Showing posts with label Police State. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Police State. Show all posts

Saturday, 12 September 2009

The End Of The Nation States Of Europe (The Irish Referendum On The Lisbon Treaty October 2nd 2009).

By Philip Jones 12th September 2009.




“Europe's nations should be guided towards the super-state without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose, but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation.” Jean Monnet (Founding Father Of The EU in a letter to a friend 30th April 1952).).

On June 12th 2008, the proud and independent minded Irish screamed a loud and clear NO to the treacherous Lisbon Treaty and to further integration into the EU Superstate being constructed around the hopes, dreams and lives of the peoples of Europe. Typically, arrogantly and not surprisingly, the Euro Fascists, whose credentials are appearing ever more Totalitarian in structure and ruthless in application, simply ignored the voice of the Irish voter, demanding there be a another vote, and this time, the rebellious Irish would have to get it right, or else.

On October 2nd this year, once again, the fate of nearly 500 million people will be decided by a country whose population totals only 4.2 million. The people of the Republic Of Ireland will now for a second time, have been the only `citizens` of the European Union given the opportunity to have their say on what is potentially the most fundamental piece of legislation in the history of the `Old Continent.` All the other member states have simply ignored the wishes of their people and left ratification to be `rubber stamped` by their respective parliaments. However, it is necessary, at least at the moment, for all twenty seven member states to complete ratification before the `Treaty` becomes legally binding.

So, if the Irish vote is `NO` for a second time, then legally, according to its own rules, Brussels will not be able to implement the Treaty. However, if the Irish people this time around swallow the massive `Pro Treaty` propaganda and vote `Yes,` then the fate of, and inevitable demise of the Nation States of Europe will be sealed. There will be no more serious obstacles left to Federalisation. The long dreamed of (by the Federalists that is) United States Of Europe will inevitably become a reality.

Many, if not the majority of people on both sides of the Atlantic have been `duped` for decades into believing that the EEC/EU is about a `free trade` zone. This is not at all the case, as the above quote by Monsieur Monet illustrates very clearly. So what are the ramifications of a `Yes` vote by the Irish.

The European Union was founded on lies and deceit at the very highest levels of government. This trail of deception has continued since, and on Thursday 13th December 2007 stopped momentarily in Lisbon Portugal, where the `dignitaries` of the member states of this `trading bloc` signed the `EU Reform Treaty`.

This `Treaty` replaces the EU Constitution rejected in 2005 by both France and the Netherlands. Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor and the former French President `Giscard D`Estaing are among many European ministers who have confirmed that the `Treaty` is but the Constitution by another name. The only differentials being the dropping from the new document those articles relating to the EU Flag, Anthem and Motto. Yet only two days prior to the `Historic event` in Lisbon, sixteen member states `broke cover` and called for an amendment to the `Treaty `and the reinstatement of these three articles, thereby transforming the `Treaty` into the original Constitution. They also want to impose the `single currency` on all those member states still retaining their `indigenous` currencies and are suggesting that a `Europe Day` become a holiday for celebration.

The leader of the United Kingdom Independence Party `Nigel Farage` said,
“The full treachery being imposed is at last fully out in the open. The pathetic attempts claiming this wasn't the Constitution are now blown out of the water. Back comes the flag, the anthem and the motto. It means that what was 96% of the original constitution is now 100%. Let's not hear any more of the `Reform Treaty`. This is the rejected EU Constitution brought back in all it's pomp.”

Whilst still in office, the former Danish Prime Minister and current Secretary General of NATO, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, decided against any referendum on the Treaty, leaving it's ratification to Danish MPs. Since then, nothing has changed here in the `Old Kingdom,` where it's business as usual as far as the Lisbon Treaty is concerned.

Last year, Mr Fogh Rasmussen stated that the “Treaty` was 'Good For Denmark.” Denmark had planned to hold a referendum on the Constitution back in 2005, but following the `NO` votes in France and Holland, said plans were dropped. The Danish Justice Ministry have concluded that the `Treaty` does not threaten Danish Sovereignty. Mr Fogh Rasmussen was quoted as saying, “ When sovereignty is relinquished, a referendum is needed, but when no sovereignty is relinquished, Parliament will ratify the text.”

He also confirmed plans to hold another referendum on the `Single Currency` (EURO) and whether to end the `opt outs` agreed at Maastricht relating to defence, justice and home affairs.

So, no threat to sovereignty ? Well let's consider the implications: If a Sovereign Nation State no longer controls it's own Economy, Defence, Justice System and Home Affairs, can it truly be called a `Sovereign Nation State` any longer ? The answer is quite simply NO.

The Political and Financial Elite of Europe have been working towards this moment since the end of World War Two. In every member state, the personalities might differ, but the rhetoric is always the same;
“No Loss Of Sovereignty, good for the people, good for the economy and so on.”

So let us take a look at what this `Treaty` is really about. What is the difference between this document and the original Constitution? German Lawyer, Klaus Heeger, a researcher and legal advisor to the Independent Democratic group in the EU Parliament has drawn the following conclusions regarding the two documents:

According to his analysis, the Constitution granted the EU 105 new `competences`. The `Treaty` also grants 105 new areas of competence. Out goes the EU symbols (Flag, Anthem, Motto) in comes Climate Change. The remaining 104 areas remain the same.

Decision making by qualified majority replaces `unanimity` in 62 new areas in the Reform Treaty. One more than in the Constitution. Out goes `Intellectual property rights,` in comes energy and climate change. The other 60 stay the same.

His conclusion; The EU Constitution by another name.

This sixth and final `Treaty` is the `death knell` for the sovereignty of the member states of the EU. Do not be mistaken about this, and no matter what your `elected` leaders are telling you to the contrary, this is it. This is the culmination of years of plotting, deception and conspiring against the people of Europe. So what's the big deal many will ask ? Read on and find out.

This `Treaty` is the EU's most secret and quickest drafted document yet. Opposition to and recognition that the EU is a Police State in the making is growing and they (the conspirators) know that speed is vital. Tony Blair agreed to it in June 2007 as his final `Stab in Britain's Back.` Foreign Ministers agreed it's terms in September 2007 and on 13th December two months later, the representatives of each member state signed the document, and now, all that remains is ratification, and the deed will be done.

So, if the result of the Irish vote is a `Yes` and all other member states do as indicated, ratify this treasonous piece of infamy, and the majority already have; how will our lives be affected ?

Our National Parliaments will become redundant as all power that still remains will transfer to Brussels. It will mean the formal end of those Historic Nations of Europe who are member states of the EU. National Embassies around the world will come under the auspices of EU bureaucrats. The ancient counties and provinces will be merged and combined into `EU Administrative Regions`. (The amalgamations of Kommunes in Denmark is a pre-emptive example of this, along with the `devolved` parliaments of Scotland and Wales, to be soon joined by the eradication of `England` and the setting up of similar regional assemblies there).

The EU will take ownership of Police, Military, Nuclear Weapons, Currency Reserves and North Sea Oil as outlined in the Treaty document. Serving members of our Police and Armed Forces will be required to take an oath of loyalty to the EU. Refusal will result in dismissal. The EU will have complete control of all military matters, equipment and facilities.

Political parties will be abolished, phased out or realigned. Only Pan European parties will be allowed. Independence parties will effectively be outlawed as under the 1999 ruling of the European Court Of Justice (case 274/99), it is illegal to criticize the EU. (Even before the Irish Vote, News from Brussels indicates that plans are afoot already to eliminate any `Euro-sceptic groups within the EU Parliament). The EU will have the legal right to close National Parliaments and Assemblies.

Many people will be made unemployed as the EU rule of `retraining` at a citizens own expense becomes universal (including the purchase of a Certificate confirming said retraining). Hundreds of thousands of small businesses will be forced to close due to the enforcement of endless numbers of impracticable and unworkable EU regulations.

Around 107,000 EU laws will criminalise many, as adherence to this amount of legislation is impossible. We will be subject to frequent fines and even arrest as a result of what will be our inevitable ignorance. Take the following as examples: From January 2006, it became illegal to repair your own domestic plumbing, electrics or even your own car. If you buy a boat over six feet long, built after 1999, you will be required to pay the equivalent in Euros of £4000, or face six months in prison. As the EU `Police State` flexes it's muscles ever more, each of us will live under the fear and threat of arrest or prosecution for any one of a myriad of offences, even minor ones.

The Large Corporations will do well of course, utilising massive immigration from within and without the EU, paying minimum wages to immigrants at the expense of the indigenous population, thus forcing salaries downwards. Furthermore, these Corporations will have a near Monopoly on employment (along with Government), and will be able to dictate conditions and terms of employment without fear of contradiction.

Top Government Jobs and the inevitable corruption which will accompany this monopoly, will create a new `Class Divide` ensuring the rich and their `fellow travellers` get richer, whilst the majority decline into poverty. Taxes will increase in order to pay for the massive growth in bureaucracy.

There will be no `redress of grievance` through local `democratic` channels because there won't be any local democracy. Or any democracy at all for that matter. The `EU Administrative Regional Governments` will be unelected (See the EU Regionalisation plan on the EU Website). Our only vote will be to the powerless EU Parliament. We will be ruled by the unelected EU Commissioners, who have no `accountability to the people` at any level.

If we demonstrate or protest, we can be seized and relocated to another EU Region. The EU Arrest Warrant and the various legislation introduced across the EU since 9/11 will give the Authorities absolute power over us. The shootings of innocents `Philip Prout` and `Jean de Menezes` were entirely legal under EU Law. The intimidation and growing `Anti Muslim` vitriol across the EU is becoming reminiscent of the treatment of Jews in pre-war Germany. A Federal European State will become a very unpleasant place to be.

Following Federation, in and around 15 years hence, Europe could collapse under the weight of it's own Bureaucracy and Corruption. There will be so little production, that no amount of taxation will be able to support the vast, inept, corrupt and wasteful government machinery. Many will be reduced to poverty on the brink of starvation. The complete lack of any `checks and balances` will leave the door open for any would be dictatorship.

The EU as monstrous as it is, is nothing more than a `stepping stone` to `World Government`. Before you dismiss this article as `Scare Mongering` or `Conspiracy Theory`, find out how many of your own country's leading politicians are members of such `Secret Organisations` as the Bilderbergers, Trilateral Commission, Club Of Rome, and the Royal Institute For International Affairs.

Each and every one of the above are totally dedicated to a `One World` Government and see a Federal Europe as a necessary evolution towards that goal. Their memberships read like a who's who of the planet's `power players`. Danish readers for example, might be very surprised to discover which of their country's Political and Financial Elites attend the Bilderberger meetings, which has been in the forefront of machinations to further European Federalisation. To find out which of your elected representatives are members of any of the above groups, just type in the organisation's name on any recognised search engine. Then sit back and prepare to be shocked.

