilled in the form of the European Union, and plans for a North American Union are beyond the planning stages. The European Single Currency or Euro is a `stepping stone` towards the World Currency, to be possibly called the `Phoenix`, symbolising Satan rising from the ashes of the old order to establish the new.

Working on the assumption that the point of no return would be reached with the establishment of European Union, the Illuminati in their obsession with all things Satanic, created a symbolic `Monetary Snake` that would penetrate into the heart of nations and undermine their power. They saw it primarily as an encirclement of Europe and in as much as, “When this ring closes, all the States Of Europe will be locked in it's coil as in a powerful vice”. This statement was made in the 19th Century and it was considered that by `enchanting` Europe, it would ultimately encompass the whole world.

The current manipulated global financial crisis is a ruse to achieve a universal system of money, and with it, World Government will be achieved by `hook or crook`, by financial or murderous means. Either way, the point of no return seems long past.

The United Nations and The European Union:

Together with UNESCO, the UN has insinuated itself globally into the very fabric of nation states, corrupting and undermining them at every turn. In the field of education for example, the intentions of the `One Worlders` who controlled UNESCO (and still do) were:

1) To deride, ridicule and destroy any feelings of patriotism or loyalty to their country amongst the youth.

2) Instill in the youth an outlook of internationalism that could easily be reconciled at a later date with the concept of a One World Dictatorship.

3) Indoctrinate the youth to embrace Marxist Socialism (under different labels such as Social Democracy for example) as being the correct social and political outlook.

4) Neutralize the youth against the religious influences in the home along with all concepts of rigid morality.

The establishment of a European Union has been critical for the Illuminati's plans to create a `World Government` and the formation of the UN was seen as a necessary preliminary, in the same way as the EU and NAU are seen as stepping stones to World Government. When the UK entered the EEC back in 1973, the British people were told deliberate lies about the intentions and significance of that move. The now familiar deceits were new back then, the primary `mother of all lies` being no loss of sovereignty. The Treaty of Rome empowered the Commission to formulate Directives which took precedence over national laws. There was no requirement to make these laws public, even though they had to be implemented.

Since then, with each treacherous treaty signed, the peoples of Europe have been lead by the nose ever closer into a Federal `Rat Trap` from which there is no way out. Jean Monnet, the so called `father` of the EU put it like this:

“Europe's nations should be guided towards the superstate without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose, but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation.'

Last years Irish referendum debacle exposed the EU for what it is; A Totalitarian State in the making, albeit of the `drip by drip variety`. It's refusal to accept the `democratic` will of the Irish people is little more than a precursor of what is to come.

The Treaty of Lisbon had been absolutely critical for the Illuminati/Communist plans for the World Dictatorship, and having come thus far, it was clear even before the Irish Referendum that the `Euro Marxists` would not allow something as insignificant as Democracy to get in their way. But the question begs to be asked; “How on earth have they managed to come this far without detection?

The research of Dr Kitty Little back in the 1960's and on through the 1980's describes how the activities of the members of a nameless subversive organisation at Oxford University back in 1940 set the agenda for how the goal of a Federal European State would be achieved.

In her pamphlet, `Treason at Westminster, she writes:

“ At a meeting in Oxford in 1940, the head of the political section of the subversive organisation described it's intentions, and MI5 received a report from Moscow the following year outlining the same plans. Members of the political section of the subversive organisation were to infiltrate the Political Parties. Those in the Conservative Party would lean to the left, those in Labour to the right. The reason being that the British it was said, distrust extremists. Those infiltrating the Conservatives were to be responsible for the `financial smokescreen` that would conceal the changeover from democracy to a Marxist Dictatorship. The description given fits entirely the manner in which the Heath Government took us into the EEC and explains the Tory party's support for the Treaty establishing European Union.”

