Wednesday, 22 July 2009

British State Sponsored Homosexualising Of Children Steps Up A Gear. But To What End?

By Philip Jones 17 Sept 2008.

This morning, I was reading through the daily `Rusepapers` and happened upon an article in the London Daily Mail which simply defies belief. The headline read;`Teach the pleasures Of `Gay` Sex to children as young as five say researchers.`

The article then goes on to explain that it is proposed that, “Children as young as five should be taught to understand the pleasures of gay sex, according to leaders of a taxpayer-funded education project. Heads of the project have set themselves a goal of 'creating primary classrooms where queer sexualities are affirmed and celebrated'.

The ambition was revealed in documents prepared for the `No Outsiders` project run by researchers from universities and backed with £600,000 of public money provided by the Economic and Social Research Council. The stated purpose of the project - which is operating in 14 primary schools - is to stop bullying and prejudice aimed at homosexuals. However, at a seminar at Exeter University tomorrow, supporters of the group will go beyond the anti-bullying agenda and discuss 'pleasure and desire` in educational contexts'.

A document prepared for the seminar and couched in convoluted academic jargon says: “The team is concerned to interrogate the de-sexualisation of children's bodies, the negation of pleasure and desire in educational contexts, and the tendency to shy away from discussion of (sexual) bodily activity in No Outsiders project work.”

At this point, I have to say that my own reaction to this torrid project is one of utter revulsion. The worse is of course is that they will get away with it. Totally unaccountable to the children who’s minds they will corrupt and pervert, or the parents of these children who are going to be left picking up the pieces of their `young one’s` shattered innocence.

This has to be said; the `Gay` Lobby and agenda is out of control and wholly without conscience or principal. It is a malevolent and vicious programme designed and intended to destabilise and de-construct Western Societies. People must begin to look beyond the `equality` racket. Just as feminism has nothing to do with `women’s rights`, the relentless promotion of homosexuality as a valid and natural alternative to normal human relations has nothing to do whatsoever with preventing prejudice against those so inclined towards such a `Homosexual` existence. At this point, it is usually time to write something along the lines of, “well of course, not all homosexuals and lesbians endorse this kind of thing, and so long as what people do in the privacy of their own home etc. etc.”

But not this time, because this has gone too far and it is time people just said `NO`. Let’s not mince our words here. Where are all the `decent` Gays and Lesbians? Why aren’t they speaking up about this abuse of trust. We who are not `that way` inclined are now served up a daily dose of it wherever we look. It’s in our books, in films, TV series, cartoons, on the news, in the streets, in our schools, and it is undermining the universal and natural order and all our civilisation once stood for.

The `Neo` Labour Government is the most appalling set of rogues, scoundrels and perverts ever to sit in the House Of Commons (which is saying something), and since that sorry day they took office back in 1997, they have proceeded with a programme designed to break apart the ancient `Act of Union`, to dissolve the United Kingdom and have it absorbed into a European Communitarian Federal State where concepts such as the individual, democracy, liberty, equality, fraternity and basic right and wrong, good and evil will be considered not only irrelevant, but dangerous.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn. Said:

“ It is almost a joke now in the western world to use words like good and evil. They have become old fashioned concepts. But they are very real and genuine concepts. They are from a sphere which is higher than us, and instead of getting involved in base, petty and short sighted political calculations and games, we have to recognise that the concentration of world evil and the tremendous force of it’s hatred is there, and is flowing from there throughout the world. And we must stand up against it and not hasten to give to it, give to it everything it wants to swallow.”

This latest assault on our children and the moral fabric of the United Kingdom is supported by the most evil of intentions. There is much more to this than the promotion of an alternative lifestyle. It’s not even about co-opting infants who would naturally and almost without exception become heterosexual adults into a deviant life choice.

As David Icke would say, you have to connect the dots. The highly regarded Roman Judge, Luccius Cassius would ask, “Cui Bono”, or “who benefits”? Who then benefits from teaching five year old children about the wonders of Sodomy? Not they themselves for sure. Nor their parents, nor society as a whole, as one thing is absolutely non debatable about the `Gay` lifestyle. It is not procreative.