We live in an age where people seem to have abdicated all responsibility for their own lives to Government. This has been going on since the end of World War Two, but has accelerated markedly since the 1980's. This `social irresponsibility` led us to Lisbon on 13th December 2007, where our so called leaders signed away our ancient rights and freedoms in the name of their `great plan`. If we sit back and do nothing, the rest of our lives will become a nightmare of our own making, because in the final analysis, it is we who will have handed over our rights and liberties into the hands of `wolves.`

The future well being of a whole continent lies in the hands of the Brave and Heroic Irish people. They need our support. They need to know they are not alone. It's time to start writing to your `elected` representatives, time to find the time to research what the EU `Beast` is really about. It's time to switch off the TV and pick up a book about the EU, or check out the many Internet sites relating to this Totalitarian `Super-State in the making.`

Do something, speak to your friends, neighbours, family; just do something before it is too late, and if the Irish vote yes, it is.


Comments to: http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/



Reference:

http://www.jimcorr.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=section&layout=blog&id=10&Itemid=77

http://www.bonde.com/index.php/bonde_uk/article/C221/

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2009/0909/breaking45.htm

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2009/0909/breaking45.htm

http://www.freenations.freeuk.com/

http://www.statewatch.org/

Friday, 24 July 2009

Taking Liberties.

By Philip Jones 14th April 2009.



“How to catch wild pigs. You start by putting out food for them in the same spot every day. In a few weeks you put up one side of a fence. After they get used to eating next to the fence you put up a second, then a third. Finally you put up the last side with a gate. Eventually, without even realizing it, the pigs have become fenced in and dependent on you for their food and protection.”

Building Fences.

All around us today, governments are building invisible fences. Constructing our `open` prisons and erecting those fences around us while we sleep walk into servitude. Of course there is nothing new in this, and from a modern standpoint, the beginnings of our incarceration can be said to have truly begun with the creation of that most deceptive of social `innovations` the Welfare State. The caption above outlines the methods used to create our mass dependency very adeptly, so I see no reason to embellish such a concise summary of our plight with unnecessary verbosity. Suffice to say, we are proverbially `up a creak without a paddle`.

So what is the answer? We cannot reasonably expect now, this late in the day, any sudden interest in individual rights by either government or the opposition parties, as without exception, all are `up to their necks` in it. Sponsored, controlled, and mere puppets of their Illuminati masters, they have been chiseling away at our personal freedoms for years, and therefore have, if they ever had any in the first place, lost all credibility.

Taking my own sad country as an example, the root of the problem is that we British are no longer masters in our own land. Only a complete withdrawal from the European Union could now restore at least some of those freedoms taken from us. We are told repeatedly that such a course of action would harm our trading relations with the Europeans, wreck our economy, and cause massive unemployment etc. But would it? Norway and Switzerland enjoy excellent trading relations with the EU and so would we. And there is still an English speaking world out there. A world with vast trade and commercial possibilities and with which we have far more in common, than we do with our artificially created relations with our European neighbours.

Secession.

Having established the Luciferian's goal of creating a One World State in my previous article `The Global Coup d'Etat` (see reference) and that the European Union is a major stepping stone towards that goal of world government, then it can be asserted that in order to avert such a disastrous outcome, exiting `Europe` is a prerequisite in order for the British people and those of the other member states to avoid complete and total enslavement in the very near future.

But such a move would entail boldness, courage, imagination, patriotism and integrity along with the will to undertake such a historic mission. Sadly, the collective leaders of the UK and the rest of Europe for that matter, are of the same ilk, Europhile, Federalist and in the final analysis, `One World Illuminist` traitors, in thrall to Lucifer and his promises of wealth and advantage. It is therefore unlikely that we can expect anytime soon national politicians, corrupted by the lure of financial inducements and the promise of jobs in Brussels, which pay lucrative salaries far and above that which they receive at home, to lobby for the exiting of their country from the twenty seven headed monster known as the European Union.

Deeply Marxist in ideology, the federalists use the `Frankfurt School's` Critical Theory strategy in order to vilify those who are opposed to continued membership, labeling them as `anti european`, xenophobic, and ironically, dangerous, fascist and nationalist, thereby quelling open debate. This is a common and well worn Communist Ruse to suffocate free speech. These ideas have been internalised by the Illuminists, and in it's attempts to silence all opposition, the EU is knowingly following a script which runs parallel to the party line laid down by the Moscow Central Committee in 1943:

“Members and front organisations must continually embarrass discredit and degrade our critics. When obstructionists become too irritating, label them as fascist, or Nazi or Anti Semite...The association will after enough repetition become fact in the public mind.”

Within a so called free society such as the UK, one might expect the Judges to have stood as the defenders of liberty, but sadly, that has not been the case. Many if not most of them have been carefully selected and are of the same mind as those other purveyors of treachery in the House Of Commons, who together with Brussels are making all those intrusive laws which are destroying `piecemeal` the ancient liberties the people of Britain have taken for granted for centuries. Liberties quite foreign to those in mainland Europe. By allowing judges to determine the moral and social framework of people's lives, instead of relying on the precedents of the English Common Law, together with their `lordship's` implementation of foreign legislation such as the `Human Rights Act`, utter confusion and a forlorn sense of demoralisation is engendered amongst the native population, who feel ever more helpless and friendless, in a world gone mad.

Up until recently, there was one body at least which seemed to have the wisdom, experience, independence and broad perspective to act as custodians of the people's liberties and here I speak of the House Of Lords. However, since that once esteemed house's abject desertion of the British people in 2004, when contrary to all the promises given to the thousands who wrote in begging they refuse to pass the severely draconian `Civil Contingencies` Bill, pass it they did. The writing was on the wall. The people were left defenseless as even that last bastion of British democracy fell to perverse forces.

Democracy or Theatre For The Masses.

What passes for democracy in the West should not be confused with true democracy where people have a meaningful say in their lives and those things that affect those lives, as in the Swiss Cantons for example. The so called democracy we see throughout the EU, the US, Canada and the other developed nations is nothing more than `Theater For The Masses`. Every four of five years, we the people are asked to choose between political parties of the liberal center, all with communitarian credentials, all at the leadership level dedicated to the Illuminist Agenda, committed to high taxation in order to bleed away the individual wealth of the private citizen, and to a large degree of state interference in people's private lives. Taking this into account, along with the fact that most `democratically elected` governments win office on less that fifty per cent of the votes cast, laws that interfere with personal liberty should be kept to a minimum.

Societies consist these days of vastly different types of people, and demanding conformity and uniformity of thought and action should be seen for what it is, abhorrent and fascist, but increasingly, laws are being passed which do just that, controlling and boxing people into a desired, designed and conformist way of life. The law is there for us, not we for it. Provided we don't harm others, it should leave us alone. But it doesn't and it won't.

Democracy is generally regarded as the safest form of government, but it is not sufficient in itself to protect the liberty of individuals. There must be a vast reduction in the power of government to micromanage our lives. It is clear that the tyranny of the mob can be as harmful as that of a despot. As President Thomas Jefferson once remarked, “Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what's for dinner”.

Any government, no matter what form it takes, must above all else give respect to the liberty of the private citizen, and recognise that that a person's private life is above and beyond it's auspices, except in the most extreme of circumstances.

Tolerance must be the guiding principal in a diverse and democratic society, and there must be no place for the social engineering instincts of the communitarian's and liberals who are so expert and well versed now in dictating to whole populations how they should think and behave. People must learn once again to take responsibility for their own lives and wrench it out of the hands of government. Any decent and just society must be a well informed and free thinking one. But with their `lockdown` control of all the organs of the state, and by the no longer subtle indoctrination of our children in the classroom, combined with incessant programming of all our minds by television, radio, newspapers, pop music and a multitude of other means, the Illuminists are able to twist people's minds to their own perverse agenda, closing down the ability to think critically and thereby making any semblance of what's left of democracy in a given society little more than a charade and meaningless.

“I know of no other country in which speaking generally, there is less independence of mind and true freedom of discussion than in America”. Alex de Tocqueville 19th Century writer.

The Home Of The Brave.

One wonders what de Tocqueville would make of the present situation in the `land of the free`. The almost addictive watching of `mindnumbing` television glorifying all manner of corruption, perversion and violence. The millions being unwittingly programmed and conditioned to think a certain way by fraudulently based psychiatric `mumbo jumbo` and `fleeced` of their hard earned dollars by psychiatrists and psychologists who in the whole history of their so called `science` have never been able to record a `cure`. When combined with all the impediments to free thought that are caused by Political Correctness, we are looking at a `dumbed down` and `cowed` society the like of which could never have been envisaged only fifty years ago. But it is erroneous in the extreme to point the finger at America, and single out that proud land and people as being alone in all of this. The situation is endemic throughout what we call the Western Nations and all of the above conditions are more or less universally present.

Out Of Chaos Order.

In our 21st century `democracies`, issues are simplified and made superficial, hence the ruse is propagated that there is a clear demarcation between the liberals on one side and the conservatives on the other, whilst both sides seek to use the law to impose the same narrow Illuminist agenda on the population. As the saying goes: “No matter whom you vote for, the Government always gets in.”

In this apparent struggle between two intolerant `opposames` , there is no consideration for the rights of the citizen, who finds himself/herself bullied by laws made only to further the Illuminist Agenda. And while to the bewildered populace, who are told by the `legislators and politicians that these laws are made to reform the law in order to ostensibly better their lot, it appears that they are in reality enacted for the sole purpose of ramming one or another dogma or prejudice down the collective throats. Both conclusions are however incorrect. When one becomes aware of the deceptive tactics employed by the Illuminists, it is all so clear. As the Freemasonic Motto goes, “ORDO AB CHAO” or “Out Of Chaos Order,”

What is happening is no evolutionary social phenomenon. It has been in the works for centuries, even millenia and is now approaching it's intended realisation.

What is so dangerous about the current model of democracy or as it should be termed `social democracy` is that people are indoctrinated into believing that they are a part of the process, when in truth, the only role they play in the drama is to cast their vote once every four or five years in a fake contest between political parties that are is essence almost identical. It is this charade which enables the State to pass the increasingly draconian laws that violate personal freedom. A politician, bureaucrat or judge who uses coercive authoritarian laws to subdue and oppress a citizen is no less a tyrant for being invested with a `democratic` mandate for doing so.