Throughout, the method has been infiltration from the top. Although the people of a `member state` may continue to vote in national elections, the candidates are chosen by a very small select number of people, and since WWII, large numbers of the subversive organisation have entered the various national parliaments. I think it is now safe to say that this insinuation of subversives is mirrored globally and particularly throughout the west, and since the great weakness in the `party` system is the manner in which candidates are chosen, this provides fertile ground for subversive activity. A further weakness in the electoral system of the UK for example has been the `packing` of marginal `seats` where strong Anti Marxist candidates are standing, with immigrants who vote the way their own `bought and paid for` leaders tell them. Thereby circumventing true democracy, and undermining those prepared to make a stand against the subversives bent on achieving the Federal Superstate as the initial goal, and the `World State` as the final solution to the `democratic question.`

The Damage Done:

Over the past thirty or so years, the primary objectives of the EEC Commission has been to pave the way for the Treaty Establishing European Union, and thereafter the creation of the Federal Superstate. The laws emanating from Brussels have seriously damaged the industry and defenses of member states and have introduced many changes needed for the smooth transition to a dictatorship. The significance of handing over vast sums of taxpayers money to the EU, only to have them returned, should not be overlooked. The money returned is spent according to the wishes of the Commissioners , mostly on altering the infrastructure of the nation that it may more easily be split into smaller administrative units, thereafter to be more easily absorbed into the Federation.

In all of this, the complicity of national governments has been imperative, and the levels of treachery unprecedented in human history.

The Penultimate Step:

Later this year, the Irish will be coerced into another referendum, and this time, there will be nothing left to chance. One way or the other, the Communitarian's of the EU will fabricate their `yes` vote and with the Lisbon Treaty finally ratified, it will be full steam ahead towards the Supestate.

Within it's murky pages, the Lisbon Treaty holds no provision for the continuation of the Monarchy (not that in this writer's opinion that is any great loss, considering who and what they are) or National Governments. The Commissioners would become absolute rulers, with a Presidential `Puppet` fronting the tyranny. The Nation States of Europe will be divided into geographical regions divorced from all historical and traditional reality. The Map Of The Superstate to be, shows ten such regions in Britain including Scotland and Wales and Northern Ireland, and four in the Irish Republic. It rejects entirely the existence of England.

The European Union is the `prototype` for the other world `Super Regions` intended to become a reality in the near future as illustrated in the diagram below.

The Final Solution:

The current financial crisis is intended to terrify and terrorize the people of the world into accepting World Government. The calls for `New World Order` and for `global solutions for global problems` are increasingly being heard and transmitted across the airwaves by the media sycophants in thrall to the Globalists. Meanwhile, the political puppets are playing their part as dictated to them by their Illuminati masters, and although the `economic` route appears to be the chosen vehicle to attain World Power for now, does anyone doubt that if they feel it expedient, they will launch a global war on a scale hitherto thought unimaginable. We are not there yet, but the world situation deteriorates daily.

This intended `Coup d' Etat` with the installation of Satan's' World State the intended `Final Solution`, is by far the most far reaching and sweeping change seen in human affairs in millenia, yet we have not been told about it by our elected leaders. The reason for this deafening silence is quite simple. The `Family` controls virtually everything it needs to ensure that the secrecy of the `Great Work` remains hidden, right up until that time, when like all conspiracies, it must raise it's head above the `ramparts` for all to see. This is happening now, but the mass of humanity is still in total denial, and seems to prefer to stick it's collective head in the sand and hope all the bad things just go away. There are comparatively few involved in this criminal conspiracy and if all those who are unconsciously helping them stopped doing so, the plan would collapse.

As Kitty Little wrote: “Publicity is what they fear most and it will defeat them.”

Further Reading:
http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Russia_China_cooperate_on_new_currency_proposals_Kremlin_999.html
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/bloodlines/index.htm
Treason At Westminster by Dr Kitty Little
Terrorism and the Illuminati by David Livingstone.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World_State (vital reading) the parallels are frightening.

Anarchy Or Tyranny : Is This the Most Pertinent Question Of Our Age?

By Philip Jones. 16th January 2009.

"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom" John F. Kennedy.

Revelations and Awakenings:

2008 was the year I finally saw, in all it's ugliness, the `prison` I had inhabited for the fifty years of my life. My journey towards this discovery took some ten years or so and the shocking truth hit me like a hammer, that since the day I was born (1958) and for long before that, a conspiratorial group of super rich and powerful individuals, dedicated to the imposition of a Global Dictatorial State, had been working behind the scenes, manipulating the events which shaped our lives, creating chaos all around, causing reactions from the unsuspecting majority which in turn enabled them to advance their agenda by responding with their `ready made` solutions.