Over the last few years, as I have become more and more embroiled in researching the ever more apparent Global Conspiracy to create a One World State, one issue keeps cropping up. No matter from whichever direction one investigates, it is the undeniable and increasingly overt `Depopulation Agenda` which appears as the common denominator. Whether it be Feminism, Planned Parenthood, Abortion, Vaccination, the AIDS scam (and more recently the HPV agenda), the increasing and contrived contamination by PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyls) in our food and water supplies, (causing a myriad of side effects including sterility), Euthanasia, War, Famine, and the incessant promotion of a Homosexual `life choice`, the desired result is the same; Death and depopulation.

The simple fact is that the Elite families and the `shadow creatures` controlling them intend to introduce a post-modern, post-democratic feudal society run by a small number of rich and powerful people with a vastly depopulated serf class working as peasants. In order to achieve their objectives they must destroy the family, the middle class and the nation state. They are using `Tavistock Institute` Frankfurt School ideological methods of psychological warfare against whole populations, engendering feelings of hopelessness, helplessness, confusion and demoralisation.

By targeting our children, they are assaulting one of the primal instincts of humanity; the defence of one’s offspring. When we instinctively know it is wrong to instruct children in the ways of perversity, and yet are powerless to stop it, the affect on our ability to stand up and be counted is shattering. We become socially, politically and psychologically impotent. Putty in the hands of those who despise us.

This corruption of our young is only one of the battlefields in the Illuminati’s War against humanity. But it is a most torrid and terrible one nonetheless.

Postscript: In the Sumerian Tablets, we are told that as the last great flood became imminent, Enlil, commander of the Annunaki forbade any of the `Gods` to advise humanity of it’s approach, wishing man destroyed. His brother Enki however, having pity on mankind instructed Zuisodro (Noah in the Biblical Tale) to build the Ark. After the Flood abated, Enlil was in fact pleased that not all of humanity had perished. He realised that he needed some humans, to do the servile and menial tasks. Could it be that these `Gods` do not intend to make the same mistake twice and know exactly how many of the intended `serf` class to keep alive?

The Original Article can be found at


  1. Take them before eight, or it´s too late, said Aleister Crowley – 666 – ”the beast” and key member of the Illuminati.

    The agenda suits our masters well in many ways. Breaking the feeling of what should be special and sacred with the ones we love, and conditioning the children to believe, that, despite of their own bad feelings, everything is just normal and allowed. This makes it so much easier to invade the intimate privacy of these people as they grow up. Who cares? What difference does it make if it’s a boy, a girl or an ADULT could be the simple reasoning of a child.

    The invasion of the sexuality of a person is well known in the mind controlling programmes, which the members of the Illuminati are involved in as well as subjected to themselves. This is a tool for installing messages which become compartmentalised – ‘forgotten’ – in order for the person to survive the traumatic experience. They themselves are mind controlled, but they just don’t know. Who would expect these people to rule otherwise, since they have been broken themselves?

    The perversions have been increasing in our society to a point, where no one seems to function anymore. So let’s unplug the television, with all the undertones of sex in the adds, the music videos and everywhere else. Teaching the above mentioned in public schools is just ‘over the line’ and should be a wakeup call for everyone.

    Let’s not forget the true basis of accepting other people, though. If a boy just happens to always fall in love with boys, that’s an other case.



  2. Thanks for your excellent comment on my article. I actually have quite an interest in `old` Al Crowley. Although infamous as one of the leading lights of the Golden Dawn and the OTO, he was equally so for his being openly bisexual (scandalous at the time. He was also a Freemason (of course)and was prone to making enemies within that `Brotherhood`. During WWI he was recruited into British Intelligence (oxymoron) and was very involved in activities of a subversive nature mostly against the British people. A strange one indeed! Moving along, the whole issue of Mind Control has opened up over the past couple of years with books by Cathy O'Brien and Brice Taylor, both victims of the MK Ultra Mind Control Program in the US.