The place to begin the liberating of the people is within the mind of each individual. Men and women must be true to themselves and not the state. It is time for people to wake up and realise that there is no longer any correlation between legality and morality. We live in an age when it is perfectly legal to murder a baby in it's mother's womb, but a crime to smoke a cigarette in public. It will soon be legal (if it isn't already) for fourteen year olds to practice sodomy, but not to learn to drive. Our dictatorial regimes, for that is what they are, give out the message that murder is alright in circumstances which do not offend the liberal conscience, which explains why the likes of General Pinochet are hounded and arrested for acts allegedly committed in Chile, whilst Marxist Dictators like Mugabe go free and unmolested. The `law` is little more than total moral confusion, which is as it is intended to be. To this writer and surely to those able to see through the mists of propagated confusion, the only force behind the law which remains, is as `Austin` wrote “purely physical not moral”.

An example of this lack of a moral compass is the case of the anti abortion activist who some years ago shot dead an abortionist in Pensacola Florida. The State demanded the death penalty for the crime. In this sad and tragic case, there were three killings, two legal and one illegal. The abortion is deemed legal. The murder of the abortionist illegal, and then the state slaughters the activist which again is considered legal. But there is a bizarre aspect to this when one considers that the abortionist killed for a living and often, whilst the activist killed only once for a cause believed to be just. I do not condone the killing of anyone, but there is an element of moral imbalance here.

Getting Away With Murder.

Recently there have been several reported cases of women killing husbands and then receiving only short suspended sentences. For any wife who kills her husband, it would appear that the trick is to claim persistent violent abuse on the part of the deceased, who being dead cannot defend himself. The almost certain result will be that the court, completely in thrall to feminist dogma, will conclude that the long suffering wife had sufficient reason for her actions. Then with her husband conveniently gone, and with freedom hers to enjoy, she is able to marry her boyfriend, or considering the strange and perverse times we live in, her girlfriend. A half century ago, she would have hung for her crime, but today, the courts are intimidated and cowed by the knowledge that even a custodial sentence would unleash a venomous attack from feminist journalists and notables nationwide. Who says crime doesn't pay?

Within two years of July 1998, the British government released it's full compliment of IRA murderers. The then Prime Minister, `Phoney` Blair justified his actions on the shoddy grounds that it would ensure peace in that troubled province. Well, that `peace was shattered well and truly in Omagh in August of that same year. But, in the `New Order` of things, if the politics are right, anything is justifiable.

Morality versus Legality.

Our Secular Laws are now so far removed from moral considerations, that the time has come for people to again turn to the Holy Scriptures, and then take moral guidance from it's pages as to what is right and what is wrong. I have long believed that this breakdown in our moral order can be clearly attributed to the loss in faith and belief in Christianity throughout what was once called Christendom, and that only a rebirth and flowering of this belief in the great wisdom provided by the Bible will prevent an apocalyptic collapse of our civilisation. Love of liberty must prevail over an indoctrinated and misguided respect for authority. As Lord Devlin, a former British `law lord` stated, “There is no longer a moral obligation to obey the law in all circumstances”.

The Designed Imbalance.

Throughout the West, we see a complete lack of equilibrium in the relationship between crime and punishment. Petty and ridiculous misdemeanors carry heavier penalties than serious felonies in many cases and this has resulted in a breakdown in respect for the law. With the awesome powers which have been handed to the Police this past decade, they are now more feared than respected. As a former Police Officer, who retired thirteen years ago, I speak from experience.

Edmund Burke said, “Good Order is the foundation of all good things”, and he was right. But over the past quarter century, it has become apparent that disorderly, immoral and violent behaviour has been fostered and nurtured by successive governments for a reason. When they had the opportunity to do something positive to combat the rise in crime and decline in morality, governments sat back and did nothing but talk about what they were going to do.

Remember the Freemasonic Motto, “Out Of Chaos Order”. This is the Hegelian Dialectic in full flow. Sponsor a situation that will demand a response, then give that predetermined response, or as David Icke terms it `Problem Reaction Solution`, and this has been `in play` for as long as I can remember and certainly during the fifteen years I served in the force.

The lack of any obvious reason for the mass of laws flowing from Brussels and elsewhere around the world has alienated millions. The more rules and regulations which violate people's freedom, the more the law will be broken. It is inevitable. One can barely sit at home in one's armchair these days without impinging on some petty diktat or another. In effect, as stated above, governments will be faced with a situation of widespread disorder, even anarchy, which will be of their own creation, and which as the creation of the `Euro Gendermerie` proves, they expect and are ready for.

We must combat State interference in our lives on all fronts. Our liberty, or what remains of it, will only continue if the general and guiding principal against the intrusion of law into private matters is acknowledged and enshrined in acceptance universally. We cannot be selective in this matter. Our cause will not go forward if on the one hand we say we do not want social workers to have the power to force entry into our homes and dictate to us how we raise our children, but yes, we do think it okay for Police to break down doors in some alleged search for weapons, explosives or drugs.

That is how we are divided and ruled. They play us off against each other so that we just cannot see the bigger picture. We must always remember that laws are not made for our benefit. Their primary purpose is to control our lives increasingly whilst taking away ever greater portions of our personal wealth and property. We must not identify ourselves with the state. It is and has always been them and us. We are forever being told that laws are for the greater public good. All tyrannies throughout human history have used terms like this to justify the implementation of laws hostile to individual rights. There is a defined conflict of interest between `community interests` and individual rights.

Abstract Rights.

We are today bombarded by `rights`. These rights rarely if ever apply to the majority population and are designed to cause further division, fracture and resentment in society. This explosion in “rights” has eroded to an amazing degree personal liberty, and created an atmosphere of suspicion and fear in the normal interactions between citizens. These rights come in all shapes and sizes and include `the right to choose`, minority rights, women's rights, gay rights, and any other `rights `they can think of to further beat down the majority into submission. The `chattering class` liberals so fond of promoting these rights, have little or no idea of their true purpose, and in their mindless enthusiasm ignore all practical consequences. And of course, the louder they talk about these `rights`, the less of them we seem to have.

I maintain here and now that we the people have an inalienable right to be allowed to live in peace and make our own decisions affecting our lives, without state interference.

But, and this is a big one, the `Law` no longer allows us to do this. For us to keep what's left of our dignity and independence of thought, we must keep our eye on `the ball` and not mistake the signals coming from government, nor the lies that are used to justify their nefarious attacks on our personal liberty. We cannot afford to look at law in isolation as each new piece of legislation is just another step towards the `open prison` our lives are becoming. Those who make the laws have but contempt for the individual but maintain a certain regard for the `Herd` providing it does as it is told.

The private citizen is just someone they bleed dry through taxation and the multitude of pernicious `fines` for petty traffic offences etc.. He/she is someone to strip of his/her rights, to be used as `cannon fodder` in wars of aggression against innocent people in far off lands and then deceive with more lies come election day. Every little law passed is part of the whole, with the ultimate goal being to reduce the individual by both legal and technological means to a passive thoughtless compliant zombie to be controlled and manipulated.

Centralisation and Globalisation.

As we move ever closer to a Federal European State, North American Union and an eventual World Government, we see an ever increasing drive towards standardisation and centralisation, masked as an administrative necessity. It's main effect is to further enslave and anaesthetise the private individual. The idea is to make everyone more or less the same worldwide, so that the Illuminists, through their puppet politicians, judges, bankers and media whores are able to control the global population. This enables the `House Of Rothschild` together with the Rockefellers and to a lesser degree, the likes of Rupert Murdoch and Bill Gates to manipulate whole markets and economies. This drive towards the One World State is the ultimate enemy of individualism and freedom.

Taking Responsibility.

Averting disaster will not be easy. It will mean every person taking back complete responsibility for his or her own life,which is not as easy as it might appear. The writer, George Bernard Shaw said, “ Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it”. The notion that it is only government which can guide, ban, encourage or regulate our lives must be treated with utter contempt. Such a concept is unfit even for animals. People deserve better than to be bossed around and herded like sheep. The dependence which has been engendered in us by the dreadful `Welfare State` whereby we look to governments rather than ourselves for solutions and inspiration is the ultimate denial of our humanity.

Slogans and Spin Doctors.

Western socialist governments, cloaked in the respectability of liberalism, promote abstract notions such as `inclusion` and `diversity` as being intrinsic to a decent and humane society. But this is just a subtle and sinister way of forcing everyone into a conformity of thought and opinion. Using slogans rather than reason, they defame anyone who thinks freely, and this rare individual will experience an intangible pressure to conform to the accepted wisdom. These slogans are always diabolically clever in construct, crafted to appeal to the superficial rather than the profound. The minds of people who have been subjected to the mass programming and propaganda of the architects of the New World Order these past fifty or so years are little more than putty in the hands of these master manipulators.

The control over our minds is all the more effective due to it's sophistication and subtlety. As `de Torqueville` wrote “Democratic despotism degrades men without tormenting them.” Unlike Dr Goebbels, the Nazi Propaganda Minister, the Illuminists have used a form of seductive mass mind programming utilising all the modern means of information. They own the newspapers and television stations, record companies and film studios. They have introduced a mind bending curriculum in our schools indoctrinating our children with a `Neo Liberal` viewpoint on abortion, race, sex education, feminism, pacifism, colonialism, and the rest of their insidious, self righteous and devilish agenda.

Network Solutions?

If we are to take back our freedom before it is too late, we must learn to rebel. To express our individualism in the face of the globalist conformist tidal wave which threatens to engulf the whole of humanity. If we continue to acquiesce, we will be `hammered` into conformity and obedience by a brutal, fascist and impersonal apparatus which will allow no dissent.

Conclusion.

The peoples of the western nations are being lead by the nose into a Police State. We are being bound and fettered by an endless barrage of intrusive and restrictive laws coming at us from every direction, or so it seems. But in reality, this attack on our lives is organised and orchestrated from a central point in the City Of London.

The oppressive trend of government interference in people's lives is now universal and is top to bottom in scope; from the false and degraded `let's all be friends` tyranny of the United Nations Organisation, down to the local social worker and the whispering `nosey` neighbours. If our short lifespan here on earth is to be lived in unmolested peace, we must not be slaves of the state. We must stand firm, united as one and take back our lives, become responsible for ourselves and those we love and just say NO.


Further reading and reference:

The Global Coup d'Etat
http://www.nylonmanden.dk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=198&Itemid=43

The Police State Road Map
http://www.policestateplanning.com/id19.htm

Stop Common Purpose
http://www.stopcp.com/

UK Column
http://www.ukcolumn.org./

The Nylon Man
http://www.nylonmanden.dk/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogsection&id=7&Itemid=43

Global Tyranny Step by Step byWilliam F Jasper

The Great Deception by Booker and North

The Holy Bible.

Thursday, 23 July 2009

Anarchy Or Tyranny : Is This the Most Pertinent Question Of Our Age?