By making diabolical use of the Hegelian Dialectic, or what David Icke has termed `Problem Reaction Solution`, these conspirators have slowly but surely brought us all to the point of no return. The decision is ours now. Do we stand or do we fall?

For most of last year, as the information and knowledge which finally put most pieces of the puzzle in place, came to me like an avalanche, I strived to disseminate that knowledge by writing articles. Many articles, which, through Henry Makow and Rense.com, along with some local sites, were, judging by the international response I received, read by many across the globe and to a lesser degree, here at `home`. My writing brought me into contact with some exceptional and gifted individuals, nowhere more so than in Denmark, the small Northern European Country which has been my home for eleven out of the past thirteen years.

As our local and international correspondence grew, we began to `feed` off each other, sharing ideas and possible solutions. This `group` of individuals, coming from very diverse backgrounds and international in it's makeup, attempted to spread the `word` far and wide. Since then, we have been working quietly via the Internet, email and private meetings to alert our fellow citizens to the `clear and present` danger approaching us all.

Late last year, we conducted a `leafleting` campaign here in Denmark, in an effort to inform people about what those strange `cloud formations` in the sky really were. I believe that over ten thousand were delivered by volunteers. As I awaited the `fallout`, expecting at least some mention in the local press, it became after some weeks apparent, that there would be none. Either people had simply ignored the information on the excellently designed and printed `flyers`, (www.nylonmanden.dk) or the media had put a `lid` on it as usual.

As the old year ended and the `New` one approached, I began to ask questions of myself and take stock of what I had achieved during the past year where this particular `hobby` of mine was concerned. It dawned on me that for all the research, reading and writing. For all the correspondence and networking, I/We had achieved very little. The sheer scale and impact of this realisation was staggering. Another year done, nothing changed. The EU well on course for Federalisation, the Global Financial Crisis, `mopping` up countless small banks and companies. State `Mafioso` style taxation removing ever more the private wealth of citizens globally. Wars of aggression still raging, Chemtrails across every sky, Tetra Masts everywhere, ID cards introduced, and the surveillance industry booming everywhere as even our private phone calls and emails are monitored ever more closely.

In essence, the NWO `Gravy Train ` just kept a` rolling` and what did `we the people` do about it? Not very much. Most just sat in front of their TV screens and `sucked up` the official lies as they had been doing all their lives. In the movie the Matrix, the Morpheous Character says this;

"The Matrix is a system, Neo, and that system is our enemy. When you are inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters, the very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are part of that system and that makes them our enemies. You have to understand most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many are so...hopelessly dependent on the system that they will fight to protect it." Exactly!

So for all the hard work and information gathering, the `enemy` was still firmly and overwhelmingly in control of the `high ground` if not morally, then strategically. More and more the feeling that positive action was needed, and this view was shared by some if not all in our group. A section of our associates still believed that an `awakening` would happen spontaneously and that all that was needed was more spreading of information. My friend and associate Peter Clement, an active worker in the fight for freedom here in Northern Europe also believes that action is required. In response to the use of the term hero by some in our group, even though well intended, he writes;

” We are no heroes, we are just ordinary people. A hero is somebody who comes into a situation where he or she does something extraordinary, puts somebody elses life above his or hers own. You don't know if you are a hero, until the moment arrives. Be humble:-)".

How many of us involved in this area of research have experienced hostilty when attempting to pass on information we know to be true?

Next up, we have the `New Golden Boy` as President, and even if his strings are invisible, you can be sure whose pulling them (Mr Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzezinski), and absent a `false flag` event, this `man of change` will on behalf of his masters do everything in his power to force through the final stages of their `work of ages`.

So, going back to the turn of this New Year, I began trying to find Allies. People who although might not have exactly the same idealogical stance as myself, and those of my `comrades`, still wished and more importantly, worked for freedom and an abolition of Governmental control from heir lives.

Here in Denmark, perhaps more than anywhere else in what we term the `industrialised world`, life is micromanaged down to the finest detail. This is as my previous articles have outlined at great length, a model society for the coming EU Superstate, and although the prison doors may be transparent, they are there all the same and Danish citizens are more than happy to lock themselves in nice and tight. They call it `tryghed`, meaning to be secure. That they are and then some.