    The whole `Pink Swastika` movement is a Tavistock/Frankfurt School `Psy Op` and has been brilliantly effective up to this point in manipulating the minds of millions and in subduing all oposition to it's pernicious agenda. In the same way as the Zionist movement has been able to discourage any questioning of suspect actions by persons of a `Judaic` background such as the Rothschilds. By fear of being labelled an extremist and defamed accordingly. The aggresive promotion of homosexual activity in schools is part of the gradual breaking down of our moral compass. Those truly behind this have no concern for individual homosexuals. It is not about them. It is about fracture in the social and moral fabric. I agree that if a man is for whatever reason inclined that way, it is his personal choice and provided no coercion is used on his part towards another, then so be it. But that is now what this is about. Thanks again for taking the time to write and give such valuable insight into some very pertinent issues

  3. This is just another move by the Illuminati to quicken the sexualising of our children for their evil ends. Five year olds should be thinking about anything but sex of any kind let alone Homosexuality. 3000 children go missing ecery day in the US alone. I can imagine what the Global Statistics might be. many of these innocents end up in the clutches of Pedophile Sex rings and Satanic Sects comprised of our so called `Elite`, Royalty, Judges, Politicians, Police and other `ner do wells`. Where are the protests and demonstrations? people are terrified to stand up in case they get labelled a `Homophobe`. But this is not about `Gay Sex`. It's about `grooming` children, and it's time parents stood up and said enough.

  4. Some more perverse news from the UK.

    Gay couple left free to abuse boys - because social workers feared being branded homophobic
    A homosexual foster couple were left free to sexually abuse vulnerable boys in their care because social workers feared being accused of discrimination if they investigated complaints, an inquiry concluded yesterday.
    Craig Faunch and Ian Wathey were one of the first homosexual couples in the country to be officially approved as foster parents.
    They looked after 18 children in only 15 months.
    Scroll down for more...

    Ian Wathey (left) and Craig Faunch were jailed last year for sexually abusing young boys
    With no previous convictions, they came across as respectable men who simply wanted to help boys with a variety of problems.
    In reality, they were paedophiles, who repeatedly abused the children in their care.
    Even when the mother of two of the children reported her suspicions to the council, officials accepted the men's explanations and did nothing.
    Instead of banning children from staying with Faunch and Wathey, they sent youngsters with more serious problems to them. Between them, the couple abused four boys aged between eight and 14.
    In a scathing report published yesterday, Wakefield Metropolitan District Council was condemned for treating the men as "trophy carers".
    The children's charity Kidscape said those in charge of overseeing the safety of children in the care of Faunch and Wathey had allowed political correctness to override common sense.
    The report, following an independent review of the case, said: "One manager described the couple as 'trophy carers' which led to 'slack arrangements' over placement.
    "Another said that by virtue of their sexuality they had a 'badge' which made things less questionable.
    "The sexual orientation of the men was a significant cause of people not 'thinking the unthinkable'.
    "It was clear that a number of staff were afraid of being thought homophobic.
    "The fear of being discriminatory led them to fail to discriminate between the appropriate and the abusive."
    The report also accused the council of failing to carry out proper assessments before and after the children were placed with Faunch and Wathey.
    "Issues arose in the first longer-term placement of two children, including potential indicators of child sexual abuse, which were inadequately investigated, understood or acted upon," it said.
    "More children were then placed with Faunch and Wathey, some successfully, some with concerns which were again inadequately investigated, understood or acted upon.
    "The practice of some social workers in this case was deficient."
    The report's authors, led by former Surrey social services chief Brian Parrott, said they could not be sure that Faunch and Wathey were "predatory paedophiles" who became foster carers in order to have access to children.
    They added: "Our criticisms are much more of those in middle management whose job it was to piece together what was really happening, to ask the right questions and to be critical and probing."