By Philip Jones. 16th January 2009.

"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom" John F. Kennedy.

Revelations and Awakenings:

2008 was the year I finally saw, in all it's ugliness, the `prison` I had inhabited for the fifty years of my life. My journey towards this discovery took some ten years or so and the shocking truth hit me like a hammer, that since the day I was born (1958) and for long before that, a conspiratorial group of super rich and powerful individuals, dedicated to the imposition of a Global Dictatorial State, had been working behind the scenes, manipulating the events which shaped our lives, creating chaos all around, causing reactions from the unsuspecting majority which in turn enabled them to advance their agenda by responding with their `ready made` solutions.

By making diabolical use of the Hegelian Dialectic, or what David Icke has termed `Problem Reaction Solution`, these conspirators have slowly but surely brought us all to the point of no return. The decision is ours now. Do we stand or do we fall?

For most of last year, as the information and knowledge which finally put most pieces of the puzzle in place, came to me like an avalanche, I strived to disseminate that knowledge by writing articles. Many articles, which, through Henry Makow and Rense.com, along with some local sites, were, judging by the international response I received, read by many across the globe and to a lesser degree, here at `home`. My writing brought me into contact with some exceptional and gifted individuals, nowhere more so than in Denmark, the small Northern European Country which has been my home for eleven out of the past thirteen years.

As our local and international correspondence grew, we began to `feed` off each other, sharing ideas and possible solutions. This `group` of individuals, coming from very diverse backgrounds and international in it's makeup, attempted to spread the `word` far and wide. Since then, we have been working quietly via the Internet, email and private meetings to alert our fellow citizens to the `clear and present` danger approaching us all.

Late last year, we conducted a `leafleting` campaign here in Denmark, in an effort to inform people about what those strange `cloud formations` in the sky really were. I believe that over ten thousand were delivered by volunteers. As I awaited the `fallout`, expecting at least some mention in the local press, it became after some weeks apparent, that there would be none. Either people had simply ignored the information on the excellently designed and printed `flyers`, (www.nylonmanden.dk) or the media had put a `lid` on it as usual.

As the old year ended and the `New` one approached, I began to ask questions of myself and take stock of what I had achieved during the past year where this particular `hobby` of mine was concerned. It dawned on me that for all the research, reading and writing. For all the correspondence and networking, I/We had achieved very little. The sheer scale and impact of this realisation was staggering. Another year done, nothing changed. The EU well on course for Federalisation, the Global Financial Crisis, `mopping` up countless small banks and companies. State `Mafioso` style taxation removing ever more the private wealth of citizens globally. Wars of aggression still raging, Chemtrails across every sky, Tetra Masts everywhere, ID cards introduced, and the surveillance industry booming everywhere as even our private phone calls and emails are monitored ever more closely.

In essence, the NWO `Gravy Train ` just kept a` rolling` and what did `we the people` do about it? Not very much. Most just sat in front of their TV screens and `sucked up` the official lies as they had been doing all their lives. In the movie the Matrix, the Morpheous Character says this;

"The Matrix is a system, Neo, and that system is our enemy. When you are inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters, the very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are part of that system and that makes them our enemies. You have to understand most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many are so...hopelessly dependent on the system that they will fight to protect it." Exactly!

So for all the hard work and information gathering, the `enemy` was still firmly and overwhelmingly in control of the `high ground` if not morally, then strategically. More and more the feeling that positive action was needed, and this view was shared by some if not all in our group. A section of our associates still believed that an `awakening` would happen spontaneously and that all that was needed was more spreading of information. My friend and associate Peter Clement, an active worker in the fight for freedom here in Northern Europe also believes that action is required. In response to the use of the term hero by some in our group, even though well intended, he writes;

” We are no heroes, we are just ordinary people. A hero is somebody who comes into a situation where he or she does something extraordinary, puts somebody elses life above his or hers own. You don't know if you are a hero, until the moment arrives. Be humble:-)".

How many of us involved in this area of research have experienced hostilty when attempting to pass on information we know to be true?

Next up, we have the `New Golden Boy` as President, and even if his strings are invisible, you can be sure whose pulling them (Mr Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzezinski), and absent a `false flag` event, this `man of change` will on behalf of his masters do everything in his power to force through the final stages of their `work of ages`.

So, going back to the turn of this New Year, I began trying to find Allies. People who although might not have exactly the same idealogical stance as myself, and those of my `comrades`, still wished and more importantly, worked for freedom and an abolition of Governmental control from heir lives.

Here in Denmark, perhaps more than anywhere else in what we term the `industrialised world`, life is micromanaged down to the finest detail. This is as my previous articles have outlined at great length, a model society for the coming EU Superstate, and although the prison doors may be transparent, they are there all the same and Danish citizens are more than happy to lock themselves in nice and tight. They call it `tryghed`, meaning to be secure. That they are and then some.

What Americans term `Big Government` has been developed to it's logical conclusion in Northern Europe. Big Government equals `Big` Control. This is achieved by absolute State/ Corporatist hegemony over all the avenues of information, so called education, and by the people themselves whose self regulation has to be seen to be believed. Conformist and Corporatist. That's Denmark, and it is leading it's citizens to a technological and idealogical oblivion as depicted in Huxley's novel, `Brave New World`..

I don't want to live in any such `Prison Society`, no matter how `cozy` it might appear on the surface.

"So go home then," I hear the cry from all those Danish People's Party supporters. The problem is, it's now a Euro Wide phenomenon and will soon be World Wide unless something is done to stop it.

So what can we do? Edmund Burke wrote this over a century ago on the subject of State Tyranny:

“All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”

Prophetic words and particularly pertinent to the age we now live in. Have people ever been more apathetic, more indifferent to their fate than they are today? Locked into a `mind prison` created by the illusion of affluence and instant gratification, humanity, at least here in the west appears to have abdicated all responsibility to the `Professionals`. The Politicians, Judges, Lawyers, Bankers, Doctors and Professors, and look where this irresponsibility has led us. On the brink of a `Fourth Reich` much more terrible than the previous attempt at World Dictatorship, as it has been done with the apparent consent of `we the people` in the guise of democratic elections. We have actually given our enemies permission to go ahead and enslave us.

Collectivism or Cooperativism : Is there a difference?

In his book, `The Robot's Rebellion` (1994) David Icke speaks of the need for people to form `Cooperatives` (not to be confused with Corporations). The Anarchists advocate the setting up of `Collectives` So is there any fundamental difference in the two. The Merriam Webster Dictionary defines these two terms thus:

A Collective: A political or economic theory advocating the collective control especially over production and distribution

A Cooperative: An enterprise or organization owned by and operated for the benefit of those using its services collectively.

In `The Robot's Rebellion`, David Icke describes his own vision of the future in some detail.

”It is difficult to predict with any accuracy what will happen next, because no-one knows in detail what the future will bring or how humanity will use its free will to react. But if we are to end the power of an economic elite we need to move from the big to the small; from central control to community and individual control; from humans serving technology to technology serving humans. People who realise what is going on around them, although still small in number are beginning to see that dramatic change is necessary when the world economic order crumbles as many forecast it will soon enough. There is going to be a great deal of reacting to events and we will have to move very quickly. We will see that we all depend on each other, and community spirit is going to return in a very big way. The focus will be on communities coming together to supply their own needs, and not being dependent on a system over which they have no control. Self-reliance and self-sufficiency in all necessities will be the basic model of economics, because that decreases dependence and gives power back to people. In the `New Peoples’ economics we will need local cooperatives and community-owned companies for food distribution. It is simply daft for food to be grown in one area and sent long distances to other communities while those communities send their produce in the other direction. Food cooperatives will have the role of collecting the food from local farmers and growers and distributing this to the local shops and markets. To be truly responsive to local needs, these cooperatives should be controlled by representatives of ALL the community, not only the farmers and growers. We will require community organizations, again with all views and needs represented, to coordinate the production and distribution of the necessities of life to everyone in their community".

Does this sounds like a `Collective`?

He then goes on to propose the following measures of passive resistance:

1) A boycott of all banks which create money out of nothing and charge interest on it. I hope people will withdraw their money from these banks and even refuse to pay interest on their loans. The latter decision needs to be well coordinated so that millions do it at the same time.

2) Support for community banks and ethical banking which invest in projects designed to benefit people and the planet.

3) Withdraw all support and investment in the major banks and Support for community banks and ethical banking which invest in projects designed to benefit people and the planet.

4) A refusal to cooperate with and in schools, universities and government departments in every country, until we have the free flow of information about what is really going on in secret and all the knowledge available.

5) Constant sit-ins, peaceful occupation and mass protests at government headquarters in every country, particularly the key players like the United States, Russia, Britain, Australia, Japan, the European Community and the United Nations.

6) The peaceful disruption of all occasions of state in every country until we are told the truth and the closing down, by mass sit-ins, of roads and entrances to parliamentary buildings.

7) Mass peaceful resistance to projects that harm the environment. If they face such protests everywhere, the authorities will soon have to re-think and listen.

8) The boycotting of all court proceedings that may arise from such actions and mass sit-ins at the court buildings to disrupt them, also.

9) The bombardment of phone-in programmes and audience participation programmes with questions and information about the secret government and what people can do to stop its manipulation.

10) Protests and sit-ins at the headquarters of media organizations until they refuse to be Brotherhood poodles and start to report the truth to people. Boycotts of system-serving newspapers.

11) The same at the headquarters and branches of the Freemasons in each country and district and the immediate resignation by all members of the Freemasons and other secret organizations who no longer wish to be used as a front for the manipulation of the world.

12) A refusal to vote for or support any politician who refuses to disclose whether he or she is a member of a secret society or closely-connected to anyone who is. A refusal to support any politician who is a member of any Brotherhood front organization, such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission or, in London, connected to the Royal Institute of International Affairs.

Is this `Anarchism` ? Let's read on.

The Robot's Rebellion was first published back in 1994. It was in this writers opinion one of Icke's best. Since then, few have done more or worked harder to expose the Illuminati and their project than he. David Icke is a `soldier` for freedom. Albeit a non combative and passive one. The above ideas on how to break down the `Prison Cells` we inhabit are in the main common sense. Icke's books sell well enough. He has toured the globe speaking and giving presentations. Yet nothing has changed. Well very little at least. The above methods have not been adopted, and the `Agenda` moves ever closer to achieving it's ends.