What Americans term `Big Government` has been developed to it's logical conclusion in Northern Europe. Big Government equals `Big` Control. This is achieved by absolute State/ Corporatist hegemony over all the avenues of information, so called education, and by the people themselves whose self regulation has to be seen to be believed. Conformist and Corporatist. That's Denmark, and it is leading it's citizens to a technological and idealogical oblivion as depicted in Huxley's novel, `Brave New World`..

I don't want to live in any such `Prison Society`, no matter how `cozy` it might appear on the surface.

"So go home then," I hear the cry from all those Danish People's Party supporters. The problem is, it's now a Euro Wide phenomenon and will soon be World Wide unless something is done to stop it.

So what can we do? Edmund Burke wrote this over a century ago on the subject of State Tyranny:

“All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”

Prophetic words and particularly pertinent to the age we now live in. Have people ever been more apathetic, more indifferent to their fate than they are today? Locked into a `mind prison` created by the illusion of affluence and instant gratification, humanity, at least here in the west appears to have abdicated all responsibility to the `Professionals`. The Politicians, Judges, Lawyers, Bankers, Doctors and Professors, and look where this irresponsibility has led us. On the brink of a `Fourth Reich` much more terrible than the previous attempt at World Dictatorship, as it has been done with the apparent consent of `we the people` in the guise of democratic elections. We have actually given our enemies permission to go ahead and enslave us.

Collectivism or Cooperativism : Is there a difference?

In his book, `The Robot's Rebellion` (1994) David Icke speaks of the need for people to form `Cooperatives` (not to be confused with Corporations). The Anarchists advocate the setting up of `Collectives` So is there any fundamental difference in the two. The Merriam Webster Dictionary defines these two terms thus:

A Collective: A political or economic theory advocating the collective control especially over production and distribution

A Cooperative: An enterprise or organization owned by and operated for the benefit of those using its services collectively.

In `The Robot's Rebellion`, David Icke describes his own vision of the future in some detail.

”It is difficult to predict with any accuracy what will happen next, because no-one knows in detail what the future will bring or how humanity will use its free will to react. But if we are to end the power of an economic elite we need to move from the big to the small; from central control to community and individual control; from humans serving technology to technology serving humans. People who realise what is going on around them, although still small in number are beginning to see that dramatic change is necessary when the world economic order crumbles as many forecast it will soon enough. There is going to be a great deal of reacting to events and we will have to move very quickly. We will see that we all depend on each other, and community spirit is going to return in a very big way. The focus will be on communities coming together to supply their own needs, and not being dependent on a system over which they have no control. Self-reliance and self-sufficiency in all necessities will be the basic model of economics, because that decreases dependence and gives power back to people. In the `New Peoples’ economics we will need local cooperatives and community-owned companies for food distribution. It is simply daft for food to be grown in one area and sent long distances to other communities while those communities send their produce in the other direction. Food cooperatives will have the role of collecting the food from local farmers and growers and distributing this to the local shops and markets. To be truly responsive to local needs, these cooperatives should be controlled by representatives of ALL the community, not only the farmers and growers. We will require community organizations, again with all views and needs represented, to coordinate the production and distribution of the necessities of life to everyone in their community".

Does this sounds like a `Collective`?

He then goes on to propose the following measures of passive resistance:

1) A boycott of all banks which create money out of nothing and charge interest on it. I hope people will withdraw their money from these banks and even refuse to pay interest on their loans. The latter decision needs to be well coordinated so that millions do it at the same time.

2) Support for community banks and ethical banking which invest in projects designed to benefit people and the planet.

3) Withdraw all support and investment in the major banks and Support for community banks and ethical banking which invest in projects designed to benefit people and the planet.

4) A refusal to cooperate with and in schools, universities and government departments in every country, until we have the free flow of information about what is really going on in secret and all the knowledge available.

5) Constant sit-ins, peaceful occupation and mass protests at government headquarters in every country, particularly the key players like the United States, Russia, Britain, Australia, Japan, the European Community and the United Nations.

6) The peaceful disruption of all occasions of state in every country until we are told the truth and the closing down, by mass sit-ins, of roads and entrances to parliamentary buildings.