  5. P2
    Wathey, 42, was jailed for five years in June last year after being convicted of four counts of sexual activity with a child and one offence of causing a child to watch sexual activity.
    Faunch, 33, received a six-year jail sentence after he was found guilty of five charges of engaging in sexual activity with a child and two of taking indecent photographs of a child.
    The couple, who lived together in Pontefract, West Yorkshire, were approved as foster carers by the council in August 2003.
    Their victims included a 14-year-old boy with Asperger's syndrome, a form of autism,who had a mental age of seven and was forced by Wathey to watch gay pornography.
    Another youngster with a "very troubled background" was only in their care for a few weeks before being abused by Faunch.
    But social workers had been aware of "inappropriate" behaviour long before then.
    Just eight months after they started as professional foster carers a mother of eight-year-old twins, who couldn't cope with raising them on her own, voiced concerns about them with social services.
    While visiting the twins, the 34-yearold single mother was shown a picture taken by Faunch showing one of the boys going to the lavatory during a visit to Butlin's holiday camp in Skegness and discovered a similar snap had been taken of the other twin.
    A social worker took the photograph and promised a full investigation.
    But the court heard that not only did social services staff lose the photo, they decided against contacting police after accepting Faunch's explanation that he was trying to embarrass the boys into shutting the lavatory door.
    Police later discovered that, days after the photos were taken, Faunch recorded an indecent video of the twins taking a shower. They began abusing the boys three months later.
    Undetected, the offences continued over an 11-month period, Leeds Crown Court was told last year.
    Police were called in to investigate the couple only after one of the abused boys told a woman he had been touched by one of the men.
    Faunch abused all four boys and Wathey targeted one of them.
    Judge Sally Cahill, QC, said neither had shown "empathy, remorse or any responsibility for their actions".
    Yesterday's report said that the fostering panel which approved Faunch and Wathey accepted without hesitation their request to look after only boys on the basis that they didn't feel equipped to look after girls.
    The report made 41 recommendations for overhauling the council's fostering process.
    Last night, Michelle Elliott, a director of Kidscape, said: "Common sense went out of the window when they allowed political correctness to take over in this case.
    "I don't care if you are homosexual or bisexual - if you are taking care of children you need to be vetted and subjected to the same investigation as anyone else.
    "Child abuse knows no gender boundaries."
    Elaine McHale, the council's corporate director of family services, said it would be "inappropriate" to comment on the report until after a meeting of the full council on September 12.

    Yeah right!!!

  6. Look at this below. can anyone mow deny that they want to get rid of us. When will people wake up. Everything the Illuminati and their puppets do is aimed at Depopulation. All the dots connect to this. For the first time in the history of mankind, we are actively engaged in wiping ourselves off the face of the earth.

    Top UN Official Applauds Plummeting Births, Calls for Protection of Sodomy
    By Susan Yoshihara, Ph.D.
    (NEW YORK – C-FAM) At United Nations headquarters last week, UN Population Fund (UNFPA) executive director Thoraya Obaid called for more funding for population programs, including reducing fertility, promoting “reproductive health services,” and “de-stigmatizing” sodomy.
    Obaid began her remarks by commemorating the 40th anniversary of Paul Erlich's book, The Population Bomb, which alarmed readers about the threat of “overpopulation” and justified the establishment of UNFPA. While she admitted the book’s prediction of “massive starvation on a large scale has not come to pass,” she nonetheless called for renewed commitment to boilerplate population control policies such as promoting smaller families, warning nations that world population had grown from 3.5 billion to 6.7 billion since 1968.
    Obaid said there is a causal relationship between fertility decline and economic development, but this claim has been seriously challenged by the emerging evidence. A landmark study published earlier this year by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), for example, found that contrary to conventional wisdom, the “Asian Miracle,” in which economic development followed a drop in fertility, was the exception to the rule. It also showed why the world will become more violent and less secure in the next thirty years due in part to rapid changes in fertility.

  7. P2

    The executive director called for more funding of “education and reproductive health” in line with UNFPA’s mandate from the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) outcome document “which,” Obaid told member states, “your governments have adopted.” Left unmentioned was the fact that ICPD explicitly safeguards each nation’s right to protect the unborn in their laws, and that it explicitly rules out abortion as a method of family planning.
    The omission was especially notable since Obaid then said that “we need increased political will and teamwork to scale up quality reproductive health services,” a term interpreted by various UN agencies and human rights experts as including abortion. Specifically, she asserted that “we will not achieve MDG 5 [Millennium Development Goal for reducing maternal mortality] unless women have universal access to reproductive health.” Nations have repeatedly rejected the inclusion of reproductive health in the MDGs, and Obaid notably dropped any reference to a new “target” for reproductive health, something that drew sharp rebukes from the US delegation in her last annual report.
    Perhaps most controversial was Obaid’s claim, during her discussion of HIV prevention, that nations must “fight even harder against stigma and discrimination,” and included “men having sex with men," among marginalized groups needing special protection along with women and children. She then mentioned “forces that do not like our agenda,” claiming that “Threats are made against…UN family planning programs in particular.” She did not provide specifics, but said that “Our focus in 2008 has been to consolidate inter-faith networks for population and development,” and announced a UNFPA-sponsored Global Faith-Based Organization Forum in Istanbul next month to “enhance this strategic partnership.”
    Obaid lauded the fact that UNFPA’s funding increased in 2008 by $50 million to a total of $470 million, and announced that UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon decided to extend her term in office by an additional two years.