Some months ago, I happened upon a website called `Anarchismo`. Like the title suggests, it's subject matter is `Anarchism`. Now like with most people, the very word brings forth images of men in `Top Hat and Tails`, throwing small grenades and the like sometime around the turn of the Twentieth Century. But having almost exhausted my interest in what I was already aware of, I decided to have a read. `Shock and Horror`, I was surprised to discover that there was much that appealed to me therein. At the top of the page I found this statement:

”Anarchists believe in a revolution by the working class which will overthrow the bosses and their governments, and create a society run and controlled by those who actually produce the wealth of the world. We believe that it is possible to live without government and to put in its place councils and assemblies where the "ordinary people" can decide what happens to this wealth. We believe in the equality of all and that maximum solidarity is needed between workers and other oppressed groups if we are to defeat those who live off our sweat.”

So, how different is the above statement in sentiment to that of Icke's some paragraphs previous. Not very I would suggest. So is David Icke an Anarchist? Well, on the face of it, I would venture to say that he is, of a sort at least. What's more, so am I then. There are some idealogical differences and the emphasis on the `collective` can create certain reservations, and yet a more comprehensive look at their written material clearly distances them, the Anarchists, from all the various forms of Marxism. In effect, they are striving for a society without Bosses. A society where ordinary people work together in consensus, without any form of authoritarianism at all. Handing back, or rather taking back responsibility for their own lives, to live as they themselves want to live.

This is very similar to what Icke proposes and what I have come to believe is the only chance humanity has to save itself from slavery. Overthrow the rulers. De-construct all the symbols and `fortresses` of government. Destroy centralisation, and dethrone what has become the very instrument of tyranny, `Legislation` and the legislators. The idea of the `Collective` is a good one and a fair one, and providing it is protected from the abuse of those who would restore `order`, then it might possibly be our last best chance for freedom.

Going back to our small group here in Denmark, there are those with grave doubts about our aligning ourselves with the `A'chists`, as images of `mad bombers` persist, even though all evidence is to the contrary. Having spent some weeks reading various essays on the subject, I will summarise my own impressions in the following Paragraphs.

The Quest For A Free Society and World:

”When we read or hear about Anarchists, we are led to believe that they are mad bombers. The myth is perpetuated that they believe in violence for the sake of it. The other myth is that Anarchism is chaos. This idea is propagated by politicians, bosses and their `puppets`in the media, stating that if there was no government there would be chaos. But did you ever wonder about society today and come to the conclusion that perhaps we are already living in chaos?” Anarchismo

We who are familiar with researching the machinations of the Illuminati and their `fellow travellers` are more than aware of what the aims of our `manipulators` are. But so it seems are the Anarchists, who spell it out clearly. They say it more bluntly and perhaps more simplistically than we do, but they have identified at least one major aspect of the Agenda; PROFIT!

And why not put it simply. If we want to get the message across to people generally this is what we need to do, and the Anarchists understand this. They realise that at the moment we live in a society in which there are two major classes - the bosses and the workers. The bosses own the factories, banks, shops, etc. The Workers don't. The only resource people have to bargain with is their labour, with which they make their living.

Workers are compelled to sell their Labour to the boss for a wage. The boss is interested in squeezing as much work out of the worker for as little remuneration as possible so that he/she can maintain high profits. Thus the more wages workers get the less profits the bosses make. Their interests are in total opposition to each other. Production is not based on the needs of ordinary people. Production is for profit. Therefore although there is enough food in the world to feed everyone, people starve because profits come first. This is called Capitalism.

The State:

For the needs of people and the workers to be fully met, the Anarchists maintain that we must get rid of the bosses. But this is no easy task. The bosses are organised. They have the media, the police, the army and the courts on their side. In effect, they have the full support of the State, and all the resources that go with it. We are of speaking about the merger of State and Corporate interests here, ie. Corporatism, or as Mussolini put it: ”FASCISM”.

The State (i.e. governments, armies, courts, police, etc.) is a direct result of the fact that we live in a class society. A world where the 225 richest people have a combined wealth equal to the combined annual income of the world's 2.5 billion poorest people.

The state is there to protect the interests of this minority, if not by persuasion then by force. Laws are made not to protect us but to protect those who own the property.

The Lie That Is Democracy:

People in the west (and especially so here in Scandinavia) have bought into the lie that the state is run in our interests. There are elections to ensure that any government not behaving itself can be brought to task? But of course, in truth, their democracy is about ticking boxes. We are given a choice all right, but between parties who all agree with the system of a tiny minority ruling the country. Check how many of the leading politicians from whichever political party in your country, are members of either the Bilderbergers, Trilateral Commission, Council For Foreign Relations or one of the plethora of similar organisations all dedicated to the Globalist Agenda.

Again, the Anarchists are in complete agreement. They can see how `Electioneering` inevitably leads to people forsaking their principles. These `political` men and women, perhaps initially of good intention, go along with whatever is popular and ensures they are elected. This becomes more important to them, than any idealogical motive. It also means that they look on the mass of voters as mere spectators. People are seen as voters, not as people who can be actually involved in politics and bringing real positive change about. But as I have written above, in the west, the populations, lured by the promise of instant credit have just handed over all political responsibility to those who would enslave them.

Real Freedom and political responsibility cannot come through Parliamentary means. The Anarchsmo Website explains
”If we look at a country like Chile we can see why. In 1973 the people elected a moderate socialist government led by President Allende. This democratically elected government was toppled by a CIA backed military coup. Repression followed in which the workers movement was smashed and thousands of militants lost their lives.”

Central to the Anarchist is the belief that it is the people who must make the revolution. In other words, take back responsibility for their own lives. Every member of the working class (workers, unemployed, housewives, etc.) has a role to play. Only by this participation can it be ensured that Anarchism is made real. They believe in a revolution that comes from the bottom up, and is based on factory and community councils. They maintain that Freedom cannot be given, it has to be taken. As each week passes, and nothing changes. As the New World Order becomes more of a reality, I have to agree with them. I cannot see how intellectual dissemination of the `truth` alone will prevent our `prison` becoming a reality within the next decade.

Not Marxists, Anarchists:

Anarchists disagree with what is called the "revolutionary left", who still hold to the belief that a Political Party is necessary to make the revolution for the people. Marxist Socialists base their ideas on Marx and Lenin who believed that workers were only capable of achieving what they called "trade union consciousness". Both believed that a party of professional revolutionaries was essential to make the revolution for the people. What happened in Russia was nothing to do with true socialism. Power remained in the hands of a tiny party elite. The state was the boss and the workers were still exploited and told what to do. Most familiar with the activities of `The Rothschild's` and Wall Street around the time of the October Revolution will be aware that the so called `Socialist Revolution` was financed by the very same people who were the supposed `arch enemies` of Communism, namely the Capitalists of Wall Street and The City Of London.

Making The New Society:

The Anarchists therefore maintain that it is up to ordinary people to create the `New Society`. The question begs to be asked; ”Would it not be chaotic?" Who knows? But what would you call our current world situation. The Freemasonic Motto `Out Of Chaos Order` is being well applied by the `puppet masters` at present, as our world descends into their manipulated economic chaos. This is clearly designed to provoke the people into demanding `something must be done`, and then they can implement their ready and waiting planned response. As things stand at the moment, Capitalism would collapse without the support of the working class, who produce everything, and therefore all the wealth. Like Icke, I agree as do the Anarchists that it is possible to organise production so that the needs of all are met. It is also possible to create structures that allow everyone to participate in making the decisions that affect them.

The Anarchists propose that Society would be based on factory and community councils. These would liaise or `federate` with each other so that decisions could be made covering large areas. Delegates could be sent from each area and workplace. They would be accountable and `recallable`. With the new technology now available, it would be much easier to involve people in the decision making process. Within such a society there would be genuine individual freedom. Individuals would have to contribute to society but would be free to the extent that they do not interfere with the freedom of others. Fundamentally Anarchists believe that people are good and if they won freedom would not easily give it up or destroy it.

Avoiding Previous Mistakes:

History is not neutral. What we learn in school is what is necessary for the perpetuation of government, rulers and capitalism. So called education is one of the major means by which we are controlled, indoctrinated and deceived. What they do not teach us though is that throughout history, it has been shown that organised government is not necessary. People are not inherently bad. Given the right conditions a spirit of mutual aid and co-operation can and will grow. The lessons of our past shows us that Anarchist ideas can work. A new society can be forged with ordinary people in control (the frontier pioneers in the US did very well without government). The Anglo Saxon Tythings were devoid of hierarchical `government` save the `Warlord` who was impotent without concensus, and operated by such concensus for almost two centuries.

But such a society won't happen spontaneously. It must be planned, built and created. - We must organise for it. Still, many in our small group here in Denmark cling to the belief that sometime soon, a great awakening will occur amongst the people. This awakening, will then as if by magic grow into a worldwide movement for peace and love and that a whole new ideal will be born out of it. David Icke most certainly has believed in and propagated this idea for almost twenty years. Icke is a visionary. A great man, and one of the finest writers in his field. But he not only has been proved to be wrong in this assertion, he is being proved wrong right now as as I write, the Illuminati `Golden Boy` is being sworn in as the 44th President of the United States. He will vow to uphold the constitution in front of Billions of people, knowing full well that he has no intention of doing so.

There will be no spontaneous awakening. That is why the Anarchists maintain and I have to agree with them, that we need revolutionary organisation. An organisation that draws together all those fighting for freedom and an end to tyranny. An organisation that gives us the chance to exchange ideas, experiences, and to learn from the lessons of history. An organisation that facilitates our struggle together for a new society. An organisation that sets aside petty differences and pseudo intellectual ideologies and as Henry Makow puts it:
”Focuses on what we have in common”.

We do not need more `leaders` and their passive followers. We do need an organisation working towards mobilising the masses of ordinary people in the process of making the `revolution`. I conclude this call for people to revolt, peacefully yet assertively, against the machinery erected and fortified ever more each day to enslave them, with a paragraph from the `RAK` (Anarchists Copenhagen) site which I feel explains very well how a fair and free society could and should be constructed:

”An anarchic society is in our opinion, overall, a socially organized community of free people without state capitalism, hierarchies and privileges. This community will be based on decentralized organization and consensus decisions. This organization is our declared goal. To achieve this goal we will use the funds and methods available which are consistent with our position. Activism is not in itself enough to create an anarchic society. It is important that we come together in our common WANT and NEED, rather than what we share ideologically. It is very important that members share this view and make no distinction between individuals based on their ethnicity, gender, etc. and or their personal lifestyle orientation,religion, diet, etc.." The RAK (Anarchists Copenhagen).

References:

David Icke : The Robot's Rebellion. Children Of The Matrix.
Nikki Rappanna : What is The Hegelian Dialectic ?
www.anarchismo.net
http://struggle.ws/anarchism/index.html
http://anarkister.wordpress
.com/

Wednesday, 22 July 2009

DK Ultra : Constructing The Mind Control State.