7) Mass peaceful resistance to projects that harm the environment. If they face such protests everywhere, the authorities will soon have to re-think and listen.

8) The boycotting of all court proceedings that may arise from such actions and mass sit-ins at the court buildings to disrupt them, also.

9) The bombardment of phone-in programmes and audience participation programmes with questions and information about the secret government and what people can do to stop its manipulation.

10) Protests and sit-ins at the headquarters of media organizations until they refuse to be Brotherhood poodles and start to report the truth to people. Boycotts of system-serving newspapers.

11) The same at the headquarters and branches of the Freemasons in each country and district and the immediate resignation by all members of the Freemasons and other secret organizations who no longer wish to be used as a front for the manipulation of the world.

12) A refusal to vote for or support any politician who refuses to disclose whether he or she is a member of a secret society or closely-connected to anyone who is. A refusal to support any politician who is a member of any Brotherhood front organization, such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission or, in London, connected to the Royal Institute of International Affairs.

Is this `Anarchism` ? Let's read on.

The Robot's Rebellion was first published back in 1994. It was in this writers opinion one of Icke's best. Since then, few have done more or worked harder to expose the Illuminati and their project than he. David Icke is a `soldier` for freedom. Albeit a non combative and passive one. The above ideas on how to break down the `Prison Cells` we inhabit are in the main common sense. Icke's books sell well enough. He has toured the globe speaking and giving presentations. Yet nothing has changed. Well very little at least. The above methods have not been adopted, and the `Agenda` moves ever closer to achieving it's ends.

Some months ago, I happened upon a website called `Anarchismo`. Like the title suggests, it's subject matter is `Anarchism`. Now like with most people, the very word brings forth images of men in `Top Hat and Tails`, throwing small grenades and the like sometime around the turn of the Twentieth Century. But having almost exhausted my interest in what I was already aware of, I decided to have a read. `Shock and Horror`, I was surprised to discover that there was much that appealed to me therein. At the top of the page I found this statement:

”Anarchists believe in a revolution by the working class which will overthrow the bosses and their governments, and create a society run and controlled by those who actually produce the wealth of the world. We believe that it is possible to live without government and to put in its place councils and assemblies where the "ordinary people" can decide what happens to this wealth. We believe in the equality of all and that maximum solidarity is needed between workers and other oppressed groups if we are to defeat those who live off our sweat.”

So, how different is the above statement in sentiment to that of Icke's some paragraphs previous. Not very I would suggest. So is David Icke an Anarchist? Well, on the face of it, I would venture to say that he is, of a sort at least. What's more, so am I then. There are some idealogical differences and the emphasis on the `collective` can create certain reservations, and yet a more comprehensive look at their written material clearly distances them, the Anarchists, from all the various forms of Marxism. In effect, they are striving for a society without Bosses. A society where ordinary people work together in consensus, without any form of authoritarianism at all. Handing back, or rather taking back responsibility for their own lives, to live as they themselves want to live.

This is very similar to what Icke proposes and what I have come to believe is the only chance humanity has to save itself from slavery. Overthrow the rulers. De-construct all the symbols and `fortresses` of government. Destroy centralisation, and dethrone what has become the very instrument of tyranny, `Legislation` and the legislators. The idea of the `Collective` is a good one and a fair one, and providing it is protected from the abuse of those who would restore `order`, then it might possibly be our last best chance for freedom.

Going back to our small group here in Denmark, there are those with grave doubts about our aligning ourselves with the `A'chists`, as images of `mad bombers` persist, even though all evidence is to the contrary. Having spent some weeks reading various essays on the subject, I will summarise my own impressions in the following Paragraphs.

The Quest For A Free Society and World:

”When we read or hear about Anarchists, we are led to believe that they are mad bombers. The myth is perpetuated that they believe in violence for the sake of it. The other myth is that Anarchism is chaos. This idea is propagated by politicians, bosses and their `puppets`in the media, stating that if there was no government there would be chaos. But did you ever wonder about society today and come to the conclusion that perhaps we are already living in chaos?” Anarchismo

We who are familiar with researching the machinations of the Illuminati and their `fellow travellers` are more than aware of what the aims of our `manipulators` are. But so it seems are the Anarchists, who spell it out clearly. They say it more bluntly and perhaps more simplistically than we do, but they have identified at least one major aspect of the Agenda; PROFIT!