  8. Most people think the Nazi's invented `Eugenics` or selected breeding and population control. But they didn't. It's roots go way back to Victorian England and the Malthusian Doctrine. It was actively propagated in the first half of the 20th century in the US by some very disturbed people such as Margaret Sanger, the founder (at least publicly) of `Planned Parenthood` and family planning in general, with the financial backing of those stalwarts, the Rockerfellers. Eugenics didn't go away after WWII and the suposed fall of the Third Reich. No, it just went to America for `incubation` and once strong enough, was exported across the West initially and is now sinking it's teeth into the third world. People, they want you dead. It's that simple. They don't want you having children, they want to end your line. That's why Feminism and gender war has been so promoted. That's why Homosexuality has become `an untouchable unchallengable concensus` and that's why they want to sexualise children. Little boys and girls can't have babies. Of course, there's more to it than that, but it's a part of it, and a major one. Read this:

  9. Planned Parenthood’s dirty little secrets
    Colleen Kopp - 9/18/08
    Planned Parenthood, an organization that claims to promote women’s health and well-being, has a deeply stained history of racism, hatred and lies.
    Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, summed up the purpose of her organization with this statement: “More children from the fit, less from the unfit.”
    It sounds like something out of Nazi Germany, like eugenics or creating a master race. Sanger founded the American Birth Control League in 1923, which later became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. She was a passionate advocate for eugenics, a movement that essentially tried to wipe out any human being deemed genetically “unfit.”
    Another well-known fan of eugenics? Adolf Hitler.
    In Sanger’s autobiography, she wrote, “The eugenists wanted to shift the birth control emphasis from less children for the poor to more children for the rich. We went back to that and sought first to stop the multiplication of the unfit. This appeared the most important and greatest step towards race betterment.”
    She continued, “Birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law, is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the processes of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives.”
    Most of the people Sanger named “defectives” or “unfit” were minorities. One of her goals was to “exterminate the Negro population,” a phrase she used in a documented letter to an associate while discussing the future of the organization. Sanger’s words should send shivers down spines.
    Although Sanger dedicated her life to providing birth control for the “unfit” of the nation, Planned Parenthood still hails their founder as “one of the movement’s great heroes.” People have not forgotten the horribly racist principles Planned Parenthood was founded on. An April, 2008 protest in Washington D.C. addressed the racism still found in Planned Parenthood today. Day Gardner, President of the National Black Pro-Life Union, said we “must wake up and stand up to this racist organization that purposefully plants abortion facilities firmly in black and minority neighborhoods and urban communities - sometimes, right next-door to schools.”
    Statistics show that African-American babies make up 20 percent of live births, but 36 percent of abortions. Rev. Jesse Peterson told the crowd at the protest, “before you go to bed tonight, more than 1,500 babies will be killed in a black woman’s womb.”

  10. Douglas R. Scott is the president of Life Decisions International and the author of “Bad Choices: A Look Inside Planned Parenthood.” In his article “Killing More Minorities than the Ku Klux Klan,” he said, “If a bigot really wanted to make sure there are fewer people of color, he would not join the Ku Klux Klan’s crusade; he would join Planned Parenthood’s. After all, Planned Parenthood is much more effective than the Klan was at the height of its terror. Planned Parenthood is killing more people than the Klan ever did — and doing it in the name of “freedom of choice” and the “betterment” of minority populations.”
    On their Web site, they claim that “for more than 90 years, Planned Parenthood has promoted a commonsense approach to women’s health and well-being.” Oh, really? Sanger was still passionately pushing her “extermination plan” in 1941, which was 67 years ago.
    Next week, starting on Sep. 24, 2008, 40 Days for Life will begin its 24-hour presence outside abortion clinics across the country. During the 40 days, pro-life organizations, including many students and young adults, stand peacefully outside numerous Planned Parenthoods and other abortion clinics. Some people use the time to pray; others walk up and down the sidewalk. According to the campaign’s Web site, last year, because of the 35,000 people who participated nationally, more than 500 mothers chose to keep their babies, abortion workers quit their jobs and clinics closed down and ceased performing abortions.
    Planned Parenthood must be stopped. The racist intentions of this organization continue to leave an ugly scar on American society.
    Tags: Eugenics, Margaret Sanger, Planned Parenthood, Population Control