By Philip Jones 3rd October 2008.



“The Mass Mind Control of a population can be defined as the sophisticated exercise of control by utilising the ability to keep people oppressed yet contented." The Tavistock Institute For Human Relations 1954.

The Hive:

Visiting Denmark and living in Denmark are two totally different states of mind. To the visitor, it is indeed a green and pleasant land. Small and tidy with an apparently happy and welcoming populace. One overlooks the small things, the little irritants and peculiarities because one is on `vacation.`

It is when one lives permanently there that those same `small things,` `little irritants` and peculiarities start to beg questions. Why is it that the majority of Danes are all so alike? They dress alike, cut their hair alike, walk alike and talk alike. They use the same phrases time and again, eat the same food, enjoy the same leisure pursuits and live almost copycat lives, with little or no variation on the theme. I accept that this is a sweeping generalisation, but believe it to be valid all the same. There are of course exceptions and to those brave individuals, I give my respect and admiration. How or why they `slipped through the net` escapes me. But they are in the minority in every sense of the word, and this indeed adds to their splendour.

Every country and people have their national characteristic’s but in Denmark it goes beyond this, because again and I stress here that I am referring to the majority of Danes, the population is phobic-ally conformist and has a profound and deep mistrust of all things and influences of a foreign origin. For those who watched the US TV Series, `Star Trek The Next Generation`, the collectivist and robotic alien force known as the `Borg` bears comparison, albeit one which admittedly is rather extreme. (Quite a coincidence actually `Borg` being a Danish word). Did Gene Roddenberry know more than he was letting on?

Danes display a `Hive` mentality, clinging to each other ever closer as the outside world closes in, rupturing their manufactured and protected isolation, and they hold tight to their Queen Bee, the Welfare State, with which they have an almost metaphysical attachment. In this Essay, I will present an hypothesis based on my own research, observations and experiences both actual and circumstantial, and the research of others operating in the same arena which I believe will show that the intentional Mind Programming of the Danish people has been under-way since the end of WWII.


The Model Totalitarians:


The vindication of two of the twentieth century’s great prophets of doom is at this time of global fracture perversely fascinating. We humans love to prove ourselves imperfect and flawed. The two pessimistic visionaries of the future of which I speak are of course George Orwell and Aldous Huxley. Their respective doom laden obituaries of the future have already passed into folklore; These two classic nightmares of what very likely awaits us, are Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four and Huxley's Brave New World.. Straddling the War years between 1939 and 1945 , these books have already shown that they were written with the apparent gift of prophecy.

Both envisaged a world in which the advance of science produced a new type of ruling class with powers hitherto not possible. Both scripted the final subservience of human beings to a revolutionary hybrid of technological manipulators and political managers. Both works predict a similar end, but it appears that the tenets of a Brave New World model have been applied here in Denmark where Huxley's novel is required reading on many adult education courses. Whereas Nineteen Eighty-Four which describes the logical conclusion of a Marxist Socialist dictatorship, or more correctly in the twenty first century a Communitarian one, has been adopted in those countries where the population is more likely to revolt and rebel against the encroachment of tyranny, such as in the US, France and the UK and some of the former eastern bloc countries now enmeshed in the EU Fascist State.


The New Totalitarians:


There was no reason why the `New Totalitarianism` which had been chosen by the conspiratorial manipulators should resemble the old model of coercive government , which is demonstrably inefficient, and in an age of advanced technology unnecessary, particularly in a relatively controlled environment such as Denmark In his book, Huxley describes perfectly the `Architect’s` goal.

He writes:


“ A really efficient totalitarian state would be the one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude.“


For anyone not born and bred in this land, and in possession of a reasonable level of awareness, I am fairly sure they will recognise the parallels with Denmark as it is today. So how was this state of acquiescence to be achieved? Huxley answered this question himself:

“ Brave New World depends on economic security; without it, the love of servitude is impossible.”

And in this, we find the foundations of the 'New Danish Model of Totalitarianism.'

Denmark solved the problem of permanent security and abolished it in the main, along with the more obvious modes of social inequality, many years ago. She has been helped in this by a century and a half of relative peace and isolation and until very recently neutrality, and by being small and easily governed. Economic security by itself does not necessarily engender a love of servitude. Other conditions are a prerequisite; On the side of the controllers, a thorough understanding of the interaction between economics and power; and on the side of the controlled, an inert submission to authority and reverence for the expert. And in both cases, an aversion to individuality, an instinct for the collective, identification with and the a worship of the State, and a preference for government by bureaucrat. Denmark fulfils the above and them some. Danes do love their work!

Programming The Masses:

At this point, it is useful to take a break from Huxley’s vision of the future and take a brief look at Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four`. The Danes have demonstrated the power of that form of semantic manipulation Orwell called `Newspeak` i.e. the changing of words to mean something else. For example, whereas in English, to say to someone you believe them to be special or fine is very positive and complimentary. In Danish, both take on negative connotations. `Special` becomes peculiar and `Fine` implies “you think you’re better than us“ . In this way, human thought can be directed, and undesirable concepts eliminated, because the means of expressing them have been removed.

As researcher Michael Bailey wrote:

“In this reality, language is the highway of how we communicate our thoughts. The gradual and intentional erosion of the vocabulary by those who wish to control us, removes the possibility of any undesirable ideas, as without the words to formulate those ideas, we cannot begin to even think them.”

In the Danish language, freedom' does not yet, as it does in Orwell's `Ministry of Truth`, imply any form of 'slavery', but it does imply an element of 'submission' to the Collective or Hive, and effectively, a powerful word in the vocabulary of any opposition has therefore been effectively neutralized. Similarly, it is exceedingly difficult to speak in any but favourable terms of the State, because all the words in that field have become positively loaded in the same manner as `special` and `fine` have been negatively so.

So how does a Conspiratorial State Apparatus, programme a whole nation of people into a condition of accepted servitude and conformity? Through State Education, the merged State/Corporate Media, the advocating and promotion of immune system damaging vaccines and drugs such as anti depressants used to clinically adjust non conformist behaviour, along with the purposeful adding of poisons into the food and drink manufacturing process which, `dumb down` and disconnect people from their ability to think for themselves. Add to this the promotion of deviant sexual practices, pornography and erroneous ideologies such as feminism and you have yourselves a cocktail guaranteed to bewilder and mesmerise a population into thinking exactly what you want them too and behaving accordingly.

As I have stated above, my contention is that Denmark and the Danes along with the other Nordic countries have been used as a Test Zone for the mass programming of whole populations. A laboratory experiment conducted to test and try out those systems to be introduced on a pan continental scale sometime in the near future. If one wanted to conduct such an experiment, certain conditions would be desirable. Like any worthwhile research site, a level of isolation and insulation is essential. The number of subject specimens needs to be large and varied enough to allow the project validity, but not so large that the possibility of losing control becomes a factor. The subject specimens themselves must have character traits found commonly from within and outside the `target zone`, yet be malleable enough to allow for sudden and unexpected changes to the programme, and as an essential, lacking completely any tendency to rebelliousness and non conformity.

Denmark certainly fulfils the criteria above and can be said to fall within the remit of the described possible scenario. It is located at the northern tip of Europe and has a tradition of relative isolationism. It has a small and compliant population due to many decades of imposed socialist dogma, and a history of bureaucratic government. It has along with Norway and Sweden been historically regarded as being on the very fringe of European Culture and therefore generally of little interest to the `mainstream of European life. But most perfectly, and up until very recently, it has been, and to a large extent still is, highly homogeneous.

Added to this was the presence of an `on site` local cultural phenomenon:

The Jantelov:

In Denmark, the `plotters and planners ` realised that the foundations of Mass Mind Control had been in place for at least a century or so, in the form of the unwritten code known as the Jantelov. The Jante Law is the Nordic version of the `tall poppy` syndrome. It was named and described by the Danish author Aksel Sandemose in his novel `A Fugitive Crosses His Tracks` circa 1933, where he writes about the small fictional northern town of `Jante,` which is modelled upon and typical of all small Danish (and probably Norwegian and Swedish) communities at the beginning of the 20th century, where anonymity is impossible. There are ten basic tenets in this `law`, but they are all variations on this one single theme;
“Don't think you're anyone special or that you're better than us.“

Those who do not keep to this 'law' and behave in accordance with it, are regarded with suspicion and hostility. Sandemose added an eleventh rule, which he formulated as a question; “Do you think I don't know anything about you“? This is the implied threat of censure, that others in the community will know something about those who dare to transgress, which can be later used against them. The rules are not only applied outwardly; Danes apply them equally and instinctively towards themselves. This means that the rules of this Jante Law create a state of arrested individuality where one does not wish nor dare to be either too high above or too far below others socially and economically.

With this rather pernicious and degrading subculture already in place, it was no coincidence and also somewhat convenient (for the conspirators that is) that the social engineers and their Illuminati backers and bankers decided upon Denmark and the other Nordic countries as the location of what can only be termed a `Mass Mind Control Experiment`.

Education:

Education is one of the `Holy Cows` of the Danish Welfare system, and it took me a while to work out how and why a State would finance and support the continued educating of not only the very gifted far into their twenties, but as experience as a guest lecturer at Odense University in the 1990’s showed me, the quite average also. Furthermore, the `push and shove` technique used to drag adult people back into education via the VUC programme similarly mystified me. What was it all about? Social equality? I don’t think so.

The introduction of State-controlled education whether in Denmark or elsewhere in the `West` was not, nor is at the controlling level, intended to educate at all. The last thing a dictator wants is a truly educated, independent minded and intelligent population. It was, and is, the means to universally indoctrinate a life-long sense of reality which conforms to that model desired by the State and Hidden manipulators.

For their intended society, the Danish planners required a type of person that, thinking collectively and suppressing his individuality in favour of the group, is technologically orientated, and socially well adjusted. To this end, the educational system was profoundly altered during the 1950s and 1960s. From imparting knowledge, its aim was changed to that of guiding social behaviour.

As Alistair Crowley correctly intimated, if the State Education ruse was to be successful, it would need to be aimed at children of a young and suggestible age. In Brave New World written in the early 1930s. Huxley described a society of total control in which children were brought up in communal nurseries, conditioned from birth to accept what the State told them to do.

Like laboratory rats, children were electro-shocked if they did anything unacceptable to the programming. One scene has babies crawling towards pictures of flowers and birds only to be shocked because the State didn’t want them to like nature. A form of this is going on right across society today as people are punished through various means for not acting in ways acceptable to the State and rewarded when they play the game as demanded.

The children in Brave New World are brainwashed even when they sleep with subliminal messages turning them into insatiable consumers to drive the engine of industrial production as indeed they are in only slightly more subtle ways today. At the heart of this child control was to remove children from the influence of their parents.