And why not put it simply. If we want to get the message across to people generally this is what we need to do, and the Anarchists understand this. They realise that at the moment we live in a society in which there are two major classes - the bosses and the workers. The bosses own the factories, banks, shops, etc. The Workers don't. The only resource people have to bargain with is their labour, with which they make their living.

Workers are compelled to sell their Labour to the boss for a wage. The boss is interested in squeezing as much work out of the worker for as little remuneration as possible so that he/she can maintain high profits. Thus the more wages workers get the less profits the bosses make. Their interests are in total opposition to each other. Production is not based on the needs of ordinary people. Production is for profit. Therefore although there is enough food in the world to feed everyone, people starve because profits come first. This is called Capitalism.

The State:

For the needs of people and the workers to be fully met, the Anarchists maintain that we must get rid of the bosses. But this is no easy task. The bosses are organised. They have the media, the police, the army and the courts on their side. In effect, they have the full support of the State, and all the resources that go with it. We are of speaking about the merger of State and Corporate interests here, ie. Corporatism, or as Mussolini put it: ”FASCISM”.

The State (i.e. governments, armies, courts, police, etc.) is a direct result of the fact that we live in a class society. A world where the 225 richest people have a combined wealth equal to the combined annual income of the world's 2.5 billion poorest people.

The state is there to protect the interests of this minority, if not by persuasion then by force. Laws are made not to protect us but to protect those who own the property.

The Lie That Is Democracy:

People in the west (and especially so here in Scandinavia) have bought into the lie that the state is run in our interests. There are elections to ensure that any government not behaving itself can be brought to task? But of course, in truth, their democracy is about ticking boxes. We are given a choice all right, but between parties who all agree with the system of a tiny minority ruling the country. Check how many of the leading politicians from whichever political party in your country, are members of either the Bilderbergers, Trilateral Commission, Council For Foreign Relations or one of the plethora of similar organisations all dedicated to the Globalist Agenda.

Again, the Anarchists are in complete agreement. They can see how `Electioneering` inevitably leads to people forsaking their principles. These `political` men and women, perhaps initially of good intention, go along with whatever is popular and ensures they are elected. This becomes more important to them, than any idealogical motive. It also means that they look on the mass of voters as mere spectators. People are seen as voters, not as people who can be actually involved in politics and bringing real positive change about. But as I have written above, in the west, the populations, lured by the promise of instant credit have just handed over all political responsibility to those who would enslave them.

Real Freedom and political responsibility cannot come through Parliamentary means. The Anarchsmo Website explains ”If we look at a country like Chile we can see why. In 1973 the people elected a moderate socialist government led by President Allende. This democratically elected government was toppled by a CIA backed military coup. Repression followed in which the workers movement was smashed and thousands of militants lost their lives.”

Central to the Anarchist is the belief that it is the people who must make the revolution. In other words, take back responsibility for their own lives. Every member of the working class (workers, unemployed, housewives, etc.) has a role to play. Only by this participation can it be ensured that Anarchism is made real. They believe in a revolution that comes from the bottom up, and is based on factory and community councils. They maintain that Freedom cannot be given, it has to be taken. As each week passes, and nothing changes. As the New World Order becomes more of a reality, I have to agree with them. I cannot see how intellectual dissemination of the `truth` alone will prevent our `prison` becoming a reality within the next decade.

Not Marxists, Anarchists:

Anarchists disagree with what is called the "revolutionary left", who still hold to the belief that a Political Party is necessary to make the revolution for the people. Marxist Socialists base their ideas on Marx and Lenin who believed that workers were only capable of achieving what they called "trade union consciousness". Both believed that a party of professional revolutionaries was essential to make the revolution for the people. What happened in Russia was nothing to do with true socialism. Power remained in the hands of a tiny party elite. The state was the boss and the workers were still exploited and told what to do. Most familiar with the activities of `The Rothschild's` and Wall Street around the time of the October Revolution will be aware that the so called `Socialist Revolution` was financed by the very same people who were the supposed `arch enemies` of Communism, namely the Capitalists of Wall Street and The City Of London.