In the UK and increasingly mirrored elsewhere throughout the EU it is the plan to impose rules on the teaching of `social and group interaction skills` to three year olds. This is has the Orwellian/Huxleyan title of `The Early Years Foundation Stage.` This is the most overt and blatant example yet of the State removing a child at the earliest practicable age, from it’s parents influence in order to indoctrinate it, whilst still at it’s most impressionable stage of development.

In Denmark the routine `farming out of infants` by working parents has been practised for the past three decades at least, in the form of the `Vuggestue` and Kindergarten‘s. Every morning across Denmark, thousands of parents unwittingly and voluntarily deliver up their `innocents` into the hands of the State. Wherever you look across the EU, this program of early indoctrination can be seen to either be in place, or about to be installed. Whereas for example in the UK, this `brainwashing for beginners` is still in it’s literal infancy, in Denmark and the other Nordic lands, it is an accepted part of the `culture.`

Alistair Crowley, the Arch Satanist, Freemason and British Spy put it this way:

“Get them by eight, or it’s too late.”

This is the point! The earlier the process starts the more effective and consolidated the effects will be. Enter ˜The Early Years Foundation Stage” and its teaching of `communication, language and literacy` to infants together with ˜knowledge and understanding of the world`. The play years of such children is vital to their balanced development because it awakens their right brain, the creative and artistic aspects of themselves. The `Right Brain` improvises and goes with the moment while the left brain wants structure and systems. All around us, we see structure and systems. Coincidence?

In his book, `The New Totalitarians` the author Roland Huntford, when writing about the Swedish educational model explained: 'Education is one of the most important agents for changing society. It has been integrated into the scheme for change, and its purpose is to turn out the correct kind of person for the new society. The new school rejects individuality, and teaches children to collaborate with others. It rejects competition, and teaches cooperation. Children are taught to work in groups. They solve problems together; not alone. The basic idea is that they are considered primarily as members of society, and individuality is discouraged. They want to produce people who are integrated into society. It aims to produce a well adjusted, good member of society. It teaches people to respect the consensus, and not sabotage it. In the schools, the emphasis lies heavily on the collective.”

In other words the aim is to produce Human Robots who look, think and act alike and in conformity to the required social norms, and refrain entirely from questioning and or challenging the regime. To this end, in Denmark, the programme has been entirely successful as any form of individuality or eccentricity is not only discouraged but becomes the object of a `silent threat` of ostracism by one’s fellows. This causes a certain level of `brain drain` as the more individual and exceptional, unable to function as they would wish in Denmark find other lands in which they can do so. Worse still, when one considers the comprehensive social security net, is the surprising level of suicide, not only in Denmark, but throughout the northern lands. Not surprisingly, many of those resorting to this tragic form of escape are the very gifted, individualistic and eccentric.

In Denmark as well as most if not all other western nations we are witnessing a relentless centralisation of all aspects of society and State Education is no exception. This move towards the centre is considered vital where the indoctrination of children is concerned. He who thinks the same can be controlled the same. One blueprint, one mind, one reality.

100% Dansk : The Danish Mass Media As Agents Of Conformity:

In the post war years, the `thinkers` of the Frankfurt School, now established in America were `recruited by the OSS, forerunners of the CIA and organised by British Intelligence in connection with the Tavistock Institute Of Human Relations, the premier Illuminati `Front` for Global Mind Control both then and now. Theodore Adorno, ` a music professor, and senior member of the `Frankfurt School` was commissioned to research the effects of manipulated radio, television, popular music, movies and advertising on the US population. The findings of this project and the application of the results are primarily responsible for the massively damaged collective psyche of people living in western societies and the `mind washing` of children whose parents have abdicated responsibility for their raising to a conspiratorial state together with a `screen` in the corner of the living room.

If one takes one’s impression of Denmark solely by viewing its mass media, the country appears to all intents and purposes to be run by a `tolerant dictatorship`. Press, Radio and TV show a remarkable similarity, as if guided by some Ministry of Propaganda. Criticism of the government there may be, but it is almost exclusively confined to administrative trivialities, and covered by the formula: 'First you decide on your goals, and then you discuss the means. There is no other discussion.' Almost never is there questioning of political fundamentals, or critical examination of the institutions of the State. All the media seem to be of one mind, advocating the same consensus, professing the same slogans, always, it seems, following the convolution of some party line. They give the impression of existing, not to question authority, but to avoid disturbing the public peace of mind; not to criticize, but to indoctrinate with a certain point of view.

In Denmark, blind belief in the state has allowed unrivalled possibilities in the `programming` of the population through sophisticated and some not so sophisticated means. One of the more obvious and least sophisticated of these is the universal and propagandised message that `Danish is Best` coupled with a peculiarly localised form of nationalism which is currently being exacerbated by the Danish People’s Party and it’s open hostility to all non Danes which now borders on the xenophobic.

This `Hive` mentality is inculcated via a Corporate Media Mafia in collusion with the state, and run overwhelmingly by Bilderbergers like Merete Eldrup and Fleming Rose of the Politiken/Jyllandsposten group of Newspapers, responsible for the mass hysteria caused by their now infamous and outrageous drawings of the Prophet Muhammad (saw). In itself this calculated ruse to further alienate the Danish people from their Muslim immigrants, was in itself pure mass mind control and manipulation. It achieved all it’s aims and more. It consolidated the already marked siege mentality in the host population. It exacerbated the feelings of being unwanted guests in the country in the Muslim Diaspora, and inflamed Western/Islamic relations around the globe causing massive and sometimes violent anti west demonstrations in the Muslim World, thereby giving credence to the ever more bogus US led war on `terror`.. In effect, the cartoons were a mind control coup on the Danish population in particular and the world in general.

Like in all other western countries today, Danes are bombarded almost 24/7 by images on television which dictate their view of their country and the world around them. As all avenues of information save the internet (for now) are further centralised into fewer and fewer hands, the opportunity for the intensive and coordinated `e-programming` of the population has never been greater. Television presents to us a view of reality which is obscenely false and in most cases perversely so. It’s relentless depictions of extreme violence and loveless recreational sex are intended to immunise the viewer to all the horrors awaiting them come the day of the `New World Order.` All the old and traditional values are brutally trashed each and every evening in movies and TV soaps where the lust for sensation is incessant. Men who should be awakening to the realities of the Global Police State falling down around them and their families, are instead sat glaring at the wide-screen in the corner as if in a trance, watching sport and horror movies.

Television News lies blatantly from the mouths of well groomed and generally attractive dummies who repeat the lies on air each day without ever questioning as to whether what they are transmitting is actual. The newspapers reinforce this deceit the following morning and the mass of sleep walkers on their way to their chosen place of servitude inhale the neatly packaged blandly written deceptions without pausing for thought at all. Then on their way home, they turn on the car radio, or place the headphones over their ears and listen to mindless pop music which unbeknown to them contains subliminal lyrics and trigger words in the same way that television programmes and advertisements are routinely displayed via almost undetectable subliminal messaging throughout the whole viewing spectrum.

Although it is true to say that in Denmark the use of mass mind control techniques via the popular media might be on a reduced scale in comparison to the USA for example. When combined with the highly advanced and sophisticated mind programming of the State Education system and the almost universal acceptance of the Jantelov as a way of life, then the effects are in many regards spectacularly more successful.

Clearly Broadcasting is a medium of indoctrination. In Denmark, it has two main aims; To persuade Danes that they live in the best of all possible worlds, and to condition them to the ideology of the sitting government. To induce a nation to believe that it enjoys the happiest lot on earth is an elementary device to secure compliance with a government and forestall criticism. In reporting from abroad, the Danish news media are concerned, not so much to show how other people live, but to illuminate the superiority of all things Danish. They concentrate on the defects of foreign countries, drawing comparisons to the advantages of Denmark. The viewer is invited to see how badly off people are everywhere else and to consider how fortunate he is. The press and periodicals take the same line.

It is not only that the Dane is told that he has the highest standard of living, and the best social security, but that he really is superior in all things, most particularly in politics and culture. An article on child care in France, published by a Danish women's magazine, seemed to have no other purpose but that of serving up a homily on how much better Danes took care of their children. Even travel writing often contains disparaging remarks, in order specifically to draw a moral in praise of Denmark, usually concerned with poverty abroad and prosperity at home. Most nations entertain a high opinion of themselves, but unless their rulers nurse ulterior motives, official media of communication do not normally insist, as a matter of policy, on advertising domestic superiority. Still less do they pursue this aim by denigrating foreign institutions. Simply put, Danes are bewildered into a patriotic sense of false security, which consolidates a sense of `cosy` superiority and belonging on the one hand, whilst enforcing a `bubble mentality` on the other.

The Use Of Mobile Phones, Wireless Broadband And Tetra Communications As Tools Of Mass Mind Control:

"Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain." U.S. government mind manipulator, Dr. Jose Delgado, Congressional Record, No. 262E, Vol. 118, 1974.

We live in an age of wireless technology. Everywhere one looks, people are using mobile phones, even children of pre pubescent age can be seen walking down the street totally engrossed in their `new best friend` seemingly oblivious to the world around them. This is exactly the situation the `planners` of the ` Mind Control State ` want. In this, Denmark is no exception.

The masts which relay the microwave signals for mobile phone networks are now so common, few even notice them. But people need to realise that these masts and especially the soon to be introduced Tetra Communications systems, which are already in use in the UK and which will soon be used by the Danish Emergency Services are potential killers and agents of Mass Mind Control.

What we call the military/industrial complex is just that - the fusion of the military and the corporate through which technology developed in the secret projects to advance human control is brought into the public arena by the military supplying a connected corporation with the know-how. This is then sold to the public as a 'breakthrough' discovered by the company itself. The people closest to the Tetra technology will be the police officers and other emergency services that use it every day. Already in countries where Tetra is operational, they are experiencing physical, mental and emotional consequences, including cancer of the oesophagus in numbers way above the international average.

Tetra signals are close to those of human brain frequencies - and this is not a coincidence. It is a designed and coldly calculated measure and a primary reason for the plan to install a network of mobile phone, Tetra, and other systems of electromagnetic communications that operate as one unit to create an electromagnetic mini-matrix to scramble normal brain and DNA function while dictating mental and emotional responses. In the film `Control factor` the character played by Adam Baldwin discovers he is a `programmed human robot` and that nothing about his life is real. He finds himself caught up in a deadly government mind control experiment whereby instructions and orders are passed to him via antenna masts.

In a report relating to the use of Tetra technology, UK Scientist Barrie Trower said in his report for the Police Federation:

"Pulse radiation from TETRA at 17.6 Hz (waves per second) is known to interfere with our natural brains rhythm. Our brains generate their own waves within our head. One of these waves, called beta waves is on a very similar frequency to the TETRA handsets. What happens is: If you could imagine yourself jumping on a trampoline and somebody larger and heavier jumps on and dances at a slightly different speed you will bounce at their pace rather than yours. When they jump off you will still bounce at their speed. The jumping on of the person onto the trampoline is known as entrainment and this occurs when the TETRA is used in close proximity to an officer's brain. Because TETRA affects the beta rhythm of the brain it will affect what the beta rhythm is responsible for; namely sound judgement in emergency situations. Entrainment is always followed by a phenomena called long-term potentiation. This is an analogous to the person getting off the trampoline leaving you dancing. Long-term potentiation has been known to last several weeks after the initial source has died down. The implications for this are that the officers' brain waves would continue to suffer entrainment even after the sets have been switched off, which would be reinforced every time the sets are switched on again.”

Trower writes of the affect on 'sound judgement in emergency situations'. Put another way, the ability to think straight. And it is not only the emergency service workers who can potentially have their thought processes disrupted. So can anyone who comes into contact with the Tetra frequencies. Thousands of Tetra masts are planned to be located throughout the rest of Europe. And their equivalent in North America and elsewhere.

Generation Ritalin X:

In 1995, Denmark's Cooperative Institute for Medical Drug Dependence reported the following withdrawal symptoms from psychotropic drug dependence: “Emotional changes: fear, terror, panic, fear of insanity, failing self-confidence, restlessness, irritability, aggression, an urge to destroy, and, in the worst cases, an urge to kill.”

Psychotic episodes and violent behaviour are also associated with chronic Ritalin abuse. Even the manufacturer warns in its information leaflet, “frank psychotic episodes can occur” with abuse.

The history of violence by teens who have been subjected to psychiatric drugs cannot be ignored. Consider the following examples:

November 20, 1986: Rod Mathews, 14, beat a classmate to death with a bat in the woods near his house in Canton, Massachusetts. Rod was put on Ritalin when he was in third grade.

February 19, 1996: Timmy Becton, 10, grabbed his three-year-old niece as a shield and aimed a shotgun at a sheriff's deputy who accompanied a truant officer to his Florida home. Becton had been taken to a psychiatrist in January to cure his dislike of school and was put on a psychiatric drug, Prozac. His parents said that when the dosage of the drug was increased, Timmy had violent mood swings and that he would “get really angry…”

May 21, 1998: Kip Kinkel, a 15-year-old at Thurston High School in Springfield, Oregon, murdered his parents and then proceeded to school where he opened fire on students in the cafeteria, killing two and wounding twenty-two. Kinkel had been prescribed both Ritalin and Prozac.

April 16, 1999: Shawn Cooper, a 15-year-old-Sophomore at Notus Junior-Senior High School in Notus, Idaho, was taking Ritalin when he fired two shotgun rounds, narrowly missing students and school staff.

May 20, 1999: T.J. Solomon, a 15-year-old at Heritage High School in Conyers, Ga. was being treated with Ritalin for depression when he opened fire on and wounded six classmates.

A report published by the Danish Lægemiddelstyrelsen states that:

“In Denmark and the other Nordic lands consumption and the number of people treated with antidepressants has been increasing since 1994 and continues to grow strongly. The increase in the consumption of the newer antidepressants is both because there are more people in treatment, but also that larger doses are being prescribed. The most preferred preparation for the treatment of depression in the year 2003 were products containing the substances citalopram and escitalopram.”

This trend is now global in dimension and what is especially concerning is how children are being increasingly prescribed Ritalin and the plethora of other Anti Depressants. Along with Ritalin, other copy-cat drugs have been produced to exploit the obsession, and the calculated agenda, of drugging the young. These include Adderall, Concerta Metadate CD, Ritalin LA, Focalin and Strattera (Atomoxetine). The Bush family-connected Eli Lilly Pharmaceutical Giant is heavily involved in this despicable programme of legalised child abuse.. Another drug being given to children is Risperdal, which was used on political prisoners in the Soviet Union to extract information.

David Healy, a leading psycho-pharmacology expert and Professor of Psychiatry at Cardiff University in Wales, said: “People who took [Risperdal] would tell anything to anyone. When you think about giving these drugs to kids, it's a whole new ball game.”

All of these drugs have similar effects to 'speed' and cocaine. These are, of course, illegal and yet drug companies and their cronies, so called 'doctors', are quite legally giving them to children like candy at a Halloween `trick or treat`.

The manufactured `necessity` promoted by the drug cartel in order to trigger this explosion of prescribing Anti Depressant Drugs, particularly to children, is a condition called `Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder` or ADHD. But there is now gathering evidence that these drugs don't even work on the 'condition' they are claiming to treat and there is much expert and experienced opinion that says there is no such thing as Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. This then makes us wonder, so if they don’t work and the condition is erroneous, what is the agenda behind the prescribing of these drugs in such large quantities to children and adults?

The main purpose of all this is the suppression of both the intellect and the individuals ability to recognise fact from fiction and truth from lies, and to be able to react and respond cognitively to a given situation. This opens up a person, (particularly a child) to a whole world of Mass Mind Control possibilities. The conspiracy for global control is targeting everyone in this regard, but, of course, their prime focus is children and young people because they are going to be the adults when the structure of planned world tyranny is in place. They know, too, that the effect of what they are doing is cumulative and so by the time the young become adults their minds will be `screwed up` to a far greater extent than they are now.

The use of these drugs is part of a concerted war against the population and it is no co-incidence that people have so been targeted with massive electrochemical attacks. These come through the additives in food and drink, together with the effects of the electromagnetic and microwave 'smog`' in which we are now forced to live, by electromagnetic technology, mobile phones, and so on. Research has proved time and again that there is a clear link between food and drink additives and hyperactive behaviour in children. One such research document published in September 2007 came to the below conclusions:

“The behaviour patterns caused by the chemical cocktails found in food and drink included hyperactive and compulsive behaviour, causing the children to become 'boisterous and lose concentration', and not being able to play with one toy or complete a single task.“

Is it pure coincidence that the Pharmaceuticals and their bought and paid for `healthcare professionals` tell us that the symptoms of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder that must be treated with Ritalin and the like are:

1) Difficulty concentrating and keeping attention on tasks or play activities.

2) Will not follow instructions and fail to finish school-work, jobs or activities.

3) Easily distracted.

4) Trouble playing or enjoying leisure activities quietly.

5) Hyperactivity..

6) Exhibit impulsive and compulsive behaviour.

The exact same behaviour symptoms of children in an official additives trial and those given these mind-altering drugs like Ritalin for 'behaviour disorder' are the same. No wonder, then, that the astonishing rise in the use of these drugs has followed the astonishing rise in the chemical additives in food and drink - even without the electromagnetic affects on behaviour.

The plan has been to destabilise people physically, mentally and emotionally, weakening their resistance to suggestion via the above cited methods including education, the media and the use of new technology . In order to deal with those who still won't be programmed and who behave and perceive life and situations differently from the herd, they now developed a chemical fail-safe of diagnosing `Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder` and dosing those so diagnosed with these drugs.

What the `system` has done, in full awareness at the `Conspiratorial` level, is to purposely structure society, education, the chemicals in food and drink, etc., to close down vast tracts of the Corpus Callosum to suppress the scale of communication between the hemispheres, while programming the population, especially children, to see life overwhelmingly through the left brain. This is one key reason why science has not understood the nature of life and reality. It is populated by left-brainers who can’t perceive beyond their University indoctrinated reality. Therefore, they are obsessed with, and blinkered by, the realm of the material . It is similarly the case with doctors, teachers, politicians and other `gatekeepers` of the system. They go through the educational mincemeat machine and take their `Mind Controlled` places in positions of power and influence with their right brain under lock and key.

This article/essay although primarily written with Denmark in mind is also applicable to the full compliment of Western Nations in this first decade of the 21st century. But due to the nature, existing culture and character of the people of this small country and the application of a deliberate and sophisticated experiment aimed at the mass indoctrination of it’s entire population, success rates have surpassed elsewhere, where comparable results have only been achieved by utilising coercive force.

With the use of a complex array of ideologies, techniques and `scams`, the Dane has been programmed into a state of illusory reality, delusion, denial and compliance by a conspiracy so devious and diabolical, that when the individual is presented with it, he or she suffers from an automatic response mechanism which creates confusion, refusal to acknowledge the facts and often open hostility to the messenger of those facts. Installed by the above means through a `Welfare State` which under the guise of a cradle to grave security apparatus, has deliberately and with malice aforethought weakened and undermined the Danes ability to think for his/herself by installing a sense of virtual reality in the collective national consciousness.

As I have written above, all the nations of the west have been and are being subjected to programmes intended to produce a similar effect. What makes Denmark in particular and the other Nordic lands generally different is the the people's complete and comprehensively programmed sense of `blind faith` in their respective regimes.

It should be emphasised that there are those in Denmark who since the `False Flag` `Psy Op` of 9/11 are beginning to look through the web of deceit and have begun to extricate themselves from the `HIVE`. One might ask “Where is the harm? Danes seem to have it good compared to many places and the standard of living is still above the average”. But when a whole people either consciously or not `take their eye off their country’s political football` and allow their politicians to step by step, drip by drip, take more and more of their personal decision making away from them and at the same time indoctrinate that populace with a particular dogma and ideology, it becomes only a matter of time before the politicians stop even the democratic charade of asking what the people think and assume complete control over their micromanaged lives, installing the dictatorship in the process.

As the British Journalist Bel Mooney wrote in the London Daily Mail:

"Make no mistake, Totalitarianism creeps up on you. One minute you think you live in a free society and then you turn your back and, hey presto, another little rule, a fresh directive, a sneaky law, an insidious diktat all of them putting up prison bars through which we have to view the world.”

Or to quote Krishnamurti:
“It is not a sign of good health to be well adjusted to a sick society.”

Sources and further reading:

http://www.laegemiddelstyrelsen.dk/publikationer/netpub/forbrugsanalyser/antidepressiva/html/entire_publication.htm

http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=6494

The New Totalitarians by Roland Huntford.

Brave New World by Aldous Huxley

1984 by George Orwell

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jante_Lawhttp://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/Laura-Knight-Jadczyk/mass_mind_control.htmhttp://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_louise_021703_mind.htmlhttp://www.peace.ca/massmindcontrol.htmhttp://www.rense.com/ufo6/mindcontrol.htmhttp://www.davidicke.com/content/category/6/25/32/* Thanks to Julius for the Alistair Crowley Quote.