Making The New Society:

The Anarchists therefore maintain that it is up to ordinary people to create the `New Society`. The question begs to be asked; ”Would it not be chaotic?" Who knows? But what would you call our current world situation. The Freemasonic Motto `Out Of Chaos Order` is being well applied by the `puppet masters` at present, as our world descends into their manipulated economic chaos. This is clearly designed to provoke the people into demanding `something must be done`, and then they can implement their ready and waiting planned response. As things stand at the moment, Capitalism would collapse without the support of the working class, who produce everything, and therefore all the wealth. Like Icke, I agree as do the Anarchists that it is possible to organise production so that the needs of all are met. It is also possible to create structures that allow everyone to participate in making the decisions that affect them.

The Anarchists propose that Society would be based on factory and community councils. These would liaise or `federate` with each other so that decisions could be made covering large areas. Delegates could be sent from each area and workplace. They would be accountable and `recallable`. With the new technology now available, it would be much easier to involve people in the decision making process. Within such a society there would be genuine individual freedom. Individuals would have to contribute to society but would be free to the extent that they do not interfere with the freedom of others. Fundamentally Anarchists believe that people are good and if they won freedom would not easily give it up or destroy it.

Avoiding Previous Mistakes:

History is not neutral. What we learn in school is what is necessary for the perpetuation of government, rulers and capitalism. So called education is one of the major means by which we are controlled, indoctrinated and deceived. What they do not teach us though is that throughout history, it has been shown that organised government is not necessary. People are not inherently bad. Given the right conditions a spirit of mutual aid and co-operation can and will grow. The lessons of our past shows us that Anarchist ideas can work. A new society can be forged with ordinary people in control (the frontier pioneers in the US did very well without government). The Anglo Saxon Tythings were devoid of hierarchical `government` save the `Warlord` who was impotent without concensus, and operated by such concensus for almost two centuries.

But such a society won't happen spontaneously. It must be planned, built and created. - We must organise for it. Still, many in our small group here in Denmark cling to the belief that sometime soon, a great awakening will occur amongst the people. This awakening, will then as if by magic grow into a worldwide movement for peace and love and that a whole new ideal will be born out of it. David Icke most certainly has believed in and propagated this idea for almost twenty years. Icke is a visionary. A great man, and one of the finest writers in his field. But he not only has been proved to be wrong in this assertion, he is being proved wrong right now as as I write, the Illuminati `Golden Boy` is being sworn in as the 44th President of the United States. He will vow to uphold the constitution in front of Billions of people, knowing full well that he has no intention of doing so.

There will be no spontaneous awakening. That is why the Anarchists maintain and I have to agree with them, that we need revolutionary organisation. An organisation that draws together all those fighting for freedom and an end to tyranny. An organisation that gives us the chance to exchange ideas, experiences, and to learn from the lessons of history. An organisation that facilitates our struggle together for a new society. An organisation that sets aside petty differences and pseudo intellectual ideologies and as Henry Makow puts it: ”Focuses on what we have in common”.

We do not need more `leaders` and their passive followers. We do need an organisation working towards mobilising the masses of ordinary people in the process of making the `revolution`. I conclude this call for people to revolt, peacefully yet assertively, against the machinery erected and fortified ever more each day to enslave them, with a paragraph from the `RAK` (Anarchists Copenhagen) site which I feel explains very well how a fair and free society could and should be constructed:

”An anarchic society is in our opinion, overall, a socially organized community of free people without state capitalism, hierarchies and privileges. This community will be based on decentralized organization and consensus decisions. This organization is our declared goal. To achieve this goal we will use the funds and methods available which are consistent with our position. Activism is not in itself enough to create an anarchic society. It is important that we come together in our common WANT and NEED, rather than what we share ideologically. It is very important that members share this view and make no distinction between individuals based on their ethnicity, gender, etc. and or their personal lifestyle orientation,religion, diet, etc.." The RAK (Anarchists Copenhagen).

References:

David Icke : The Robot's Rebellion. Children Of The Matrix.
Nikki Rappanna : What is The Hegelian Dialectic ?
www.anarchismo.net
http://struggle.ws/anarchism/index.html
http://anarkister.wordpress.com/